June 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
'Tut, tut, child,' said the duchess. 'Everything's got a moral if only you can find it.'
Lewis Carroll
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9
♥ K 8 6 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 2
♥ Q 10 5
♦ K Q J 9
♣ Q 9 4 |
♠ 6 4
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 8 5 3
♥ A
♦ 7 3 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
I don't think a simple call of three clubs gets your hand across fully. I'd rather jump to four clubs, which (even though my heart king may be utterly wasted) does suggest a hand with real game interest and good club support. You would bid three clubs if the club two were the spade two.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ K 8 6 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Remember me when I am dead And simplify me when I’m dead.
Keith Douglas
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ 8 5 3
♦ A 5 4
♣ A K 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 2
♥ A J 9 4
♦ K Q 10
♣ J 9 5 |
♠ 9 6
♥ 10 6
♦ 9 8 6 3 2
♣ Q 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K J 4 3
♥ K Q 7 2
♦ J 7
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Dummy is going to put down a three-suited hand with either a 1-4-4-4 pattern, or with a spade void and five diamonds. Whenever you are defending on a deal where one player rates to be three-suited, a trump lead will work out reasonably well. This hand is no exception.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4 3
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 8 3
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My partner and I are trying to improve our communication by learning the most popular conventions. Do you have any comment on the right mixture of artificial and natural bidding in the sort of system we should be using?
Training Wheels, Hartford, Conn.
It is a very good idea to question the technical merit of learning conventions. Don't assume they are good unless you have identified a problem that you can be sure needs fixing. The key is frequency of use and the complexity of the gadget you take on board. Don't forget that losing a natural call may also be critical. My view: Any time you forget a gadget, you undo its usefulness for a whole year.
When your partner opens a major suit and the next hand doubles, the choice often comes down to making a simple raise or a jump raise. That seems a bit limited — can you suggest how to improve my impoverished vocabulary here?
Jack Robinson, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
You should play both the simple raise and the jump raise as rather weaker than in an uncontested auction. With a limit raise or better, jump to two no-trump –a bid known as "Jordan" or "Truscott." This call is not necessary for a natural bid, as one would redouble with that hand. One can also play a two-club response after the double as purely artificial, showing 7-9 points and three trumps, thus letting the simple raise be 4-6 points. But see the letter above this one!
We are considering playing one no-trump as weak rather than strong. I have always assumed that one would open any hand in the range 12-14 whether or not it included a five-card minor, but recently we have suffered some painful reverses from that approach. If I decide a 12-point hand is poorly put together, can I pass, or should I open the minor? I have noticed in the past that not all players open with 12 points, but I was taught that one should do so.
Meter Maid, Miami, Fla.
|
If you play weak no-trumps, I would certainly advise you to open all balanced hands in the range with that call, including hands with a five-card minor. Even if you have had one or two bad results from making such an opening, bridge is a game of percentages and odds, and you will inevitably get some bad results by using any method of bidding. Incidentally, if you do open one of a minor with a balanced hand, you may well find yourself with rebid problems at your second turn.
I read your column online and would like your help. Say you pick up ♠ J-3, ♥ A-5-4-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-4. After responding one heart to one club, you hear one spade to your left and two spades to your right. Would you now pass, or raise clubs, or even rebid hearts?
Traditionalist, London, England
It always gives me a perverse pleasure to answer a multiple choice with "none of the above." Passing would be cowardly, while committing the hand to either clubs or hearts would be premature and unilateral. Best is to double, which is played as takeout when the opponents have bid and raised a suit. No response your partner could make will embarrass you.
This balanced strong no-trump caused me considerable problems. Holding ♠ Q-10-4 ♥ K-J-3, ♣ A-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-4, I opened one no-trump and my partner transferred into clubs, then followed up with a call of three spades, natural and forcing. With something in both unbid suits, was I right to bid no-trump, or should I have raised one black suit or the other?
Self-Starter, Cartersville, Ga.
Can I first suggest that it is better to play that one should bid Stayman with long clubs and a four-card major, while reserving the actual sequence of transferring to clubs then bidding a new suit for shortage, not length? A transfer to a major followed by a new suit should be played as natural and forcing, of course. That said, on your actual auction I would bid four clubs. Trumps that good should not be kept under wraps.
|
June 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Our dilemma is that we hate change and love it at the same time; what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better.
Sydney .J. Harris
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 7 2
♥ J 10 9 6 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ 8 7 2
♦ K 8 4 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
♠ J 10 9 5
♥ K 5 3
♦ 6 5
♣ K J 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ A Q
♦ A J 9 3
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣3
After a reverse, best practice is for responder to use the rebid of two hearts by as natural and forcing for one round, showing five or more hearts. Your bid is consistent with a good hand, but you can pass a minimum call from your partner at his next turn. Your plan will be to stop short of game unless partner guarantees extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 2
♥ J 10 9 6 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast.
Isaiah 26:20
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 7 4 2
♥ K J 9 2
♦ 6
♣ Q 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ Q 9 5 3
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
♠ 10 9 5 3
♥ 5 3
♦ A J 7
♣ A 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ Q 10 6
♦ K 10 8 4 2
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♥* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Five spades and four hearts, forcing.
♦3
The choice is between reopening with a call of two hearts (which would suggest this pattern in the majors and suggest less than a full invitation) or doubling. Your double should be card-showing, closer to takeout than penalty, and would be my choice. I can convert a response of two diamonds to two hearts, and would be delighted if partner elected to pass out the double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 7 4 2
♥ K J 9 2
♦ 6
♣ Q 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Do not try to find out — we're forbidden to know — what the gods have in store for me or for you.
Horace
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J
♥ A J 9
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ K Q 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10
♥ Q 8 7 4 3
♦ A K Q 4
♣ 10 7 5 |
♠ A 9 8 7 6 3 2
♥ 6 5
♦ 9 6
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5 4
♥ K 10 2
♦ J 10 5
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
All pass |
♦K
When faced with a close decision on when to reopen over a pre-empt, it makes sense to be conservative in direct seat and aggressive in balancing. While passing out two diamonds might be our side's only plus score, or smallest minus score, I would double here. But, for instance, I would pass out an opening of two hearts because of my heart values. And with the actual hand, I'd pass in direct seat.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 4
♥ K 10 2
♦ J 10 5
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
When two evil guys fight in a duel, the worst of both will be the winner.
Toba Beta
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 5 2
♥ A 7 3
♦ 10 8 7 3 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 7 3
♥ Q 10 9 6
♦ J 5
♣ 9 2 |
♠ 10 6 4
♥ J 5 2
♦ Q 9 6
♣ J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ K 8 4
♦ A K 4
♣ 8 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠7
The choice here is to raise to two hearts or to rebid one no-trump. I always try to avoid the rebid at no-trump with two small in a side-suit, and this is no exception. Yes, you would prefer four trumps for the raise, but when you offer a ruffing value, that makes up for the deficiency.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ A 7 3
♦ 10 8 7 3 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, June 3rd, 2014
Oh I get by with a little help from my friends.
Lennon and McCartney
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 10 7
♥ J 9 4
♦ K Q 6
♣ 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ A 8 7
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q J 10 9 8 |
♠ 4 3
♥ Q 10 3
♦ 9 5 4 3 2
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 6
♥ K 6 5 2
♦ A J 10
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣K
Whenever the opponents escape from a penalty double into a suit where you have four cards, you should plan to double for penalty unless your hand is remarkably weak for defense. By contrast, this hand is perfectly average in terms of shape and high cards, and the weak trump spots are not a huge drawback, so you should feel happy to double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 9 8 6
♥ K 6 5 2
♦ A J 10
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I feel all the pride of power sink and all presumption in the wisdom of human contrivances melt and die away within me.
Edmund Burke
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 6 5 4
♥ 9 4
♦ 9
♣ 10 8 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K Q J 6 5 3
♦ J 10 8 6 3
♣ K 3 |
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ 10 8 7 2
♦ —
♣ A Q J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 9 2
♥ A
♦ A K Q 7 5 4 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥K
Dummy rates to put down a singleton spade, and not to offer much in the way of ruffing values, so there is no need to get active. My instincts are to go after clubs, since leading a diamond (whether it be the ace or a low one) looks unduly committal.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ K 6 5 2
♦ A 10 5
♣ Q 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
In a deal you analyzed, the key suit was ♠ A-K-J-3-2 in dummy opposite a small doubleton, with no side-entry to the long suit. The suggested line for four tricks was to duck the first spade, then play the ace and king. This wins on all 3-3 breaks as well as picking up a doubleton queen, and you indicate that this is the best line. How does that compare with ducking the first trick, then finessing the jack on the second round?
Plan B, Newark, Calif.
Your line loses to all distributions with the spade queen over the jack. It also takes only three tricks when there are five or six cards to the queen onside. That comes to winning chances of about 42 percent. I believe my proposed line works out at just over 50 percent.
How would you respond in the following auction? I was dealt ♠ 9-4-3, ♥ K-10-3, ♦ K-10-9-3, ♣ Q-9-2, and heard my RHO open three hearts with neither side vulnerable. This was passed around to my partner, who doubled. What do you think of the options of passing, bidding four diamonds, and responding three no-trump?
Chase, Little Rock, Ark.
Both passing and bidding three no-trump could work out beautifully on the right day — but both are significant gambles. Equally, a bid of four diamonds leaves our side in no man's land: We could be too high or not high enough. Put me down as a gambler in three no-trump. However, with a side-suit doubleton, my heart 10 might make me think more seriously about passing.
What are the merits of using the response of one no-trump to one club as 8-10 points rather than more wide-ranging? What are the drawbacks to this approach? Do they outweigh the positives?
Balancing Act, Winston-Salem, N.C.
|
The merits of the strong one-no-trump response have decreased recently, since nowadays opener rarely has a semibalanced hand in the 15-17 range. (You might already have opened one no-trump!). Thus, opener tends to have either too little to bid again, or so much that he knows it is right to bid again whatever the range of the response. Also it is not attractive to have to distort hands in the 6-7 range by inventing a one-diamond response, so I am not a fan of this method.
What precisely is a Lightner double? And does it apply only to doubles of slams?
Tony the Tiger, Atlanta, Ga.
Theodore Lightner devised the idea that a double of a slam by the hand not on lead should call for an unusual lead — typically either with a void or two tricks in dummy's first-bid suit. These days, the idea that a hand that has bid or overcalled can call for a different lead with a double of a game is also becoming more prevalent — especially against no-trump games.
In an unopposed sequence, my partner opened one club and I held ♠ Q-7-5-3, ♥ 3, ♦ A-10-9-5-3, ♣ A-J-4. Since I thought I had an opening hand, I reversed, initially responding one diamond rather than one spade. My partner bid one no-trump, and I saw my plan through by bidding two spades, then raised my partner's three-spade bid to four. Alas, my partner thought I had five spades and had raised me with three trumps, so we suffered a defeat. But was I wrong in my general plan?
Sinking Fast, Pueblo, Colo.
Your call was quite reasonable, since you certainly had something like an opening bid. Make the club jack the 10 and I would bid one spade. On your actual auction, your partner would typically bid two no-trump with only three spades here. But of course she can raise diamonds or emphasize good clubs or hearts if she has a skewed honor structure.
|
|
Today's deal dates back 75 years — it originally appeared in an American magazine in 1938. The deal was set as a puzzle for readers to solve.The contract was six spades, on the lead of the diamond king.
Imagine that you win the diamond lead and run your trumps. You hope that at least one defender if not both will retain their hearts to prevent you from running the suit. Now you can cash your club winners and cut loose with a diamond, hoping that someone will have to give you a winner in dummy at trick 13. But that is hardly a guarantee, and indeed, as the cards lie, as long as West retains two diamonds, the slam will fail.
The solution does not rely on defensive error, and once you have seen the theme, you may kick yourself if you didn’t find it at the table. All you have to do is to duck the diamond king. Now if a second diamond is led, declarer can arrange a diamond ruff in dummy. If West shifts to a trump to kill the ruff, the diamond ace remains in dummy to provide an entry to the heart king after all the trumps have been drawn.
In a sense, ducking the first diamond requires the defenders to do two things at once to defeat the slam — namely, to play a trump and to continue with diamonds. If you win the first diamond, you accomplish one of those things for the defense.