August 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To take command, one must first create the illusion that command is already yours.
Denise Domning
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 3
♥ K J 10 4
♦ J 7 4
♣ J 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ Q 10 9 8
♣ K 10 7 |
♠ K 5 2
♥ A 7 5
♦ K 6 5 3
♣ Q 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 9 8 6
♥ Q 2
♦ A 2
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦10
This auction is always one where declarer will be struggling for tricks (dummy rates to have no more than 6 HCP) and if you had a passive lead, you might well make it. Since you don't, the case for a spade lead is that this rates to be declarer's shortage, and even if you are wrong, spades surely won't be running for declarer.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 2
♥ A J 8 5
♦ 8 5
♣ K 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My take on weak two-bids is moderately disciplined — I like to have two top honors vulnerable, but don't insist on that nonvulnerable. In that context, what is your opinion on the best meaning for the relay response of two no-trump to a weak two; Ogust, or feature-ask — or something else?
Man Friday, Naples, Fla.
If you play disciplined weak-twos, as your letter suggests, a feature ask is best. If your weak twos deliver variable suit qualities, the Ogust Relay (where opener indicates his range and suit quality) may be wiser.
I dealt and passed holding ♠ 10-6-4, ♥ K-7-5, ♦ Q-10-8-5, ♣ Q-8-5. When my LHO opened one club, my partner overcalled one spade and my RHO bid one no-trump. What should I have done now? I elected to pass, and we missed a playable partscore — but I had expected to run into the spades stacked against me.
Chicken, Whiting, Ind.
When your RHO bids one no-trump, he simply shows a spade guard rather than a spade stack. (In fact, with a spade stack he might play for penalties rather than bid.) You may not have a maximum for your two-spade bid, but you have to support with support and let partner take things from there.
I know that in choosing a trump suit, a 4 – 4 split often plays better than a 5 – 3 fit. But which trump split is better, 6 – 2 or 5 – 3?
Eight Is Enough, Kingston, Ontario
|
It is a little tough to give a general answer here. 6-2 probably gives you more easy tricks (after all a 13-card suit is better than 12 — which is better than 11). But imagine you have eight cards with the three top honors. A 5-3 fit may allow you to find a 4-1 split, then finesse, while with a 6-2 fit, you may find out too late. Equally, when missing the queen, but holding both the jack and 10, with the ace and king split, the 5-3 split offers the chance to take two finesses and protect against the 4-1 break.
How should I respond to my partner’s double of one club when I had ♠ Q-10-7-5, ♥ A-Q-6-5, ♦ 9-5, ♣ 10-8-3? I was not sure if I had enough to cue-bid and raise my partner’s major to three. I tried that but I was told that it was an overbid.
Shaky Ground, Memphis, Tenn.
Your partner was right, in that you are about a queen short of a cue-bid. However the right answer is to respond one spade, not one heart. Your plan in further competition would be to bid hearts and let partner choose economically between the majors. This is a rare instance where you would bid the higher four-card suit before the lower.
I play with seven women three or four times a month. My question to you is that I was informed me that it was not proper to ask the scorekeeper the score after the bidding starts. I have played bridge for 50 years and this was a first!
Pearl Jam, Mountain Home, Idaho
For the record, I think everyone should keep score. But yes, one should not remind partner of the score in mid-auction. However, until the cards are picked up, you not only can, but SHOULD remind partner (unless they always remember and an opponent doesn't!).
|
August 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 2nd, 2014
An honest politician is one who when he's bought, stays bought.
Simon Cameron
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 6 5 2
♥ 8 5
♦ 8 6 5
♣ J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ 10 6
♦ A 9 7 3 2
♣ 10 9 7 6 2 |
♠ K 10 9 8 7
♥ K Q 7 2
♦ 10 4
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
♠ 4 3
♥ A J 9 4 3
♦ K Q J
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦3
The simple approach is to raise to two no-trump here. Never bid three no-trump on this auction unless you have extra playing strength in the form of solid hearts. Another option that is well worth considering is to mark time with a call of two clubs, planning to rebid no-trump over a minimum response or to raise diamonds. But the simple raise of no-trump looks better.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ A J 9 4 3
♦ K Q J
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
You will send a foreign Minister, whoever he may be, naked into the conference chamber.
Aneurin Bevin
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 2
♥ 10 7
♦ A K 7 6 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 9 8
♥ 4 3
♦ J 10 9 8 3
♣ A 8 |
♠ J 7 6 4 3
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ 2
♣ K 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K Q J 2
♦ Q
♣ Q J 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♠K
This is a forcing auction, and your choice appears to be to raise hearts or repeat diamonds. I'd expect your hand to be somewhat useful to your partner in hearts (an ace-king cannot be wholly bad news) and so I'd settle for the simple raise rather than the rebid. If there is a game, partner will be well-placed to work out which.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ 10 7
♦ A K 7 6 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Ah! What avails the classic bent And what the cultured word Against the undoctored incident That actually occurred?
Rudyard Kipling
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 8 3
♥ A Q
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ A 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 8 6 5 4 3
♦ 8
♣ 8 5 4 |
♠ 5
♥ J 2
♦ A K 10 9 7 6
♣ K Q 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 4 2
♥ K 9 7
♦ J 4
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Limit raise with four trumps
♦8
The choice is between the simple rebids of one spade and one no-trump. I don't feel strongly about this — though I suspect if my heart queen were the club queen, I'd feel much happier about bidding one no-trump. The advantage of bidding spades is that if this is a partscore deal, you have got your shape across at a low level. The advantage of bidding one no-trump is that you limit your hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 3
♥ A Q
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If you never get a second chance at something you didn't take a first chance at? That's true failure.
C. Joybell C.
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 7 6
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 8 7
♥ K 5 3
♦ K 3 2
♣ J 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 5 3
♥ 10
♦ A J 8 5
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
The simple route here is to double — which is a balanced penalty-oriented action. Your partner will almost never remove the double. But if you want to find a major-suit fit and do not want to risk defending when dummy puts down long running clubs, then cuebid two clubs. This is take-out suggesting the majors, and implicitly limited by your failure to double, and would be my choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
You might as well fall on your face as lean over too far backwards.
James Thurber
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 4 3
♥ J 10 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ K 9 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 10 6 5 4 |
♠ 9 7 6 5 2
♥ 8 6 5
♦ Q J 9 8
♣ A |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 7 2
♦ A K 6 3
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
When considering giving false preference back to two spades on auctions like this, consider two things. Would you be happy if partner made a try for game, and are your values in partner's long or short suit? If the answer to either question is yes, false-preference does make sense. If not, pass. Here, passing two hearts looks right to me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ J 10 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
'You oughtn't to yield to temptation.' ‘Well, somebody must, or the thing becomes absurd.’
Anthony Hope
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ K Q 3
♦ 10
♣ Q J 10 9 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 6 5 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ K 9 8 4
♣ — |
♠ 7
♥ 9 7 5 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ K 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A J 7 3 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2♠ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
When in doubt, lead from a four-card major, not a four-card minor on blind auctions like this. So are you in doubt here? I think so. The diamonds are better, but by no means safe, so I'd lead a heart. However, switch the hearts and the clubs, and I might lead from my three-card suit and eschew both minors.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3
♥ J 6 4 2
♦ K J 9 6
♣ 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
August 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I opened one club, holding ♠ A-J-3, ♥ Q-5-2, ♦ Q-9, ♣ A-J-9-3-2. My LHO overcalled one diamond, which my partner doubled (negative). Should I have rebid my clubs, introduced my spades, or tried one no-trump?
Off-Target, Fredericksburg, Va.
A rebid of one no-trump suggests a balanced 12-14 and doesn't guarantee a great diamond stopper. You would prefer to have more in diamonds, but since a two-club call would strongly suggest a six-card suit and bidding a three-card major would be somewhat misleading. If the opponents bid diamonds again, you can balance with two hearts to suggest only three trumps.
I picked up ♠ 10-8-6-3, ♥ A-Q-5, ♦ Q-10-5, ♣ 10-8-3, and heard my partner open one club. With a balanced hand and a feeble suit, I responded one no-trump. My expert partner told me after the game that while it is acceptable to bypass a four-card major if the opponents come in with a double, you should be wary of doing so in an uncontested auction. What do you think?
Skip Tracer, Phoenix, Ariz.
Bypassing a weak four-card major with honors in each of the other suits is reasonable. And facing a passed partner, where the risk of playing a 4-3 major is far higher your call would be quite reasonable. In competition, your choice becomes even clearer, since spades may well be splitting badly, even if you find a 4-4 fit. Also, partner will be more inclined to raise with three, expecting your suit to be sturdier.
As an inexperienced player I seek clarification on the difference between a splinter and a cuebid. If both "conventions" are used in tandem, how is one able to tell the difference? I apologize if this is a clear point that I have missed, but the game gets more complicated the more you know or think you know.
Tangled Up, Bremerton, Wash.
A splinter bid is a jump that shows support for the suit partner has just bid, game values, and a singleton or void in the suit called. Normally, it consists of an unnecessary jump in an auction where a bid of the same suit at a lower level would have been forcing. A cue-bid is rarely a jump bid, and typically shows a control — though this could be based either on shortage or the possession of the ace or king. So there is an overlap.
|
Recently I was in fourth seat, with six clubs to the K-10, and queen-third of spades, with two small doubletons. After the opponents bid one heart – one no-trump – two diamonds – two hearts, I risked a three-club call, which might well have made. But when my LHO bid three hearts, my partner doubled, and this rolled home. Am I barred from protecting at pairs with a weak hand, in case partner doubles for penalties, or is partner barred from doubling here in case I have a weak hand?
Monkey King, Dallas, Texas
I'd consider bidding unwise, not because the opponents might compete to three hearts, but because I'd expect to go for a penalty myself. The hand on your right surely has no great length in spades, hearts or diamonds, thus has a minimum of four clubs. He may well be delighted that he is out of a misfitting auction (the two-heart bid does not imply a fit) and will have something to sink his teeth into.
Holding six diamonds, five hearts, two singletons, and 11 points, my partner opened one diamond and, after my one-spade response, rebid two hearts. As this would normally show 16 points, is this the best way to bid such a hand? Or would a repeat of the hearts show the 5-6 pattern but cancel the message of extra strength for one of extra shape?
Lord Chesterfield, Newport News, Va.
Even experts disagree here. You can shade a reverse with extra shape, as in the example you give. However 11 points is too weak for this. Your choices are to open and rebid in diamonds, or to bid the hearts first and lie about suit lengths. I'd tend to open the major unless it is honorless and looked more like four. Neither route is perfect, but to conceal a five-card major twice while rebidding a minor is generally worse than misleading partner over your respective suit lengths.
|
August 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Wherever we go, across the Pacific or Atlantic, we meet, not similarity so much as the bizarre. Things astonish us, when we travel, that surprise nobody else.
Mary Ritter Beard
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J 7
♥ 10 8 7 5
♦ A 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 6 |
♠ 6 3
♥ K J 9 6
♦ K Q J
♣ Q J 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 2
♥ 3
♦ 5 3
♣ A 10 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣6
Your partner's two-club call is natural and nonforcing. Should you go back to spades here? I think so, though it is very close. Admittedly, your partner could rebid a chunky five-card spade suit, so he is as likely to have clubs equal to or longer than his spades. But you do have only three clubs, and he will be expecting more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
As I have often remarked, one cannot persuade one's opponents not to do something just because one earnestly wants them not to do it. If you want to prevent them from making a play, you have to work a little harder at it than that.
Take today’s deal, where South reaches four spades on an unopposed auction, after North’s slightly pushy raise to game. Your partner leads the diamond 10. Declarer plays low from dummy at trick one, you encourage, and declarer takes the diamond ace and advances a low heart, to the heart eight from your partner, and dummy’s 10. Plan the defense.
When declarer leads a heart, partner’s heart eight shows an even number, almost certainly in this case a four-card suit. You must duck this trick, to prevent declarer getting two heart tricks later on.
Of course you don’t want to let declarer get to dummy to lead out the spade queen and capture your king. But since you cannot prevent South from taking the spade finesse sooner or later, you might as well not give him anything in hearts to which he is not entitled.
If you duck trick two, declarer will now take the spade finesse and run his trumps, then exit with the heart queen. However so long as the defense retain their club guard, they can take the heart queen and lead out winning diamonds at every turn. Declarer will eventually have to concede three minor-suit losers to go with the heart ace, for one down.