August 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism.
Sir William Osler
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4 3 2
♥ Q J 4
♦ A K Q J
♣ — |
♠ 7 5
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 6 5
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J
♥ A K 10 9 6 5
♦ 4
♣ A K 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
♦K
It looks simple to bid one spade rather than redouble, since you really cannot expect to defend successfully to both red suits. The one-spade call is simply natural and unlimited except by the original pass. One other possible call is a fit-jump to two spades, though that would typically show five spades and four clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Had I said that, had I done this, So might I gain, so might I miss.
Robert Browning
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ J 9 7 3 2
♦ —
♣ 10 7 6 5 4 |
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ K Q 10 8
♦ K 5
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 5
♦ J 9 7 6 4 2
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| Rdbl. |
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
I'm fairly conservative on the subject of opening 11-counts, but this is a hand that cries out to be opened. With an easy rebid over partner's likely one-heart response, and all my values in my long suits (with a couple of strategically placed 10s), I would deem this to be a far better hand than a balanced 12-count.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ 8 2 |
August 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It doesn't matter if you're born in a duck yard, so long as you are hatched from a swan's egg!
Hans Christian Andersen
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K Q J
♥ A J 10
♦ 9 8 5
♣ 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 9 7 5 2
♦ 10 4
♣ A Q 2 |
♠ 8
♥ K Q 6 4 3
♦ Q J 7 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 5 4 3
♥ 8
♦ A K 6
♣ K J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2♣* |
Pass |
2♦** |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Natural, 11-15 HCP.
**Inquiry
♦10
Your partner's double emphasizes takeout. There is some merit in considering going to the six-level, but with no first-round controls, your objective is to reach your best game. You might just bid five hearts at pairs, but you can also show a two-suiter with a call of four no-trump. Partner will assume the minors and you will correct his five-club call to five diamonds to reach the better red-suit fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ K Q 6 4 3
♦ Q J 7 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 5
♥ K 8 7 5 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ A 9 3
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ A 10 5 2 |
♠ A 10 9 8 6
♥ Q 10
♦ K 8 7 5
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4 2
♥ J 6 2
♦ Q 2
♣ Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
You are way too good for a bid of three no-trump, and a case could be made for a simple bid of six clubs. But your partner might have stretched to get his clubs in without real extras, so start with a cuebid of three diamonds, planning to find a forcing club raise at your next turn one way or another.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ K 8 7 5 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 21st, 2014
I to my perils Of cheat and charmer Came clad in armour By stars benign.
A.E. Housman
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ A 3
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ J 5 2
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ K Q J 6 2
♦ K 10 8
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A J 10
♥ 10 9
♦ 7 4 3
♣ K Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
| 3♣ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
With a choice of unacceptable alternatives here, on an auction where declarer rates to have club and heart length and partner seems unlikely to have that much in spades, a club is the best shot at a passive lead. A spade seems likely to give up a natural trick in the suit but is hardly less attractive. There might be a case for the diamond ace, but I'm just not brave enough.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 8 5 3
♥ Q 4
♦ A 10 6 4
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I know that if I open the bidding and jump to two no-trump over a one-level suit response, it shows 18-19 points or maybe a good 17. Does that also apply after partner responds one no-trump (whether the call is forcing or nonforcing)? I thought that this could be slightly less — maybe 16-17.
Finagler, Newark, N.J.
The values for the two-no-trump call remain the same, no matter what the response — though it depends slightly on your range for the one-no-trump response. Some play the response of one no-trump to one club as 8-10 (not a very popular style anymore) when the raise to two no-trump could be a little lighter.
Could you give me an unbiased summary of what discarding method you would recommend for a beginner to duplicate? Ease of recall should be a factor!
Help Wanted, Nashville, Tenn.
Standard signals, where you throw high cards in the suit you like, are easy to abuse — because one tends to let go cards one cannot afford, often to tell partner something he knows already. The same applies to a lesser degree to reverse signals. There are three equivalent methods I do not have space to discuss in detail: Lavinthal (or suit-preference), revolving discards, and odd-even discards. Each uses a discard in one suit to indicate which of the other suits you prefer. I think odd-even is slightly the most flexible. Check out the Cornhusker Bridge website for more information.
I know about negative doubles by responder at his first turn, but would you clarify what a double by responder on the second round should mean after his LHO comes into the auction. For example, after the auction 1 ♦ — Pass — 1 ♠ — (2 ♣) — Pass — Pass, is my hand suitable for a double, holding: ♠ A-Q-6-4, ♥ K-6-5, ♦ Q-9-5-4, ♣ J-3? Or should I simply raise diamonds?
In a Rut, Casper, Wyo.
Here an invitational jump to three diamonds would not be absurd (you may have 12 points, but your hand does not suggest game will be easy your way). If you double, that is for takeout — typically not very short in clubs, though. If you double and subsequently raise diamonds, it would suggest a good hand, though maybe only three-card support.
|
I have decided to teach an intermediate class on basic bidding. I want them to understand the general rules on what auctions are forcing and what are nonforcing. Just for the record, most of these students don't play 2/1. In current bidding rules, is it true that a new suit by opener is forcing for one round if responder has introduced a new suit at the two-level — and does that also apply by a passed hand?
Faust, Eau Claire, Wis.
Your first statement is true, but there may not be clear agreement in the second instance. The answer is yes, but it is more about partnership agreement than anything else. The logic is that opener is unlimited, and should not have to jump to create a force. I agree that the two-level response by a passed hand shows values, but does not guarantee a second call after opener has shown a minimum hand.
How would you rate the possible courses of action on this unopposed sequence: 1 ♣ – 1 ♥ – 1 ♠ – 3 ♣? As dealer I had: ♠ A-Q-10-5, ♥ 8-5, ♦ 9, ♣ A-Q-10-8-3-2 and passed because I held a minimum in high cards, but my partner suggested I should have reraised to four clubs with my extra shape.
Timid Tim, Lincoln, N.H.
Your hand is worth driving all the way to five clubs. With your extra shape and prime honors in your long suits, there are probably more hands where game is laydown or on a finesse, than where it is not. For example, give partner as little as a black king plus an ace, with a doubleton spade. Respect your extra club length and fine honor structure — this would be a far worse hand with queen-fourth of spades and the bare diamond ace.
|
August 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Diplomacy means the art of nearly deceiving all your friends, but not quite deceiving all your enemies.
Kofi Busia
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6
♥ A K 5 3
♦ A
♣ A 10 9 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ J 7 4
♦ K 9 4 3 2
♣ K J 5 |
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ 10 9 8 2
♦ 10 8 7
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 5 4
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣* |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Strong
♦3
This would be a harder problem if your partner were not a passed hand, As it is, you should play the double as takeout and bid two diamonds. Personally, I play that even by a passed hand this is a rare double of one no-trump for takeout, not penalty. Even if partner is strong, either opener or responder will be running to safety — or you won't have your bid. Either way, a penalty double won't get you rich.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7 5 4
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Those whose conduct gives room for talk are always the first to attack their neighbors.
Moliere
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q
♥ A K 10
♦ Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ A 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ 7 5 3 2
♦ K 7
♣ J 9 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 10 7 6 4
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 8
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ Q J 9
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
The point here needs to be made occasionally, if only to reinforce it to everyone: Bidding a major over a one-diamond overcall promises a minimum of just four cards. But if the opponents overcall one heart, you double with four spades and bid the suit with five. So bid one spade here, rather than make a negative double, which would guarantee both majors, typically with four cards in each.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ Q J 9
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, July 17th, 2014
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.
Edward Phelps
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 8 3 2
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ K J
♣ A J 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9 7 6
♥ A K 10 6
♦ A Q
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣4
On this auction there is a very good case to play three clubs as your second negative and not two no-trump. The logic is that, with three no-trump a very likely final contract, you want the strong hand to be declarer — so the lead runs up to it, rather than coming through it. Therefore, I would bid three clubs here to deny values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Pride is a tricky, glorious, double-edged feeling.
Adrienne Rich
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 6
♥ A Q 6 5 2
♦ K Q 2
♣ A Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ K J 7 4
♦ J 8 7 5
♣ K 10 2 |
♠ K Q J 4 3
♥ 10 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 5
♥ 9 8
♦ A 3
♣ 8 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
It is surely right to bid here; the question is what to bid. A call of two diamonds, planning to back in with two spades over two hearts, is quite reasonable, but it does leave the opponents more room than a direct call of two spades. For that reason, and fr its lead-directing value, I prefer to bid the major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 4 3
♥ 10 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The junior and schools teams championships were contested in Atlanta last summer. When the last board of the Australia-Turkey semifinals started, Turkey had a comfortable lead.
Both tables in the match reached six clubs and the Australian East, led and continued diamonds, forcing declarer, Berk Gokce, to ruff. Gokce played his club ace and saw the trump void in West. He followed with dummy’s small trump to this trick, a slight but fatal error.
He next cashed the top hearts and ruffed the third heart with the trump queen in dummy. Then came a trump from dummy, which East covered with the nine and declarer won with the 10. Now declarer went to dummy with the spade king and led dummy’s remaining trump, the eight.
This time East did not cover, and declarer could not let the eight hold or he would be stranded in dummy, so had to overtake and eventually concede the setting trick to the trump jack.
Declarer had to unblock the club seven or eight under his ace on the first round of trump. Then he would have been left with the club two in the dummy in the ending. He would have finessed in clubs, ending up in his hand.
When slam made in the other room after a diamond lead and spade shift (and yes, the contract should have been defeated after that start), Australia qualified for the finals, where they lost to a strong American team.