Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 11th, 2014

Are most serious events played as pairs scoring, or teams? And are there any rubber bridge events played at a national level?

Backing Group, Greenville, S.C.

In all of the national tournaments (which are played three times a year), the major event is scored using one form or another of teams scoring. That is not to downplay pairs scoring, but I think both at national and world level the winners of the big teams events are rated more highly than the winners of the pairs games. There are really no rubber bridge or individual events left anymore.

I was fourth to speak with ♠ A-5,  Q-9-4-3,  Q-9-5-2, ♣ K-8-2, and heard one spade to my left, passed around to me. I felt obliged to double, and when my LHO bid two spades, my partner doubled, which I assumed was for penalty. The result was nine tricks for declarer. My partner thought I needed more to double one spade, in fourth position. Was it I or he who was out of line — he had a 3-3-4-3 10-count?

High Noon, Great Falls, Mont.

It is normal to play a balancing call in fourth seat as potentially a king lighter than the same action in second seat. So your double looks normal enough. It was once common to use your partner's double of a rebid suit as penalties. I still do.

One could argue that the responsive double gains on frequency grounds, even if the size of the swing might be larger with the penalty double. But I’ll stick with the penalty double interpretation.

What is your opinion about the technical merits of coding the leads of jacks and 10s against no-trump, whereby the opening leads of jacks deny a higher honor, while 10s are from jack-10 or 10-nine, in each case promising a higher honor? My instinct is that this gives away as much as it benefits. What do you think?

Mister Cellophane, Seneca, S.C.

My experience mirrors your gut reaction. At trick one, the 'coded' 10s and jacks are very revealing. However if you really must play those methods, at least keep them for the middle of the hand, not trick one, at which point you should know enough about the hand to be aware when partner, not declarer, needs to know.

I passed in first chair with ♠ Q-10-7-4,  K-J-3,  5-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and I heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner doubled, and I responded one spade. My partner now raised to two spades. Does this show a good hand or is this just a courtesy raise?

Normal Business, Wichita Falls, Texas

Raising your partner in competition would not guarantee extras (your partner would bid two spades with a few extras or perfect shape even in a minimum hand). But if your LHO passes, as here, a raise by him should be real extras. Your hand would be just too good to pass now. I'd guess to bid three clubs as a game try.

How should one play the following double? I was in second seat with five spades, six points, and a balanced hand. At unfavorable vulnerability, I passed over my RHO's one-club bid. I heard five clubs to my left, and a double from partner. Is this penalty, takeout, or optional?

Piggy in the Middle, Spokane, Wash.

Your partner's double has to cover many hands that are too good to pass and have no other clear-cut action. If he bid a suit, it would have to show a good suit and strong distribution; otherwise, the action would be far too risky. Therefore, double covers all good hands that do not fall into this category. With your actual hand you should assume their contract is not making. Since you should only remove the double to what you believe is a making contract, passing looks right here.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 10th, 2014

Our imagination is the only limit to what we can hope to have in the future.

Charles F. Kettering


South North
East-West ♠ Q J 7 6
 A 8 6 5 4 2
 2
♣ J 6
West East
♠ 10 9 5
 10 9
 K J 10 6 3
♣ K 10 8
♠ 8 2
 Q J 7 3
 Q 4
♣ 9 7 4 3 2
South
♠ A K 4 3
 K
 A 9 8 7 5
♣ A Q 5
South West North East
1 Pass 1 Pass
1♠ Pass 3♠ Pass
4♣ Pass 4 Pass
4 NT Pass 5 Pass
5 Pass 6♠ All pass

♠10

Imagine you reach the small slam in spades and receive the lead of the trump 10. To bring home 12 tricks, you will need to set up hearts, but the entries to dummy are scarce. After you win the spade ace and unblock the heart king; what next? It might look natural to ruff a diamond to dummy and ruff a heart to hand. But if hearts do not break, you are out of trump and doomed to go down.

The best plan now is somewhat counterintuitive. Since you must rely on trumps to be 3-2 and hearts no worse than 4-2, you should next play the club queen out of your hand.

If West wins the king and plays a trump — as good as anything — you win in dummy with the spade jack, ruff a heart low in hand, cross to dummy with the club jack, and ruff a heart with the spade king. Then you can cash the diamond ace and ruff a diamond to draw the last trump, with dummy high.

If West ducks the club queen, you change tack altogether. You go to dummy with a trump, then ruff a heart with the spade king. Now you can cross to dummy and draw the last trump by leading the spade four to the jack. Next you play the heart ace and another heart. You concede one heart trick, but the last trump in dummy is the entry back to all the good hearts.


I take a relatively relaxed view about the suit quality required for a weak-two when nonvulnerable, though if vulnerable I like to have two of the top three honors. Having said that, ace-sixth is the worst possible holding for a weak-two (you have no tricks facing shortage but lots of defense). Meanwhile, your good spade suit is another red flag against pre-empting. Pass at any vulnerability.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 7 6
 A 8 6 5 4 2
 2
♣ J 6
South West North East
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 9th, 2014

Not by age but by capacity is wisdom acquired.

Plautus


North North
Both ♠ 7
 A Q 10 9 4 3
 A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2
West East
♠ A J 10 3
 8 7 5
 J 8 5 4 3
♣ 7
♠ Q 6 5 4 2
 K J 6 2
 2
♣ K 9 6
South
♠ K 9 8
 —
 K Q 9 7
♣ A J 10 8 4 3
South West North East
2* Pass
2 NT Pass 3** Pass
5♣ All pass    

*5 hearts and 4-plus in a minor, or 6 hearts with 10-14 points

**One-suiter with short spades

3

Over the last decade the standards in senior bridge have begun to rival the open game, and the world championships are contested at the very highest level. The American and German senior teams have met in the late stages of two recent world championships; each side has won one match narrowly. When a 64-board match is won by only 7 IMPs, several deals could have reversed the result. But this board from the final session settled the issue.

At both tables, West led a low diamond against five clubs. In the Open Room, John Schermer put in dummy’s 10, then played a spade to his king. West won with the ace and gave his partner a diamond ruff. East now shifted to the spade queen, but declarer ruffed it in dummy and ran the club queen successfully to make his contract.

In the Closed Room, declarer also won with dummy’s diamond 10, but then called for the club queen. When Steve Landen played low smoothly, South became worried that West would win from a singleton or doubleton club king and give his partner a diamond ruff. Then cashing the spade ace would result in one down. So South quite reasonably went up with the club ace and continued with the 10. However, East won with his king, led a spade to the king and ace, and received a diamond ruff for down one.

Plus 600 in one room and plus 100 in the other gave U.S.A. seniors 12 IMPs and the match.


This auction suggests that your partner had a penalty double of one spade, probably with a six-card suit, and his failure to go past the two-level should indicate that he does not have enough to drive to game. I'd expect him to be in the range of 7-11 HCP, so I would pass, imagining that no game could be all that good for us.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7
 A Q 10 9 4 3
 A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2
South West North East
1 1♠ Pass 2♣
Pass Pass 2♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 8th, 2014

The arrogance of age must submit to be taught by youth.

Edmund Burke


South North
East-West ♠ A Q 9 7 4
 A 4 3
 Q 4 3
♣ K 9
West East
♠ 3 2
 Q J 7 6 2
 A 5
♣ J 10 8 5
♠ 8
 K 10 9 8
 K 10 9 2
♣ A 7 4 2
South
♠ K J 10 6 5
 5
 J 8 7 6
♣ Q 6 3
South West North East
2♠* Pass 4♠ All pass

*Weak with spades and a minor

Q

Today's deal from a recent junior championships saw a good lead and smart declarer play rewarded with a nice pickup.

At both tables South’s two-spade opening showed a weak hand with spades and a minor. In one room where East had doubled four spades, West expected his partner to have values in all the three outside suits. So he led the diamond ace, and was rewarded when this led to an immediate diamond ruff and a quick one off.

At the other table, where East-West had passed throughout, West led a heart. Could declarer take advantage? After winning the heart ace, South ruffed a heart, drew trump (East pitching a heart), and ruffed another heart, the king appearing from East. He then led a club to the jack, king and ace. East returned a club, and declarer won, ruffed his last club, and paused to take stock.

West appeared to have started with five hearts. In addition, West was known to have the club 10 left (since he had played the jack on the first round and the 10 had not appeared yet). It followed that if either player was short in diamonds it was more likely to be West than East.

Accordingly, declarer led the diamond queen from dummy. East won his king and deceptively returned the diamond nine, but South rose with the jack, hoping that even if it lost to the king, West might be endplayed. His second chance came to pass; West won the diamond ace, but then had to give a ruff-sluff and the game came home.


I am not going to be rash enough to say that it will always work better to open one no-trump than one spade. That clearly isn't true. But what I will suggest is that 5-3-3-2 distribution represents a balanced hand, and that when in the range of 15-16, you should open one no-trump no matter what your five-carder — unless you have all your high cards in your five-card major and a three-card side-suit.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 9 7 4
 A 4 3
 Q 4 3
♣ K 9
South West North East
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 7th, 2014

Confidence is not a guarantee of success, but a pattern of thinking that will improve your likelihood of success, a tenacious search for ways to make things work.

John Eliot


South North
East-West ♠ Q J 10 8 7 4
 J 4 2
 A 6
♣ 4 3
West East
♠ 6
 K Q 6
 Q J 10 8
♣ K 9 7 6 5
♠ 3
 9 7 3
 K 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 2
South
♠ A K 9 5 2
 A 10 8 5
 7 4
♣ A Q
South West North East
1♠ Pass 4♠ All pass

Q

The differences in approach between teams or rubber bridge and the pairs game is a subject that exercises my readers' curiosity. I am often asked whether there are deals that exemplify the difference in approach between one form of scoring and the other. Today's deal might clarify that point, because while the approach at pairs would not be straightforward here, the best play at teams is easy to identify.

Declaring four spades, you receive the lead of the diamond queen. With only four possible losers, you might decide at pairs to win the opening lead and draw trump, then to run the heart jack, or to lead a heart to the eight. You are playing for an overtrick, but with all the club and heart honors lying badly for you, the defenders are likely to prevail by winning the heart and reverting to diamonds. When East wins and plays a club through, you finesse, and lose both that trick and a further heart.

At teams or rubber bridge you would banish thoughts of an overtrick. Instead you win the diamond lead, draw trump, and exit with a diamond. When East wins to shift to a club, you take your ace and exit with a club. This forces the defenders to open up hearts for you. They can lead hearts through you once but not twice (and if East had shifted to a heart, not a club, at trick four, you would have set up a heart for a club discard).


Though not worth a drive to game, you are worth at least one more call, since your partner's range is 6-10 HCP. While it is human nature to advance in spades, that would be impetuous, and unnecessary. Since you have already shown 5-4 in the majors, the best way to show your extra values is to bid two no-trump. That suggests this pattern, plus extra values. Let partner decide the level and strain now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A K 9 5 2
 A 10 8 5
 7 4
♣ A Q
South West North East
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 6th, 2014

I am little concerned with beauty or perfection. I don't care for the great centuries. All I care about is life, struggle, intensity. I am at ease in my generation.

Emile Zola


South North
Neither ♠ K 5
 Q J 6
 A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4
West East
♠ 8 7 6
 K 10 8 4
 10 8 6 2
♣ 8 2
♠ 3
 9 7 3 2
 K J 7 5
♣ Q 10 5 3
South
♠ A Q J 10 9 4 2
 A 5
 9 4
♣ A 6
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
3♠ Pass 4 Dbl.
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5♣* Pass 5 NT Pass
6♠ All pass    

*Three keycards

2

In today's deal the North-South bidding was no more than adequate, but it was South's play that left room for significant improvement.

At his final turn North might well have converted six spades to six no-trump to protect his diamond tenace. When West obediently led the diamond two, declarer optimistically inserted dummy’s queen, but of course the finesse lost. At this point East did well to return a diamond, removing an entry from the table, rather than the more obvious heart shift. After winning with the diamond ace, declarer tested the clubs by cashing the ace and king, then ruffed a club high. Since the queen had not appeared, all that was left was to cash the two top spades, ending in dummy, and fall back on the heart finesse. Down one.

Can you see a better approach to the play? Suppose that declarer simply plays low from dummy at trick one. East wins with his jack but clearly cannot return the suit without conceding the 12th trick. Say that he switches to a heart; South wins with his ace and follows with three rounds of clubs as before. Then comes the spade ace, and another spade to dummy’s king allows another club to be ruffed high. The key difference is that after South draws the last trump, the diamond ace is still in dummy as an entry to the long club.

Finally, I leave my resourceful readers to work out what might have happened if West had found the lead of the diamond 10.


I would sit for one no-trump doubled, since partner might well have run if he were weak and had a long suit (particularly if he was short in hearts). The danger with bidding two clubs is that the opponents may be able to take heart ruffs against that contract. And one no-trump is a level lower, after all.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 5
 Q J 6
 A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4
South West North East
Pass Pass 1
1 NT Dbl. Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 5th, 2014

For ever most divinely in the wrong.

W.B. Yeats


North North
East-West ♠ A Q 8
 K 9 8
 A J 10 9
♣ A 6 5
West East
♠ 6 5
 —
 Q 8 7 6 4 3
♣ J 10 9 8 3
♠ J 9 7 3 2
 J 6 4 3 2
 K
♣ 7 4
South
♠ K 10 4
 A Q 10 7 5
 5 2
♣ K Q 2
South West North East
1 Pass
1 Pass 2 NT Pass
3♣* Pass 3 Pass
6 All pass    

*Checkback Stayman

♣J

Today's deal comes from a head-to-head encounter in a match between two New York country clubs. At one table the North-South pair had missed their respectable slam, but were delighted to find that they had picked up a big swing when the player in the South seat had chosen the wrong time to apply expert technique.

If you simply focus on the heart suit, you have probably been taught that the right way to guard against a 4-1 break is to cash a top honor from hand and lead up to the king. However, that play would only be critical if there were no side-entries to dummy — and here the entries to the North hand plentiful.

So you can focus your energy on other problem distributions. Since you will never guess to play West for four hearts and are not bothered by East’s having four hearts to the jack as we have seen, all that remains in the way of problem distributions are the 5-0 breaks.

Correct technique in the slam after the club-jack lead runs around to the king is to lead a heart to the king. Now you can pick up East’s trump with ease because your spot cards allow for two finesses. Of course, if West had followed to the first heart, you would play a heart to the queen, then cross back to dummy with a spade for the marked finesse, if necessary.


No lead looks very attractive. My best guess would be to lead a low club, thinking that declarer does not rate to have any honors in the suit, and partner will surely be able to work that out. But declarer might easily misguess if dummy has the king and jack — or he might not put up an unsupported king.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 4 2
 K 10 3
 J 9 8
♣ A 7 5
South West North East
1♣ 1 NT 2♣ 2
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 4th, 2014

Where do you stand on the issue of using the opening no-trump call with hand-patterns such as 5-4 in the minors? Does your holding in the majors influence that decision?

Red Brick, West Palm Beach, Fla.

Where you have an easy rebid (as with five diamonds and four clubs) your hand would have to be stacked in the majors to make an opening of one no-trump palatable. Conversely, where you have reversing pattern and 15-16 points (four diamonds and five clubs, or four hearts and a five-card minor) opening one no-trump may be the least lie.

If you were second to speak with: ♠ —,  J-9-3,  A-K-Q-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ A-10 how would you best describe it? I can see a case for opening the hand with a one-level call, a pre-empt or even a strong two.

Scatterbrain, Selma, Ala.

Few of us have a strong two diamond call in our armory any more. I would strongly vote against two clubs and a high preempt seems self-defeating. So put me down as a one diamond opener — I’ll be surprised if everyone passes…

My question revolves around bidding conventions. A local bridge instructor (but also many opponents at local bridge clubs) reacts with shock if a bid has an unusual conventional meaning. I am often told that a specific call “always means…” This invariably gets into a heated debate about conventions which sometimes drives me to want to give up bridge. Should bids always mean the same thing or can you play what you want?

Free Bird, Danville, Ill.

I'm sorry to hear this. But in constructive or unopposed auctions, and especially on the later rounds of bidding, you should be allowed to play anything you like; you are not imposing on your opponents if you do this. I will deal with the rest of your question later this month.

I was fourth to speak with: ♠ A-Q-7-4-3,  J-3,  A-Q-9, ♣ A-J-10, and opened one spade. I heard my partner respond two spades and wanted to decide which game to get to. Should I jump to three no-trump and rely on my partner to convert back to four spades if appropriate?

Fred Flintstone, Holland, Mich.

Better is to make a game-try of three clubs, planning to pass a three-spade or three no-trump response, or to bid three no-trump over a three heart call from your partner. Over a three diamond response it feels right to bid four spades.

I know it may be hard to generalize, but in a no-trump contract, when would it be right for a partner not to return partner's opening lead suit and instead to switch to another suit? I find when in doubt it is better to continue the suit led.

Robert the Robot, Harrisburg, Pa.

Sometimes the evidence tells us that a shift is likely to be right. You might have a very strong suit of your own, or a good suit with an outside entry. Alternatively, dummy may have a strong holding in partner's suit. Equally, the rule of 11 may tell you that declarer is either strong or long in the suit led. For example, say partner leads a two (fourth highest) and both you and dummy hold a doubleton. Now you know continuing this suit, will establish declarer's five-card suit.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 3rd, 2014

We must accept life for what it actually is — a challenge to our very essence and quality without which we should never know of what stuff we are made, or grow to our full stature.

Robert Louis Stevenson


West North
Neither ♠ A Q 8 6
 A K 9 8 7 2
 8
♣ 10 6
West East
♠ K 9 5
 6 4
 A Q
♣ A K J 9 4 2
♠ 7
 Q J 10 5
 J 10 7 6 4
♣ 7 5 3
South
♠ J 10 4 3 2
 3
 K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8
South West North East
1♣ Dbl. Pass
1♠ 1 NT 2♠ Pass
4♠ All pass    

♣K

There is nothing more satisfying than to find a hand where the defenders set their opponent a real challenge, and declarer was equal to the task.

This deal came up at the European championships a few years ago, and few defenders found the route to trouble declarer. A typical sequence of play saw the defenders cash their clubs and exit in trump, letting declarer ruff a heart to hand early and draw trump.

Far better for the defense is for West to cash the diamond ace at trick three and play a third club, attacking the trump suit. When this happened, declarer elected to ruff in hand. However, the 3-1 trump break coupled with the bad heart break meant that so long as West did not cover the spade jack, declarer could not avoid a fourth loser. If declarer drew trump, he would be unable to ruff out hearts; if he left trump out, West could overruff South on the third heart. (Note that if West covers the spade jack, declarer can ruff the next heart high and then finesse the spade eight to make his game.)

The winning line at trick three for declarer is to ruff the club on the table and discard his heart from hand. Now he can take a heart ruff and run the spade jack. West will gain nothing by covering, but if he ducks, declarer leads a spade to the queen. Next comes a second heart ruff, a spade to the ace, and dummy is high.


Even by a passed hand a call of two diamonds, the fourth suit, would be forcing for one round. But that call would be unwise, and a bid of two no-trump would be suicidal. This leaves you three unpalatable choices. Rebidding two spades might leave you in a 5-1 fit, and giving preference to two hearts rates to do the same. So what else can you do but pass and hope partner has five clubs?

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 10 4 3 2
 3
 K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8
South West North East
Pass Pass 1 Pass
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 2nd, 2014

Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions.

Ralph Waldo Emerson


South North
None ♠ 3 2
 A K 10 2
 K J
♣ A K J 9 3
West East
♠ A Q 9 8 7 6
 7 6 3
 10 7 3
♣ 2
♠ J 4
 4
 9 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4
South
♠ K 10 5
 Q J 9 8 5
 A Q 8
♣ 8 5
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1 2♠ 3♠ Pass
4 Pass 5* Pass
6 All pass    

*Asking for a spade control

7

When South promised a spade control by raising North's five-heart jump to slam, West wisely decided to go passive with a trump lead.

Declarer now tried to improve on the simple chance that clubs would break favorably. He drew three rounds of trump, and when East discarded two diamonds, he realized that West was going to be very short in either clubs or diamonds. It would have been simple (but fatal) to cash the ace and king of clubs. Instead South found a very neat play. He took one top club, cashed three rounds of diamonds, pitching a spade from dummy, and found West with three cards in the suit, then led a club to dummy.

As expected, West showed out, but declarer was unfazed. He had reduced the hand to a five-card ending, where dummy had a singleton spade, a trump, and jack-third of clubs, while South had two trumps and his three spades left. He knew West was down to six spades, including the ace, so he led dummy’s spade and covered East’s card, endplaying West to give him a spade trick for the 12th winner.

Note that even if West had begun with fewer diamonds, and thus had a club left, a club play would have set up a club winner in dummy as an alternative route to the 12th trick. The only shape that would have been fatal to declarer was if West had started life with four diamonds and no clubs, when there is no winning line.


Since three hearts is best played as forcing and you have a little in hand, you are probably worth one slam-try, though you would not want to go past four hearts without some cooperation from your partner. A call of four diamonds simply shows a diamond control and will maybe let partner take over from here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 3 2
 A K 10 2
 K J
♣ A K J 9 3
South West North East
1♣ Pass 1♠ Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].