May 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 11th, 2014
|
Are most serious events played as pairs scoring, or teams? And are there any rubber bridge events played at a national level?
Backing Group, Greenville, S.C.
In all of the national tournaments (which are played three times a year), the major event is scored using one form or another of teams scoring. That is not to downplay pairs scoring, but I think both at national and world level the winners of the big teams events are rated more highly than the winners of the pairs games. There are really no rubber bridge or individual events left anymore.
I was fourth to speak with ♠ A-5, ♥ Q-9-4-3, ♦ Q-9-5-2, ♣ K-8-2, and heard one spade to my left, passed around to me. I felt obliged to double, and when my LHO bid two spades, my partner doubled, which I assumed was for penalty. The result was nine tricks for declarer. My partner thought I needed more to double one spade, in fourth position. Was it I or he who was out of line — he had a 3-3-4-3 10-count?
High Noon, Great Falls, Mont.
It is normal to play a balancing call in fourth seat as potentially a king lighter than the same action in second seat. So your double looks normal enough. It was once common to use your partner's double of a rebid suit as penalties. I still do.
One could argue that the responsive double gains on frequency grounds, even if the size of the swing might be larger with the penalty double. But I’ll stick with the penalty double interpretation.
What is your opinion about the technical merits of coding the leads of jacks and 10s against no-trump, whereby the opening leads of jacks deny a higher honor, while 10s are from jack-10 or 10-nine, in each case promising a higher honor? My instinct is that this gives away as much as it benefits. What do you think?
Mister Cellophane, Seneca, S.C.
|
My experience mirrors your gut reaction. At trick one, the 'coded' 10s and jacks are very revealing. However if you really must play those methods, at least keep them for the middle of the hand, not trick one, at which point you should know enough about the hand to be aware when partner, not declarer, needs to know.
I passed in first chair with ♠ Q-10-7-4, ♥ K-J-3, ♦ 5-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and I heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner doubled, and I responded one spade. My partner now raised to two spades. Does this show a good hand or is this just a courtesy raise?
Normal Business, Wichita Falls, Texas
Raising your partner in competition would not guarantee extras (your partner would bid two spades with a few extras or perfect shape even in a minimum hand). But if your LHO passes, as here, a raise by him should be real extras. Your hand would be just too good to pass now. I'd guess to bid three clubs as a game try.
How should one play the following double? I was in second seat with five spades, six points, and a balanced hand. At unfavorable vulnerability, I passed over my RHO's one-club bid. I heard five clubs to my left, and a double from partner. Is this penalty, takeout, or optional?
Piggy in the Middle, Spokane, Wash.
Your partner's double has to cover many hands that are too good to pass and have no other clear-cut action. If he bid a suit, it would have to show a good suit and strong distribution; otherwise, the action would be far too risky. Therefore, double covers all good hands that do not fall into this category. With your actual hand you should assume their contract is not making. Since you should only remove the double to what you believe is a making contract, passing looks right here.
|
May 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Our imagination is the only limit to what we can hope to have in the future.
Charles F. Kettering
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ A 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 10 9
♦ K J 10 6 3
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 8 2
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ Q 4
♣ 9 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ K
♦ A 9 8 7 5
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♠10
I take a relatively relaxed view about the suit quality required for a weak-two when nonvulnerable, though if vulnerable I like to have two of the top three honors. Having said that, ace-sixth is the worst possible holding for a weak-two (you have no tricks facing shortage but lots of defense). Meanwhile, your good spade suit is another red flag against pre-empting. Pass at any vulnerability.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ A 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ J 6 |
May 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Not by age but by capacity is wisdom acquired.
Plautus
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7
♥ A Q 10 9 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 3
♥ 8 7 5
♦ J 8 5 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ Q 6 5 4 2
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8
♥ —
♦ K Q 9 7
♣ A J 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥* |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥** |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*5 hearts and 4-plus in a minor, or 6 hearts with 10-14 points
**One-suiter with short spades
♦3
This auction suggests that your partner had a penalty double of one spade, probably with a six-card suit, and his failure to go past the two-level should indicate that he does not have enough to drive to game. I'd expect him to be in the range of 7-11 HCP, so I would pass, imagining that no game could be all that good for us.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A Q 10 9 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The arrogance of age must submit to be taught by youth.
Edmund Burke
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A 4 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 7 6 2
♦ A 5
♣ J 10 8 5 |
♠ 8
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ A 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ 5
♦ J 8 7 6
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Weak with spades and a minor
♥Q
I am not going to be rash enough to say that it will always work better to open one no-trump than one spade. That clearly isn't true. But what I will suggest is that 5-3-3-2 distribution represents a balanced hand, and that when in the range of 15-16, you should open one no-trump no matter what your five-carder — unless you have all your high cards in your five-card major and a three-card side-suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A 4 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 9 |
May 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Confidence is not a guarantee of success, but a pattern of thinking that will improve your likelihood of success, a tenacious search for ways to make things work.
John Eliot
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 8 7 4
♥ J 4 2
♦ A 6
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 7 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 5 2
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ 7 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
Though not worth a drive to game, you are worth at least one more call, since your partner's range is 6-10 HCP. While it is human nature to advance in spades, that would be impetuous, and unnecessary. Since you have already shown 5-4 in the majors, the best way to show your extra values is to bid two no-trump. That suggests this pattern, plus extra values. Let partner decide the level and strain now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 5 2
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ 7 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
I am little concerned with beauty or perfection. I don't care for the great centuries. All I care about is life, struggle, intensity. I am at ease in my generation.
Emile Zola
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 5
♥ Q J 6
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 7 3 2
♦ K J 7 5
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 4 2
♥ A 5
♦ 9 4
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Dbl. |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣* |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three keycards
♦2
I would sit for one no-trump doubled, since partner might well have run if he were weak and had a long suit (particularly if he was short in hearts). The danger with bidding two clubs is that the opponents may be able to take heart ruffs against that contract. And one no-trump is a level lower, after all.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ Q J 6
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
For ever most divinely in the wrong.
W.B. Yeats
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 8
♥ K 9 8
♦ A J 10 9
♣ A 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ —
♦ Q 8 7 6 4 3
♣ J 10 9 8 3 |
♠ J 9 7 3 2
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ K
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 4
♥ A Q 10 7 5
♦ 5 2
♣ K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣* |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Checkback Stayman
♣J
No lead looks very attractive. My best guess would be to lead a low club, thinking that declarer does not rate to have any honors in the suit, and partner will surely be able to work that out. But declarer might easily misguess if dummy has the king and jack — or he might not put up an unsupported king.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 4 2
♥ K 10 3
♦ J 9 8
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1 NT |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
Where do you stand on the issue of using the opening no-trump call with hand-patterns such as 5-4 in the minors? Does your holding in the majors influence that decision?
Red Brick, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Where you have an easy rebid (as with five diamonds and four clubs) your hand would have to be stacked in the majors to make an opening of one no-trump palatable. Conversely, where you have reversing pattern and 15-16 points (four diamonds and five clubs, or four hearts and a five-card minor) opening one no-trump may be the least lie.
If you were second to speak with: ♠ —, ♥ J-9-3, ♦ A-K-Q-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ A-10 how would you best describe it? I can see a case for opening the hand with a one-level call, a pre-empt or even a strong two.
Scatterbrain, Selma, Ala.
Few of us have a strong two diamond call in our armory any more. I would strongly vote against two clubs and a high preempt seems self-defeating. So put me down as a one diamond opener — I’ll be surprised if everyone passes…
My question revolves around bidding conventions. A local bridge instructor (but also many opponents at local bridge clubs) reacts with shock if a bid has an unusual conventional meaning. I am often told that a specific call “always means…” This invariably gets into a heated debate about conventions which sometimes drives me to want to give up bridge. Should bids always mean the same thing or can you play what you want?
Free Bird, Danville, Ill.
|
I'm sorry to hear this. But in constructive or unopposed auctions, and especially on the later rounds of bidding, you should be allowed to play anything you like; you are not imposing on your opponents if you do this. I will deal with the rest of your question later this month.
I was fourth to speak with: ♠ A-Q-7-4-3, ♥ J-3, ♦ A-Q-9, ♣ A-J-10, and opened one spade. I heard my partner respond two spades and wanted to decide which game to get to. Should I jump to three no-trump and rely on my partner to convert back to four spades if appropriate?
Fred Flintstone, Holland, Mich.
Better is to make a game-try of three clubs, planning to pass a three-spade or three no-trump response, or to bid three no-trump over a three heart call from your partner. Over a three diamond response it feels right to bid four spades.
I know it may be hard to generalize, but in a no-trump contract, when would it be right for a partner not to return partner's opening lead suit and instead to switch to another suit? I find when in doubt it is better to continue the suit led.
Robert the Robot, Harrisburg, Pa.
Sometimes the evidence tells us that a shift is likely to be right. You might have a very strong suit of your own, or a good suit with an outside entry. Alternatively, dummy may have a strong holding in partner's suit. Equally, the rule of 11 may tell you that declarer is either strong or long in the suit led. For example, say partner leads a two (fourth highest) and both you and dummy hold a doubleton. Now you know continuing this suit, will establish declarer's five-card suit.
|
May 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
We must accept life for what it actually is — a challenge to our very essence and quality without which we should never know of what stuff we are made, or grow to our full stature.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 8 6
♥ A K 9 8 7 2
♦ 8
♣ 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q
♣ A K J 9 4 2 |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ J 10 7 6 4
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4 3 2
♥ 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Even by a passed hand a call of two diamonds, the fourth suit, would be forcing for one round. But that call would be unwise, and a bid of two no-trump would be suicidal. This leaves you three unpalatable choices. Rebidding two spades might leave you in a 5-1 fit, and giving preference to two hearts rates to do the same. So what else can you do but pass and hope partner has five clubs?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 4 3 2
♥ 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| South |
North |
| None |
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K J
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 7 6
♥ 7 6 3
♦ 10 7 3
♣ 2 |
♠ J 4
♥ 4
♦ 9 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 5
♥ Q J 9 8 5
♦ A Q 8
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♠ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for a spade control
♥7
Since three hearts is best played as forcing and you have a little in hand, you are probably worth one slam-try, though you would not want to go past four hearts without some cooperation from your partner. A call of four diamonds simply shows a diamond control and will maybe let partner take over from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K J
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Imagine you reach the small slam in spades and receive the lead of the trump 10. To bring home 12 tricks, you will need to set up hearts, but the entries to dummy are scarce. After you win the spade ace and unblock the heart king; what next? It might look natural to ruff a diamond to dummy and ruff a heart to hand. But if hearts do not break, you are out of trump and doomed to go down.
The best plan now is somewhat counterintuitive. Since you must rely on trumps to be 3-2 and hearts no worse than 4-2, you should next play the club queen out of your hand.
If West wins the king and plays a trump — as good as anything — you win in dummy with the spade jack, ruff a heart low in hand, cross to dummy with the club jack, and ruff a heart with the spade king. Then you can cash the diamond ace and ruff a diamond to draw the last trump, with dummy high.
If West ducks the club queen, you change tack altogether. You go to dummy with a trump, then ruff a heart with the spade king. Now you can cross to dummy and draw the last trump by leading the spade four to the jack. Next you play the heart ace and another heart. You concede one heart trick, but the last trump in dummy is the entry back to all the good hearts.