July 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Dear Night! This world's defeat; The stop to busy fools; care’s check and curb.
Henry Vaughan
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K J 6
♥ K Q 6
♦ K Q 8 5 2
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5 4 3 2
♥ 2
♦ 9 7
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
♠ —
♥ 10 5 3
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ A Q J 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 7
♥ A J 9 8 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
2♣ |
| 2♥ |
4♣ |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
The big question!
This is an awkward one. Your partner heard you suggest diamonds and spades (on an auction where you could have doubled for takeout of hearts). When he overrules you to bid clubs, do you have any reason to doubt him?- He might have seven small clubs. right ? That argues for a pass now; his clubs will be worth tricks when they are trumps but will be valueless to you.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 6
♥ K Q 6
♦ K Q 8 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Variety's the very spice of life, That gives it all its flavor.
William Cowper
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 10 8
♥ J 9 6
♦ —
♣ Q 10 9 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ A K Q 5
♦ A 9 8 6 2
♣ — |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q 4 3
♣ J 8 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ J 5 2
♥ 7 4 3
♦ K J 10 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Leading a club (whether you choose the ace or a small one) seems far too committal. Partner's failure to raise clubs suggests he is not loaded for bear in that suit, and there seems no reason to broach diamonds either. My instincts are to lead a heart rather than a spade, since dummy may well be very short of spades and entries. Leading a heart won't do much for declarer that he could not do for himself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 2
♥ Q 8 4
♦ K 9 4
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I'm eager to experiment with some home-grown conventions. If any convention is explained to the opponents, should it be allowed? We are talking "club" level, but I am curious at why some conventions might be banned at regional tournaments. How can a convention give a partnership an advantage if the opponents are aware of it?
Rocket Scientist, Bay City, Mich.
There are different degrees of license; general and mid-chart are two such categories, the latter being more wide-ranging. In essence you cannot play any gadget until it is licensed. Most clubs will let you do what you like in your own constructive auctions, but won't let you open or overcall with a bid that requires defensive methods to be discussed. And that is how it should be.
I held ♠ A-Q-4-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ Q-4-3. My partner opened one club, and I responded one spade. Now my LHO overcalled two diamonds, passed around to me. We play support doubles, so my partner had denied holding as many as three spades. I chose to double (do you agree?) and heard a two-spade response. What now?
Lumpfish, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
What an unexpected rebid! Your double looks fine, and I suppose your partner rates to have a 2-3-5-3 pattern with the doubleton spade king. I'd guess to jump to three no-trump now, hoping partner hasn't forgotten to make a support double at his previous turn.
When responder raises opener's second suit, the call seems to have an awkwardly wide range. Holding ♠ K, ♥ K-Q-10-7-3, ♦ K-10-2, ♣ K-J-3-2, I heard my partner respond one spade to my one-heart opening, then raise my two-club rebid to three. Was I supposed to pass, drive to three no-trump, or explore further for hearts?
Outlier, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
|
Partner sometimes issues a courtesy raise with four trumps and slightly less than an invitational hand, but you should not necessarily assume that to be the case. You have too much to pass, but rather than going directly to three no-trump, you might temporize with the fourth suit, three diamonds, hoping partner can produce heart support or bid three no-trump himself.
Recently my partner opened one club, and I held ♠ —, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ A-K-J-9-5-3, ♣ K-8-4. In a noncompetitive auction should I bid one diamond, intending to reverse to hearts, or bid hearts, intending to jump-shift to diamonds? I chose to bid one diamond, and my LHO pre-empted to two spades. My partner bid two no-trump, and I bid three hearts, over which partner dutifully bid four hearts, which I passed. However, we were cold for slam. Where did we go wrong?
Missed Connection, Albuquerque, N.M.
Any time you have game-forcing values, bid your long suit first. So far so good, but your partner showed 18-19 with her two-no-trump bid. That means you should drive the hand to at least a small slam — indeed, you might well be cold for a grand slam on a good day.
Recently in Bid With the Aces, you advocated a two-club rebid after opening one heart and hearing a one-spade response, with ♠ 5-2, ♥ Q-J-10-9-7, ♦ A-K, ♣ K-J-8-2. Might not a rebid of one no-trump keep you comfortably low, and isn't your hand closer to balanced than unbalanced?
Balancing Act, Muncie, Ind.
One can make a case for rebidding one no-trump to get across the basic nature of the hand (minimum balanced). However, the intermediates in the long suits argue to me for the simple rebid in clubs. Whatever anyone tells you, a hand with 5-4-2-2 pattern is more suited to play in suits than in no-trump, all else being equal. At the very least, suggest your shape and let partner decide.
|
July 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The sharp thorn often produces delicate roses.
Ovid
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 10
♥ A 9 8 7
♦ A K 8 6 2
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ 10 7 5 3
♣ 8 4 |
♠ 7 6
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ Q 9
♣ J 7 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 4 3
♥ 5
♦ J 4
♣ A K Q 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
Pass |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 7♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
You have no reason for the time being to assume that East is playing games. So ignore your spade suit now and bid two clubs. As the auction progresses, you can reassess the position and think about bidding spades if the opportunity arises.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 4 3
♥ 5
♦ J 4
♣ A K Q 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A throw of the dice will never abolish chance.
Stephane Mallarme
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 3
♥ A 9 7 6
♦ Q 8 4 3
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9
♥ 5 4 3
♦ A 7
♣ A 9 8 7 6 4 |
♠ A 7 2
♥ J 10 8 2
♦ K J 10 9 6
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q
♦ 5 2
♣ J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
If you trust your partner to deliver the right shape for his takeout double, you should compete to two spades now. Yes, partner does not rate to have four spades unless he is very minimum, but he could easily be suitable for spades, while holding only three trumps. More to the point, when each side has at least an eight-card fit, don't give up too early.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q
♦ 5 2
♣ J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 21 Comments
If thou must choose Between the chances, choose the odd: Read the New Yorker, trust in God, And take short views.
W.H. Auden
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K J 9
♥ A J 10 6 5 3
♦ 3 2
♣ 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 9 4
♣ A J 10 9 7 |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ Q 9 7 4 2
♦ Q 5
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A 10 7 3
♥ K
♦ A 10 8 7 6
♣ 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
2♦* |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*A pre-empt in either hearts or spades
♥8
There are not many positions where I turn into a coward, but this is one of them. With limited values, I am facing a passed partner, and I have the sort of suit I don't really want to command my partner to lead. So the prospect of making an overcall that takes up no space is not an inviting one. I will pass, and let my partner lead what he likes, if necessary.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 4
♥ Q 9 7 4 2
♦ Q 5
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The moment a man begins to talk about technique that's proof that he is fresh out of ideas.
Raymond Chandler
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9 7 6
♥ 9 4 3
♦ A K Q 3
♣ A 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K
♥ 5
♦ 10 9 8 6 5 4 2
♣ Q J 4 2 |
♠ 10 8 5 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ J 7
♣ 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 4 2
♥ A K Q J 10 8
♦ —
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 7 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
It is tempting to rebid one no-trump to show the basic nature of the hand, but I'd prefer a somewhat more robust heart stopper. Since my partner has guaranteed five spades (with four he would have made a negative double), I can raise spades, knowing we have an eight-card fit. It may not be elegant, but it serves the purpose.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6
♥ 9 4 3
♦ A K Q 3
♣ A 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The greatest obstacle to being a hero is the doubt whether one may not be going to prove oneself a fool.
Nathaniel Hawthorne
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8
♥ 10 9 4
♦ A K J 5
♣ K Q J 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 3
♥ K 6 2
♦ Q 10 9 6 3
♣ A |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 8 7 5
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 6 5 2
♥ A Q J 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♦ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Simplest here might be to pass, but you'd like to try to find your side's best minor-suit fit and to stop the opponents from getting together in spades. One route would be to rebid two clubs. Then if either opponent bids two spades, you can bid again with two no-trump to suggest the minors, not an attempt to play there. If you wanted to play two no-trump, you would have let partner play one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ 10 9 4
♦ A K J 5
♣ K Q J 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
He played the King as though under momentary apprehension that someone else was about to play the ace.
Eugene Field
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ Q J
♦ K Q 6 3 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7 5 2
♥ 8 4 3
♦ 10 8
♣ 10 7 |
♠ 3
♥ K 10 9 7 5
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ A Q 9 |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ A 6 2
♦ A 7
♣ K J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
When dummy is known to be very weak, your target is not only to set up tricks for your side, but also to avoid giving declarer tricks to which he is not entitled, or to give him finesses he might find hard to take. Since your partner did not act, I'd be inclined to avoid a spade lead. And because a club lead feels too committal, I guess a small diamond is all that is left.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ K 9 3 2
♦ J 4 3
♣ A 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
My partner and I had an expensive misunderstanding when I opened one heart and he responded one no-trump over my LHO's one-spade call. My RHO raised to two spades now, and I doubled, negative, holding ♠ 9, ♥ K-Q-10-8-3, ♦ K-J-4, ♣ K-Q-3-2. This did not work out well when my partner mistook it for a penalty double!
Judge Dread, Mitchell, S.D.
Sometimes when the opponents bid and raise a suit, doubles simply show extras, requesting partner to act. However after you or your partner has bid no-trump over opposition intervention, your subsequent doubles tend to be penalties. Here, I would expect your double to be real high-card extras, or trump length. With your hand, I would simply pass two spades or compete to three clubs.
This hand appeared in our paper, showing South opening one spade. West, who held ♠ —, ♥ A-9-2, ♦ Q-J-9-5-3, ♣ 9-8-6-5-4, passed, allowing his LHO to close out the auction with four spades. The next player passed with a strong hand that included five diamonds to the ace-king. He would have bid five diamonds and made it if West had come in with the unusual no-trump. Is there a recommended strength requirement for the unusual no-trump in various circumstances?
Friendly Fred, Wilmington, N.C.
Thank you for your very challenging question. It feels wrong to bid with a weak hand and bad suits, but move the heart ace into the clubs and one might bid at favorable vulnerability. My suggestion is clearly wrong on the actual hand. That at least proves I don't qualify as a results-merchant. At equal vulnerability I might bid with the actual hand and the club king instead of the nine, maybe.
Some of our opponents play third and lowest (or third-and-fifth leads – are they the same?). How does the rule of 11 work now?
Fingers and Thumbs, Bellevue, Wash.
|
Third and low means you lead third-highest from a six-card suit, while in third and fifth you might lead fifth-highest. The rule of 11 is changed to the rule of 12 if the card led appears to be third from four, and to the rule of 10 if the card is fifth highest. So when what appears to be a fifth-highest three is led, the other three hands have seven cards higher than the three between them.
Against silent opponents, my partner opened one spade. I held ♠ A-Q-J-9-3, ♥ 10-9, ♦ A-K-5-3, ♣ 6-4, and responded two diamonds, game-forcing. My partner now bid three clubs. Should I play my partner for extras and bid three spades, four spades, or even five spades? If I bid three spades and partner bids four spades, what next? (At the table I passed, missing a laydown slam.)
Puzzle Maven, Corpus Christi, Texas
I assume you could not set spades earlier with a Jacoby two-no-trump call. That said, I play that three clubs promises extra shape or high-cards or both. You might try a jump to five spades, but bidding three spades and respecting partner's sign-off is pessimistic but certainly possible. A jump to four spades would be right only if you play that bid to show good trumps and diamonds, no heart control — but some people do.
I saw what was quite clearly a light-hearted reference to the beer card in a bridge magazine recently. Would you explain what this term means?
Pale Ale, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
The tradition of rewarding a player who won a deal's last trick with the diamond seven when diamonds were not trump has been around for a couple of decades. I believe it started in Denmark. But whether anyone actually does so or just gives nominal credit, I do not know.
|
|
Most of the critical decisions in the problems I present arise in the middle of the deal, but this time in a teams match you are simply faced with an opening-lead problem.
By the way, did that four-club call on a zero-count shock you? You wanted to take away bidding-space from your opponents, believing they had a good fit and the balance of high cards. Your opponents nonetheless sailed into a slam — but partner (a very good and highly aggressive player) ups the ante. Your lead!
Anyone familiar with the Lightner double might guess that, since you would have considered leading a club without the double, you have been asked to do something unusual, and the spade lead looks like the obvious choice. When your partner doubles a slam, you look for an unusual lead. So far so good, but I hope you avoided leading a fourth-highest spade four. If you did, your partner would ruff the first trick and would then consider underleading his club ace to get a second ruff.
Why? Well, I told you that your partner was an aggressive player. He can guess that six hearts doubled might also be the contract reached at the other table, and so that extra undertrick would be worth 300 points, or 7 IMPs. Since you know an underlead in clubs would be a disaster, lead a suit-preference spade eight, to steer partner away from the club suit.
Incidentally, which opponent, North or South, do you think should have retreated to the cold six no-trump?