Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 21st, 2014

People trust their eyes above all else — but most people see what they wish to see, or what they believe they should see; not what is really there.

Zoe Marriott


South North
North-South ♠ Q J 9 8
 6 5 3
 A K J 3
♣ K 3
West East
♠ 7 6 5
 A K J 4
 8 7 5
♣ 10 9 8
♠ 10
 10 8 7
 9 6 4 2
♣ A 7 5 4 2
South
♠ A K 4 3 2
 Q 9 2
 Q 10
♣ Q J 6
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
2 NT Pass 4♠ All pass

K

At the risk of stating the obvious, the defenders cannot see each other's cards. Conversely, declarer can see partner's cards — though this benefit is shared with the defenders. On this hand, South should have appreciated that if East got on lead, a heart through him would very likely scupper the contract. Therefore, declarer needed to use whatever wiles were at his disposal to disrupt defensive communications.

West led the heart king, to the three, seven and two. The opening leader could read East’s seven as being the lowest heart in his hand; therefore, it was likely to be the bottom of three cards. If East had held a doubleton heart, he would have played his highest, unless it was the queen. And if South had held four hearts, he would surely have bid them over partner’s two-club response. So West intelligently switched to the club 10. In with the ace, East returned a heart and down went the game.

Declarer had missed his opportunity for subterfuge. If he had dropped the heart nine under West’s ace, doubt might have been created in West’s mind. With the two still out, West would not have been able to gauge the heart position accurately. East might hold Q-7-2, and the seven might be the highest card available to him to signal liking for the lead.

As a rule of thumb in similar situations, declarer should ‘signal’ as if he were a defender, If he wants the opening leader to continue the suit, he should follow with a high card.


With no really attractive lead, the choice is to go relatively passive (I prefer a club lead to a heart) or to go aggressive with the lead of the diamond king. There is no right answer here, but I suspect at pairs I would try to play the straight man. Meanwhile, at teams or rubber, I'd opt for the chance to be a hero — or a villain.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 2
 10 8 3 2
 K 10
♣ J 6 5 4 3
South West North East
1♠
Pass 3♠ Pass 4♠
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 20th, 2014

In second seat I held ♠ 7,  K-9-5-3-2,  A-Q-9-2, ♣ K-10-4 and opened one heart. My partner raised to two hearts over my LHO's one-spade overcall, and this was passed back to my LHO, who bid two spades. When my partner doubled, what did it mean, and what should I bid now?

Caped Crusader, Tupelo, Miss.

Your partner's double suggests he wants to defend — perhaps with two potential trump tricks, together with a maximum for his two-heart raise. Conversely, your short spades plus minimum values make the prospect of defending two spades doubled too risky. Run to three diamonds (or three hearts) and be prepared to apologize in the post-mortem if you are proved to be too cowardly.

When my RHO opened one diamond, I doubled, holding ♠ K-9-3,  A-Q-6-3,  5, ♣ A-Q-10-7-2. My LHO raised to two diamonds, and my partner doubled. I thought this was takeout so bid two hearts, but my partner now bid two spades. What did this show — and what should I do now?

Jump Starter, Durham, N.C.

This auction sounds like spades and clubs (probably with only four spades but he might easily have five clubs). It looks clear to bid three clubs now, correcting to the higher partscore but one that should be much easier to play. Your partner could have up to invitational values, but this is not guaranteed.

What are the general rules about rebidding one no-trump as opener with a hand with a singleton in partner's suit? Specifically if you open one diamond and hear one spade, would you rebid two clubs as opposed to two diamonds on a hand with one spade and five diamonds, together with four hearts and three clubs? Or do you prefer to rebid one no-trump?

Heading for Home, Sunbury, Pa.

I'm a big fan of getting my second suit in cheaply if I can, but when I hold a reversing pattern and not enough values for that call, I will settle for a rebid of one no-trump and hope to survive by making the least lie. At least I limit my hand this way.

Say you held  A-Q-3,  J-7-6-5, ♣ K-J-10-8-4 ♠ 5 and elected to pass in first seat. When your partner opens one club, the next hand bids three hearts. Should you commit to three no-trump and hope partner has a full opener, or should you pass and settle for your sure plus?

Horn Bill, Duluth, Minn.

I would pass now and hope my partner can reopen with a double, when I will rub my hands and pass, expecting a big penalty.

Would you be happy to play some form of Blackwood where the conventional call is some bid other than four no-trump? When a minor suit is agreed, I understand experts use either the minor suit or one over the minor suit as ace-asking to save space.

Modern Scientist, Dodge City, Kan.

Heaven Forbid! I would rather eliminate Blackwood altogether than have people get confused by using other calls as conventional. That said, if you must play a call as artificial when a minor is agreed, do not use a call in the minor suit itself, but subvert the suit above to that end. If you are really interested, try visiting Bridge Guys for a summary of the methods.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 19th, 2014

It's frightening to think that you might not know something, but more frightening to think that, by and large, the world is run by people who have faith that they know exactly what is going on.

Amos Tversky


South North
Both ♠ 10 5 4
 J
 K J 4
♣ A K 10 9 7 2
West East
♠ A K Q 6 3 2
 A 9 7 2
 6
♣ Q 6
♠ J 8 7
 8 6 3
 10 9 7 5
♣ J 8 4
South
♠ 9
 K Q 10 5 4
 A Q 8 3 2
♣ 5 3
South West North East
1 1♠ 2♣ Pass
2 2♠ 3♠ Pass
4 Pass 5 All pass

♠K

There was a wide range of systems in use at the NEC tournament in Japan last April.

Perhaps the most exotic of the methods in play was that of Martin Reid and Peter Newell. I have slightly expurgated their sequence to make it look less unusual to an American’s eye, although the auction basically went as shown below. But whatever the peculiarities of the auction in today’s deal, it produced arguably the most spectacular declarer play of the tournament.

When David Beauchamp led out two top spades against five diamonds, Reid ruffed and led a low heart to West’s ace and East’s upside-down-count heart eight, which suggested an original odd number of cards in that suit. Back came a third spade and Reid ruffed, cashed a second heart as South completed his echo, then ruffed a heart in dummy as both opponents followed.

At this point in the deal, Reid knew from the auction that East had only three spades and he appeared to have only three hearts. Declarer cashed the club ace and, when no honor appeared from West, it seemed reasonable to play him for a doubleton. If so, East would hold three clubs. So ruffing out the clubs and playing for diamonds to be 3-2 would not work; East would be left with the long trump.

So Reid cashed the second top club, ruffed a club with the diamond eight, and when it held, was able to score a high crossruff for the last four tricks. Very nicely done.


Your partner is looking for a spade stopper to play three no-trump, though he may be about to bid on, looking for slam in one of the red suits, with a spade control. You don't have to know which yet; rebid four diamonds, since in context you have no real extras for your opening bid. Let partner decide where to go from here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9
 K Q 10 5 4
 A Q 8 3 2
♣ 5 3
South West North East
1 2♠ Dbl. Pass
3 Pass 3♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 18th, 2014

Genius is only a greater aptitude for patience.

Comte de Buffon


East North
Both ♠ 5 3
 —
 A Q 10 5 3
♣ A Q 9 8 3 2
West East
♠ A K 9 6 4
 K 7
 J 9 7 4
♣ K 7
♠ J
 A Q J 10 3 2
 8 6 2
♣ J 6 5
South
♠ Q 10 8 7 2
 9 8 6 5 4
 K
♣ 10 4
South West North East
2
Pass 4 4 NT Pass
5♣ Dbl. All pass  

♠K

Today's deal brought back happy memories of sitting opposite Bob Hamman, who made a play very similar to this one, with a very similar result. The difference was that the seven IMPs he won were just enough to win the International Trials for selection for our team.

There was slightly less at stake in the featured deal, since it comes from the semifinals of the NEC tournament, held in Japan last April. Both pairs played five clubs doubled from the South seat, and both Wests led three rounds of spades, trumped by dummy’s nine. At one table East overruffed dummy to play back a heart. Declarer ruffed this, crossed to the diamond king to finesse in trumps, then ruffed a diamond to hand, and eventually drew trumps to claim down one when the club king put in an appearance. Not a triumph, but not a disaster either.

However when Roy Welland and Sabine Auken were East and West, defending against five clubs doubled, Auken led three rounds of spades. Declarer ruffed the third one with the club nine, on which Welland as East pitched a diamond rather than overruff! Declarer now led a diamond to the king and a club to the eight. Welland won with his jack and played back a club, leaving declarer with an eventual diamond loser.

That led to a penalty of plus 500 and the hardest-earned seven IMPs of the event. Welland’s team went on to reach the final, but lost to a Russia-Netherlands combination.


This is an easy one. Your call of two hearts here will be natural and nonforcing. Indeed, it denies as much as game interest, since you would have relayed with two clubs (known as New Minor Forcing) with invitational values or better. Whether a jump to three hearts here would be shapely and invitational, or 5-5 game-forcing, is up to each individual partnership.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10 8 7 2
 9 8 6 5 4
 K
♣ 10 4
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, April 17th, 2014

Never do today what you can
Put off till tomorrow.

Matthew Browne


East North
Neither ♠ K 7 5 4 2
 A K Q 9
 6
♣ 7 5 4
West East
♠ A 10 9
 J 8 7
 A Q 10 8
♣ Q 10 3
♠ J 8 6 3
 10 6 2
 J 7
♣ A J 9 8
South
♠ Q
 5 4 3
 K 9 5 4 3 2
♣ K 6 2
South West North East
Pass
Pass 1♣* Dbl. 1♠
3 All pass    

*Two-plus cards

♠A

The finals of the NEC trophy in Yokohama this time last year turned out to be one-way traffic, in favor of the combined Russia-Netherlands team. This deal was symptomatic of what happened in the match.

In one room Evgeny Gladysh was delighted when the opponents came to rest at the three-level in his best suit. He started with ace and another spade, as declarer, Sabine Auken, pitched a club. She then led a trump to the king and ace. Gladysh switched to a heart, and Auken won and played four rounds of the suit to pitch a club before playing any more trump. That allowed Sjoert Brink to ruff in from the short trump hand, and now the contract was down three for minus 150.

In the other room Andrei Gromov played in diamonds, but a level lower and two tricks better. Jacek Pszczola for Team Welland (known as Pepsi) led a heart against two diamonds. Gromov won and did not play on trumps; instead, he led a spade to the queen and ace.

Pepsi now switched to a club to the ace, and Michal Kwiecien returned a club. Gromov won the king, crossed to a top heart, then pitched his last club on the spade king. He ruffed a spade, led his third heart to dummy, then ruffed a club and got out with a low diamond. Kwiecien overtook the diamond eight with the jack and returned a diamond, but Pepsi was now endplayed to concede a diamond to Gromov’s king for eight tricks, and 6 IMPs to Russia.


Even as a passed hand, I would caution against responding at the two-level when you have only a singleton in partner's suit. A response of one no-trump may temporarily conceal your diamonds — but as against that, it is far from clear you want to emphasize them that much. You have a bad hand for partner; a two-level response may excite him unduly.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q
 5 4 3
 K 9 5 4 3 2
♣ K 6 2
South West North East
Pass Pass 1♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 16th, 2014

Poor Eliza. How simply frightful! How humiliating! How delightful!

Alan Lerner


West North
North-South ♠ 9 6 5 3
 A 8 7 6 5 3
 A J
♣ A
West East
♠ 4
 4
 9 8 5 3
♣ K Q 9 8 7 4 3
♠ J 10 8 2
 J 10 9 2
 K 7 6 4
♣ J
South
♠ A K Q 7
 K Q
 Q 10 2
♣ 10 6 5 2
South West North East
4♣ Dbl. 5♣
5 NT* Pass 6 Pass
6♠ All pass    

*Pick a slam

4

What a difference a day makes. In the semifinals of the NEC tournament we had seen Sabine Auken and Roy Welland unable to put a foot wrong; on the next day the boot was on the other foot.

Today’s deal was just one instance of that. Their opponents even managed to locate the correct eight-card fit on what appeared to be a straight toss-up as to whether game or slam might be better — not to mention in which suit one should come to rest.

In the other room, where Rees Milner and Hemant Lall had somewhat pessimistically decided to come to rest in four hearts, they had hopes of gain when all the key suits split so badly.

However, Sjoert Brink and Mikhail Krasnosselski avoided the first hurdle when they landed in six spades, not six hearts, and overcame the second hurdle on opening lead. Either minor-suit lead takes the entry out of dummy prematurely, but you can hardly blame Sabine Auken for leading her singleton heart. Declarer won, tested trumps, then tested hearts, finding the doubly bad news. Then he went to the club ace, played the heart ace, ruffed out the hearts, cashed the last top trump from hand, then ruffed a club to dummy.

East could overruff, but then was endplayed; he had to lead diamonds back into dummy’s tenace. So the swing was 13 IMPs to Russia instead of the same number the other way.


Your partner cannot hold spades, or he would have bid the suit at his first turn. This sequence (sometimes referred to as "the impossible spade bid" should suggest a good raise to three hearts, and your aces and 6-4 pattern more than make up for your weak trump spots. Jump to four hearts now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 6 5 3
 A 8 7 6 5 3
 A J
♣ A
South West North East
1 Pass 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 15th, 2014

Minorities… are almost always in the right.

Revd. Sydney Smith


East North
East-West ♠ A 8 7
 9 8 7 6 5
 Q 10 2
♣ A 7
West East
♠ J 10 9 6 5 4 3
 K Q 10 4
 —
♣ J 3
♠ K Q 2
 2
 A J 8 7 5 4 3
♣ 10 6
South
♠ —
 A J 3
 K 9 6
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 2
South West North East
1
2♣ 2♠ 3♣ 4♠
5♣ Dbl. All pass  

K

The NEC trophy normally held in February, took place last year in April, so that the international field could then play a week later in the Yeh Bros tournament at the same venue.

In the final of the NEC event, Mikhail Krasnosselski for the winners made a very nice play here. He reached five clubs doubled, and after the lead of the heart king, he knew that diamonds rated to be 7-0.

One reasonable plan now would be to cash two rounds of clubs ending in dummy, and take the spade ace to discard a heart loser. Then he would lead a diamond to the nine, and hope the defenders could not engineer a diamond ruff. This line works today, but would fail if South were 6-4-0-3, perhaps somewhat more likely than his actual hand, given the auction. Krasnosselski found a better solution: He won the heart ace, ran five trumps, then led a diamond to the queen and ace. That forced East to win and return a diamond or spade to dummy, letting declarer discard one heart loser and then take the diamond finesse.

In the other room four spades had gone down one, when North did not raise clubs and South could not bid on to the five-level on his own, so Russia gained 10 IMPs. Credit Sjoert Brink, North, for his three-club call here; raising two-level overcalls encourages partner when he has bid with a good suit (and will teach him to have one next time if he has come in with an insufficient excuse).


In this sequence the two-club call should be forcing, suggesting some kind of real extra values though not necessarily a heart fit. Whatever partner has, you can show your hand by jumping to three diamonds, suggesting a real fit for diamonds, together with extras in the context of being a passed hand, and leave the rest to him.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 8 7
 9 8 7 6 5
 Q 10 2
♣ A 7
South West North East
Pass 1♣ 1 Pass
1 Pass 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 14th, 2014

I waited and waited, and when no message came, I knew it must have been from you.

Ashleigh Brilliant


West North
East-West ♠ J 9
 Q 9 3
 A Q 7 6 4 3
♣ A 10
West East
♠ A K 10 6
 10 6
 10 9
♣ 8 7 6 5 3
♠ 7 5
 J 7 5 4 2
 K 8 5
♣ K Q 2
South
♠ Q 8 4 3 2
 A K 8
 J 2
♣ J 9 4
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

♣7

The NEC tournament in Yokohama is now one of the strongest and best established invitational team events in the world. After an initial Swiss format, the top eight teams go through to a knockout phase. Today's deal (and indeed all this week's deals) comes from the later stages of last April's event.

Both Wests in our featured match led a club against three no-trump. David Bakhshi led the seven, and East won cheaply and continued the suit. Declarer won in dummy perforce (Bakhshi helpfully following with the eight to suggest spade values whereas his opposite number was not so generous). Both declarers now led a low diamond to the jack and a diamond back to the queen.

The unsuccessful defender — East — now shifted to a heart (perhaps playing partner for the spade ace and heart king) and declarer claimed 600, while Bakhshi’s partner ,David Gold, unblocked his club honor, on which his partner played his highest missing club spot, then shifted to spades for three down.

Gold’s defense was right in theory as well as in practice, but Bakhshi’s suit-preference signal at trick two had made his partner’s life far easier. The general rule is that when a defender has a choice of irrelevant small cards or when he knows that his partner knows exactly what his holding is, he should try to give his partner a suit-preference signal, as here. In virtually every deal the defenders have a chance to signal suit-preference — even if in practice they rarely do so.


Your hand does not suggest the opponents will have a source of tricks in a side suit, but there may well be some merit in stopping a crossruff, since that is surely the opponents' most likely source of tricks. Lead a trump, on the assumption that your partner is very unlikely to have a finessible trump honor.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 7 6 5
 Q 10 2
 7
♣ Q 9 8 7 3
South West North East
1
Pass 3 Dbl. Pass
3♠ Pass Pass 4
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 13th, 2014

I'm weighing up several choices of leading styles. What is your view on leading from three, four or five small — and do circumstances alter cases as to what to lead?

Mini-Max, Riverside, Calif.

I believe that one should lead low from three or four small if partner might read you for a doubleton, but top if you have bid the suit or shown support for partner in that suit. I am not a fan of leading second-highest against suit contracts, though I might do that at no-trump if I had a second suit which partner might want to shift to. From almost any five-card suit I would lead fourth highest, unless my partner knows my length already.

As dealer I passed with ♠ K-6-5-2,  4-3,  K-7-6-5, ♣ K-Q-4. My LHO also passed, and my partner opened the bidding with one heart. I responded one no-trump. My partner passed and I made 11 tricks when my partner came down with five solid hearts, the spade ace and four diamonds to the queen. She said I should have bid more, but I do not know what I could have bid. Any thoughts?

At a Loss, Durango, Colo.

Every call was right up to a point. Your pass and partner’s one-heart call look right. Two no-trump by you would maybe now have been artificial, so your call of one no-trump is clearly right. But now your partner should bid two diamonds, and when you raise, she can rebid three no-trump. One should only pass one no-trump with a balanced 12-14 and no side four-card suit.

I would like your views on how I should have described my hand here. I held ♠ A-K-Q-5-2,  10-3,  —, ♣ A-K-Q-10-8-4. Is it right to open one club or two clubs — or even one spade? My partner held a 1-5-6-1 pattern with six hearts to the K-Q-J and five diamonds to the jack, with the singleton club jack. How should we get to the best contract (and what is it?).

None But the Brave, Ketchikan, Alaska.

Put me down firmly as a one-club bidder. I get to jump to two spades next (one club never gets passed out) and can then show my full hand when I rebid spades. As to the best contract; six clubs is down on a trump lead, while in six hearts the defenders do best to lead a trump and duck it — maybe not so easy to do.

I've been told that the best way to deal with intervention over my partner's one-no-trump opening is to use Mirror Doubles. Do you recommend them, or are they just a fad? And is there a better treatment you could suggest?

Grace Notes, Doylestown, Pa.

When opponents intervene over one no-trump with a natural or artificial call, then if you play transfers, a Mirror Double conventionally means that you would have made the call that they just did. All other transfers remain in place. This approach gives up on being able to play negative doubles over intervention. I prefer to use negative doubles (without transfers) of all intervention of two diamonds or higher, though you can play that transfers do apply after an overcall of two clubs.

I was involved in a highly competitive auction where we ended up playing five hearts doubled and making. One opponent remarked that I had been walking the dog — and I did not know if this was a compliment or an insult. Please let me know if I should have thanked him or slapped him!

Peke Condition, Willoughby, Ohio

Walking the dog is a lot easier to describe after the event than to recognize at the time. When one player realizes that his side has a big fit but wants to buy the contract as low as possible, he can occasionally make a deliberate underbid at his first turn, then try to buy the auction by bidding up the auction slowly. If you can do it, it is always very satisfying.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 12th, 2014

People say that life is the thing, but I prefer reading.

Logan Pearsall Smith


South North
Both ♠ K J 10 8 4
 A 3
 K 10 4
♣ 9 6 3
West East
♠ 7 3
 Q J 10 9
 A Q 2
♣ A Q J 2
♠ 2
 8 6 5 2
 J 8 7 6 3
♣ 10 7 5
South
♠ A Q 9 6 5
 K 7 4
 9 5
♣ K 8 4
South West North East
1♠ Dbl. 3 NT* Pass
4♠ All pass    

*Balanced spade raise.

Q

By reading, and by learning from other people's mistakes, the expert can sometimes get the play right in a position he has not actually encountered before. Today's deal provides such an example, which comes from the final of the 1986 Australian Interstate Championships. Against four spades West led the heart queen, and declarer took it with dummy's ace to try to camouflage the position as best he could, while East discouraged. Now declarer came to hand, drawing just one round of trumps, then led a diamond. Put yourself in West's shoes: Would you win the diamond ace, or would you duck?

When you’ve made your decision, compare what happened at the table. West knew that his side had no tricks coming in the majors, and that he needed his partner to have the diamond jack — on the bidding there was no chance that he could hold the club king. So on the first round of diamonds West contributed the queen and dummy the king. On the diamond continuation, East rose with the jack and put the club 10 on the table. Curtains for declarer!

As you can see, if West ducks the first diamond, he can subsequently be endplayed in diamonds to lead clubs. And if he goes up with the ace, he can later be thrown in with a heart (declarer pitching a club from dummy on the third heart) to lead clubs, again after the trumps and diamonds have been stripped off.


Your partner's jump to four hearts is a splinter bid, agreeing spades and showing short hearts. You would like to bid Blackwood — but how do you know partner has a club control? Best now is to jump to five spades, which focuses on control in the danger suit, clubs. Partner will bid slam with second-round control or better, and pass without a control.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K J 10 8 4
 A 3
 K 10 4
♣ 9 6 3
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1♠ 2♣ 4 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].