June 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
In a deal you analyzed, the key suit was ♠ A-K-J-3-2 in dummy opposite a small doubleton, with no side-entry to the long suit. The suggested line for four tricks was to duck the first spade, then play the ace and king. This wins on all 3-3 breaks as well as picking up a doubleton queen, and you indicate that this is the best line. How does that compare with ducking the first trick, then finessing the jack on the second round?
Plan B, Newark, Calif.
Your line loses to all distributions with the spade queen over the jack. It also takes only three tricks when there are five or six cards to the queen onside. That comes to winning chances of about 42 percent. I believe my proposed line works out at just over 50 percent.
How would you respond in the following auction? I was dealt ♠ 9-4-3, ♥ K-10-3, ♦ K-10-9-3, ♣ Q-9-2, and heard my RHO open three hearts with neither side vulnerable. This was passed around to my partner, who doubled. What do you think of the options of passing, bidding four diamonds, and responding three no-trump?
Chase, Little Rock, Ark.
Both passing and bidding three no-trump could work out beautifully on the right day — but both are significant gambles. Equally, a bid of four diamonds leaves our side in no man's land: We could be too high or not high enough. Put me down as a gambler in three no-trump. However, with a side-suit doubleton, my heart 10 might make me think more seriously about passing.
What are the merits of using the response of one no-trump to one club as 8-10 points rather than more wide-ranging? What are the drawbacks to this approach? Do they outweigh the positives?
Balancing Act, Winston-Salem, N.C.
|
The merits of the strong one-no-trump response have decreased recently, since nowadays opener rarely has a semibalanced hand in the 15-17 range. (You might already have opened one no-trump!). Thus, opener tends to have either too little to bid again, or so much that he knows it is right to bid again whatever the range of the response. Also it is not attractive to have to distort hands in the 6-7 range by inventing a one-diamond response, so I am not a fan of this method.
What precisely is a Lightner double? And does it apply only to doubles of slams?
Tony the Tiger, Atlanta, Ga.
Theodore Lightner devised the idea that a double of a slam by the hand not on lead should call for an unusual lead — typically either with a void or two tricks in dummy's first-bid suit. These days, the idea that a hand that has bid or overcalled can call for a different lead with a double of a game is also becoming more prevalent — especially against no-trump games.
In an unopposed sequence, my partner opened one club and I held ♠ Q-7-5-3, ♥ 3, ♦ A-10-9-5-3, ♣ A-J-4. Since I thought I had an opening hand, I reversed, initially responding one diamond rather than one spade. My partner bid one no-trump, and I saw my plan through by bidding two spades, then raised my partner's three-spade bid to four. Alas, my partner thought I had five spades and had raised me with three trumps, so we suffered a defeat. But was I wrong in my general plan?
Sinking Fast, Pueblo, Colo.
Your call was quite reasonable, since you certainly had something like an opening bid. Make the club jack the 10 and I would bid one spade. On your actual auction, your partner would typically bid two no-trump with only three spades here. But of course she can raise diamonds or emphasize good clubs or hearts if she has a skewed honor structure.
|
June 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Sometimes, you have to look back in order to understand the things that lie ahead.
Yvonne Woon
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 8 7 2
♥ Q 9 6 3 2
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ 5 4
♦ Q 8 4
♣ 10 8 7 4 |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A J 9 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ A K J 10 8
♦ 9 7 2
♣ K Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
♣7
Some might consider driving this hand to game, some would invite game, some would say it was worth a splinter raise to four clubs — showing short clubs and spade fit. I fall into the middle ground: I'm going to go to game here, but a splinter jump seems excessive with such feeble hearts. I'll settle for a call of four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 7 2
♥ Q 9 6 3 2
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
From my tribe I take nothing. I am the maker of my own fortune.
Tecumseh
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A K Q 3 2
♣ K Q 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ K Q 9 8 7 6
♦ 8 7 5
♣ — |
♠ 10 9
♥ 5 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K 7 3 2
♥ A J 10
♦ J 4
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
3♥* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
*Short hearts, club fit
♥K
It would be pardonable to jump to three clubs, driving to game, and planning to bid three no-trump if your partner bids a red suit next. But that is excessive when your partner's response has made your hand worse. A simple call of two clubs, planning to bid again at your next chance, is far more disciplined. Had your partner responded one spade, a jump to three clubs would have been fine.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A K Q 3 2
♣ K Q 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The height of cleverness is to be able to conceal it.
Duc de La Rochefoucauld
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 4 3
♥ 6 5 2
♦ A 10 2
♣ K 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ Q 9 7 4
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 9 7 4 |
♠ K 5
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ K Q 9 7
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 8
♥ A K
♦ J 6 5 4
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦8
Yes, your partner's pass suggests a minimum opening bid, but are you going to allow the opponents to steal from you? Double them and expect to beat them comfortably. I would lead a top diamond, not the spade king, since this is certainly an auction where East might have passed initially with spade length.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ K Q 9 7
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time … and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.
William S. Burroughs
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 10 9 8
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 7 6 5
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4
♥ K Q J 9 4 2
♦ A Q 8 4
♣ 6 |
♠ Q 7 6 5
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ 2
♣ 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 8
♦ K 3
♣ K J 10 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
| 4♣ |
4♥ |
5♣ |
All pass |
♥K
Since three clubs set up a game-force, your partner should simply have raised clubs or rebid hearts if that was practical. His jump to four no-trump should be quantitative (suggesting a balanced 17-19 or so). With decent controls and a respectable source of tricks, this hand looks as if it is worth six no-trump now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 8
♦ K 3
♣ K J 10 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
2♦ |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Necessity is the mistress and guardian of nature.
Leonardo da Vinci
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 6
♥ A K J 3
♦ A J 8 4
♣ J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ 7 5 2
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ Q 10 9 3
♥ 8 6 4
♦ K Q 10
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ J 5
♥ 7 5 2
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠2
You showed extras (in shape or high-cards or both) when you doubled two clubs, and your partner, who did not have enough to act initially, took a minimum action. Though you have a nice hand, the fact that you are balanced and have all the high cards lying over you, argues for caution. I would pass now, and would only bid three hearts if my club five were the spade five.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 6
♥ A K J 3
♦ A J 8 4
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I'll be with you in the squeezing of a lemon.
Oliver Goldsmith
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ A 10 6
♦ K 6
♣ A K Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6
♥ Q 9 5 3
♦ Q J 9 8 7 4
♣ 7 |
♠ A 9 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 8 7 4
♥ K J 7
♦ 2
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Invitational with five spades, unbalanced
♣7
When you know that suits are not behaving for declarer, you should aim to make a passive lead. Here, trumps are breaking badly, and it is unlikely that declarer can set up dummy's diamonds. A spade is your best shot. My preference would be the seven if playing fourth-highest leads, and second from bad suits.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
June 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
If my partner and I have agreed to play that an opening two-bid means something that we alert our opponents to. Shouldn't this be acceptable to our opponents without the rolling of eyes and the questioning of my loyalty to my country?
Free Bird, Palm Springs, Calif.
My wishy-washy answer is: yes and no. Destructive tools (e.g., a one-spade overcall shows 13 cards nonvulnerable vs. vulnerable) get in the opponents' way and there is no great defense against them. Not everyone agrees. In some countries (for example, Australia) you can do what you like. Even Forcing Pass systems are allowed in some places. But I'd ban destructive methods that you can't defend against easily in normal club play. Arguably, though, at the top level anything goes.
Nonvulnerable at Teams I picked up ♠ K-J-10-7-5-3, ♥ A-Q, ♦ Q-5, ♣ 10-8-3. I opened one spade and was raised to two spades. Was I wrong to try for game by bidding three spades?-My partner told me that I was being too-optimistic.
Moon Spinner, Tioga, N.D.
You could certainly argue that you made the right bid for the wrong reason. Subject to your having any special agreement with your current partner, the reraise should be a blocking bid, not a game invitation. With game interest, you would bid a new suit as a help-suit try, while keeping three spades as semipre-emptive (shutting the opponents out).
I found myself in the middle of a bitter disagreement between my current and ex-partner on the meaning of a reopening call of two no-trump, when one of a suit is passed around to the player in fourth chair. Third parties consulted offered ideas that ranged from a two-suiter, weak or strong, to a balanced hand, and other options too bizarre to mention!
Plebiscite, Springfield, Mass.
|
I say that there is just one right answer here. The bid shows approximately a two-no-trump opening bid, say 19-21 points. With a two-suiter, bid one of the suits, make a Michaels Cue-bid, or pass if your hand is weak enough to make you think the opponents may have missed something.
I was last to speak, with ♠ Q-5, ♥ Q-J-9-7-3, ♦ A-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and heard my LHO bid one spade and my RHO bid one no-trump, forcing. I realize that I'm not quite worth a bid of two hearts, but I also thought that if I didn't act now, I'd have to bid over two spades. That seemed more dangerous than acting now. Was I out of line? As it turned out, bidding was not the right thing to do.
Soupy Sue, Raleigh, N.C.
I hate to be shut out, but I'd pass initially and bid only if my LHO bid two of a minor and this was passed around to me. Otherwise, I'd sell out; color me yellow if you must. The opponents frequently do not have a real fit here, and can double at will.
Is there such a thing as an obvious suit-preference position? Or are there general rules to follow about helping partner out?
Galley Slave, Staten Island, N.Y.
Suit-preference situations principally occur where partner is about to gain or retain the lead and will need to know which suit to switch to. This assumes that a continuation of that suit is illogical. But when you are giving a ruff or are wanting to indicate the need for a ruff, the same rules apply. Far more complex is the idea that when you have already signaled attitude, your second card may be high or low signalinging your preference for one of the other suits. Finally, when declarer is drawing trump, some people use their spot cards in trump to give a suit-preference signal.
|
June 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Curtsy while you're thinking what to say. It saves time
Lewis Carroll
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 8 7 5
♥ K
♦ A J
♣ A Q J 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 5
♦ K 10 9 6 5
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 6 4 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 3 2
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Opinions will be sharply divided here on whether you should sit for a double of one spade if your partner makes that call. I say no; and if you agree, you are better off bidding two diamonds right now — suggesting a minimum shapely hand. If you pass and pull the double on the next round, that would show a better hand in high-card terms.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It was beautiful and simple as all truly great swindles are.
O. Henry
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ 5 4
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3 |
♠ 10 8
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 6 3
♥ A 8 3 2
♦ Q 8
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
If you believe, as I do, that two-level overcalls are not to be taken lightly, especially facing a passed partner, then a simple bid of three hearts does not do justice to this hand. You should bid four hearts, since you were planning to show a limit raise had East not stolen your bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal saw West lead the club seven against six hearts (third from an even number, low from an odd number), and declarer discarded a diamond from the dummy. Plan the defense.
It might look easy for East to win the club ace and shift to a heart, but East paused to reflect on why declarer had chosen to discard, apparently giving him a free trick.
Clearly, dummy had great trumps and controls, but was short of fillers. Declarer’s cue-bid of four spades indicated he surely had short spades, and if he had the diamond queen in addition to that, he would surely have ruffed the first trick and led toward the diamond queen after drawing trump as an easy route to 12 tricks. Therefore, West must have the diamond queen — in which case it was almost guaranteed that declarer had the missing high honors in clubs. West had led from a doubleton club, or third from a three- or four-card suit, the former situation being nearly hopeless for the defense, since declarer could then probably crossruff 12 tricks.
East also realized that if his partner had 10-third or -fourth of clubs, he should not win the club ace or he could count declarer’s 12 tricks — two aces, two high clubs, five trump tricks in his hand, plus three ruffs in dummy. So he put in his club jack at the first trick, and declarer could win cheaply, but was left with two diamond losers he could not avoid.