June 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I'll be with you in the squeezing of a lemon.
Oliver Goldsmith
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ A 10 6
♦ K 6
♣ A K Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6
♥ Q 9 5 3
♦ Q J 9 8 7 4
♣ 7 |
♠ A 9 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 8 7 4
♥ K J 7
♦ 2
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Invitational with five spades, unbalanced
♣7
When you know that suits are not behaving for declarer, you should aim to make a passive lead. Here, trumps are breaking badly, and it is unlikely that declarer can set up dummy's diamonds. A spade is your best shot. My preference would be the seven if playing fourth-highest leads, and second from bad suits.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
June 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
If my partner and I have agreed to play that an opening two-bid means something that we alert our opponents to. Shouldn't this be acceptable to our opponents without the rolling of eyes and the questioning of my loyalty to my country?
Free Bird, Palm Springs, Calif.
My wishy-washy answer is: yes and no. Destructive tools (e.g., a one-spade overcall shows 13 cards nonvulnerable vs. vulnerable) get in the opponents' way and there is no great defense against them. Not everyone agrees. In some countries (for example, Australia) you can do what you like. Even Forcing Pass systems are allowed in some places. But I'd ban destructive methods that you can't defend against easily in normal club play. Arguably, though, at the top level anything goes.
Nonvulnerable at Teams I picked up ♠ K-J-10-7-5-3, ♥ A-Q, ♦ Q-5, ♣ 10-8-3. I opened one spade and was raised to two spades. Was I wrong to try for game by bidding three spades?-My partner told me that I was being too-optimistic.
Moon Spinner, Tioga, N.D.
You could certainly argue that you made the right bid for the wrong reason. Subject to your having any special agreement with your current partner, the reraise should be a blocking bid, not a game invitation. With game interest, you would bid a new suit as a help-suit try, while keeping three spades as semipre-emptive (shutting the opponents out).
I found myself in the middle of a bitter disagreement between my current and ex-partner on the meaning of a reopening call of two no-trump, when one of a suit is passed around to the player in fourth chair. Third parties consulted offered ideas that ranged from a two-suiter, weak or strong, to a balanced hand, and other options too bizarre to mention!
Plebiscite, Springfield, Mass.
|
I say that there is just one right answer here. The bid shows approximately a two-no-trump opening bid, say 19-21 points. With a two-suiter, bid one of the suits, make a Michaels Cue-bid, or pass if your hand is weak enough to make you think the opponents may have missed something.
I was last to speak, with ♠ Q-5, ♥ Q-J-9-7-3, ♦ A-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and heard my LHO bid one spade and my RHO bid one no-trump, forcing. I realize that I'm not quite worth a bid of two hearts, but I also thought that if I didn't act now, I'd have to bid over two spades. That seemed more dangerous than acting now. Was I out of line? As it turned out, bidding was not the right thing to do.
Soupy Sue, Raleigh, N.C.
I hate to be shut out, but I'd pass initially and bid only if my LHO bid two of a minor and this was passed around to me. Otherwise, I'd sell out; color me yellow if you must. The opponents frequently do not have a real fit here, and can double at will.
Is there such a thing as an obvious suit-preference position? Or are there general rules to follow about helping partner out?
Galley Slave, Staten Island, N.Y.
Suit-preference situations principally occur where partner is about to gain or retain the lead and will need to know which suit to switch to. This assumes that a continuation of that suit is illogical. But when you are giving a ruff or are wanting to indicate the need for a ruff, the same rules apply. Far more complex is the idea that when you have already signaled attitude, your second card may be high or low signalinging your preference for one of the other suits. Finally, when declarer is drawing trump, some people use their spot cards in trump to give a suit-preference signal.
|
June 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Curtsy while you're thinking what to say. It saves time
Lewis Carroll
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 8 7 5
♥ K
♦ A J
♣ A Q J 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 5
♦ K 10 9 6 5
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 6 4 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 3 2
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Opinions will be sharply divided here on whether you should sit for a double of one spade if your partner makes that call. I say no; and if you agree, you are better off bidding two diamonds right now — suggesting a minimum shapely hand. If you pass and pull the double on the next round, that would show a better hand in high-card terms.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It was beautiful and simple as all truly great swindles are.
O. Henry
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ 5 4
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3 |
♠ 10 8
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 6 3
♥ A 8 3 2
♦ Q 8
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
If you believe, as I do, that two-level overcalls are not to be taken lightly, especially facing a passed partner, then a simple bid of three hearts does not do justice to this hand. You should bid four hearts, since you were planning to show a limit raise had East not stolen your bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
But far more numerous was the herd of such Who think too little and who talk too much.
John Dryden
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ A J 8 6 4 2
♣ J 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q
♥ Q 10 4
♦ K Q 10 7 5 3
♣ A Q |
♠ 8
♥ 9 8 7 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ 10 9 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 6 5 4
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦K
You are far too good to pass now, but you do have a choice of calls. The question is whether to bid no-trump yourself (and if so, at which level), or to cue-bid three clubs and then follow up with a call of three no-trump to express doubt. Since three no-trump will surely play better from your partner's hand, I'd go for the cue-bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 6 5 4
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
I can't play bridge. I don't play tennis. All those things that people learn, and I admire, there hasn't seemed time for. But what there is time for is looking out the window.
Alice Munro
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 6
♥ K 9
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ J 10 |
♠ J 3 2
♥ J 2
♦ A 10 9 8 6
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 7 5 4
♥ A 8 6
♦ —
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Although it might be right to pass (your LHO could have a powerhouse and have missed game), the odds favor reopening the bidding. You have a simple choice: One no-trump shows a balanced 12-15 points, not the 15-17 points it would show in direct seat, while double is takeout. I'd go for the first option since I have a heart stopper that I think requires my hand to be declarer whether we end at a suit or no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ K 9
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking.
Albert Einstein
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 10 7
♥ A Q
♦ 10 9 8 6 4
♣ K 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ J 9 8 2
♦ 5 3
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
♠ 9 6 4 3
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A J 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ K Q 7
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♣10
Two diamonds is a Michaels cue-bid, showing 5-5 in the majors, suggesting a hand in the range of 9-13, the hand strength depending a little on the vulnerability. With nearly all your values in the majors, you have enough to invite game — after all, facing A-Q-fifth of spades and K-J-fifth of hearts, you have a decent play for game. So bid three spades and let partner make the final decision.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7
♥ A Q
♦ 10 9 8 6 4
♣ K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Youth will be served, every dog has his day, and mine has been a fine one.
George Borrow
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 10 2
♥ A K 6
♦ J 7 5
♣ 8 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 5 4
♥ Q 10 4
♦ K 10 4 3
♣ K J |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ 7 5 2
♦ A 8
♣ A Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Tempting as it is to lead the singleton in partner's suit, you have a natural trump trick and really do not need a ruff. If you have listened carefully to the auction, it is more likely that you have the heart ace and king to cash, to go with your near-certain spade trick. Even if partner has the heart queen, not the ace, a heart lead will surely be best.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ K J 6 4
♦ 10
♣ 8 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♦ |
4♠ |
| Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
| Pass |
5♠ |
All pass |
|
June 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
When no suit has been agreed and there is the possibility of a small slam, what is the best meaning to attach to a call of four no-trump? I thought an ace-asking bid could only be used if a fit has been found. Or is it for straight aces?
Star Watcher, Grand Forks, N.D.
When you are investigating a slam at no-trump, four no-trump is not normally played as Blackwood, but is instead used as a quantitative bid, asking partner to bid on if maximum and pass if minimum. The logic of this is that even if you hold the requisite number of aces needed for a slam, it is the combined high-card points that really matters at no-trump.
I was not sure what to rebid when holding ♠ Q-6, ♥ A-J, ♦ 9-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-6-3-2. I opened one club, heard a one-spade overcall, over which my partner bid two hearts. Can you compare the merits of rebidding two no-trump with such a weak stopper vs. raising hearts or repeating clubs?
Pick-Me-Up, Pottsville, Pa.
I think the simple raise to three hearts is best, your support equating to a three-card holding, in that it allows your partner to explore for no-trump with a cue-bid of three spades, getting you to three no-trump the right way up. Repeating the clubs is also sensible enough. I'm not brave enough to rebid no-trump without a nudge from my partner.
I had heard that some of the world's leading financiers play bridge. Is this true? And if so, do any of them play in the major events?
Star Hunter, Houston, Texas
|
Bill Gates plays occasionally in national events, while two of Bear Stearns' former senior executives, Jimmy Cayne and Warren Spector, are keen and expert players. Finally, Warren Buffett is a highly enthusiastic player, who frequently participates in Omaha regional events. Nick Nickell is the strongest and most successful of the chief executives.
Can the unusual no-trump be used after opponents have opened one no-trump? I thought it was only after an opening of one of a suit by the opposition.
The Unusual Suspect, Madison, Wis.
It makes sense for the call of two no-trump to be assigned some artificial meaning over a no-trump opening, whatever the range, since you hardly need it as natural. It used to be played to show a game-forcing two-suiter, with any two suits. However, many people these days play it to show the minors, and have other systemic bids to show the remaining two-suiters.
We play the fourth-suit as forcing to game, but until yesterday had never discussed how opener should bid when fourth suit has been doubled. Our sequence began 1 ♦ – 1 ♠ – 2 ♣ – 2 ♥ – (Dbl.). Does redouble now promise a stop, or show real length?
Number Cruncher, Memphis, Miss.
Redouble here should be an attempt to play — suggesting three cards to an honor, or a four-card suit. Bidding two no-trump might show a very strong doubleton such as ace-king or ace-queen. Playing this way lets you pass with a less clear-cut action, and wait for partner to make his natural call or redouble — which would also be a suggestion of a place to play.
|
May 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You have no control over what the other guy does. You only have control over what you do.
A.J. Kitt
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 8 3
♥ A 5 4 2
♦ J 9 8
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 4
♥ K Q 9
♦ 6 5 4
♣ K 9 5 3 |
♠ J 6 5
♥ 8 7 3
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ A 3 2
♣ J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*12-14
♠10
Your partner must have a powerhouse (though at the moment you do not know if it is based on diamond support). Your first priority would be to bid three no-trump if you could. Since you cannot, and have already denied four spades, you can bid three spades now, suggesting honor-third in that suit. Partner will tell you where he is headed at his next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ 8 7 3
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When there is a long solid suit in dummy — or even one that looks as if it will set up easily — it often pays to grab whatever tricks might be available to the defense before they disappear.
Today’s deal cropped up in the European Champions Cup of 2007. Against four spades, West led his singleton club, won in dummy. Then declarer called for the trump two, to the three, jack and queen. Seeking to put his partner on lead for the club ruff, West continued with the diamond queen. Dummy played low, as did East. A second diamond went to the king and ace and was ruffed by South, who proceeded to knock out the trump ace. Now East’s club return was too late. West was fresh out of trump, and South’s third heart departed on dummy’s fifth club.
At the second table, the play to the first two tricks replicated those at the other table. But when West, Albert Faigenbaum, returned the diamond queen at trick three and declarer called for dummy’s six, Michel Bessis rose with the ace and delivered the club ruff that set the contract. He had noted the danger of dummy’s clubs and also took into consideration the lead itself. Surely a diamond lead, from a suit headed by the queen and jack would have been preferable, unless West’s club lead was a singleton.
Incidentally, should West have shifted to a low diamond at trick three to avoid this particular dilemma for East? I think so.