Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 26th, 2014

I'll be with you in the squeezing of a lemon.

Oliver Goldsmith


North North
North-South ♠ 10 5 2
♥ A 10 6
♦ K 6
♣ A K Q J 6
West East
♠ Q 6
♥ Q 9 5 3
♦ Q J 9 8 7 4
♣ 7
♠ A 9 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ 10 8 2
South
♠ K J 8 7 4
♥ K J 7
♦ 2
♣ 9 5 4 3
South West North East
1 NT Pass
2♣ Pass 2♦ Pass
2♠* Pass 4♠ All pass

*Invitational with five spades, unbalanced

♣7

When there is a long solid suit in dummy — or even one that looks as if it will set up easily — it often pays to grab whatever tricks might be available to the defense before they disappear.

Today’s deal cropped up in the European Champions Cup of 2007. Against four spades, West led his singleton club, won in dummy. Then declarer called for the trump two, to the three, jack and queen. Seeking to put his partner on lead for the club ruff, West continued with the diamond queen. Dummy played low, as did East. A second diamond went to the king and ace and was ruffed by South, who proceeded to knock out the trump ace. Now East’s club return was too late. West was fresh out of trump, and South’s third heart departed on dummy’s fifth club.

At the second table, the play to the first two tricks replicated those at the other table. But when West, Albert Faigenbaum, returned the diamond queen at trick three and declarer called for dummy’s six, Michel Bessis rose with the ace and delivered the club ruff that set the contract. He had noted the danger of dummy’s clubs and also took into consideration the lead itself. Surely a diamond lead, from a suit headed by the queen and jack would have been preferable, unless West’s club lead was a singleton.

Incidentally, should West have shifted to a low diamond at trick three to avoid this particular dilemma for East? I think so.


When you know that suits are not behaving for declarer, you should aim to make a passive lead. Here, trumps are breaking badly, and it is unlikely that declarer can set up dummy's diamonds. A spade is your best shot. My preference would be the seven if playing fourth-highest leads, and second from bad suits.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ 3
South West North East
1♥
Pass 2♦ Pass 2♥
Pass 4♥ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 25th, 2014

If my partner and I have agreed to play that an opening two-bid means something that we alert our opponents to. Shouldn't this be acceptable to our opponents without the rolling of eyes and the questioning of my loyalty to my country?

Free Bird, Palm Springs, Calif.

My wishy-washy answer is: yes and no. Destructive tools (e.g., a one-spade overcall shows 13 cards nonvulnerable vs. vulnerable) get in the opponents' way and there is no great defense against them. Not everyone agrees. In some countries (for example, Australia) you can do what you like. Even Forcing Pass systems are allowed in some places. But I'd ban destructive methods that you can't defend against easily in normal club play. Arguably, though, at the top level anything goes.

Nonvulnerable at Teams I picked up ♠ K-J-10-7-5-3, ♥ A-Q, ♦ Q-5, ♣ 10-8-3. I opened one spade and was raised to two spades. Was I wrong to try for game by bidding three spades?-My partner told me that I was being too-optimistic.

Moon Spinner, Tioga, N.D.

You could certainly argue that you made the right bid for the wrong reason. Subject to your having any special agreement with your current partner, the reraise should be a blocking bid, not a game invitation. With game interest, you would bid a new suit as a help-suit try, while keeping three spades as semipre-emptive (shutting the opponents out).

I found myself in the middle of a bitter disagreement between my current and ex-partner on the meaning of a reopening call of two no-trump, when one of a suit is passed around to the player in fourth chair. Third parties consulted offered ideas that ranged from a two-suiter, weak or strong, to a balanced hand, and other options too bizarre to mention!

Plebiscite, Springfield, Mass.

I say that there is just one right answer here. The bid shows approximately a two-no-trump opening bid, say 19-21 points. With a two-suiter, bid one of the suits, make a Michaels Cue-bid, or pass if your hand is weak enough to make you think the opponents may have missed something.

I was last to speak, with ♠ Q-5, ♥ Q-J-9-7-3, ♦ A-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and heard my LHO bid one spade and my RHO bid one no-trump, forcing. I realize that I'm not quite worth a bid of two hearts, but I also thought that if I didn't act now, I'd have to bid over two spades. That seemed more dangerous than acting now. Was I out of line? As it turned out, bidding was not the right thing to do.

Soupy Sue, Raleigh, N.C.

I hate to be shut out, but I'd pass initially and bid only if my LHO bid two of a minor and this was passed around to me. Otherwise, I'd sell out; color me yellow if you must. The opponents frequently do not have a real fit here, and can double at will.

Is there such a thing as an obvious suit-preference position? Or are there general rules to follow about helping partner out?

Galley Slave, Staten Island, N.Y.

Suit-preference situations principally occur where partner is about to gain or retain the lead and will need to know which suit to switch to. This assumes that a continuation of that suit is illogical. But when you are giving a ruff or are wanting to indicate the need for a ruff, the same rules apply. Far more complex is the idea that when you have already signaled attitude, your second card may be high or low signalinging your preference for one of the other suits. Finally, when declarer is drawing trump, some people use their spot cards in trump to give a suit-preference signal.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 24th, 2014

Curtsy while you're thinking what to say. It saves time

Lewis Carroll


West North
East-West ♠ Q 8 7 5
♥ K
♦ A J
♣ A Q J 8 6 4
West East
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 5
♦ K 10 9 6 5
♣ 7 5
♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2
South
♠ A K J 6 4 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 3 2
♣ 10 3
South West North East
Pass 1♣ 1♥
1♠ 4♥ 4♠ Pass
Pass 5♥ Pass Pass
5♠ All pass    

♥Q

Both sides' double-fit will encourage plenty of overbidding. But at this vulnerability East-West rate not to go beyond the five-level, while North has rather too many losers to risk Blackwood at his second turn. Mind you, six spades depends only on a successful club finesse, and if North bids on to five spades over five hearts, South might well raise to six.

The next question is what West should lead at trick one. A case could be made for a diamond; however, most Wests will lead a heart — but which? I like the idea of advancing the queen, retaining the lead while you plan what to do when the dummy comes down. Of course, things do not work out as planned, and it is East who has to lead to the second trick.

East will know that two more tricks are needed to defeat the contract. Since the club suit will yield one trick at most and West’s lead surely denies a club void, a trick will have to come from the trump or diamond suit. To set up his side’s potential diamond trick, East must play his partner for the diamond king and shift to that suit. If you found the answer, well done!

But that is not the full story. To avoid being thrown-in with the second diamond after the major suits have been eliminated, East must switch to the diamond queen at trick two, or he will be fatally endplayed with a diamond at the end of trick five.


Opinions will be sharply divided here on whether you should sit for a double of one spade if your partner makes that call. I say no; and if you agree, you are better off bidding two diamonds right now — suggesting a minimum shapely hand. If you pass and pull the double on the next round, that would show a better hand in high-card terms.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10
♥ A J 10 6 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ K 9 2
South West North East
1♥ Dbl. Rdbl. 1♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 23rd, 2014

It was beautiful and simple as all truly great swindles are.

O. Henry


South North
Both ♠ A 9 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ 5 4
♣ 9 8 7 4
West East
♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3
♠ 10 8
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ 10 6 5 2
South
♠ K Q J 6 3
♥ A 8 3 2
♦ Q 8
♣ A Q
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2♠ Pass
4♠ All pass    

♥J

The general rule about winning or ducking tricks is that when in doubt ,you should win the trick if you can. But there is a whole class of positions where ducking in a suit in which you do have the top cards has a much more devious purpose than generating extra tricks from that suit alone. Your duck is strategic, in that it relates to the play in the side suits, and not just in the suit itself.

Imagine that on today’s deal you play in four spades, that being the only suit bid, and West leads the heart jack. If you take this and draw trump before conceding a heart, East will surely win the third heart and should find the diamond switch. This will be enough to beat the contract when the club finesse loses.

But say that you duck the first trick and follow with the eight, trying to make East’s spot card look as large as possible. West will surely feel happy about continuing with the heart 10, won’t he? That will give you time to develop a heart, on which you will discard one of dummy’s losing diamonds.

Do you blame West for not shifting to a diamond? It is hard to be too critical, since you might hold a 5-4-3-1 pattern with your actual honors — except that you have the diamond ace, not the heart ace. Now a diamond switch would be the only way to let the contract through.


If you believe, as I do, that two-level overcalls are not to be taken lightly, especially facing a passed partner, then a simple bid of three hearts does not do justice to this hand. You should bid four hearts, since you were planning to show a limit raise had East not stolen your bid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ K J 9 7 3
♣ K J 3
South West North East
Pass 1♠ 2♥ 2♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 22nd, 2014

But far more numerous was the herd of such
Who think too little and who talk too much.

John Dryden


East North
Both ♠ 10 9 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ A J 8 6 4 2
♣ J 8
West East
♠ K Q
♥ Q 10 4
♦ K Q 10 7 5 3
♣ A Q
♠ 8
♥ 9 8 7 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ 10 9 7 6 4 3
South
♠ A J 6 5 4
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9
♣ K 5 2
South West North East
Pass
1♠ 2♦ 4♠ All pass

♦K

In today's deal, West may be strong but his honors are not put together well. While he has a maximum for a bid of two diamonds, a two-level overcall should show a decent hand. When the auction gets back to him at four spades, it would be very dangerous to act again.

Having said that, East has the right shape if not the high cards to consider bidding four no-trump over four spades to show the unbid suits.

Assuming West leads the diamond king against four spades, many declarers will put up the ace. East will ruff, and play a club through for a quick one down. South will claim to be unlucky, and probably no one will say anything more (unless North is the pedantic sort). However, a nitpicker in the North seat will tell declarer that it was ‘obvious’ that diamonds were 6-0; and even if they were not, what harm could it do to duck the first trick? Even if East had a diamond all along, with West on lead at the end of trick one, the best he can do is cash the club ace before dummy’s clubs go away.

Is that all there is to it? Not at all! East might leap to South’s defense and tell North that it would not have done declarer any good to duck the first trick, since East was planning to ruff his partner’s winner and find the club shift. After that, no one should have anything more to say.


You are far too good to pass now, but you do have a choice of calls. The question is whether to bid no-trump yourself (and if so, at which level), or to cue-bid three clubs and then follow up with a call of three no-trump to express doubt. Since three no-trump will surely play better from your partner's hand, I'd go for the cue-bid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 6 5 4
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9
♣ K 5 2
South West North East
1♣
1♠ Pass 2♦ Pass
2♥ Pass 2♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 21st, 2014

I can't play bridge. I don't play tennis. All those things that people learn, and I admire, there hasn't seemed time for. But what there is time for is looking out the window.

Alice Munro


North North
Both ♠ K 10 6
♥ K 9
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K 9 6 5
West East
♠ 8
♥ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ J 10
♠ J 3 2
♥ J 2
♦ A 10 9 8 6
♣ Q 7 3
South
♠ A Q 9 7 5 4
♥ A 8 6
♦ —
♣ A 8 4 2
South West North East
1♦ Pass
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2♣ Pass 2♠ Pass
4♦ Pass 4♥ Pass
6♠ All pass    

♣J

There was an element of Ping-Pong in today's deal, which cropped up in the later stages of a recent U.S. Teams Trials.

South’s two-club bid on the second round was a relay, setting up a forcing sequence. When South emphasized his spades rather than introducing his clubs, the second-best slam was reached. Six spades is not a hopeless spot, but it looks doomed because of the 6-2 heart break.

However, when West led the club jack, declarer won in dummy with the king. He then cashed the spade ace and king before leading a diamond from the dummy. East went in with the ace (perhaps expecting that West would have led a diamond from his actual holding) and declarer ruffed.

Now declarer had 12 tricks; but when he crossed to dummy’s heart king and played the diamond king, he did not yet know that clubs were breaking. So he discarded a club from his hand. Now when his attempt to ruff a heart in dummy was overruffed, he had to go one down.

Do you see where declarer went wrong? It was an error to play the diamond king when he did; he should have played the club ace first. If both opponents follow, he draws the last trump and concedes a club, later crossing to dummy with a club to discard a heart on the diamond king. However, if someone shows out on the club, he plays the heart ace and ruffs a heart before pitching a club on the diamond king.


Although it might be right to pass (your LHO could have a powerhouse and have missed game), the odds favor reopening the bidding. You have a simple choice: One no-trump shows a balanced 12-15 points, not the 15-17 points it would show in direct seat, while double is takeout. I'd go for the first option since I have a heart stopper that I think requires my hand to be declarer whether we end at a suit or no-trump.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 6
♥ K 9
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K 9 6 5
South West North East
1♥ Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 20th, 2014

The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking.

Albert Einstein


South North
North-South ♠ J 10 7
♥ A Q
♦ 10 9 8 6 4
♣ K 6 2
West East
♠ 8 5 2
♥ J 9 8 2
♦ 5 3
♣ 10 9 8 7
♠ 9 6 4 3
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A J 2
♣ 5 4 3
South
♠ A K Q
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ K Q 7
♣ A Q J
South West North East
2♣ Pass 2♦ Pass
2 NT Pass 6 NT All pass

♣10

Staying in control of dummy's entries would have been the key to success on today's deal. North correctly did not introduce his diamond suit at his first turn, and saw no reason to look any further than the no-trump slam when South showed a balanced hand.

Against six no-trump, West led the club 10, and declarer appreciated that he needed to bring in the diamond suit to make the slam. Of course, had dummy’s redundant spade jack been the diamond jack, the slam would have been foolproof.

South won the club lead with dummy’s king, then led a low diamond to his king. Returning to dummy in hearts, declarer played a second diamond. East smartly rose with the ace to return a heart, taking out dummy’s last entry. Although the diamonds could be set up after the queen dropped the jack, declarer needed a helicopter to reach the rest of the suit. One more option remained — the heart king might have dropped the jack — but when that failed, so did the slam.

South had allowed East to disrupt dummy’s entries. See the difference if declarer wins the first club in hand. Next comes a heart to dummy, for a diamond to the king. When that holds, a second heart to dummy is followed by another diamond, and now East is helpless. If he rises with the ace and returns a club, declarer wins in hand, cashes the diamond queen, collecting the jack, then a club to dummy’s king reunites him with the rest of the diamond suit.


Two diamonds is a Michaels cue-bid, showing 5-5 in the majors, suggesting a hand in the range of 9-13, the hand strength depending a little on the vulnerability. With nearly all your values in the majors, you have enough to invite game — after all, facing A-Q-fifth of spades and K-J-fifth of hearts, you have a decent play for game. So bid three spades and let partner make the final decision.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 10 7
♥ A Q
♦ 10 9 8 6 4
♣ K 6 2
South West North East
1♦ 2♦ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 19th, 2014

Youth will be served, every dog has his day, and mine has been a fine one.

George Borrow


West North
North-South ♠ A 10 2
♥ A K 6
♦ J 7 5
♣ 8 7 6 5
West East
♠ K 7 5 4
♥ Q 10 4
♦ K 10 4 3
♣ K J
♠ 9 8
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ 9 3 2
South
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ 7 5 2
♦ A 8
♣ A Q 10 4
South West North East
1♦ Dbl. Pass
2♦ Pass 3♣ Pass
3 NT All pass    

♦3

Today's deal comes from last year's world junior championships, featuring interesting problems in both rooms from the match between England and China. In the first room West opened one diamond and North made a light takeout double. East raised to two diamonds and South doubled for takeout. When North bid three clubs, South continued with three spades, and North raised to game. This was a poor contract, which duly went one down on a diamond lead.

In the other room, West also opened one diamond, but here the English pair handled the bidding better, and Tom Paske (South) became declarer in three no-trump on the auction shown.

On a diamond lead, declarer put up dummy’s jack and East covered with the queen. Declarer ducked the first diamond and won the next round, the opponents’ carding suggesting that diamonds were 4-4. Given East’s silence in the auction, declarer laid down the club ace, and when the jack dropped, he could drive out the king and later take the spade finesse. Three spades, three clubs, two hearts and one diamond added up to nine tricks and 12 IMPs to England.

In isolation, the right play in clubs for three tricks is to take two finesses, but in light of the bidding, South’s play was clearly right since West had opened the bidding and East had already shown up with the diamond queen. With only 15 points missing, it was almost certain that West had the club king.


Tempting as it is to lead the singleton in partner's suit, you have a natural trump trick and really do not need a ruff. If you have listened carefully to the auction, it is more likely that you have the heart ace and king to cash, to go with your near-certain spade trick. Even if partner has the heart queen, not the ace, a heart lead will surely be best.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10 2
♥ K J 6 4
♦ 10
♣ 8 7 6 5 3
South West North East
2♦ 4♠
Pass 5♣ Pass 5♦
Pass 5♠ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 18th, 2014

When no suit has been agreed and there is the possibility of a small slam, what is the best meaning to attach to a call of four no-trump? I thought an ace-asking bid could only be used if a fit has been found. Or is it for straight aces?

Star Watcher, Grand Forks, N.D.

When you are investigating a slam at no-trump, four no-trump is not normally played as Blackwood, but is instead used as a quantitative bid, asking partner to bid on if maximum and pass if minimum. The logic of this is that even if you hold the requisite number of aces needed for a slam, it is the combined high-card points that really matters at no-trump.

I was not sure what to rebid when holding ♠ Q-6, ♥ A-J, ♦ 9-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-6-3-2. I opened one club, heard a one-spade overcall, over which my partner bid two hearts. Can you compare the merits of rebidding two no-trump with such a weak stopper vs. raising hearts or repeating clubs?

Pick-Me-Up, Pottsville, Pa.

I think the simple raise to three hearts is best, your support equating to a three-card holding, in that it allows your partner to explore for no-trump with a cue-bid of three spades, getting you to three no-trump the right way up. Repeating the clubs is also sensible enough. I'm not brave enough to rebid no-trump without a nudge from my partner.

I had heard that some of the world's leading financiers play bridge. Is this true? And if so, do any of them play in the major events?

Star Hunter, Houston, Texas

Bill Gates plays occasionally in national events, while two of Bear Stearns' former senior executives, Jimmy Cayne and Warren Spector, are keen and expert players. Finally, Warren Buffett is a highly enthusiastic player, who frequently participates in Omaha regional events. Nick Nickell is the strongest and most successful of the chief executives.

Can the unusual no-trump be used after opponents have opened one no-trump? I thought it was only after an opening of one of a suit by the opposition.

The Unusual Suspect, Madison, Wis.

It makes sense for the call of two no-trump to be assigned some artificial meaning over a no-trump opening, whatever the range, since you hardly need it as natural. It used to be played to show a game-forcing two-suiter, with any two suits. However, many people these days play it to show the minors, and have other systemic bids to show the remaining two-suiters.

We play the fourth-suit as forcing to game, but until yesterday had never discussed how opener should bid when fourth suit has been doubled. Our sequence began 1 ♦ – 1 ♠ – 2 ♣ – 2 ♥ – (Dbl.). Does redouble now promise a stop, or show real length?

Number Cruncher, Memphis, Miss.

Redouble here should be an attempt to play — suggesting three cards to an honor, or a four-card suit. Bidding two no-trump might show a very strong doubleton such as ace-king or ace-queen. Playing this way lets you pass with a less clear-cut action, and wait for partner to make his natural call or redouble — which would also be a suggestion of a place to play.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 17th, 2014

You have no control over what the other guy does. You only have control over what you do.

A.J. Kitt


South North
North-South ♠ K 8 3
♥ A 5 4 2
♦ J 9 8
♣ A Q 6
West East
♠ 10 9 4
♥ K Q 9
♦ 6 5 4
♣ K 9 5 3
♠ J 6 5
♥ 8 7 3
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ 10 7 2
South
♠ A Q 7 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ A 3 2
♣ J 8 4
South West North East
1 NT* Pass 3 NT All pass

*12-14

♠10

In this deal from the Yeh Bros. there were two leads to trouble South's three no-trump. Tony Nunn of Australia led a top spade against Hiroki Kaku's three no-trump. Declarer won in dummy to lead a heart to the jack and queen. Nunn shifted to a diamond to the nine and Sartaj Hans' 10, ducked by declarer, who also ducked the next diamond.

Now a spade came back, so declarer ran the spade and diamond winners. This forced West to discard a club, after which declarer played three rounds of clubs to throw West in, forced to lead hearts into the tenace. (Note that had Hans tried the ruse of false-carding with the diamond queen on the first round of the suit, declarer might have won the trick — and been sunk without a trace).

At another table, where North was declarer in three no-trump, Peter Newell of New Zealand led the diamond queen, ducked all around. After a spade shift, declarer Shen Jiaxing won in dummy and finessed in clubs, then led a heart to the 10 and queen. Martin Reid as West returned a diamond, and declarer took it, cashed all the spades, (East discarding a heart, West a club) then exited with a third diamond to East.

If Newell cashed his last diamond, declarer would discard a heart from dummy and catch West in a simple squeeze. If East did not cash his diamond, but exited with either a heart or a club, Reid would be thrown in with that suit a trick later, to concede an extra trick in the other suit.


Your partner must have a powerhouse (though at the moment you do not know if it is based on diamond support). Your first priority would be to bid three no-trump if you could. Since you cannot, and have already denied four spades, you can bid three spades now, suggesting honor-third in that suit. Partner will tell you where he is headed at his next turn.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 6 5
♥ 8 7 3
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ 10 7 2
South West North East
1♥
Pass 2♥ Dbl. Pass
3♦ Pass 3♥ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].