May 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
One must be something to be able to do something.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 6 2
♥ Q 6
♦ K J 7 4
♣ A K 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ K 2
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
♠ K 9 5 4 3
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ 10 9
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥* |
| Dbl.** |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
**Takeout; hearts and a minor
♠7
The range for a call of one no-trump goes from 8-13 points, though you may upgrade a minimum opening bid to a call of two no-trump with a decent stopper and a source of tricks. This hand is emphatically one that you should not upgrade. You can see that it will prove hard to develop the spade suit, and your lack of intermediates argues for caution. One no-trump is more than enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Beauty in things exists in the mind which contemplates them.
David Hume
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 7 5
♥ 10 9 3
♦ K Q 2
♣ A 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 8 6 4
♥ K 8 4
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 10 |
♠ 2
♥ Q 7 5 2
♦ 10 6 5 3
♣ J 9 7 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ A J 6
♦ A J 8
♣ Q 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
For better or worse, I would play pass here as prepared to play two hearts redoubled, so I must bid with this hand. However, rather than pick a minor and guess unluckily, the best option is to bid two no-trump, which is a way to show a two-suited hand in clubs and diamonds since you would bid spades if you could, or a minor if you had a single-suit. So this asks partner to take his pick of the minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ Q 7 5 2
♦ 10 6 5 3
♣ J 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
There are more ways of killing a cat than choking it with cream.
Charles Kingsley
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 9 8
♥ K 9 8 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ J 7 6 5 4
♦ 7 6
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ Q 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 3
♥ A 10
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♣4
On this auction, the two- heart call shows no extras at all. Your partner would make this call on any hand with four hearts, even the barest minimum opening. You should bid four hearts — but it should not surprise you that your partner is more likely to go down in game than make 12 tricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 8
♥ K 9 8 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The play, I remember, pleased not the million; 'twas caviar to the general.
William Shakespeare
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 2
♥ K J 5
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6
♥ 9 7 6 4 3 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ J 8 |
♠ 10 8
♥ A 8
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ A K Q 9 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 5 4 3
♥ Q 10
♦ A 5
♣ 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT* |
| Pass |
3♦ |
3♠ |
All pass |
*Minors
♣J
Had the opponents not overcalled, you would have bid two clubs yourself, as Drury, to show a maximum pass with heart support. Now your choice is to make a simple raise to two hearts, or to make a cue-bid raise to three clubs to show a limit raise in hearts. Facing a third-in-hand opening bid, the former course is wiser. Partner can always make a try, knowing you may have pulled in a notch.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 2
♥ K J 5
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
Am I not a man and a brother?
Josiah Wedgwood
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 9 8 7 4 3
♥ 8
♦ J 9 3
♣ A K 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 2
♥ A 9 6
♦ A K 6 5
♣ 9 8 2 |
♠ J 10 5
♥ 10 7
♦ 8 7 4
♣ Q J 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ K Q J 5 4 3 2
♦ Q 10 2
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl |
2♣ |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Both at pairs and at teams on "blind" auctions — where the opponents have reached no-trump without bidding any suits — your objective is to lead from a long suit of five cards or more. But when you are balanced, you should try not to give away tricks. Therefore, I much prefer leading the heart 10, not a fourth-highest spade (and leading from ace-fourth at no-trump is always a very ugly lead).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 4
♥ 10 9 7
♦ J 9 3
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 11th, 2014
|
Are most serious events played as pairs scoring, or teams? And are there any rubber bridge events played at a national level?
Backing Group, Greenville, S.C.
In all of the national tournaments (which are played three times a year), the major event is scored using one form or another of teams scoring. That is not to downplay pairs scoring, but I think both at national and world level the winners of the big teams events are rated more highly than the winners of the pairs games. There are really no rubber bridge or individual events left anymore.
I was fourth to speak with ♠ A-5, ♥ Q-9-4-3, ♦ Q-9-5-2, ♣ K-8-2, and heard one spade to my left, passed around to me. I felt obliged to double, and when my LHO bid two spades, my partner doubled, which I assumed was for penalty. The result was nine tricks for declarer. My partner thought I needed more to double one spade, in fourth position. Was it I or he who was out of line — he had a 3-3-4-3 10-count?
High Noon, Great Falls, Mont.
It is normal to play a balancing call in fourth seat as potentially a king lighter than the same action in second seat. So your double looks normal enough. It was once common to use your partner's double of a rebid suit as penalties. I still do.
One could argue that the responsive double gains on frequency grounds, even if the size of the swing might be larger with the penalty double. But I’ll stick with the penalty double interpretation.
What is your opinion about the technical merits of coding the leads of jacks and 10s against no-trump, whereby the opening leads of jacks deny a higher honor, while 10s are from jack-10 or 10-nine, in each case promising a higher honor? My instinct is that this gives away as much as it benefits. What do you think?
Mister Cellophane, Seneca, S.C.
|
My experience mirrors your gut reaction. At trick one, the 'coded' 10s and jacks are very revealing. However if you really must play those methods, at least keep them for the middle of the hand, not trick one, at which point you should know enough about the hand to be aware when partner, not declarer, needs to know.
I passed in first chair with ♠ Q-10-7-4, ♥ K-J-3, ♦ 5-3-2, ♣ K-10-2, and I heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner doubled, and I responded one spade. My partner now raised to two spades. Does this show a good hand or is this just a courtesy raise?
Normal Business, Wichita Falls, Texas
Raising your partner in competition would not guarantee extras (your partner would bid two spades with a few extras or perfect shape even in a minimum hand). But if your LHO passes, as here, a raise by him should be real extras. Your hand would be just too good to pass now. I'd guess to bid three clubs as a game try.
How should one play the following double? I was in second seat with five spades, six points, and a balanced hand. At unfavorable vulnerability, I passed over my RHO's one-club bid. I heard five clubs to my left, and a double from partner. Is this penalty, takeout, or optional?
Piggy in the Middle, Spokane, Wash.
Your partner's double has to cover many hands that are too good to pass and have no other clear-cut action. If he bid a suit, it would have to show a good suit and strong distribution; otherwise, the action would be far too risky. Therefore, double covers all good hands that do not fall into this category. With your actual hand you should assume their contract is not making. Since you should only remove the double to what you believe is a making contract, passing looks right here.
|
May 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Our imagination is the only limit to what we can hope to have in the future.
Charles F. Kettering
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ A 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 10 9
♦ K J 10 6 3
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 8 2
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ Q 4
♣ 9 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ K
♦ A 9 8 7 5
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♠10
I take a relatively relaxed view about the suit quality required for a weak-two when nonvulnerable, though if vulnerable I like to have two of the top three honors. Having said that, ace-sixth is the worst possible holding for a weak-two (you have no tricks facing shortage but lots of defense). Meanwhile, your good spade suit is another red flag against pre-empting. Pass at any vulnerability.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ A 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ J 6 |
May 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Not by age but by capacity is wisdom acquired.
Plautus
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7
♥ A Q 10 9 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 3
♥ 8 7 5
♦ J 8 5 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ Q 6 5 4 2
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8
♥ —
♦ K Q 9 7
♣ A J 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥* |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥** |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*5 hearts and 4-plus in a minor, or 6 hearts with 10-14 points
**One-suiter with short spades
♦3
This auction suggests that your partner had a penalty double of one spade, probably with a six-card suit, and his failure to go past the two-level should indicate that he does not have enough to drive to game. I'd expect him to be in the range of 7-11 HCP, so I would pass, imagining that no game could be all that good for us.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A Q 10 9 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The arrogance of age must submit to be taught by youth.
Edmund Burke
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A 4 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 7 6 2
♦ A 5
♣ J 10 8 5 |
♠ 8
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ A 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ 5
♦ J 8 7 6
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Weak with spades and a minor
♥Q
I am not going to be rash enough to say that it will always work better to open one no-trump than one spade. That clearly isn't true. But what I will suggest is that 5-3-3-2 distribution represents a balanced hand, and that when in the range of 15-16, you should open one no-trump no matter what your five-carder — unless you have all your high cards in your five-card major and a three-card side-suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A 4 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 9 |
May 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Confidence is not a guarantee of success, but a pattern of thinking that will improve your likelihood of success, a tenacious search for ways to make things work.
John Eliot
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 8 7 4
♥ J 4 2
♦ A 6
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 7 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 5 2
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ 7 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
Though not worth a drive to game, you are worth at least one more call, since your partner's range is 6-10 HCP. While it is human nature to advance in spades, that would be impetuous, and unnecessary. Since you have already shown 5-4 in the majors, the best way to show your extra values is to bid two no-trump. That suggests this pattern, plus extra values. Let partner decide the level and strain now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 5 2
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ 7 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal from the match between Sweden and Italy in the Yeh Bros. Cup shows both sides using unconventional bidding methods. Antonio Sementa's double of the spade-showing one-heart call showed hearts and a minor. Had he simply held hearts, he would have bid two hearts. His partner Giorgio Duboin now drove to game, doubling for takeout at his next turn to speak, and then, when confident that he was facing short spades, forced his partner to pick a minor at the five-level.
Sementa received a spade lead against five diamonds, and took an uncharacteristically long time to play to trick two, seeing the problems with late entries to his own hand. Eventually, he led a trump to dummy to run the heart queen. West, Fredrik Nystrom, won and also took his time before playing ace and another diamond.
Declarer won this in hand, passed the club jack, covered all around, finessed in hearts, then set up the hearts by ruffing with dummy’s last trump. Now he ruffed a spade back to hand, cashed his long heart, and finally took the second club finesse for his 11th trick. Even the ranks of Tuscany could scarce forbear to cheer.
Yes, the cards did not lie unfavorably, but it was up to Sementa to take advantage of the position. In the other room South played four hearts on repeated spade leads, and the defenders could set up a force to defeat that contract.