May 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
I am little concerned with beauty or perfection. I don't care for the great centuries. All I care about is life, struggle, intensity. I am at ease in my generation.
Emile Zola
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 5
♥ Q J 6
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 7 3 2
♦ K J 7 5
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 4 2
♥ A 5
♦ 9 4
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Dbl. |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣* |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three keycards
♦2
I would sit for one no-trump doubled, since partner might well have run if he were weak and had a long suit (particularly if he was short in hearts). The danger with bidding two clubs is that the opponents may be able to take heart ruffs against that contract. And one no-trump is a level lower, after all.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ Q J 6
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
For ever most divinely in the wrong.
W.B. Yeats
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 8
♥ K 9 8
♦ A J 10 9
♣ A 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ —
♦ Q 8 7 6 4 3
♣ J 10 9 8 3 |
♠ J 9 7 3 2
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ K
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 4
♥ A Q 10 7 5
♦ 5 2
♣ K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣* |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Checkback Stayman
♣J
No lead looks very attractive. My best guess would be to lead a low club, thinking that declarer does not rate to have any honors in the suit, and partner will surely be able to work that out. But declarer might easily misguess if dummy has the king and jack — or he might not put up an unsupported king.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 4 2
♥ K 10 3
♦ J 9 8
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1 NT |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
Where do you stand on the issue of using the opening no-trump call with hand-patterns such as 5-4 in the minors? Does your holding in the majors influence that decision?
Red Brick, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Where you have an easy rebid (as with five diamonds and four clubs) your hand would have to be stacked in the majors to make an opening of one no-trump palatable. Conversely, where you have reversing pattern and 15-16 points (four diamonds and five clubs, or four hearts and a five-card minor) opening one no-trump may be the least lie.
If you were second to speak with: ♠ —, ♥ J-9-3, ♦ A-K-Q-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ A-10 how would you best describe it? I can see a case for opening the hand with a one-level call, a pre-empt or even a strong two.
Scatterbrain, Selma, Ala.
Few of us have a strong two diamond call in our armory any more. I would strongly vote against two clubs and a high preempt seems self-defeating. So put me down as a one diamond opener — I’ll be surprised if everyone passes…
My question revolves around bidding conventions. A local bridge instructor (but also many opponents at local bridge clubs) reacts with shock if a bid has an unusual conventional meaning. I am often told that a specific call “always means…” This invariably gets into a heated debate about conventions which sometimes drives me to want to give up bridge. Should bids always mean the same thing or can you play what you want?
Free Bird, Danville, Ill.
|
I'm sorry to hear this. But in constructive or unopposed auctions, and especially on the later rounds of bidding, you should be allowed to play anything you like; you are not imposing on your opponents if you do this. I will deal with the rest of your question later this month.
I was fourth to speak with: ♠ A-Q-7-4-3, ♥ J-3, ♦ A-Q-9, ♣ A-J-10, and opened one spade. I heard my partner respond two spades and wanted to decide which game to get to. Should I jump to three no-trump and rely on my partner to convert back to four spades if appropriate?
Fred Flintstone, Holland, Mich.
Better is to make a game-try of three clubs, planning to pass a three-spade or three no-trump response, or to bid three no-trump over a three heart call from your partner. Over a three diamond response it feels right to bid four spades.
I know it may be hard to generalize, but in a no-trump contract, when would it be right for a partner not to return partner's opening lead suit and instead to switch to another suit? I find when in doubt it is better to continue the suit led.
Robert the Robot, Harrisburg, Pa.
Sometimes the evidence tells us that a shift is likely to be right. You might have a very strong suit of your own, or a good suit with an outside entry. Alternatively, dummy may have a strong holding in partner's suit. Equally, the rule of 11 may tell you that declarer is either strong or long in the suit led. For example, say partner leads a two (fourth highest) and both you and dummy hold a doubleton. Now you know continuing this suit, will establish declarer's five-card suit.
|
May 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
We must accept life for what it actually is — a challenge to our very essence and quality without which we should never know of what stuff we are made, or grow to our full stature.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 8 6
♥ A K 9 8 7 2
♦ 8
♣ 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q
♣ A K J 9 4 2 |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ J 10 7 6 4
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4 3 2
♥ 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Even by a passed hand a call of two diamonds, the fourth suit, would be forcing for one round. But that call would be unwise, and a bid of two no-trump would be suicidal. This leaves you three unpalatable choices. Rebidding two spades might leave you in a 5-1 fit, and giving preference to two hearts rates to do the same. So what else can you do but pass and hope partner has five clubs?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 4 3 2
♥ 3
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| South |
North |
| None |
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K J
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 7 6
♥ 7 6 3
♦ 10 7 3
♣ 2 |
♠ J 4
♥ 4
♦ 9 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 5
♥ Q J 9 8 5
♦ A Q 8
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♠ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for a spade control
♥7
Since three hearts is best played as forcing and you have a little in hand, you are probably worth one slam-try, though you would not want to go past four hearts without some cooperation from your partner. A call of four diamonds simply shows a diamond control and will maybe let partner take over from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K J
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There will be … time for all the works and days of hands
That lift and drop a question on your plate.
T.S. Eliot
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 9 8
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q 4 3
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 9 4 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ K J 5 2 |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 10 8 6 3
♦ 10 8 2
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 6 5 3 2
♥ 7
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♥ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥2
Whatever your opinion is on the right minor suit to open with 4-4 in the minors in third seat (everyone has an opinion, but nobody agrees with anyone else), it is almost unarguable that you should bid the suit you most want partner to lead. Here, opening one diamond is sensible; bidding one club is masochistic, since if partner leads away from a club honor, he rates to lose your side a trick.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q 4 3
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Diseases desperate grown By desperate appliance are relieved Or not at all.
William Shakespeare
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 10 5
♥ J 9 6 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ K 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 3
♥ Q 10 5
♦ 10 8 7 2
♣ Q 7 2 |
♠ 9 8 2
♥ A K 7 3
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ 8 2
♦ A K 5
♣ A J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦2
This is a classic example of when to make a responsive double, suggesting four cards in both majors. The double is essentially for takeout, and this would apply if East had raised to three diamonds. But note that a double by South of a new suit by East would be penalty, not responsive. Here South will raise either major to three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 5
♥ J 9 6 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
To have begun is half the job: be bold and be sensible.
Horace
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 2
♥ A 9 6 5
♦ A Q 7 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8 5
♥ Q J 10 7 2
♦ 4
♣ J 5 |
♠ 9 7
♥ 4 3
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ Q 10 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K 6 4 3
♥ K 8
♦ K J 5 3
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠Q
You want to set hearts as trump, and the simple way to do that is to bid four hearts. But is that enough? With all four aces, you really have a slam-suitable hand if partner wants to cooperate. You don't have to go mad; simply bid four clubs — a cue-bid in support of the last suit, and let partner decide if he wants to go past four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 2
♥ A 9 6 5
♦ A Q 7 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Creativity comes from looking for the unexpected and stepping outside your own experience.
Masaru Ibuka
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 5
♥ Q 3
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ K Q 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ A K J 10 4 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ 9 6 |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ 9 6
♦ A 9 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 9 8 7
♥ 8 7 5
♦ —
♣ A J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
When in doubt, one could argue for a major-suit lead over a minor. Here though, with the spade builder in the form of the 10, spades are a more attractive lead. Switch the spades and the diamonds and this is really a toss-up as to what to do. I'd go for diamonds, I think.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ J 4 2
♦ K 9 5 2
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
May 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
Is it wrong to support partner's one-spade opening bid when you hold nothing but four spades to the queen and no other high-card points but a singleton heart? If so, how much more does one need to bid rather than pass?
New Broom, Tucson, Ariz.
This is more about tactics than best practice. I would never pass if nonvulnerable. (I might respond one no-trump if playing forcing no-trump, planning to rebid two spades to show a very weak hand with spades, or a moderate hand with a doubleton spade). If vulnerable, especially if facing a third- or fourth-hand opening, where the danger of the opponents' bidding game was less, passing is more attractive.
At favorable vulnerability I held ♠ A-10-8-5, ♥ A-K-7-4-3, ♦ K-Q, ♣ Q-4, and my partner opened one diamond. I bid one heart, then after a rebid of two clubs I used fourth suit and heard my partner rebid three clubs. Would you force to a slam now?
Forest Gump, Albany, Ga.
I'd bid four no-trump now, natural and quantitative, suggesting approximately this shape and feeling that I was at the top of my range. If I had the club 10, then my two working clubs and diamond honors would make it very close to a call of five no-trump to get my partner to pick a slam.
In a club game, my partner opened one heart and my RHO overcalled two clubs. Holding ♠ 5, ♥ Q-4, ♦ Q-7-6-5-3-2, ♣ K-J-9-4, was I strong enough to bid two diamonds and would that call be forcing?
Quad Wrangler, Vancouver, British Columbia
Two diamonds is forcing and guarantees at least invitational values. Some play you promise a second call; I don't. Even so, your hand is very borderline for this action, with likely wasted values in clubs on offense — but good on defense. I'd bid two diamonds with the diamond ace instead the queen, I think. Here I'd pass, prepared to defend, facing a balanced hand.
|
Say you are playing pairs. You open one diamond, then hear a pre-emptive jump to three hearts on your left, raised to four hearts. What is best current practice for the player in fourth seat, who might hold a strong balanced or unbalanced hand? Should you vary your approach depending on whether you are playing teams as opposed to pairs?
French Lessons, Riverside, Calif.
You should play a double for takeout, so a balanced hand with trump tricks may have to pass for fear partner will remove with shape. Note: a call of four no-trump would show diamonds with secondary clubs. I can't see a reason to change your basic approach according to the form of scoring, or vulnerability. But after such a double, a balanced weak hand opposite should pass and hope to defeat the game.
My partner threw me a curveball when he opened two spades, and after his LHO bid three hearts, passed back to him, he doubled. What should that call mean? Just for reference, what would a double mean if instead of passing, his RHO had raised to four hearts?
Loopy Lou, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
The first sequence, while unusual, is unambiguous. The double is clearly for takeout, with short hearts and a maximum — maybe six spades to the ace-jack and a side trick, with a singleton or void in hearts, at least three cards in each of the other two suits, prepared to defend if you have trump tricks. The second auction sounds like a Lightner double, with a void in a side-suit; your partner is hoping you can give him a ruff, and that then he can put you in again for a second ruff.
|
|
In today's deal the North-South bidding was no more than adequate, but it was South's play that left room for significant improvement.
At his final turn North might well have converted six spades to six no-trump to protect his diamond tenace. When West obediently led the diamond two, declarer optimistically inserted dummy’s queen, but of course the finesse lost. At this point East did well to return a diamond, removing an entry from the table, rather than the more obvious heart shift. After winning with the diamond ace, declarer tested the clubs by cashing the ace and king, then ruffed a club high. Since the queen had not appeared, all that was left was to cash the two top spades, ending in dummy, and fall back on the heart finesse. Down one.
Can you see a better approach to the play? Suppose that declarer simply plays low from dummy at trick one. East wins with his jack but clearly cannot return the suit without conceding the 12th trick. Say that he switches to a heart; South wins with his ace and follows with three rounds of clubs as before. Then comes the spade ace, and another spade to dummy’s king allows another club to be ruffed high. The key difference is that after South draws the last trump, the diamond ace is still in dummy as an entry to the long club.
Finally, I leave my resourceful readers to work out what might have happened if West had found the lead of the diamond 10.