April 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I'm weighing up several choices of leading styles. What is your view on leading from three, four or five small — and do circumstances alter cases as to what to lead?
Mini-Max, Riverside, Calif.
I believe that one should lead low from three or four small if partner might read you for a doubleton, but top if you have bid the suit or shown support for partner in that suit. I am not a fan of leading second-highest against suit contracts, though I might do that at no-trump if I had a second suit which partner might want to shift to. From almost any five-card suit I would lead fourth highest, unless my partner knows my length already.
As dealer I passed with ♠ K-6-5-2, ♥ 4-3, ♦ K-7-6-5, ♣ K-Q-4. My LHO also passed, and my partner opened the bidding with one heart. I responded one no-trump. My partner passed and I made 11 tricks when my partner came down with five solid hearts, the spade ace and four diamonds to the queen. She said I should have bid more, but I do not know what I could have bid. Any thoughts?
At a Loss, Durango, Colo.
Every call was right up to a point. Your pass and partner’s one-heart call look right. Two no-trump by you would maybe now have been artificial, so your call of one no-trump is clearly right. But now your partner should bid two diamonds, and when you raise, she can rebid three no-trump. One should only pass one no-trump with a balanced 12-14 and no side four-card suit.
I would like your views on how I should have described my hand here. I held ♠ A-K-Q-5-2, ♥ 10-3, ♦ —, ♣ A-K-Q-10-8-4. Is it right to open one club or two clubs — or even one spade? My partner held a 1-5-6-1 pattern with six hearts to the K-Q-J and five diamonds to the jack, with the singleton club jack. How should we get to the best contract (and what is it?).
None But the Brave, Ketchikan, Alaska.
|
Put me down firmly as a one-club bidder. I get to jump to two spades next (one club never gets passed out) and can then show my full hand when I rebid spades. As to the best contract; six clubs is down on a trump lead, while in six hearts the defenders do best to lead a trump and duck it — maybe not so easy to do.
I've been told that the best way to deal with intervention over my partner's one-no-trump opening is to use Mirror Doubles. Do you recommend them, or are they just a fad? And is there a better treatment you could suggest?
Grace Notes, Doylestown, Pa.
When opponents intervene over one no-trump with a natural or artificial call, then if you play transfers, a Mirror Double conventionally means that you would have made the call that they just did. All other transfers remain in place. This approach gives up on being able to play negative doubles over intervention. I prefer to use negative doubles (without transfers) of all intervention of two diamonds or higher, though you can play that transfers do apply after an overcall of two clubs.
I was involved in a highly competitive auction where we ended up playing five hearts doubled and making. One opponent remarked that I had been walking the dog — and I did not know if this was a compliment or an insult. Please let me know if I should have thanked him or slapped him!
Peke Condition, Willoughby, Ohio
Walking the dog is a lot easier to describe after the event than to recognize at the time. When one player realizes that his side has a big fit but wants to buy the contract as low as possible, he can occasionally make a deliberate underbid at his first turn, then try to buy the auction by bidding up the auction slowly. If you can do it, it is always very satisfying.
|
April 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
People say that life is the thing, but I prefer reading.
Logan Pearsall Smith
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 10 8 4
♥ A 3
♦ K 10 4
♣ 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ A Q 2
♣ A Q J 2 |
♠ 2
♥ 8 6 5 2
♦ J 8 7 6 3
♣ 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 6 5
♥ K 7 4
♦ 9 5
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
3 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced spade raise.
♥Q
Your partner's jump to four hearts is a splinter bid, agreeing spades and showing short hearts. You would like to bid Blackwood — but how do you know partner has a club control? Best now is to jump to five spades, which focuses on control in the danger suit, clubs. Partner will bid slam with second-round control or better, and pass without a control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 8 4
♥ A 3
♦ K 10 4
♣ 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
4♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
In faith and hope the world will disagree, But all mankind’s concern is charity.
Alexander Pope
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8 6 5
♥ 8 4 3
♦ 10 9 2
♣ A Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ K 7
♦ K 8 7 6
♣ K J 9 8 5 |
♠ 10 4
♥ A J 10 6
♦ Q 5 4
♣ 10 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 3
♥ Q 9 5 2
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
3♣ |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
On this sort of auction, I would always rather give preference to partner with a call of two clubs than bid one no-trump. In my book, my partner does not have to introduce spades with a 4-3-3-3 pattern; he can instead rebid one no-trump. We might miss the best partscore, but the limiting rebid will help us reach the best game or slam. At pairs, though, I might be tempted to respond one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4
♥ A J 10 6
♦ Q 5 4
♣ 10 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Only those who have patience to do simple things perfectly ever acquire the skill to do difficult things easily.
James J. Corbett
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 7 5 3
♥ K 2
♦ Q 6 5
♣ J 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 2
♥ A Q 6 4 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ 9 2 |
♠ 10 6 4
♥ 8 7 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ 10 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ J 8
♥ J 10 9
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ A K Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥4
Although you have no more than two likely tricks on defense, you have a hand where the opponents should not be making overtricks, and you would certainly not expect five spades to have any chance to make. So double, expecting that this will end the auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7 5 3
♥ K 2
♦ Q 6 5
♣ J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
5♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 21 Comments
You're a mouse studying to be a rat.
Wilson Mizner
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 9 4
♥ 7 2
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ A K Q 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6 5
♦ 6 5 3 2
♣ 9 7 5 3 2 |
♠ K 5 3
♥ A K Q 10 9 4
♦ 9 8
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 6 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ K J 4
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥6
There are some (not I) who would have opened this hand a strong no-trump. And equally, there are others who would now reverse into two diamonds at their second turn. I prefer to rebid clubs because I feel that a reverse — which would force club preference at the three-level — requires at least another working queen.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 4
♥ 7 2
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ A K Q 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The dwarf sees farther than the giant, when he has the giant's shoulder to mount on.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 4 3 2
♥ K 9 6
♦ 2
♣ A K 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9
♥ J 10 7
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ J 5 2 |
♠ J 8 6 5
♥ 4 3 2
♦ A K 8
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A Q 8 5
♦ Q J 9 6 3
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Your partner's double shows a maximum pass, and suggests a heart suit that is not good enough to bid, together with diamond tolerance. With four-card heart support, you should jump to three hearts, not so much because you think your side can make game but to take away bidding space from your opponents.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A Q 8 5
♦ Q J 9 6 3
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
John Wooden
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7
♥ 9 7
♦ A Q 10 9 6 4
♣ K Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 3 2
♥ K 10 8 5 2
♦ 2
♣ 9 3 |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ J 6
♦ J 7 5 3
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 4
♥ A Q 4 3
♦ K 8
♣ A J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
2♣* |
2♠** |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades and hearts
**Diamonds, GF
♠A
With the cards apparently lying badly for declarer, you might elect to go passive here with a club lead. I am not convinced about this. My instincts are to try to set up or cash diamond winners for our side before they go away on the clubs, one way or another.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7
♥ Q 10 3
♦ K 9 6 4
♣ 10 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
| Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 6th, 2014
|
My partner has suggested I play revolving discards (where a high card in one suit calls for the suit above, a low one for the suit below). Do you think that this system is compatible with suit-preference signals as played in the normal fashion?
Busy Lizzy, Rockford, Ill.
Your signaling method and your discarding method are not necessarily mutually exclusive — they do not have to be the same. I'm happy to play any system of discarding where I can call for one suit by discarding in one of the other suits; I find I throw fewer winners away as a consequence of that.
I was fourth to speak with ♠ Q, ♥ J-3, ♦ A-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ A-K-10-2, and opened one diamond. After partner responded one no-trump, it did not feel right to pass. But I felt I had too many choices, with bids at various levels in either minor. Even the possibility of raising no-trump did not seem outlandish.
Pick Six, Wausau, Wis.
Passing certainly does not seem right — the hand has potential for game in either minor, but even one one no-trump might go down on a bad day! I'd recommend a simple call of two clubs, intending to rebid three diamonds whether partner reverts to two diamonds, or raises to three clubs. Both sequences would sound like 6-4 in the minors with extra values.
I teach bridge, and I tell my students to respond in their longest suit if they can afford it. In your column you told players to respond one spade with the following hand if their partner opened one diamond: ♠ K-8-6-5, ♥ Q-4, ♦ K-5, ♣ K-9-6-5-4. If you are not playing two-over-one, I feel you can afford a two-club response, and whatever partner bids next, you should have no problems. What are your thoughts?
Lumberjack, Spokane, Wash.
|
You make a fair point. I think with one-bid hands you should bid a major if you can. What you do on game-forcing hands is normally to bid the long suits. It is with the in-between hands where you have to make a judgment call. If the major is weak, you might opt to introduce a longer minor first.
Why do you prefer the lead of the king from king-queen as well as from the ace-king? Does it not create some ambiguity when you have certain holdings that include the jack?
Justice League, San Antonio, Texas
I am someone who leads his fair share of unsupported aces and wants to know what partner's attitude is when he knows the king is missing. I admit that when you hold jack-third in response to a king lead and dummy has a relatively short holding without the queen or ace, you might not know how to signal. I will take that downside in exchange for more clarity elsewhere.
Say your LHO opened one diamond, and partner made a three-club overcall. What would you bid after your RHO made a negative double and you held ♠ 10-5, ♥ A-Q-9-4-3, ♦ 10-6-5, ♣ Q-4-3? The deal comes from a matchpoint pair event with your side at favorable vulnerability and with a cheap save in five clubs over four spades.
Nosey Parker, Spartanburg, S.C.
I would not bounce to five clubs immediately, but I would not necessarily recommend my solution to you until you had discussed this with your partner. I'd suggest that you bid three hearts, with the understanding that a new suit in response to a pre-emptive overcall is fit-showing in competition. It shows a hand with club tolerance or better and a desire for a heart lead. That should help partner decide whether to save and what to lead.
|
April 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There are men in the world who derive as stern an exaltation from the proximity of disaster and ruin, as others from success.
Winston Churchill
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 6 3
♦ A Q 8
♣ 8 6 4 3 |
♠ 9 6 5 4
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 5
♣ K Q 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 2
♥ K J 10 9 8 2
♦ K 7 4
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Stayman or a simple raise to three no-trump? The balanced shape argues against looking for a major-suit fit, and in the process giving away your shape to the opposition. In favor of investigation are the three small cards in two suits, either of which could be a fatal weakness at no-trump. Put me down for Stayman, but it is a close call. If you made the diamond six the jack, I might go the other way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Put none but Americans on guard tonight.
George Washington
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 4 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 2
♥ Q 10 9 6 2
♦ Q 10
♣ K 8 7 6 |
♠ 10 9 8 6
♥ 8
♦ K J 9 3
♣ J 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ A K J 7
♦ A 7 5 4 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
The response of two no-trump to a weak two-bid is a relay guaranteeing at least game-invitational values. So opener must drive to game, whatever your scheme of responses. Assuming you would rebid a feature if you had one, you must choose between a call of three no-trump, implying solid or semisolid spades, or a jump to four spades. I prefer the former action, since I have no side-suit shortage.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 4 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
By reading, and by learning from other people's mistakes, the expert can sometimes get the play right in a position he has not actually encountered before. Today's deal provides such an example, which comes from the final of the 1986 Australian Interstate Championships. Against four spades West led the heart queen, and declarer took it with dummy's ace to try to camouflage the position as best he could, while East discouraged. Now declarer came to hand, drawing just one round of trumps, then led a diamond. Put yourself in West's shoes: Would you win the diamond ace, or would you duck?
When you’ve made your decision, compare what happened at the table. West knew that his side had no tricks coming in the majors, and that he needed his partner to have the diamond jack — on the bidding there was no chance that he could hold the club king. So on the first round of diamonds West contributed the queen and dummy the king. On the diamond continuation, East rose with the jack and put the club 10 on the table. Curtains for declarer!
As you can see, if West ducks the first diamond, he can subsequently be endplayed in diamonds to lead clubs. And if he goes up with the ace, he can later be thrown in with a heart (declarer pitching a club from dummy on the third heart) to lead clubs, again after the trumps and diamonds have been stripped off.