April 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 6th, 2014
|
My partner has suggested I play revolving discards (where a high card in one suit calls for the suit above, a low one for the suit below). Do you think that this system is compatible with suit-preference signals as played in the normal fashion?
Busy Lizzy, Rockford, Ill.
Your signaling method and your discarding method are not necessarily mutually exclusive — they do not have to be the same. I'm happy to play any system of discarding where I can call for one suit by discarding in one of the other suits; I find I throw fewer winners away as a consequence of that.
I was fourth to speak with ♠ Q, ♥ J-3, ♦ A-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ A-K-10-2, and opened one diamond. After partner responded one no-trump, it did not feel right to pass. But I felt I had too many choices, with bids at various levels in either minor. Even the possibility of raising no-trump did not seem outlandish.
Pick Six, Wausau, Wis.
Passing certainly does not seem right — the hand has potential for game in either minor, but even one one no-trump might go down on a bad day! I'd recommend a simple call of two clubs, intending to rebid three diamonds whether partner reverts to two diamonds, or raises to three clubs. Both sequences would sound like 6-4 in the minors with extra values.
I teach bridge, and I tell my students to respond in their longest suit if they can afford it. In your column you told players to respond one spade with the following hand if their partner opened one diamond: ♠ K-8-6-5, ♥ Q-4, ♦ K-5, ♣ K-9-6-5-4. If you are not playing two-over-one, I feel you can afford a two-club response, and whatever partner bids next, you should have no problems. What are your thoughts?
Lumberjack, Spokane, Wash.
|
You make a fair point. I think with one-bid hands you should bid a major if you can. What you do on game-forcing hands is normally to bid the long suits. It is with the in-between hands where you have to make a judgment call. If the major is weak, you might opt to introduce a longer minor first.
Why do you prefer the lead of the king from king-queen as well as from the ace-king? Does it not create some ambiguity when you have certain holdings that include the jack?
Justice League, San Antonio, Texas
I am someone who leads his fair share of unsupported aces and wants to know what partner's attitude is when he knows the king is missing. I admit that when you hold jack-third in response to a king lead and dummy has a relatively short holding without the queen or ace, you might not know how to signal. I will take that downside in exchange for more clarity elsewhere.
Say your LHO opened one diamond, and partner made a three-club overcall. What would you bid after your RHO made a negative double and you held ♠ 10-5, ♥ A-Q-9-4-3, ♦ 10-6-5, ♣ Q-4-3? The deal comes from a matchpoint pair event with your side at favorable vulnerability and with a cheap save in five clubs over four spades.
Nosey Parker, Spartanburg, S.C.
I would not bounce to five clubs immediately, but I would not necessarily recommend my solution to you until you had discussed this with your partner. I'd suggest that you bid three hearts, with the understanding that a new suit in response to a pre-emptive overcall is fit-showing in competition. It shows a hand with club tolerance or better and a desire for a heart lead. That should help partner decide whether to save and what to lead.
|
April 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There are men in the world who derive as stern an exaltation from the proximity of disaster and ruin, as others from success.
Winston Churchill
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 6 3
♦ A Q 8
♣ 8 6 4 3 |
♠ 9 6 5 4
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 5
♣ K Q 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 2
♥ K J 10 9 8 2
♦ K 7 4
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Stayman or a simple raise to three no-trump? The balanced shape argues against looking for a major-suit fit, and in the process giving away your shape to the opposition. In favor of investigation are the three small cards in two suits, either of which could be a fatal weakness at no-trump. Put me down for Stayman, but it is a close call. If you made the diamond six the jack, I might go the other way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Put none but Americans on guard tonight.
George Washington
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 4 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 2
♥ Q 10 9 6 2
♦ Q 10
♣ K 8 7 6 |
♠ 10 9 8 6
♥ 8
♦ K J 9 3
♣ J 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ A K J 7
♦ A 7 5 4 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
The response of two no-trump to a weak two-bid is a relay guaranteeing at least game-invitational values. So opener must drive to game, whatever your scheme of responses. Assuming you would rebid a feature if you had one, you must choose between a call of three no-trump, implying solid or semisolid spades, or a jump to four spades. I prefer the former action, since I have no side-suit shortage.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 4 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There are times to stay put, and what you want will come to you, and there are times to go out into the world and find such a thing for yourself.
Lemony Snicket
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ 10 5 4
♣ A K J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 3
♥ 9 3
♦ A Q 3
♣ 9 7 5 |
♠ A J 6 4
♥ 10 4 2
♦ J 8 6 2
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A Q J 8 7
♦ K 9 7
♣ Q 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
3♠ |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
This is the same auction as in our featured deal, except that South is a passed hand. The choice is a two-spade cue-bid raise, or a fit-jump to three clubs, for which you would really need either a fifth club or a fourth heart. Without the club jack, a simple raise to two hearts would suffice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ 10 5 4
♣ A K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It Don't Mean a Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing.
Duke Ellington
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 6 5 3 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ 7 6 3
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4
♥ Q 10 9 6 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ A 5 3 |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ —
♦ A J 10 2
♣ K Q 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ J 7
♥ A K 7 5 4
♦ K 5 4
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
3♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣A
Facing a passed partner I would jump to three clubs to make my opponents' task of finding a fit more difficult. Somebody has quite a lot of hearts, and since my partner has already passed, I'm guessing it is West. Whether he will be happy to find a heart contract is more difficult to predict.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 8
♥ —
♦ A J 10 2
♣ K Q 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
In skating over thin ice, our safety is in our speed.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 3
♥ 10 8 6 5
♦ Q 9 7 5
♣ 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 2
♥ Q J 2
♦ 8 3 2
♣ K J |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ 9
♦ K J 10 6
♣ Q 9 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10
♥ A K 7 4 3
♦ A 4
♣ A 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠5
Unlike the sequence in today's featured deal, partner's delayed support of hearts strongly suggests only two or three hearts in a very minimum raise. If that is so, you should advance with caution. Here a bid of two no-trump conveys your values nicely and does not lock you into playing hearts. You have already shown your long suits; there is no need to repeat yourself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ A K 7 4 3
♦ A 4
♣ A 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
'The game,' he said, 'is never lost till it's won.'
George Crabbe
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 10 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ Q 7 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ K J 9
♦ J 8 5
♣ K 7 6 5 3 |
♠ 5 3
♥ Q 6 4 2
♦ A 9 4 3
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A 8 7
♦ K 10 6
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♣5
The lead of the spade ace may not cost, but it does not feel right to go after such a broken suit. (Declarer's spade losers will go away only if declarer can run clubs for discards.) A trump feels no safer, so I guess I'm forced to lead a low club, though I can't say I like it.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 6 3
♥ J 7
♦ A J 8
♣ Q 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
April 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
What does a transfer in response to an opening no-trump guarantee in terms of high cards? And how about a Stayman response?
Minnie Mouse, Woodland Hills, Calif.
A transfer shows five cards or more in the implied major, typically six in a minor. (If you don't play minor-suit transfers, ignore this clause!) But it guarantees absolutely NOTHING about high cards! Responder's plan should be to describe his range at the next turn — be it to play, invite to game, or drive to slam. Opener simply obeys the transfer whether he likes it or not, and awaits further information. Some play that Stayman always guarantees an invitation or better; I don't.
I held ♠ J-10-3, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ A-9-5, ♣ Q-10-3-2, and heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner bid one spade and the next hand bid three diamonds, weak. Should I have raised to three spades, or passed, or doubled?
Lumber Yard, Denver, Colo.
In competition one can be pushed to a single level higher than you intended to bid, but not two levels. Since you would happily have bid two spades over two diamonds, take the push to three spades. For the record, double here shows a good hand, primarily for takeout, perhaps a king better than your actual hand.
What sort of hand should I have expected from my partner when he passed over one diamond on his right, but then doubled when his LHO responded in spades and his RHO raised that suit?
Backed into a Corner, Franklin, Tenn.
|
Normally, the only hands you pass on initially, then double in a live auction like this (as opposed to an auction where you are balancing after two passes) are those where you are long in the opponents' first-bid suit, short in the suit they have bid and raised. Here a perfect hand would be a 1-4-4-4 shape with 13-plus HCP.
With both sides vulnerable I was dealt ♠ J-10-3, ♥ 5, ♦ A-10-8-6-4-3-2, ♣ Q-4, and elected to open a three-level pre-empt. My partner complained that I should have had a better suit. What do you think?
Frisky, Dover, Del.
Nonvulnerable in first or second seat, and in third seat at any vulnerability, bidding three diamonds seems right. Vulnerable in first seat one might open only two diamonds with such a flawed suit, and in second seat the weak-two seems clearly right (in fact passing would not be totally unreasonable there — though I must admit I am rarely that disciplined).
My partner had the following hand: ♠ K-Q-10-9, ♥ A-J-9-4-3, ♦ 6-5, ♣ 10-4. After three passes she also passed, giving us a below average in an otherwise really good session. Would you open this hand? Knowing the field was not too good, would it make a difference?
Mill Stone, Hoboken, N.J.
Yes I would open — though I might open one spade I admit, to facilitate the rebid. It is very close, but note that it is more tempting to open vulnerable than at favorable vulnerability. The logic is that partner rates to be the one who might pass the 11 count. When the opponents don't bid and are non-vulnerable, they rarely have even moderately good hands anymore.
|
April 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I try not to be surprised. Surprise is the public face of a mind that has been closed.
Bernard Beckett
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 5 3
♥ 10 8 6 2
♦ A 9
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9
♥ 9 7 5 4
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ A J 9 |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ A K Q J 3
♦ J 6 2
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 7 2
♥ —
♦ Q 7 5 3
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
2♦* |
Pass |
2♥ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*High-card heart raise to two hearts
♥7
You should not seriously consider passing here. Partner's reopening double suggests shortage and normal defense, but your weak trumps are not really enough to consider playing for penalties. The same hand with the club queen instead of the two might come closer. Bid two hearts now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 3
♥ 10 8 6 2
♦ A 9
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 28th, 2014
Our life is frittered away by detail… simplify, simplify.
Henry David Thoreau
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9
♥ 10 9 4
♦ A K 8
♣ K Q 10 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 5 3 2
♥ K J 2
♦ Q 7 2
♣ J 2 |
♠ K 7 6 4
♥ 7 6 3
♦ 10 6 5 4 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8
♥ A Q 8 5
♦ J 9
♣ A 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT** |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
*Clubs
**Short spades, without four hearts
♠Q
You cannot support spades or bid no-trump, so the choice is to temporize with a cuebid or to repeat clubs, or even to raise diamonds. I'd like a minor honor in hearts for the cuebid and raising diamonds should show four, so I'm forced to repeat clubs. At least the spots are good!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ 10 9 4
♦ A K 8
♣ K Q 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal demonstrates that one should always go for that slim extra chance. You never know when the card gods are going to reward you for digging around to find a way to overcome a bad break, or an unfriendly lie of the cards.
When you declare four hearts, the spade queen is led to the first trick. It seems that you must rely on the diamond ace being onside. Can you do better, though?
There is indeed an extra chance when the diamond ace is wrong, and this is that East holds either the club king-queen or a doubleton club honor. To prevent East from gaining the lead when he has both club honors, you must duck the opening lead in both hands — a strange-looking play but one that can hardly cost since you have plenty of other losers to discard on the spade winner. After winning the next spade in hand, cross to dummy by leading the heart jack to the queen, then playing the club two, intending to insert the jack.
East must therefore split his honors, and you take East’s queen with the ace, play the heart two to dummy’s seven, then throw the club jack on the spade ace and lead the club 10. After ruffing away East’s king with your trump king, play the heart two to dummy’s seven. You can now throw a diamond on the good club nine, and can even lead a diamond to the king in the search for the overtrick.