Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 23rd, 2013

You would have understood me, had you waited;
I could have loved you, dear! as well as he:
Had we not been impatient, dear! And fated
Always to disagree.

Ernest Dowson


East North
Neither ♠ A K Q J
 6
 A 10 9 8 2
♣ A Q 6
West East
♠ 9
 Q
 K J 6 4 3
♣ J 10 7 5 4 3
♠ 8 7 6 5 4 3
 A 9 8
 Q 7 5
♣ 8
South
♠ 10 2
 K J 10 7 5 4 3 2
 —
♣ K 9 2
South West North East
1 Pass
1 Pass 2♠ Pass
4 Pass 6 All pass

♠9

Today's auction saw North and South disagreeing on the meaning of a jump to game in a game-forcing auction. So before we go on to look at the specifics of the deal, let's outline the two positions.

One is that in forcing auctions, jumps to game show a good fit or good suits, denying controls in the unbid suit(s. The second position is that whenever you are in a game-forcing auction, a jump to game in an agreed suit is minimum or non-slammish. This can be abbreviated to PFA or the Principle of Fast Arrival.

The first style is harder to play but makes use of the jump in the auction to show something specific, not just a minimum hand — when partner might want to explore, but can no longer do so efficiently. Popular as the second style is, I would certainly not apply it to today’s auction, where South’s jump to game should have shown a semisolid suit. (With a solid suit facing a jump shift, South would surely not have stopped short of slam.)

In any event, against six hearts, West leads the spade nine. How would you plan the play? If trumps are 4-0, you have no chance. If trumps are 2-2, it is even money whether you play to the jack or the king, so focus on when trumps break 3-1. The only 3-1 break you can deal with is the singleton queen. So you should win the lead and play a trump to your king.


Your partner is marked with values and relatively short diamonds, but he never acted or balanced, so my guess would be that this is most likely because he has spade length. So I would lead the spade two. I might lead the 10 in a different situation, but here I think I might need that card later.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 5 2
 K 8
 J 9 7 3 2
♣ 10 8 2
South West North East
1
Pass 1♠ Pass 1 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 22nd, 2013

My partner was dealt ♠ K-5-4,  A-4,  J-10-2, ♣ A-Q-6-5-4. When I opened one club, he bid three no-trump, claiming that this was the best way to describe a balanced 13-15 hand without a four-card major. Since my heart suit was a singleton jack, this was not a success, and five clubs would have been very easy to make. Can you recommend methods that would have helped us?

Gidget the Gadget, Vancouver, Wash.

Two possible answers. In the old days you would play three clubs as forcing. Nowadays inverted minors (using two clubs to show a limit raise or better) are common. If you do not play either of these, then maybe you have to temporize with a one-diamond response — but frankly, the three no-trump response is a perfectly reasonable alternative.

What is the best way to handle a balanced hand with 4-4 in the majors with about 6-7 HCP opposite a strong no-trump opening? Until now I have passed, figuring we are probably in a reasonable spot. My assumption was that if I used Stayman and we didn't find a 4-4 fit, we would probably be worse off than if I had passed.

Misfit, Mitchell, S.D.

I suggest you look at the strength of your majors and doubleton and bid accordingly. With values in the majors, use Stayman, but equally clearly, with values in your short suits, you would pass. With the first hand a 4-3 fit might play better than one no-trump, while with the second hand, no-trump might play better than a 4-4 fit.

Say you hold ♠ 5,  A-10-2,  A-Q-8-5-4 ♣ K-J-9-3. You open one diamond and hear a one-heart response. Should you raise hearts (and to what level) as opposed to bidding two clubs?

Fielder's Choice, Harrisburg, Pa.

While your hand is suitable for raising hearts — the call shows four trumps or three and a ruffing value — your hand is a tad too strong for the simple raise. If you bid two clubs and then convert partner's club or diamond preference to hearts, you show extras and this precise shape. You are a dead minimum for the auction, but you are worth it because of your controls.

Playing five hearts, I lost the first trick. I was due to make 12 tricks, until an opponent revoked by ruffing, after which I took all of the remaining tricks for a total of 11. When the revoke was caught, the director declared that since we took all of the remaining tricks after the revoke was established, we should be awarded ONE overtrick for “equity” reasons. Why didn’t the revoke cost our opponents anything? They finished up with the same score they would have received without the revoke.

No Fair! San Antonio, Texas

The revoke law is NOT designed to restore equity as its primary function; it’s a penalty. If you revoke but do not personally win the trick, it is a one-trick penalty – but only if your side wins one trick or more. If you revoke and win the trick with the card you played on the trick, it is a two-trick penalty — but only if your side wins two more tricks. Most revokes cost blood, so your opponents just got lucky!

I assume you would open one diamond when holding ♠ K-Q-10-2,  A-4,  J-7-4-3-2, ♣ Q-10, and if you do, your partner will respond two clubs, natural and game-forcing. Should you rebid your feeble suit, bid two spades with a minimum, or make a somewhat off-center call of two no-trump to limit your hand?

At Sea, Richmond, Va.

The answer depends a little on your partnership style. In classic two-over-one, a two-diamond rebid simply shows five, but the meaning of a two-spade call (extra high cards, or extra shape, or, according to some, denying either!) is up to you. I like the two-spade call to show this pattern, so I have no problem with making that call. I'd prefer the call to show a slightly better hand, but once in a while you may have to compromise somewhere.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 21st, 2013

Small Is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered.

Ernst Schumacher


East North
Neither ♠ J
 K 10 9 6 2
 A 7 6 3
♣ 10 9 2
West East
♠ 10 6
 Q 8 7 4
 J 4
♣ A J 8 6 5
♠ K Q 8 7 5 4
 J 5 3
 8 2
♣ Q 3
South
♠ A 9 3 2
 A
 K Q 10 9 5
♣ K 7 4
South West North East
2♠
2 NT Pass 3* Pass
3 NT All pass    

*Hearts

♠10

At the end of the 1999 Cavendish, David Berkowitz and Larry Cohen were in serious contention for major honors, along with Michel Abecassis and Jean-Christophe Quantin. This board decided the minor placings.

With eight top tricks in three no-trump, South, it seems, would be able to find a ninth trick somewhere, especially given that West’s natural lead is the spade 10 or a club.

When Cohen led the spade 10 to the jack and queen, ducked, Berkowitz did well to find the heart shift. Abecassis won and cashed three diamonds ending in dummy (West pitching a club, East a spade), leaving a diamond entry to dummy, then led the heart 10 to Berkowitz’s jack.

East exited with the club queen, covered by the king and ducked by Cohen, to keep declarer from being able to cash his nine winners. If Cohen wins and clears clubs, that is declarer’s ninth trick.

At this point Abecassis cashed his diamond winners in hand (Cohen throwing hearts) and led a club, but Cohen claimed the rest with three club winners. South needed instead to cash the spade ace, then lead his low diamond to dummy to achieve a four-card ending in which he has cut himself off from his fifth diamond, but gets back two tricks by squeezing West. If Cohen pitches a heart, dummy’s suit comes in, but if West instead discards a club, declarer exits with a club and collects two heart winners in the end on West’s forced play at trick 12.


When your partner as opener produces delayed support facing a hand that has shown minimum responding values, he guarantees a good hand and three trumps — say 15-17 in high cards. So your double fit means you have an easy jump to four hearts.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J
 K 10 9 6 2
 A 7 6 3
♣ 10 9 2
South West North East
1 Pass
1 Pass 1♠ Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, December 20th, 2013

So was the huntsman by the bear oppressed
Whose hide he sold — before he caught the beast!

Edmund Waller


East North
Neither ♠ K 4
 10 5
 A K J 7 6 2
♣ 9 8 2
West East
♠ 10
 8 7 3
 Q 10 5 4
♣ A 10 7 4 3
♠ A Q 7 6 3
 K J 9 6 2
 3
♣ J 6
South
♠ J 9 8 5 2
 A Q 4
 9 8
♣ K Q 5
South West North East
1♠
1 NT Pass 2 2
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

8

On this deal from the 1999 Cavendish, Michael Seamon found an excellent line to bring home three no-trump. After an informative auction David Berkowitz led the heart eight, and Seamon thought for a long while, then put up dummy's 10 and ducked East's king.

Larry Cohen continued the attack on hearts, and Seamon won the trick, then advanced the diamond eight. When Berkowitz ducked, Seamon let it run and subsequently finessed again in diamonds to bring home nine tricks. Should Berkowitz have worked out to block the diamond suit by covering the diamond eight? If his partner had started with the singleton diamond nine, this would not have been a success. But I suppose declarer’s pause at trick one might have persuaded Berkowitz that this was precisely what declarer was planning to do — and if so, that should perhaps have directed him toward the correct defense.

By contrast, when Norberto Bocchi and Giorgio Duboin defended three no-trump, Bocchi led a club. Declarer had to duck this, and now East shifted to the heart jack. (Note that if East plays a low heart, declarer lets it run to dummy’s 10, but the shift to the jack effectively surrounds dummy’s holding.)

Declarer covered the heart jack with the queen, and next dislodged the club ace himself. Back came a second heart, then the diamond eight, covered by Bocchi, and now three no-trump had to go down.


Some calls are made easier with the use of conventional calls; some are about judgment, not system. Here I would like to be able to show a spade raise with a diamond suit that I want partner to lead. If you play a convention called McCabe, then you can bid three diamonds to show precisely that. A jump to four diamonds would be diamonds and a spade fit (the same hand, but with the spade five, not the heart five).

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 4
 10 5
 A K J 7 6 2
♣ 9 8 2
South West North East
2♠ Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, December 19th, 2013

To be alive is power,
Existence in itself,
Without a further function,
Omnipotence enough.

Emily Dickinson


North North
North-South ♠ J 8 2
 Q 6 3
 K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3
West East
♠ A K 7 5 4
 J 7 2
 2
♣ J 7 4 2
♠ Q 10 9 6
 A 9 5 4
 10 4
♣ A 10 8
South
♠ 3
 K 10 8
 A Q 9 8 5 3
♣ K Q 6
South West North East
Pass Pass
1 1♠ 2 3
4 All pass    

♠K

One of the pairs fighting for the top honors at the 1998 Cavendish was Bart Bramley, playing with Sidney Lazard. Sidney is one of an elite group of players who represented the U.S. in world championship play in the 1950s. By my count we are now down to a handful of such players, including Ivar Stakgold and Billy Rosen. Bart is a representative of the next generation who has now started a partnership with another of my regular teammates, Lew Stansby.

Bart drew an interesting inference to bring home this delicate four-diamond contract.

On the spade-king lead and continuation, Bramley put up the spade jack to force the queen and to confirm the location of the spade honors. He ruffed, drew two rounds of trumps, then led a club to the king. Now came a third diamond to dummy, and a second club.

East, Michael Cornell, took the ace and played a third club. Bramley won and paused to count up the hand. Since East clearly had both round aces to justify his cue-bid and had also shown up with the spade queen, he was less likely to have the heart jack than his partner — the point being that he might have opened the bidding with that hand, playing a weak no-trump that started at 11 high-card points. So Bart advanced the heart 10, and whether Lionel Wright covered that card or not, Bramley had his 10th trick.


This sort of double is not for penalties. When you start by making a takeout double, you can't turn your hand into a penalty double the next time around. This sequence shows a really good hand (one that would have cue-bid two clubs if the call hadn't been stolen). With extra values but no extra length anywhere and thus no clear bid, you can fall back on the cue-bid of three clubs to show precisely this.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 8 2
 Q 6 3
 K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3
South West North East
1♣ Dbl. Pass
1 2♣ Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, December 18th, 2013

How can a rational being be ennobled by anything that is not obtained by its own exertions?

Mary Wollstonecraft


North North
Both ♠ 7 2
 A K 10 8
 J 9 8 6 5 3
♣ K
West East
♠ A J 6 3
 5 4 2
 7 4
♣ Q 9 5 3
♠ K 8
 Q J 9 6 3
 K Q 10 2
♣ 8 4
South
♠ Q 10 9 5 4
 7
 A
♣ A J 10 7 6 2
South West North East
1 1
2♣ Pass 2 Pass
2♠ Pass 2 NT Pass
3♣ All pass    

2

In today's deal from the 1998 Cavendish Pairs tournament, Bob Hamman stretched to open the unappealing East hand one diamond. The combination of positive actions from East and West meant that when Nick Nickell tried three clubs at his third turn, Hamman did not care if this was intended as forcing, but passed gratefully.

Nickell took the opening heart lead in dummy and played a spade at trick two. East hopped up with the king and shifted a trump. Nickell could now win the club king and cross to the diamond ace to play the club ace. then the club jack, and drive out the club queen. Upon regaining the lead, he would play spades from the top. West could obtain the lead three times with his black winners and force declarer twice, once in either red suit,, but Nickell drew the last trump and then led top spades at every opportunity. At trick 13, West was left on lead with the spade six in his hand, and Nickell scored up his contract with the spade nine.

Unlikely as it may seem, East can beat three clubs by returning a spade at trick three. West wins the spade jack and leads a low spade to promote the club nine.

In these sorts of positions, one tends to do whatever declarer does not want you to do. Here the fact that declarer is playing the side-suit seems to mean that you should not do the same thing, but should play trumps, does it not?


Here a double by you is takeout, suggesting values and either the other two suits, or at least one of those suits plus secondary support for partner. Your plan might be to raise diamonds if partner bids them, and pass two spades, since your singleton king almost certainly won't be pulling its full weight.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 2
 A K 10 8
 J 9 8 6 5 3
♣ K
South West North East
1♣ 1♠ 2♣
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 17th, 2013

Few are qualified to shine in company, but it is in most men's power to be agreeable.

Jonathan Swift


North North
East-West ♠ K 8
 K Q J 9 5
 A 9 5
♣ A Q 7
West East
♠ Q J 10 9
 7 4 3 2
 J
♣ K 10 6 3
♠ 7 6 5 4 3
 —
 K 8 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 4
South
♠ A 2
 A 10 8 6
 Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1 Pass 4 Pass
6 All pass    

♠Q

On an unopposed sequence Gaylor Kasle declared six hearts as South. (It might be better not to ask why, but it involved North's missorting his hand). He received the spade queen lead, and he won the king and drew four rounds of trump,while East pitched a couple of diamonds and a couple of spades.

Now the simple analysis might be to assume that since West has four hearts and East none, West (who must hold the club king to give you a chance) is more likely to have the doubleton king than four clubs to the K-10.

However, Kasle saw there was no need to commit himself at once. He carefully found out more about the hand by playing ace and a second diamond toward the queen. East took his king and declarer saw the spade nine discarded on his left, after some thought.

Now the odds in clubs had changed dramatically. Since his LHO had started with five red cards and his RHO with six, the odds favored the double finesse in clubs rather than playing for the doubleton king onside — and that is what Kasle did, by running the club jack. When it was covered, he crossed back to hand to repeat the club finesse against the 10 to bring home the contract.


Here a call of two no-trump describes your values precisely. There is no reason to do more; your partner is not marked with real clubs — he could easily have a balanced minimum with just four clubs. However, the more clubs he has, the fewer values he will possess, given his pass at his second turn. It is easy to imagine that a club partscore might be your safest spot — but let your partner judge that for himself.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 2
 A 10 8 6
 Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2
South West North East
Pass 1♣ 1
1 2 Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 16th, 2013

I went out to the woods today
To hide away from you,
From you a thousand miles away —
But you came, too.

Jessie Rittenhouse


East North
North-South ♠ Q 8 5
 K Q 8 6
 A Q 9 5
♣ 10 8
West East
♠ A K 10 7
 9 4
 J 6 4
♣ A Q 6 5
♠ J 6 4
 J 10 7 3
 10 8 3
♣ 7 4 3
South
♠ 9 3 2
 A 5 2
 K 7 2
♣ K J 9 2
South West North East
Pass
1* 1♠ Dbl. Pass
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

*Balanced 11-13 or diamonds

9

In this deal from the Cavendish pairs I thought Geoff Hampson made a nice play to disguise his intentions although the defense certainly missed a chance or two. Having opened a precision one diamond with the South cards, Hampson was driven to three no-trump after Brad Moss (West) had overcalled one spade. Eric Greco as North made a negative double, Hampson rebid one no-trump and Greco raised him to game. The one good thing about this auction was that Hampson had suggested more in spades than he had, so naturally Moss did not lead the suit he had bid, since he held just four spades.

On the lead of the heart nine Hampson took the king and played the club eight to the king and ace, and now Moss did not see the danger of the club suit, whereas if declarer had run the club eight or 10 from dummy at once, the position would have been obvious. When Moss pressed on with hearts, declarer could win dummy(s queen and run the club 10.

Moss ducked this trick, so Hampson played a diamond to his king and a third club. Moss won his queen and exited with another diamond, but when that suit split, declarer had nine tricks.

Curiously, Moss might still have beaten the contract in the ending had he shifted to a low spade after winning the club queen. Declarer had formed the impression that Moss had a broken five-card spade suit to one top honor, and would have ducked the spade — letting the defense run the spade suit.


If you trust your partner, he will have something resembling a three-suited hand with short hearts and close to an opening bid. (How else could he come into a live auction?) Lead a trump, since your opponents do not appear to be overloaded with high cards and have no obvious source of tricks outside trumps. Do not let them get a crossruff going.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7 2
 10 8 5
 J 9 5 3
♣ K 4 3
South West North East
1 Pass 1
Pass 2 Dbl. 4
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 15th, 2013

Would you ever open ♠ Q-10-8,  A-4.  K-5-4, ♣ A-J-9-5-2 with a strong no-trump, either for tactical reasons or because you believe the hand is worth that action?

Far From the Adding Crowd, Newark, N.J.

At matchpoints when nonvulnerable I can see the argument for getting the no-trump in first. A chunky five-card suit must be worth something, and since you might well want to play the hand your way up, it is not absurd to make the call. This is especially true in third seat when you should also aim to make the opponents' search for a major-suit fit rather more challenging.

I recently read an Aces column where you explained Bergen raises to the reader, implying that you weren’t particularly in favor of using them. I’ve used them ever since I read “To Bid or Not to Bid.” What don’t you like about them?

The Raiser's Edge, Winston-Salem, N.C.

They fall into the category of bids where judgment takes second place to system. They also allow lead-directing doubles rather too easily. One doesn’t always use Stayman when holding a four-card major; equally, one sometimes raises a major to two with four trumps and a defensive hand. That said, giving up jump responses in a minor is not a big loss, I agree. There are some sensible alternative “natural” uses, though weak jump responses may not be among them.

Imagine at matchpoints that you held ♠ A-10-3-2,  A-Q-9-4,  9-7-5-4-2 ♣ — in third chair. Would you open the hand — and if so, what call would you prefer?

Open Sesame Paste, Orlando, Fla.

Since I am under oath, I think I'd pass if vulnerable and open nonvulnerable; I would marginally prefer a one-heart bid to the other choices. I really do not want to bid diamonds to see partner leading his doubleton ace, king or queen! Bidding long suits in third position is somewhat overrated; bidding good suits with one-bid hands has a lot to recommend it.

A friend gave me a somewhat garbled description of Snapdragon doubles. In what position do they apply, and how do they work exactly? More importantly, are they a good idea?

Boldly Advancing, Seneca, S.C.

When LHO opens, partner overcalls, and RHO makes a low-level bid, doubles of that bid should be for takeout. Doubling a bid-and-raised suit shows the unbid suits and a fair hand. If RHO introduced a new suit, double suggests values, with the unbid suit AND support for partner. Since you rarely have a penalty double in this position, the idea behind the convention is a sound one.

I always thought that if I had two equal or close to equal suits I should open with the higher of touching suits and the lower of nontouching suits. In one of your recent columns, you described a reverse as whenever the player bids any lower suit before a higher suit, in this case clubs and then hearts. Can you describe how these two ideas overlap?

Circle of Confusion, New York City, N.Y.

Anytime in an noncompetitive auction that you bid the low suit at the one-level, then a higher suit at the two-level, so that responder has to give preference to the first one at the three-level, it's a reverse. So, for example, opening one club, then bidding two hearts over one spade, guarantees reversing extras. You may have to repeat clubs or bid one no-trump without those extras.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 14th, 2013

It is a very great thing to be able to think as you like; but, after all, an important question remains: what you think.

Matthew Arnold


West North
Both ♠ K 5
 A Q 5
 A K 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 3
West East
♠ 10 9 4 2
 K J 9 6 4
 —
♣ A K Q 10
♠ Q J 7
 10 7
 Q J 10 9 7
♣ J 4 2
South
♠ A 8 6 3
 8 3 2
 8 6 5 4
♣ 9 6
South West North East
2* Dbl. 2
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3 Pass Pass Dbl.
All pass      

*An opening bid with five hearts and four spades

♣K

In the Dutch bridge magazine IMP, Onno Eskes has investigated the limits of computers' abilities at bridge. He predicts that the next generation of bridge programs will beat world champions within the next five years. Here is the computer at work.

Against three diamonds doubled, West leads out the three top clubs and East follows suit with the two, eight, and jack (suggesting an original odd number). Can the hand still be made?

The problem is virtually an open book after West’s Flannery opening, the penalty double, and East’s signals. It may not seem possible that you can prevent East from taking three trump tricks, but for the computer, these types of problems are a cinch. It ruffs the third round of clubs, takes the heart finesse, and ruffs a spade in dummy. The heart ace is cashed and we have reduced to a five-card ending where dummy has three trumps, a club loser and a heart loser, South has three trumps with a spade and a heart loser, and East has all his five trumps.

When the last club is led from North, East must ruff high to prevent the diamond eight from becoming South’s ninth trick, allowing declarer to discard the heart eight. East is now forced to exit with a high diamond, taken by North’s ace. East is then forced to play yet another high trump on the lead of dummy’s heart, and now he is endplayed, having to lead away from his 9-7 of trumps; his third trump winner has vanished!


You have a nice hand with real potential, but you do not need to communicate that message all at once. Your initial choice is either a cue-bid of two spades to show a limit raise or better in hearts, or a negative double to show both minors. The advantage of the double is that it keeps the auction low and lets partner describe his hand — if the opponents allow him to.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 5
 A Q 5
 A K 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 3
South West North East
1 1♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].