March 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Had it been his brother, Still better than another; Had it been his sister, No one would have missed her.
Anon
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ A 10 6 3
♦ 9
♣ A 7 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6
♥ K 9 5 4
♦ A J 4 3
♣ Q 8 |
♠ A 3
♥ J 7 2
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ J 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 5
♥ Q 8
♦ K Q 10 8
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♠J
Nothing is ideal here, but my best guess would be to jump to two hearts, natural and invitational. The range for this call is typically 9-11, but your extra shape argues for an aggressive call. Since you could easily make game facing a balanced minimum opener with nothing in diamonds, you need to do more than make a simple call of one heart, and you may always get clubs in later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 2
♥ A 10 6 3
♦ 9
♣ A 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
There is endless merit in a man's knowing when to have done.
Thomas Carlyle
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 2
♥ J 10 6 5 3
♦ K 10
♣ K 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 6
♥ K 9
♦ 8 4 3
♣ Q 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ Q J 9 7 6 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 8 4 2
♦ A 5
♣ A J 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game forcing, with heart support
♠Q
Declarer has followed an auction that implies he is not interested in playing no-trump. The most likely explanation is that he has nothing in spades. Lead the spade ace and decide (assuming you are still on lead at the end of trick one) which major to play next.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 3
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
5♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
Do you consider the following hand to be worth an opening bid? Would you consider pre-empting with it? With no one vulnerable, you are in first seat, holding ♠ K-7, ♥ 10-9-4, ♦ Q-3, ♣ K-Q-10-5-4-2.
One Toe in the Water, White Plains, N.Y.
I do not feel strongly about whether to pass or to pre-empt to three clubs with this hand — your choice might depend on partnership style rather than anything else. Opening one club is a bit rich for me, but give me the diamond king instead of the queen, and you would tempt me to act.
My partner and I had a disagreement about an unopposed sequence starting one diamond – one spade – three hearts. What does the last call in that sequence mean?
Fit for Nothing, Union City, Tenn.
It was once customary to use this call to show 5-6 distribution. But nowadays a reverse to two hearts by opener is effectively played as forcing, so you do not need a jump in the same suit to show the same hand-type. The three-heart bid can therefore be reserved as a splinter bid, showing four-card spade support with short hearts. Some would define it as forcing only as far as three spades.
After an unopposed auction I was on lead against one no-trump, holding ♠ A-10-7-4, ♥ Q-4-3, ♦ K-J-3, ♣ 8-5-4. The bidding went one club – one heart – one spade – one no-trump. What would you lead and what is your general philosophy here?
Seeking Solace, Portland, Ore.
Before I led, I would ask about dummy's minimum club length. I wouldn't lead a spade — this is too likely to carve up a trick or two. Because a heart lead seems to offer more risk than reward, my choice would come down to a diamond (either the three or jack) or a passive club. Since the suits do not seem to be lying that well for declarer, I'd lead the club eight.
|
What is your view on transferring out of your partner's overcall of one no-trump with moderate values and a weak five-card suit? Recently I had a problem with ♠ Q-6-4-3-2, ♥ Q-4-3, ♦ Q-4, ♣ 10-9-2 when my partner had overcalled one heart with one no-trump. Is it better to transfer here with a poor, medium or near-invitational hand?
Walking Tall, Charleston, S.C.
Unlike an opening no-trump bid, the overcall can occasionally be based on a semibalanced hand, and if so, it tends to be short in the other major. This means that with moderate values and a weak five-card major, the transfer is less attractive. Your hand is a fine example of a transfer not being mandatory. With either a weaker or stronger hand, I would start with the transfer.
Is it wrong to support partner by raising a one-spade opening bid when you hold four spades to the queen, no other HCP, and a singleton heart?
Full of Beans, Sioux Falls, S.D.
It is not really recommended to raise with such a weak hand. When the opponents are silent, one tends to raise to the two-level with 6-9 points and to the three-level with 10-12. The danger of raising with a very weak hand is that partner will not know whether to bid on, or even to make a game-try. Bidding to the level of the trump fit (that is to say, competing to the three-level with nine trumps) most commonly occurs when the auction has become competitive.
|
March 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Keep up appearances; there lies the test. The world will give thee credit for the rest.
Charles Churchill
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 10 4 3
♥ K
♦ K 10 9 3
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 8 2
♥ 4 3 2
♦ Q 7
♣ A 9 7 4 |
♠ —
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ Q J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 7 6 5
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ A 6 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade raise
♥4
You should pass and hope to make it. Don't even consider raising to four hearts. With bad trumps and a poor spade suit facing likely shortage, not to mention a singleton honor, this is about as bad a 13-count as you could hold. If you made the club king the ace, you might think about bidding because of the controls.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 6 5
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ A 6 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
My lodging is on the cold ground, And hard, very hard, is my fare….
John Gay
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 5 3
♥ J 9
♦ Q 9 8
♣ Q 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ K Q 6 3 2
♦ J 3
♣ A J 10 6 3 |
♠ J 10 8 2
♥ 8 7 5
♦ K 6 4 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 4
♥ A 10 4
♦ A 10 7 5
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2♥* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Hearts and a minor
♥K
There are three plausible directions in which to take this hand. The simplest, which I prefer, is to advance with one no-trump, which describes the basic nature and values of the hand. A one-spade bid would typically show five or more; a raise in diamonds is safe, but less constructive; and partner may not expect quite as many values. Equally, a cue-bid raise should be a better hand for offense than this.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 3
♥ J 9
♦ Q 9 8
♣ Q 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
If you're young and talented, it's like you have wings.
Haruki Murakami
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 7
♥ A K 10 8 5
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5 4
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 10 5
♣ J 5 3 |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ 9 4
♦ J 9 8 7
♣ A K 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A 6 2
♥ J 6
♦ A K Q 4
♣ Q 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠4
Do not have any illusions about the nature of the redouble. If your partner were happy to play hearts, he would pass and let you get on with it. The redouble is for rescue, with a two- or three-suited hand short in hearts. You do not have to work out the details; simply bid the lowest suit you can stand to play in. For the time being, this is spades, but the auction may well not be over.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7
♥ A K 10 8 5
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The signers of the Declaration of Independence had chutzpah. Don't ever aim your doubt at yourself. Laugh at yourself, but don't doubt yourself.
Alan Alda
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ K
♦ A K Q 8 5
♣ 9 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 3
♥ J 9 8 5 3
♦ J 10
♣ J 10 4 2 |
♠ 9 8 5 2
♥ A Q 6
♦ 9 6 4 3
♣ 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ 7 2
♣ A K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦J
The simple answer is to make a take-out double rather than bidding two diamonds. Yes, your diamond suit is strong, but your hand is really worth only one call, with the heart king not pulling its weight. Best is to double and let partner describe his hand. If you bid two diamonds and the opponents raise hearts, you may feel obligated to bid again. That would be a lot of bidding here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ K
♦ A K Q 8 5
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
To the victor belong the spoils of the enemy.
William Learned Marcy
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K Q J 10
♦ A 5 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 4
♥ 9 7 4 3
♦ 9 8 7 2
♣ J 7 |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 8 2
♦ K J 10
♣ A Q 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 3
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 6 3
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
If you play this response as forcing and balanced, bid three no-trump. If you play the Jacoby two no-trump to show a game-forcing spade raise, then you are too good to sign off in four spades. Since new suits show shortage at the three-level, while four-level actions promise a 5-5 pattern, rebid three no-trump to show some extras with no shortage. Three spades would show a really good balanced hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 9 3
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 6 3
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.
Josh Billings
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 5 3
♥ Q 7 6
♦ K Q J 9
♣ J 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4 2
♥ 9 8 3
♦ A 8 2
♣ K 9 7 6 3 |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ 10 5 4 2
♦ 5 4 3
♣ A Q |
| South |
♠ A Q 9
♥ A K J
♦ 10 7 6
♣ 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*12-14 points
♣6
I can see the case for a club lead; but though declarer has not specifically promised four clubs, he strongly rates to have length there. As against that, partner rates to have heart length, while dummy may or may not have four hearts. All things considered, I'd go for the small-heart lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J
♥ Q 6 3
♦ Q 8 4 2
♣ J 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Say you open one diamond, holding ♠ Q-7, ♥ A-9-4, ♦ A-K-8-3-2, ♣ J-5-4, and hear two spades on your left, over which your partner makes a negative double. What is your most sensible option?
Nowhere to Run, Vancouver, British Columbia
I could imagine that any one of the three following calls might work: two no-trump, three clubs, or three diamonds. The advantage of bidding two no-trump confidently is that if partner has a spade stopper, you have right-sided no-trump, and the defenders may not lead spades when it is right to do so. My second choice would be to repeat the diamonds.
When I open the bidding and my partner responds in a new-suit at the one-level, is it acceptable to rebid one no-trump with an unguarded suit? The sort of hand I mean is ♠ 8-4-3, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-K-J-6-5, ♣ K-4-3 after a one-diamond opening and one-heart response.
Least of Evils, Olympia, Wash.
Not only is the one-no-trump response acceptable, but it is the only practical choice, since rebidding the suit you opened tends to suggest six cards, not five. The rare exceptions to that rule come if your hand is 4-5 in hearts and a minor. After opening your long suit and hearing a one-spade response, you might rebid a strong five-card suit rather than bid no-trump with a small doubleton in the other minor.
I just heard that the ACBL has mandated that the minimum age for seniors will now be 60, not 55. Do you agree?
Junior Mints, Madison, Wis.
Not only do I agree, but I agree strongly. With the average age of bridge players sneaking up to the mid-60s, it truly makes no sense to have an artificial cut-off at 55, particularly when the rest of the world is using 60 as the threshold for senior bridge. Additionally, a grandfathering clause (how apt!) will mean nobody will be too harshly penalized by the change in legislation.
|
Holding ♠ 7-6-4-3, ♥ 4, ♦ A-Q-4-3, ♣ A-K-J-4, I opened one club and my partner responded one diamond. Should I now bid one spade or raise diamonds — and if I raise, what level is appropriate? With the spades and diamonds reversed, would you do differently?
Mynah Bird, Sacramento, Calif.
The hand is certainly not good enough for a jump to three diamonds, so the choice is to bid the major, or to bypass the weak spades and raise diamonds. I'd go for the latter, since I expect partner to have values (neither opponent bid hearts) and bid on, thus allowing me to describe my hand more fully. With the suits switched, I would bid one spade, not wishing to lose the fit.
We had a dispute in our friendly rubber game. Opener kicked off with a strong two-heart call, and the next player bid three diamonds. The next two players were looking at Yarboroughs and passed. Opener later commented that her partner should have bid because the opening bid was forcing to game. Meanwhile, responder thought she was right to pass because the overcall took her off the hook. Who is correct?
Open Season, Taos, N.M.
After a strong two-heart call, the opener is forced to bid again when the auction comes back to her, but responder, while obliged to keep the auction open in an uncontested auction, does not have to bid if the opponents come in. With a weak hand and heart support, she jumps to game, while a three-heart call would show values. Pass suggests neither heart support nor values. Double would be penalty.
|
|
This hand, submitted to the Australian Gold Coast bulletins by Sue Lusk, demonstrated nice technique by her brother Bruce Neill from the Teams Qualifying event.
South had declared four spades on the spade-jack lead, which seems to be a moderately helpful start for declarer. East had won the spade ace and continued with spades.
Declarer could now have crossed to dummy and played a diamond to the 10, hoping for something good in either diamonds (the diamond jack doubleton or tripleton in the East hand) or the less than likely chance that the defense would not be able to play a third trump.
Declarer, however, had a seemingly better plan. He played the club king, a club to the ace, and a club ruff. It was at this point that Neill found the best defense by not accepting the “Greek gift” of an overruff, but simply discarding a heart — a diamond discard would have been fatal.
This left declarer without recourse, since if he played on diamonds, it would allow the defense to play the third trump, leaving declarer with one spade loser, one heart loser and two diamond losers.
Had West overruffed, he would have been endplayed to lead hearts or diamonds, either of which would give declarer a trick. Declarer would run the heart around to his queen, while an overruff and diamond shift would allow declarer to score two diamond tricks and a diamond ruff. Moreover, South could pitch his losing heart on the eventually established fifth club.