December 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
To give an accurate and exhaustive account of that period would need a far less brilliant pen than mine.
Max Beerbohm
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 10 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ J 5 3
♦ A J 5 4
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
♠ A 9 8
♥ A 7
♦ 9 8
♣ A K J 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 5 4 3
♥ K 10 9 8 4 2
♦ 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| 2♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣9
If you play inverted minors, where a simple raise is forcing for one round, this hand is duck soup. Equally, if you play a double raise as forcing, you will have no problems. If you play a simple raise is weak and a double raise invitational, then your choice is to invent a club suit or (my preference — inelegant as it might seem) to bid three no-trump and protect your major-suit honors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 10 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
And the giant with his club, And the dwarf with rage in his breath, And the elder giants from far, They are all the children of Death.
Lord Dunsany
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 2
♣ K Q 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9
♥ Q 10 8 7
♦ J 9 8 7 4
♣ A 5 |
♠ K Q 8 4 2
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 6 5
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A J 6 5
♦ A K 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥* |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Four-card majors and a strong no-trump
♠10
While a leap to five clubs might be right, heading for the nine-trick game of three no-trump looks more practical to me. You might find partner with a diamond stopper or partial stopper, or West may have no entry to his suit. In five clubs there are just too many potential top losers, plus the risk of defensive ruffs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 2
♣ K Q 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Gamesmanship: The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating.
Stephen Potter
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ Q 10 9 5 4
♦ A 7
♣ 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 6 2
♥ —
♦ Q 9 2
♣ K Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K J 2
♦ J 10 8 5 4 3
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
After three suits have been bid (or if LHO had raised his partner instead of bidding a new suit), your partner's double is takeout. It shows values and typically both unbid suits, if there are two, or else the unbid suit, together with tolerance for partner's suit. Here you have a straightforward call of one no-trump to show your hand-type and honor location. Two clubs would be my second choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Speak in French when you can't think of the English for a thing.
Lewis Carroll
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A K 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ Q 10 7 6 5 3
♦ A J 9
♣ Q 10 4 |
♠ A J
♥ J 9 8 2
♦ 10 5 4 2
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 7 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ Q 8 7
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥6
When the opponents intervene over a transfer bid, you should not go out of your way to complete the transfer at the three-level with only three trumps, unless your hand offers considerable extra offense. Here your hand is only average for play in hearts so you should pass. By contrast, if partner had transferred into spades, your fourth trump would make it clear to bid three spades over three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A K 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The guardian spirit of the place She seemed, and I some ghost forlorn, Surprised by the untimely morn She made with her resplendent face.
Ambrose Bierce
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ A 9 3
♣ A J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10
♥ 7 5
♦ Q J 7 6
♣ K 10 6 2 |
♠ J 9 8 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 10 8 2
♣ 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ A J 10 9 6
♦ K 5 4
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Partner's failure to support hearts means he is probably short in the suit. That doesn't in and of itself mean the lead will cost a trick though — and it may be that the trick will come back one way or another. The other choice is to lead a spade — but here the risk of losing a trick with no return is too high. On balance, I will lead a heart. But you could certainly tempt me to lead a club if my holding were J-10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ K J
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
You hear two spades to your left, passed around to you, and you are holding ♠ 10-2, ♥ K-Q-7-5-4, ♦ Q-9, ♣ A-Q-5-4. Would you balance, and with what? And would the form of scoring influence your decision?
On the Spot, Grand Junction, Colo.
I don't think you can pass, but whether you balance with a double –catering to the penalty pass from partner — or a three-heart call to get your main feature across, is up to you. I vote for the double; we might find clubs or hearts just as often as diamonds. And yes, I'd bid at any form of scoring or vulnerability — they don't get to push me around!
At a club duplicate game, my partner opened one club and I held ♠ A-J-10-5-4, ♥ J-5-4, ♦ Q, ♣ A-K-7-4. I responded one spade, then over his two-club call I took a chance at three no-trump. We lost the first five tricks in diamonds. How would you have handled the bidding?
Sucker-Punched, Montreal
You have given me a chance to expound on a subtle principle that might get past quite a few good players. Since two diamonds at my second turn would obviously be forcing, showing diamond values if not necessarily length, is a call of three diamonds "more" forcing? Surely not! If a call at one level is forcing and natural, a bid one level higher in the same suit is a splinter-bid, showing shortage and agreeing on partner's suit. So bid three diamonds.
What simple agreement should one have when partner opens a suit, the next hand doubles, and you redouble? Given that this suggests invitational values or better, how far forcing is this, and what do subsequent doubles show? If penalties, would three trumps suffice?
Lightning in a Bottle, Riverside, Calif.
|
Unless you are facing a third-in-hand opening, which might be shaded, redouble guarantees a second call, with subsequent doubles strongly suggesting defending from either side. Yes, one might make the call with three good trumps if there is no fit for your side and the vulnerability argued for it. Opener, especially, should double when he can with three trumps and defense.
How do you apply the rule of 11 if using third-and-fifth (or third-and-lowest) leads?
Higher Math, Macon, Ga.
If the lead is third highest, subtract the spot-card lead from 12. The result is the number of cards higher than the lead held by the other three players. If a fifth-highest lead — and you will normally be able to work out from the auction which one it is — subtract the card led from 10. So if a fifth-highest two is led, subtract two from 10. The other three players have eight higher cards in that suit.
In second seat, I picked up ♠ A-K-Q-J, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-J-7, ♣ 10-9-8-2. My RHO opens one spade. I chose to pass, and the auction continued with one no-trump on my left and two spades on my right. I now doubled. Was it for penalties? And if my partner runs, what does an escape to two no-trump suggest?
Passing Fancy, Elkhart, Ind.
Your first pass makes sense, as opposed to doubling, since you do not really want to convert two hearts to two no-trump or three of a minor. Double on the second round is best played as heavy penalty or light takeout — Partner should know which! If he escapes, then a bid of two no-trump would be scrambling – suggesting two or more places to play.
|
December 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Even the death of friends will inspire us as much as their lives.
Henry David Thoreau
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 7 4 3
♥ A Q
♦ A 7 6 5 2
♣ Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ 7 5 3
♦ K Q
♣ K 7 6 5 2 |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ 9 8
♦ J 10 9
♣ A 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K 6
♥ K J 10 6 4 2
♦ 8 4 3
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♥3
This one looks relatively simple to me — which is not always a good sign… With decent support in context, but a minimum in high-cards, simply raise to three spades and let partner decide what he wants to do. You have no reason not to let partner have a say after this point. And, just for the record, two spades is usually played as forcing for one round, if not necessarily to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6
♥ K J 10 6 4 2
♦ 8 4 3
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, December 6th, 2013
For fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
Alexander Pope
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ J 10 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ Q 9 7 6 5 3
♦ K
♣ A 9 |
♠ J
♥ A 8 2
♦ Q J 10 9 8 6 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 5
♥ K
♦ A 7
♣ K Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣* |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong; 16-plus, any hand.
♥6
Three clubs is forcing to game; you might think it sensible to pass (and you might even be right at the table), but if partner has game in his own hand, he will not be happy. Over the three-club call, many players, including me, play the next step of three diamonds to be a second negative, typically 0-4 high-card points, or no satisfactory alternative call. In context, this bid seems best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3 2
♥ J 10 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It's the same old same old.
Anon.
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 3
♥ A K 5 4
♦ A K J
♣ 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 4
♣ A K Q J |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 6 5 2
♥ J 10 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1 NT |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣10
Before I answer the question, let's clarify that a jump to two spades would be a high-card invitation. One can, however, play the jump as shapely, not limit, if your RHO has redoubled — when there cannot be enough high cards in the deck for a true invitation. That said, a simple bid of one spade seems to be enough now; the auction will surely not end there, and you can compete as appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 6 5 2
♥ J 10 3
♦ 8 6
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
People who have no weaknesses are terrible; there is no way of taking advantage of them.
Anatole France
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 3
♥ A 10 9 8 5 2
♦ A K 9
♣ 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 5 2
♥ J 4
♦ 7 3
♣ A Q 10 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ K Q 6
♦ 5 2
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ 7 3
♦ Q J 10 8 6 4
♣ K J 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
3♦ |
4♠ |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
The question of what you consider to be forcing here and what is not may indicate how old you are! In the modern (post 1970's) style, simple raises of partner and a jump to three spades are all invitational, not forcing. To start a force, bid two hearts, which sets up an unequivocal game force. Then bid three spades, showing a forcing one-suiter.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 9 5 2
♥ J 4
♦ 7 3
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When I collected the bronze medal at the 1994 Generali Individual, Wubbo de Boer (who was part of the Dutch team that had won the world championship a couple of years previously) was sitting South and received a club lead against his contract of four spades doubled.
He ruffed it, then realized that if he played a heart to the king, the defense could simply draw trump, and leave him with a probable second heart loser. So he guessed correctly to run the heart 10 around to East’s ace. Back came a second club, which he ruffed again.
Now if declarer plays on trumps, the defense can duck the first round. When they win the second trump and play a third club, the hearts are blocked. Declarer would have to ruff to get back to hand and would run out of trump. However, if South unblocks the hearts at once before playing the spade king, East wins his spade ace, leads a diamond to his partner, then gets a heart ruff.
De Boer saw the problems, and having gone to all those lengths to finesse in hearts at trick two, he now led the heart king from his hand, crashing the queen, then ruffed a heart with dummy’s spade king! Next he simply drew trump, having retained control of the hand, and could not be prevented from making 10 tricks.
It is psychologically very difficult to reverse your strategy in midhand as De Boer did, and even more difficult to find these plays at the table rather than in the post-mortem.