February 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 12th, 2014
A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession.
Albert Camus
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 4 2
♥ 9 7 3
♦ 7 2
♣ A 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3
♥ K 10 4 2
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ J 9 5 |
♠ J 10 9 6 5
♥ A Q 8 5
♦ 10
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ J 6
♦ A K Q 6 5 4
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥2
When your partner reopens with a takeout double, you might be tempted to pass and convert his double to penalties. You do, after all, have shortage in partner's suit and two potential trump tricks. As a matter of general policy, though, I would suggest it is right to bid two spades. Take out your partner's double if you have a reasonable way to do so — and here you have four spades, so bid the suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 4 2
♥ 9 7 3
♦ 7 2
♣ A 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
2♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What is fame? An empty bubble; Gold? A transient shining trouble.
James Grainger
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A Q J 10
♦ A 9
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 8 7 6 4
♣ J 7 5 |
♠ A J 10 6 5
♥ 9 6 5
♦ K Q J
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ K 8 7
♦ 10 5 3 2
♣ A K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
There is a place for subtlety, and a place for bidding what you think you can make. You could argue that a simple jump to three no-trump announces your hand's strength at once. Equally, there may be a case for doubling to show cards, then bidding no-trump at your next turn. The logic here would be to express less certainty about playing no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A Q J 10
♦ A 9
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Vicissitudes of fortune, which spares neither man nor the proudest of his works, which buries empires and cities in a common grave.
Thomas Gibbon
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 7 2
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 5 3
♣ Q J 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 4 3
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ K Q 7 6
♣ — |
♠ J 10 5
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ K 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A K 7
♦ A J 4
♣ A 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
Partner rates to have a few scattered values here. A trump looks far too dangerous, and, of the other choices, a low heart is my least favorite since partner does not rate to have honors there. Either the diamond ace or a low club are sensible choices. Of the two, the low club would be marginally my favorite despite the fact that underleading aces is normally frowned upon.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6 2
♦ A 10
♣ A 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
3♠ |
All pass |
|
February 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Recently you ran a Bid With the Aces question where you held ♠ K-J-10-9-8-7, ♥ A-Q-4, ♦ 6-5-4, ♣ 2. Why is it appropriate to open two spades in second seat vulnerable but only one spade if nonvulnerable? It seems you would be more concerned about pre-empting partner if you were vulnerable. How would the decision change, if at all, at IMPs versus pairs?
Champion the Wonder Horse, Carmel, Calif.
When vulnerable in second seat, you don't want to pre-empt partner (without the perfect hand). That doesn't mean you should never pre-empt, merely that you should wait till you have a near opener with a good suit — like this. The vulnerability trumps the form of scoring.
Do you like to be able to double and convert partner's response of clubs to diamonds without it promising extra values? I understand this is often referred to as 'Equal Level Conversion'.
Axe of Violence, Detroit, Mich.
I double fairly freely compared to the average expert (often without much support for the unbid minor or on relatively balanced hands). That said, I will indeed double and convert a response in clubs to diamonds to suggest 4-5 or 4-6 in the unbid major plus diamonds, without significant extras.
Holding ♠ J-7-5-4, ♥ K-2, ♦ 9, ♣ Q-J-9-7-4-3, I heard my partner open one no-trump. Should I pass, transfer to my long suit, or bid Stayman? And should I aim to play game or a partscore here?
Buffalo Soldier, Elkhart, Ind.
|
These days, Stayman followed by a call of three clubs would be natural and forcing. I might risk Stayman and rebid two no-trump if we have not located a fit. Incidentally, with the minors switched, Stayman looks far safer, since I could pass a two-diamond response.
When is it wrong to investigate slam by using Blackwood as opposed to cue-bidding?
Bouncing Baldrick, Kansas City, Mo.
Much depends on my partner, the opponents, and the precise hand. When playing with a partner who will not cooperate intelligently in a cue-bidding exercise, by all means drive to slam via Blackwood if you know your side has the appropriate combined values — but be prepared to apologize if necessary! Cue-bidding works best when you have a suit with no control or you want partner to take charge.
What would you recommend to me as a way to watch and remember all the spot cards as declarer or defender? And do you try to remember every suit or just the ones you think will matter?
Pipsqueak, Levittown, Pa.
Every player in the world sometimes errs by missing spot cards, or missing the significance of the cards played. If you find yourself failing to recall the cards as they are played to the first trick, try saying the numbers silently to yourself, or as a matter of course reviewing the trick before turning it over. I find that sometimes the act of verbalizing the cards helps to get them to stick.
|
February 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Hope never abandons you; you abandon it.
George Weinberg
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 6
♥ K 5 4 3 2
♦ A Q
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 9 7 6
♣ K 8 6 |
♠ Q 4
♥ 9
♦ J 10 8 5 4 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ A Q J 10 7
♦ K 2
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
*Game-forcing raise of hearts
♠J
Your partner rates to have real extras, but if he had a second suit, he would surely have bid it rather than redouble. Given your initial pass, your partner will not expect too much from you if you raise to two spades now, and your major-suit holdings suggest bidding rather than passing. So I would bid two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ 9
♦ J 10 8 5 4 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Never say never, for if you live long enough, chances are you will not be able to abide by its restrictions.
Gloria Swanson
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 4
♥ K 5 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ Q 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 5
♥ J 9 8 7 3
♦ A 3
♣ A 9 4 |
♠ 10 9 3 2
♥ 10
♦ 10 9 6 2
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 6
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ K 5 4
♣ K J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥7
Don't be a point-counter, since not all 10-counts are created equal and this one ranks some way down the pecking order — in fact, almost at the bottom. When you are raising partner, a cue-bid shows a limit raise or better, a simple raise shows somewhat less than 10 HCP normally. But this hand is worth no more than a raise to two hearts, as some of your soft cards will surely prove to be irrelevant to partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ K 5 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
When I’m playful, I…drag the Atlantic Ocean for whales.
Mark Twain
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 7 3
♥ A 8 5
♦ A Q 2
♣ K 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 9 7 4 3
♦ 9 6
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ A 10 9 6 2
♥ J 2
♦ 10 8 3
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
♠ J
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ K J 7 5 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♣10
Your partner, who has denied a four-card major, has bid three spades to indicate spade values. (He is either worried about hearts for no-trump or is about to cue-bid in support of diamonds.) You should bid three no-trump now, since if he is angling for three no-trump, you have the danger suit under control, but do not have enough to head to slam until you find a fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ K J 7 5 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and THEN do your best.
W. Edwards Deming
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q 3
♦ A 10 5
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ 9 7
♦ Q 9 4 3
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
♠ A Q J 9 8
♥ 6 5 2
♦ K J 6
♣ K J |
| South |
♠ K 5 3
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 8 7 2
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
A double by you of one heart would be penalties, not responsive. (If you have spades or diamonds, you bid your suits in a sensible order.) So a double would be perfectly sensible, except that you do not really know what to do when West runs to a black suit. Therefore you might well give up on penalties and simply bid one no-trump yourself, which describes your values and stoppers perfectly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 3
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 8 7 2
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volitional and are the portals of discovery.
James Joyce
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 10
♥ 7 3
♦ 10 4 2
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5 4
♥ J 5 4
♦ A J 7 6
♣ 10 5 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ 10 2
♦ Q 5 3
♣ A K J 9 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K Q 9 8 6
♦ K 9 8
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Without the double it would have been quite clear to bid one spade (even though it is an honorless suit), both for tactical and constructive reasons. After the double it is equally clear to raise to two diamonds, both to make it slightly harder for the opponents to compete, and to establish the right lead for your partner, if your LHO becomes declarer.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 5 4
♥ J 5 4
♦ A J 7 6
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I do not want people to be very agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them a great deal.
Jane Austen
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 4
♥ J 10 6 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ A K J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5 3 2
♥ Q 4
♦ 2
♣ Q 9 8 4 3 2 |
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ 8 3
♦ A K Q 10 9 8
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 9
♥ A K 9 7 5
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Heart raise
♦2
When you are looking at what appears to be a soft trump trick, as here, you probably do not want to play for club ruffs — especially if in so doing you risk giving up a natural trick in the suit. Yes, a heart lead might conceivably give up your side's trick in the suit, but that is considerably against the odds. A heart lead combines aggression and safety as best you can.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 9 8 5 4
♦ J 5 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal comes from the recent U.S. National tournament in Atlanta. The guilty party reported the deal in the confessional booth, so we have preserved his anonymity.
In third seat our hero opened two no-trump, perhaps more as a tactical move to keep the opponents from identifying a major-suit fit if they had one, than because he thought it the right valuation of his hand. Naturally his partner raised him to three no-trump after a Stayman inquiry. The defense started by cashing four hearts, and declarer discarded a diamond and a spade from hand and a spade from dummy.
East now shifted to a diamond, and declarer took two high diamonds, finding that East had started with a singleton. With the clubs behaving, declarer had seven minor-suit winners and the spade ace, but no communication between his hand and dummy, so all that West had to do was watch declarer’s discard on the fourth club to defeat the game.
Since West had the spade king and only three clubs, declarer had missed the small extra chance that made the difference between success and failure. At trick five try taking the diamond shift, then cashing the spade ace (the Vienna Coup — an unblocking maneuver to facilitate the timing for a squeeze) and next running the clubs.
This would have had the effect of bringing West under pressure. In the three-card ending, dummy has the doubleton spade queen and a diamond, while declarer has king-queen-third of diamonds, and West cannot keep control of both suits.