February 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 2nd, 2014
|
I held ♠ J-9-8-2, ♥ A-J, ♦ 7-3, ♣ K-J-9-8-3. My LHO opened one diamond, and my partner made a one-heart overcall. Assuming I have enough to respond, which suit (if any) should I bid?
Marking Time, Worcester, Mass.
You might get votes for bids of either black suit, or a cue-bid of two diamonds, or even a stopperless one-no-trump response. Two clubs makes perfect sense to me, but equally, a simple heart raise is also in the picture, since you could argue that two honors is better support than three small trumps.
If you pick up a two-suited hand such as five spades to the three top honors, six semisolid clubs, and a small doubleton heart, are you better off opening two clubs or one of the black suits? If the latter, which suit would you bid?
The Black Hand, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
The two-club call might work, but if the opponents intervene, you might well find yourself pre-empted out of getting your suits into play. Having decided to go low, I prefer almost without exception to open my long suit with a hand worth a reverse or more. Quantity generally outranks quality when it comes to picking a trump suit.
With moderate values and five-card support for partner's minor, should you raise the minor before introducing your own four-card major, holding, for example, ♠ Q-10-4-2, ♥ J-4, ♦ K-5, ♣ Q-9-8-4-3 facing a one-club opening? And what if your RHO has doubled the one-club opening?
Hand-Hog, Grand Junction, Colo.
The simple answer in a noncompetitive auction is to bid the major first, since your side is not assured of a real fit for clubs. Occasionally, in a competitive auction, it may time out better to support the minor first, but that is the exception, not the rule. After the double, I like raising when I'm weak, but here, since I think it is our hand, I will bid spades first, then raise clubs.
|
How should my partner have acted, holding ♠ Q-7, ♥ K-9-4, ♦ A-10-3, ♣ Q-10-6-5-4, when his LHO opened one diamond? I doubled and his jump to three clubs ran into a 4-2 break, going one down, while three no-trump might have come home for us.
Desperately Seeking a Strain, Kenosha, Wis.
I would have guessed to jump to two no-trump with your partner's hand, since I'd expect there to be a risk of heart ruffs or diamond ruffs against me. It is not perfect — if the facing hand is a limited three-suiter with short diamonds, you might well make more in clubs than no-trump. But the most likely game is three no-trump.
Because we do not play the forcing no-trump, we occasionally miss games when we make a simple raise of a major with a balanced 10-count. Facing a one-spade opening, should we upgrade a hand like ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ Q-6-5-4, ♦ J-5-4, ♣ J-10-8 to a raise to three spades, or is it better to just bid two spades?
Up or Down, Salinas, Calif.
The forcing no-trump allows you to distinguish constructive and nonconstructive raises (by putting the weaker options through the forcing no-trump response). But if you do not play that, then with a 10-count I'd advocate only raising to three spades with four trumps, or with significant extras in terms of intermediates or side-suit shape. The hand you quote does not qualify under either heading. The same logic applies to raising a one-level overcall, by the way.
|
The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 1st, 2014
February 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To control aggression without inflicting injury is the Art of Peace.
Morihei Ueshiba
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ K
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 8 7 5 3
♦ 8 7
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ K Q J 7 3
♥ 10 6 4
♦ Q 9 6
♣ J 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
2♦* |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
* A weak two in either hearts or spades
♥7
I could just about understand it if you passed this hand in first seat, since the heart king is not really pulling its full weight. But if you open the bidding, as I would, I much prefer opening one club, not one diamond. My plan would be to raise a one-spade response and bid one no-trump over a one-heart response (a singleton honor equating to two small trumps in support of partner if he insists on hearts).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5
♥ K
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
February 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
As for disappointing them I should not so much mind; but I can't abide to disappoint myself.
Oliver Goldsmith
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A J 10 9 4
♦ 8 5
♣ K J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10
♥ K 7 3 2
♦ A 9 7 3
♣ A Q 7 6 |
♠ J 9 5 4 3
♥ Q 6 5
♦ J 10 6 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ 8
♦ K Q 4
♣ 10 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
All pass |
♠10
The fact that you have a balanced hand with decent defense against clubs should not deter you for a second from competing to two spades. Yes, your LHO rates to have four spades, but your partner knew that when he bid one spade, and he should not have any trouble negotiating trump finesses, if any.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A J 10 9 4
♦ 8 5
♣ K J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A good deal of tyranny goes by the name of protection.
Crystal Eastman
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 10 8 4 3
♥ 6 3
♦ K Q 8
♣ K 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ K J 10 4 2
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 9 5 3 |
♠ J 9 7
♥ 9 8 7
♦ J 9 7 4
♣ 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A Q 5
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ A J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♠2
Despite your limited high cards, you should bid five hearts. Your partner has shown a singleton or void in spades and a raise to at least four hearts. You have no defense to their suits and a clear double-fit, so bid on (and if they compete to five spades and partner passes, you should think about bidding six hearts).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ K J 10 4 2
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
3♠ |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Perverseness is one of the primitive impulses of the human heart.
Edgar Allan Poe
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 10 7 2
♥ 9 5
♦ A 10
♣ J 10 9 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ A J 7 2
♦ 3
♣ K 7 6 5 4 |
♠ Q 8 6 3
♥ Q 8 6
♦ J 6 5 4 2
♣ A |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ K Q 9 8 7
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣4
There is no reason to accept the invitation to game with an unsatisfactory club-holding and a weak spade stopper. If your partner's clubs were semisolid, he would surely have bid three no-trump at his last turn. However, your spade stopper is uncomfortably feeble, so let three clubs go. With the spade 10 in addition, you might consider looking for no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6 3
♥ Q 8 6
♦ J 6 5 4 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
That's the thing about people who think they hate computers. What they really hate is lousy programmers.
Larry Niven
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10 4 3 2
♥ K 10 9
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ 7 5
♣ K J 9 7 |
♠ K Q 7
♥ 6 4
♦ A K 6 4
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ A J 7 2
♦ J 9 3
♣ A Q 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
This hand is totally unsuitable for a pre-empt (with too many controls, too playable in three strains, and with intermediates that bolster all your honors). As a general rule, you should not pass moderate hands with good suits. Either pre-empt or open at the one-level, the latter being my choice here. An initial pass followed by a pre-empt therefore suggests a two-suiter.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 4 3 2
♥ K 10 9
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ — |
February 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Man is a creature who lives not upon bread alone, but principally by catchwords.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ A 4 3
♦ K 7 4 3
♣ J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ Q 6 5
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ 3 2 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 9 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A K J
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ A 6 5
♣ A 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
The fact that the opponents have not bid to game suggests that your partner has something close to an opening bid, so that you should probably lead his suit. You might be more reluctant to make this lead if the opponents had bid to three no-trump. I can see the case for a top heart, a small diamond, or even an inspired spade eight here, but today I'll settle for the mundane top of my doubleton spade.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ J 10 2
♦ Q 9 7 3 2
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
|
In second seat, you pick up ♠ A-K-Q-J, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-J-7, ♣ 10-9-8-2 and hear your RHO bid one spade. I chose to pass, thinking I was not quite good enough to correct to three of a minor when partner bid two hearts over a double. Now the auction continued with a forcing no-trump to my left and two spades to my right. What were my options now?
Hall Monitor, Pottsville, Pa.
Your first pass was quite reasonable, simply because nothing is appealing.
Double by you at your second turn is heavy penalty or light takeout; partner should know which! If your partner does remove, he should only bid hearts with five or more cards, two no-trump being a scramble with two or more places to play.
What is the best way to handle a 4-4-2-3 shape with about 6-7 HCP opposite a 15-17 NT, that is to say not quite an invitational hand? Until now I have passed, figuring we are probably in a reasonable contract, given our combined high cards. I could bid Stayman, but there is no guarantee a major will be dramatically better, and if we don't find a 4-4 fit, we would probably be worse off.
Chef's Hat, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Can I suggest that when in doubt, you look at the strength of your majors and your doubleton, and decide accordingly? To take two extremes: with all your points in the majors use Stayman, and with none of them in the majors a pass is equally clear-cut. The weaker your hand, the more sense Stayman makes.
I overcalled one heart with one no-trump, holding ♠ 10-5, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ A-Q-10, ♣ K-Q-10-6-4. Would you agree with that choice? When this was doubled by my LHO, should I have run to two clubs when this got passed back to me? I did — and found that one no-trump would have been cheaper, as my partner had a 4-3-4-2 one-count!
Flight of the Concord, Boise, Idaho
|
I sympathize with both your one-no-trump call (which I think is better than two clubs, since your action is more likely to get you to game) and equally with your decision to run to two clubs. Regardless of the result, you had reason to expect that two clubs would have been less catastrophic than playing one no-trump doubled.
What are the rules about bidding again after pre-empting? Holding ♠ 10-4, ♥ —, ♦ Q-J-9-4, ♣ A-Q-10-6-5-3-2, I opened three clubs, and over three hearts my partner competed to four clubs. My RHO bid four hearts and I sacrificed in five clubs. Was I wrong?
Overdone, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
Yes, you were probably wrong to bid again. Your partner's four clubs is not a request for you to continus bidding — if he wanted to sacrifice, he might have done it himself. Once you pre-empt, be it a weak jump or a pre-emptive opening, you transfer responsibility for further bidding to your partner. Maybe your feeling you had not done enough suggests you might have opened four clubs to get across your extra shape at your first turn.
What is the proper course of action when a card is shown during the deal? Is it a misdeal? Is the card put back into the undealt deck, or can the card be kept at the option of the receiver? Does it matter whether we are playing rubber or duplicate?
Butterfingers, North Bay, Ontario
Should the Rubber Bridge dealer accidentally face a card when dealing, or if the cards are not dealt in the correct manner, the cards should be reshuffled, cut, and redealt. An opponent may also ask for a redeal. In a Duplicate event, redealing is typically only allowed prior to the first time the cards are played (and not if all four players pass the first time a duplicate deal is played).
|
February 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The strongest and sweetest songs yet remain to be sung.
Walt Whitman
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 4 2
♦ 10 3
♣ 8 7 6 5 4 |
♠ 10 7
♥ A J 3
♦ K 9 8 2
♣ Q J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 2
♥ 10 9 5
♦ A J 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣8
You should respond two spades rather than two hearts because your plan is to compete to three hearts if East backs in with three diamonds. If you bid two hearts after North doubles, you will be unable to offer partner the choice of majors at the three-level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Journalists say a thing that they know isn't true, in the hope that if they keep on saying it long enough, it will be true.
Arnold Bennett
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 10 7 3
♥ J 10
♦ A J 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 4 2
♥ A 2
♦ Q 10 7 6
♣ A |
♠ J 6 5
♥ 6 5 4
♦ K 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K Q 9 8 7 3
♦ 5 3
♣ K Q 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
Despite your fine intermediates, this hand does not seem worth a force to game. The choice is a raise to three clubs, an eclectic raise to three hearts, or the simple invitational call of two no-trump. This last option seems like the most flexible route to go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 3
♥ J 10
♦ A J 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
These days your opponents will bid so many thin games that you need to defeat them whenever possible, or you will be at a severe disadvantage.
In the finals of the 2008 world championships between England and China (England sat North-South), West opened a multicolored two diamonds, showing a weak two-bid in either major, or various strong options. North passed and East pre-empted further, bidding three hearts. Three hearts was passed out and went three down, for 150 to England.
When England was East-West, the Chinese North doubled the two-diamond opening (showing a balanced 13-16), causing South to jump to three no-trump. If the Chinese made this, they would gain 10 IMPs; if they went down, England would gain at least six IMPs.
Against three no-trump, West, Heather Dhondy, led a heart won by dummy’s king. Declarer now played a club to her queen. Had West won this, the defenders could have cleared the hearts, but then declarer would have finessed a club safely into the East hand and guessed the diamond queen for her contract. West would do better to shift to spades, but declarer might still have come home.
However, Dhondy smoothly ducked the club queen, causing declarer to place the ace with East. So she next ran the club 10. East won the jack, cleared the hearts, and, in due course, West won her club ace and cashed three hearts to beat the game by two.