December 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Among all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitous.
George Eliot
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 6
♥ A 10 4 3
♦ K Q 9 8 6
♣ A 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 5
♥ 8 7 6
♦ 5
♣ K 10 9 4 2 |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ J 9 5
♦ 7 2
♣ Q 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 2
♥ K Q 2
♦ A J 10 4 3
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠J
This is one of the awkward hand patterns best solved by opening one no-trump because of the honors in the short suit. You are not strong enough to open one diamond and reverse to two hearts over a one-spade response, though add the heart jack and you might do that. Equally, if your doubletons were two small spades and the club A-Q, you might open one diamond and rebid one no-trump over one spade.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6
♥ A 10 4 3
♦ K Q 9 8 6
♣ A 5 |
December 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead, either write something worth reading or do things worth writing.
Benjamin Franklin
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J
♥ J 3
♦ K Q 7 6 3
♣ A 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 10 4 2
♦ J 10 9 5
♣ Q J 10 5 4 |
♠ A 9 5 4
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ 8
♣ K 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 8 7 6 3
♥ A K 8 6
♦ A 4 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♣Q
On any auction where your side has the clear balance of high cards and the opponents are sacrificing, a trump lead has to make sense. This is especially true in a situation of this sort — where there is no realistic chance that the opponents will be running the unbid suit, clubs, against you.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 2
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ Q 8 6
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
2♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
| Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
December 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I assume that if holding ♠ K-Q-7-5-4, ♥ A-Q-5-4, ♦ 10-2, ♣ A-4, you would open one spade and rebid two hearts over partner's two-club response — which we do not play as game-forcing. But when partner bids three diamonds, fourth suit and game-forcing, what would you do next?
Caught Napping, Grand Forks, N.D.
Help! The fact that you have extras means a call of four clubs, going past three no-trump, is not terrible, but partner will expect you to hold three clubs, of course. The other choices are to rebid three spades (I'd do that with the spade jack instead of the seven) or three no-trump, hoping partner has either diamond length or a major-suit fit. If he has 2-3-2-6 shape, I'll apologize handsomely.
Several of my bridge friends claim there is a written rule that says a player may change his first bid into a completely different bid if it is done in the same breath. I didn’t agree. What is the rule on this subject?
Legal Eagle, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
The simple rule is that a change of mind is not permitted, but an instantaneous correction of a played card is sometimes allowed and a correction of a mechanical error with a bidding box is also allowed. Here, though, when you utter a call, you very rarely say the wrong thing — you change your mind. That's a no-no.
One of our opponents at my local club used a gadget I'd never heard of. He was defending four hearts and his partner led the diamond king, then the ace, from A-K-J-fifth. With ♠ K-J-7-5, ♥ Q-2, ♦ 10-3-2, ♣ J-9-4-3, he followed with the two, then the 10, and afterwards explained to his partner that this was suit preference. I thought that only applied to discards.
Inspector Gadget, Dallas, Texas
|
I like an inquiring mind! You are right that suit preference often occurs on discards, but any time you have a choice of cards in a holding where partner knows what you have, an unnecessarily high or low card may be used to convey suit preference. This even happens from time to time at trick one, when a continuation of the suit led is obviously not in question.
Is it ever proper to keep the auction open with a really weak hand facing a one-club opening bid? One of my opponents uses one diamond as an artificial bid showing fewer than six points.
Stretching the Truth, Bristol, Va.
I certainly wouldn't go that far. When nonvulnerable, I do often respond light to a one-club opening bid if short in clubs. Equally, I occasionally do bid one diamond over one club on a three-card suit, when a one-no-trump response or club raise is undesirable. But this is more improvisation than partnership agreement.
I know you are not the biggest fan of Keycard Blackwood, but can you tell me how to show the trump queen after answering keycards?
Find the Lady, Sunbury, Pa.
Let's say trumps are hearts. After a five-club response, five diamonds asks, and in response five hearts denies the trump queen. All other bids show it, with six hearts denying any side-suit king, and all other calls show your cheapest king. Five no-trump can be used to promise extras and no king. If the response was five diamonds, five hearts by the inquirer would be to play, so five spades asks for the queen. Six hearts denies it, five no-trump says you have the queen and no kings, and all other responses are your cheapest king plus the trump queen.
|
December 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Nothing erases the past. There is repentance, there is atonement, and there is forgiveness. That is all, but that is enough.
Ted Chiang
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 9 7
♥ K 10 5
♦ 8 4 2
♣ A 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q
♥ 9 6 4 3
♦ Q 7
♣ K Q 5 4 3 |
♠ 5 3
♥ J 7 2
♦ A K 10 6 5 3
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 6 4 2
♥ A Q 8
♦ J 9
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
The best plan with relatively limited values is to raise to three clubs directly rather than to let the opponents gauge their degree of fit and combined high cards. By raising at once, you prevent West, for example, from introducing diamonds at a convenient level. Or you may force him to bid at the three-level when he wanted only to bid at the two-level. Support with support if you can.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 4 2
♥ A Q 8
♦ J 9
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The human mind is our fundamental resource.
John F. Kennedy
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 8 5
♥ 6 4 3 2
♦ K 5 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6
♥ A J 9 5
♦ A J 9 3
♣ J 10 9 |
♠ J 10 7 4
♥ —
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ K Q 10 8 7
♦ 7
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*6-9 points, four trumps
♣J
When your opponents make a negative double of your partner at a low level, there is no need to panic even if you have no support. Simply pass and await developments. If you bid, you do not promise support, but you will be suggesting better overall values, or a more robust suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 4
♥ —
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Ah, the snow-frail maiden! Somehow truth has missed her, Left the heart unladen For its burdened sister.
A.E. (George William Russell)
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ K 9 2
♦ Q 5
♣ Q 8 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ Q 10 7 4
♦ 9 6 3
♣ A 10 7 5 2 |
♠ K J 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 7 4
♣ K J 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ A J 8 5 3
♦ K 10 8 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
2♠ |
| 4♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠4
This hand has the perfect shape for reopening with a double of two hearts. In an ideal world, partner would have a penalty double of two hearts and sit for the takeout double. If (as is equally likely) partner has a weak hand with a suit of his own, he would simply describe his hand by bidding his suit, knowing you will have support for him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 7 4
♣ K J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It is a trick among the dishonest to offer sacrifices that are not needed, or not possible, to avoid making those that are required.
Ivan Goncharov
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9 5
♥ 10 6 3
♦ 2
♣ A Q J 10 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 7
♦ K J 7
♣ 9 2 |
♠ K Q 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ A Q 10 5 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ A K J 9 5
♦ 9 8 6 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣** |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14
**Invitational
♦7
Your partner has issued an invitational sequence, and although you have a minimum in high cards, you have a real fit, plus quick tricks. Imagine partner with six spades to the king-queen and with A-Q-third of clubs, for example. You would want to be in four spades — and game is likely to be no worse than relying on the heart finesse, whatever he has.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10
♥ A K J 9 5
♦ 9 8 6 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Anyone who thinks there's safety in numbers hasn't looked at the stock market pages.
Irene Peter
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 10 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ A 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ K Q J 8 6 4
♦ J 7 6 2
♣ 3 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ 9 7 5
♦ 8
♣ Q J 10 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 6
♥ —
♦ A K 10 9 4 3
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♥ |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
7♠ |
All pass |
♥K
Had East simply raised to two diamonds, you would of course have bid two hearts, an action that suggests a balanced opening bid with no real extras, but promises four hearts. Here, though, you cannot compete to three hearts on a hand where in a noncompetitive auction you would have been content with a call of one heart. You can let your opponents force you to bid one level higher than you want — but not two.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 10 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ A 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
3♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Being smart was key; being careful was critical. Being lucky didn’t hurt.
Kate Brady
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 10 8 7
♥ Q 9
♦ K J 10 6 5
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 2
♥ 5
♦ A 9 8 7 2
♣ K 8 5 4 |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A 9 3
♥ A K 10 6 4 2
♦ 4
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
I am sure everybody will lead a major here — both minor suits are unattractively dangerous. But no one really knows if it is right to lead a fourth-highest spade or to try to hit your partner with a heart lead. If I had a safe three-card lead (say 9-8-third) in hearts I would go for that. But leading from this heart suit is by no means safe, so I will lead a spade as my preferred route.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ 10 6 2
♦ J 9 7 5
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
December 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Is the following hand worth a game-force or just an invitation? In fourth chair I heard my partner open one heart, and the next hand bid two diamonds. I held ♠ 10-8-7-2, ♥ Q-4-2, ♦ K-J-3, ♣ A-Q-3. Was I supposed to raise hearts, bid no-trump, or double — and to what level should I commit the hand?
Torn in Three, Albuquerque, N.M.
It looks most flexible to start with a double (raising partner's major may be too committal and bidding no-trump might lose the fit in either major). After you get a response, you will have to decide where to go — I fancy three no-trump, unless a spade fit comes to light, but if necessary, you might cue-bid next to obtain more information.
Playing rubber bridge with very few conventions, I picked up ♠ K-4, ♥ K-Q-J-6-5-3, ♦ Q-J, ♣ A-Q-2. I opened one heart and heard an overcall of one spade. Now my partner jumped to three diamonds, strong. What would you recommend?
Slamma Jamma, Albany, Ga.
Assuming three diamonds shows a respectable suit, there is much to be said for a simple Blackwood bid. Even if this doesn't help you find out directly about the diamond king, you can do so at your next turn and then play six or seven no-trump. Please note that if partner simply has game-going values and, say, ace-fifth of diamonds, he should just bid two diamonds. This is forcing and doesn't waste space.
I liked your 'tip for beginners' a few weeks ago. Can you offer some more simple guidance for beginners — or for intermediates who might still benefit from simple advice?
Help Wanted, Lorain, Ohio
Here goes! When counting trump, do not keep a running count up to 13. Instead, when dummy comes down, add up your trump and dummy's trump. Take that number from 13, and this is the number of trumps out. Now forget about your trump and dummy's, just focus on that number, whether it be four, five or six, and count down to zero from there.
|
Let's say partner opens one heart. The next hand overcalls two clubs, you pass with ♠ Q-8-7-4, ♥ J-5, ♦ 10-5-4-2, ♣ Q-10-2, and partner re-opens with a double. Would you pass or bid — and if you do bid, what should you do?
Stick Shift, Janesville, Wis.
This is awkward. Passing out a takeout double with only one trump trick looks wrong. But I can see a case for acting by bidding either four-card suit or even raising partner. I'll go for the two heart call because that way at least I know one of us will have long trumps.
You mentioned the Wolff signoff in a recent column. Could you explain how that works in just a little more detail?
Seeking an Edge, Woodland Hills, Calif.
If you respond light to an opening bid and hear partner jump to two no-trump, you need both to check for partner having a fit in your suit, but also occasionally to be able to sign off in your own suit. One way to do this is to use responder's rebid of three clubs as artificial. The no-trumper now bids three diamonds (after which your bid of three of your major is to play and three no-trump offers a choice of games). Every other auction by responder is forcing to game and natural.
|
|
Techniques for defending against possible squeezes can be found in the literature, but less has been written about the concept of persuading declarer that you have been squeezed when, in fact, you have not. This deal is an amusing example.
After the Stayman sequence, North showed diamonds and a major, game-forcing, then jumped to slam when the fit came to light. Six diamonds was not a bad contract, of course, superficially depending on the heart suit yielding four tricks, but with considerable extra chances if the spade king was onside.
Declarer covered the spade jack with dummy’s queen, then ducked the spade king, won the spade continuation, and ruffed a spade high in dummy. Then he cashed the club ace (a maneuver known as the Vienna Coup, catering for the possibility of either defender’s holding the guarded heart jack as well as the club king and queen) and followed by running five rounds of trumps.
From West’s point of view it seemed sure that declarer held the heart queen but not the jack (for then he would have claimed). It was essential to try to persuade South that the heart jack was guarded. West discarded first the spade 10, then the club nine, 10 and king (carefully preserving the club four and his three low hearts).
Convinced that West had shed all his clubs in order to keep four hearts, declarer cashed the heart king and queen, then finessed the 10 – only to lose the last two tricks.