February 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
|
In second seat, you pick up ♠ A-K-Q-J, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-J-7, ♣ 10-9-8-2 and hear your RHO bid one spade. I chose to pass, thinking I was not quite good enough to correct to three of a minor when partner bid two hearts over a double. Now the auction continued with a forcing no-trump to my left and two spades to my right. What were my options now?
Hall Monitor, Pottsville, Pa.
Your first pass was quite reasonable, simply because nothing is appealing.
Double by you at your second turn is heavy penalty or light takeout; partner should know which! If your partner does remove, he should only bid hearts with five or more cards, two no-trump being a scramble with two or more places to play.
What is the best way to handle a 4-4-2-3 shape with about 6-7 HCP opposite a 15-17 NT, that is to say not quite an invitational hand? Until now I have passed, figuring we are probably in a reasonable contract, given our combined high cards. I could bid Stayman, but there is no guarantee a major will be dramatically better, and if we don't find a 4-4 fit, we would probably be worse off.
Chef's Hat, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Can I suggest that when in doubt, you look at the strength of your majors and your doubleton, and decide accordingly? To take two extremes: with all your points in the majors use Stayman, and with none of them in the majors a pass is equally clear-cut. The weaker your hand, the more sense Stayman makes.
I overcalled one heart with one no-trump, holding ♠ 10-5, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ A-Q-10, ♣ K-Q-10-6-4. Would you agree with that choice? When this was doubled by my LHO, should I have run to two clubs when this got passed back to me? I did — and found that one no-trump would have been cheaper, as my partner had a 4-3-4-2 one-count!
Flight of the Concord, Boise, Idaho
|
I sympathize with both your one-no-trump call (which I think is better than two clubs, since your action is more likely to get you to game) and equally with your decision to run to two clubs. Regardless of the result, you had reason to expect that two clubs would have been less catastrophic than playing one no-trump doubled.
What are the rules about bidding again after pre-empting? Holding ♠ 10-4, ♥ —, ♦ Q-J-9-4, ♣ A-Q-10-6-5-3-2, I opened three clubs, and over three hearts my partner competed to four clubs. My RHO bid four hearts and I sacrificed in five clubs. Was I wrong?
Overdone, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
Yes, you were probably wrong to bid again. Your partner's four clubs is not a request for you to continus bidding — if he wanted to sacrifice, he might have done it himself. Once you pre-empt, be it a weak jump or a pre-emptive opening, you transfer responsibility for further bidding to your partner. Maybe your feeling you had not done enough suggests you might have opened four clubs to get across your extra shape at your first turn.
What is the proper course of action when a card is shown during the deal? Is it a misdeal? Is the card put back into the undealt deck, or can the card be kept at the option of the receiver? Does it matter whether we are playing rubber or duplicate?
Butterfingers, North Bay, Ontario
Should the Rubber Bridge dealer accidentally face a card when dealing, or if the cards are not dealt in the correct manner, the cards should be reshuffled, cut, and redealt. An opponent may also ask for a redeal. In a Duplicate event, redealing is typically only allowed prior to the first time the cards are played (and not if all four players pass the first time a duplicate deal is played).
|
February 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The strongest and sweetest songs yet remain to be sung.
Walt Whitman
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 4 2
♦ 10 3
♣ 8 7 6 5 4 |
♠ 10 7
♥ A J 3
♦ K 9 8 2
♣ Q J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 2
♥ 10 9 5
♦ A J 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣8
You should respond two spades rather than two hearts because your plan is to compete to three hearts if East backs in with three diamonds. If you bid two hearts after North doubles, you will be unable to offer partner the choice of majors at the three-level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Journalists say a thing that they know isn't true, in the hope that if they keep on saying it long enough, it will be true.
Arnold Bennett
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 10 7 3
♥ J 10
♦ A J 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 4 2
♥ A 2
♦ Q 10 7 6
♣ A |
♠ J 6 5
♥ 6 5 4
♦ K 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K Q 9 8 7 3
♦ 5 3
♣ K Q 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
Despite your fine intermediates, this hand does not seem worth a force to game. The choice is a raise to three clubs, an eclectic raise to three hearts, or the simple invitational call of two no-trump. This last option seems like the most flexible route to go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 3
♥ J 10
♦ A J 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny.
Napoleon Bonaparte
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 8
♥ K 5
♦ 7 6 4 2
♣ A K 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5 4
♥ Q J 10 3 2
♦ —
♣ Q J 9 5 |
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ 9 8 6
♦ 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ A 7 4
♦ A K Q J
♣ 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Your hand is far too good to pass, but competing intelligently is not that easy. Doubling for takeout will persuade partner that you have hearts, while a call of three clubs takes you dangerously high without a known fit. I'd settle for an idiosyncratic raise to two spades. (Tell your partner you had a club in with your spades.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8
♥ K 5
♦ 7 6 4 2
♣ A K 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
There are moments when everything goes well; don't be frightened, it won't last.
Jules Renard
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 6 4
♥ 8 7 6 4 2
♦ 6 4 3
♣ A 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 3
♥ 10 3
♦ K J 9 7
♣ J 10 8 4 |
♠ Q 9 7 2
♥ 5
♦ 10 8
♣ K Q 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 5
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣J
A simple call of two hearts would show extras, but not a hand this good. It feels right to cue-bid two diamonds, then bid three hearts. That should be natural and forcing, and help to get you to the right major-suit strain.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 5
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
To rush would be a crime, ‘Cause nice and easy does it every time.
Marilyn & Alan Bergman and Lew Spence
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 6
♦ K Q J 4
♣ A 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 2
♥ 5
♦ 8 6 2
♣ J 8 4 3 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K Q 10 7 2
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
♠ A 8 3
♥ J 9 8 4 3
♦ A 10
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♠J
An argument could be made for a two-no-trump opening here (partner as a passed hand is unlikely to raise you to an umakeable slam). As against that, opening one diamond and jumping to two no-trump shows the best feature of your hand. Additionally, it is far from clear that the hand will play better your way up. (Imagine partner with queen-third of either clubs or hearts in three no-trump.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 6
♦ K Q J 4
♣ A 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
We believed we were safe. That was the big fantasy.
John Marsden
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 5 3
♥ A 8
♦ A K 8 6
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7
♥ 10 6 3
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 8 4 |
♠ A
♥ K Q J 9 5 2
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ 7 4
♦ 5 3
♣ K J 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
It is largely a matter of partnership agreement here, but I suggest a simple agreement: double is 0-4 HCP, and pass is semipositive, forcing to game. New suits are natural and suggest a decent suit and seven or more HCP. The make-up of this hand would allow you to go either way between a double and pass, but I would opt for the more aggressive action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ 7 4
♦ 5 3
♣ K J 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I held ♠ Q-J-8-7, ♥ 9-4, ♦ Q-7-6-3, ♣ A-Q-4 and passed in first chair. When my partner opened one heart, I was afraid that a one-spade response would lead to our missing game, so I tried two no-trump. That was not a success. Would a call of two spades have been better?
Young Lochinvar, Spartanburg, S.C.
Let's first discuss what a jump by a passed hand should be. I say it can't be natural and weak — you would already have opened. Nor can it show a good hand, for the same reason. The only logical reason for jumping is that you have a real fit for opener. So here a simple call of one spade is enough. Partner will always raise with four, and if he has three and a minimum, what game will you have missed?
At matchpoint pairs you hold ♠ Q-J-9-7-2, ♥ 7-4, ♦ 9-6-3, ♣ A-K-3. When your partner opens one diamond, you respond one spade, and your partner rebids three diamonds. What is your call? I knew bidding three no-trump with that heart holding was dangerous, but could not see any other way to get to the no-trump game from here.
Down the Rabbit Hole, Texarkana, Texas
My belief is that responder's jump to three diamonds should be forcing to game — unless responder passes right now. So responder can make a forcing rebid of three spades (he doesn't mind being raised with honor doubleton) and opener will bid three no-trump. Responder rates to have clubs rather than hearts controlled, or he could temporize by bidding three hearts over three diamonds at his second turn.
When should one be prepared to bid no-trump with an open suit? I had an unsuccessful experiment yesterday, holding ♠ 4, ♥ K-7, ♦ A-5-3, ♣ A-K-J-6-4-3-2. I opened one club, my partner responded one heart, and my RHO pre-empted to three diamonds. I guessed to rebid three no-trump, and the opponents cashed five spade tricks, while my partner turned purple.
Unprepared, Anchorage, Alaska
|
I wish all my partners were always brave enough to bid three no-trump on hands like this. I think you made the right call — bidding four clubs figures to take you past your side's most likely game. You were unlucky, that's all. What is the chance that your LHO had five decent spades and didn't bid initially?
We were both vulnerable at Chicago Bridge when my LHO opened three hearts. My partner doubled for takeout, and my RHO bid four hearts. Holding ♠ 4-2, ♥ 9-4, ♦ K-J-5-3-2, ♣ K-10-5-4, I passed, and we defended against four hearts down a trick, but we could have made five clubs. Should I have bid, passed, or doubled?
Huntington, W. Va.
If you feel the need to act, it must be right to bid four no-trump over four hearts. This is neither Blackwood nor to play, but shows both minors and asks partner to pick one. It is one of the more common meanings of four no-trump in competitive auctions. However, it is certainly not clear to bid here. Change your major-suit pattern to 3-1 (either way) and bidding would be far more attractive.
I read in a recent column that after an unopposed sequence (two clubs – two diamonds – two spades), responder should bid two no-trump with a 2-4-2-5 pattern instead of three clubs. (His seven-count consisted of four hearts to the king-queen and five clubs to the queen.) Apparently, the latter call would be construed as a second negative. However, instead of wrong-siding the no-trump, why not bid three hearts? This would allow partner to bid the no-trump game from the right side.
Early Warner, Waterbury, Conn.
I think a call of three hearts here should show a five-card suit, not four. You'd be worried if partner raised you, in case you were in a 4-3 (or even a 4-2) fit with no-trump better — and played the wrong way up to boot! But I agree it might work.
|
February 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Cowardice, as distinguished from panic, is almost always simply a lack of ability to suspend the functioning of the imagination.
Ernest Hemingway
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 3
♥ K J 4 2
♦ A J 10 9
♣ K 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 9 3
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A J 2 |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ Q 10 7 6
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A 8 5
♦ K 7
♣ Q 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
Your partner rates to have extra values (typically three-suited with short spades), and your hand has negative defense. Your heart length augurs that his heart tricks won't stand up, while your three small spades indicate your side has no future in trumps. You should therefore bid five hearts as a sort of two-way shot.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 5
♥ Q 10 7 6
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
2♥ |
4♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree.
Ezra Pound
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 10 9 8
♥ Q 5
♦ A K 7
♣ A K 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ A J 9 4 2
♦ 8 5 3 2
♣ 5 |
♠ K J
♥ 7 6 3
♦ Q J 9 4
♣ Q 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ K 10 8
♦ 10 6
♣ J 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣5
When the opponents intervene over one no-trump with a natural call or a bid that shows two suits, one of them being the bid suit, a sensible method for you to use is that all first doubles (from either side of the table) are for takeout. All subsequent doubles should be for penalty. Here, you can double two diamonds and plan to raise spades, or pass a two-heart response.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ K 10 8
♦ 10 6
♣ J 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In 1974, BOLS Royal Distilleries, a Dutch company, first sponsored a competition in which the world's best players were asked to write articles promoting their favorite bridge tips. Inevitably, the first crop of tips was the best, and one of the best of those was called "The Intrafinesse," submitted by the Brazilian superstar, Gabriel Chagas.
Today’s deal is an extremely challenging example of the theme. North-South had done well to avoid four spades, which would have had to go down when East turns up with the heart jack, and there is a virtually inevitable diamond loser.
Against three no-trump West found the best lead of a club. In practice declarer broached diamonds by running dummy’s queen (hoping for West to have a singleton honor or two honors doubleton), but still could manage only two diamond tricks, bringing his total to eight.
Declarer could have succeeded if he had relied on an intrafinesse, which involves first finessing against a significant missing card, then pinning it on the next round. He should start with a diamond to dummy’s six, which would have lost to East’s eight. On the next round of the suit declarer leads dummy’s diamond queen covered by the king and ace, and West’s 10 falls. Now declarer’s J-7 are poised over East’s 9-2, Declarer cashes his spades ending in dummy, then plays a diamond to his seven, thus making the three diamond tricks he needed for his contract. This line works against a doubleton eight, nine or 10 in West.