January 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 22 Comments
Many things are not as they seem: The worst things in life never are.
Jim Butcher
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 3
♥ A J 5
♦ A 9 4
♣ A K J 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ Q J 7 5
♣ 5 4 |
♠ A K Q 10 7
♥ 9 6 3
♦ 8 2
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ Q 4
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥7
Before I start, I warn you that experts disagree on what you are expected to do here. But partner's double of three no-trump is surely based on the desire for a lead other than hearts. (If he wanted you to lead hearts, he would simply have passed, expecting you to lead his suit.) My guess is he has hearts and good clubs, so I would lead a club.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4 2
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
January 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
We play inverted minor-suit raises, so when I opened one diamond and my partner raised to two, I was looking for a slam, holding ♠ K-Q-7, ♥ A-9-4, ♦ A-K-10-3, ♣ Q-5-4. Since two no-trump would have been nonforcing, what would you recommend? And what would a jump to three no-trump show?
Bonanza, Bellingham, Wash.
A jump to three no-trump would show extra values (typically 18-19) with three diamonds, or a bad four-card suit in a balanced hand. I think I might start with two spades to emphasize where my values lie. Now my partner will either limit his hand with a call of three diamonds or with two no-trump. If he does not, we will go to at least a small slam.
If we are playing Two-Over-One Game-Forcing, what are the suit requirements to open a suit and then jump in it over a two-level response? Does it show extras as well as a good suit?
Hop, Skip, and Jump, Panama City, Fla.
It is normal to play that a jump in a forcing auction shows a semi-solid suit or better (missing at most one of the top two honors) but more than a minimum. So, assuming I held six spades to the king-queen-jack, I would open one spade, then rebid three spades over two clubs with 15HCP or more. With a slightly weaker suit or fewer HCP, two spades would be enough.
Is there a simple mathematical formula for determining how the five remaining cards should split when you have an eight-card trump suit? Can this be extrapolated to give a general rule?
Lex Luther, Atlanta, Ga.
The mathematics for remembering the rule about how the missing cards will split is basically as follows: It is a toss-up with two cards missing, but for any other even number of missing cards, they are somewhat less likely to split evenly than one away from evenly. So a 3-1 break is rather more likely than 2-2; a 4-2 than 3-3. With an odd number of cards missing, they are considerably more likely (use two-thirds as a guideline) to split as evenly as possible.
|
I often have a problem as responder at my second turn when I have a borderline invitation and no clear fit. For example, in an unopposed auction such as one club – one diamond – one spade, how should I advance as responder with ♠ K-7-4, ♥ 9-5-2, ♦ K-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-10-2?
Sundown, Newark, N.J.
A raise to two spades with three trumps and a balanced hand feels wrong to me. (Change the heart two to the diamond two and I would be more sympathetic to that action.) At pairs I'd rebid one no-trump; at teams I'd rebid two clubs if the one-spade call promises at least four clubs, and that the opener would rebid one no-trump with a balanced hand.
In what position or at what vulnerability is it acceptable to open a three-level pre-empt with a six-card suit? How does suit quality or the form of scoring affect that decision?
Booster, Madison, Wis.
You can occasionally open three clubs with six clubs (since there is no other convenient pre-empt). In third seat or at favorable vulnerability, the rules about seven-card suits are often relaxed. This would also apply to a three-diamond opening if you play Flannery. The best suits to bend the rules on are good six-carders without the ace. Having a little side-suit shape (such as a four-card minor) is certainly a plus.
|
January 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
No one can build his security upon the nobleness of another person.
Willa Cather
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 8
♥ A K 8 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ A 10 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 4 3
♥ 5 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q J 10 9 7
♦ A K
♣ K J 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9
♥ 6 4
♦ 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
One can make a case for rebidding one no-trump to get across the basic nature of the hand (minimum and balanced), but in fact the intermediates in the long suits argue for the simple rebid in clubs. Whatever anyone tells you, a hand with a 5-4-2-2 pattern is better off for play in a suit than in no-trump, all things being equal.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ Q J 10 9 7
♦ A K
♣ K J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
But with the morning cool repentance came.
Sir Walter Scott
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
♠ A 9 7 6
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ 5 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
All pass |
♣K
To get both your suits into play, bid four no-trump now. This cannot be Blackwood facing a passed partner. Instead, it is an extension of the unusual no-trump, indicating 6-5 or 7-5 in the minors, letting partner pick where he wants to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I have no great message to the world.
Orson Welles
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ K 6 5 4 3
♣ A Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 7 6
♥ 7 4
♦ A 9
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ J 10 7 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 4 3
♥ A Q 8 2
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠7
Do not hesitate to make a one-spade overcall, even if your chances of declaring the final contract are relatively low. With a chunky suit and a strong preference for a spade lead rather than a heart lead, you should take any relatively safe opportunity to get into the auction, no matter what the form of scoring or vulnerability.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9 7 6
♥ 7 4
♦ A 9
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
The strongest of all warriors are these two — Time and Patience.
Leo Tolstoy
| North-South |
North |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 8 6 5
♦ —
♣ J 10 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ A 9 2
♦ Q J 9 3 2
♣ 9 8 6 5 3 |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ K 10 4
♦ A K 10 8 4
♣ A 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 2
♥ Q 7 3
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
Many people use a two-club check-back by responder here to investigate opener's shape in more detail. I'm not convinced that approach is correct with this hand. Given all the side-honors in the unbid suits and a balanced hand, a simple jump to three no-trump looks practical and gives far less away.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10 2
♥ Q 7 3
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Oh, I get by with a little help from my friends.
Lennon and McCartney
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K J 10 4
♥ A 10 7
♦ Q 7 6
♣ A 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ Q 8 6
♦ K J 8 2
♣ K 10 4 3 |
♠ 9 7 6
♥ 5 4 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ Q J 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K J 9
♦ 10 9 4 3
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦2
Just because your partner might have only three diamonds does not mean he actually does — in fact he has more than four at least 95 percent of the time. That said, you should only raise to two diamonds with real support or decent responding values. This hand just fails to make the grade. Change the heart king to the ace, and I'd raise to two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K J 9
♦ 10 9 4 3
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true.
Bertrand Russell
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 9 7 6 5 2
♥ A K 2
♦ 7 6
♣ K Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 8 4
♥ 7 4
♦ A Q 9
♣ 8 7 4 |
♠ A 10 3
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ J 10 8 4 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q J 6 5
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 10 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♠K
Facing a third-in-hand pre-empt (which you can infer to be relatively light, given how the opponents have brushed it aside and bid to three no-trump), you have the choice of a heart lead or a club lead. My instincts are to lead a club — if I'm wrong, I probably have given up no more than a trick in that suit. But my heart jack may become a trick if declarer misguesses how to play the suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 4
♥ J
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K 9 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
January 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
We ran into a problem when playing negative doubles. I opened one heart and my LHO overcalled two clubs, which was passed back to me. What should I have done, holding ♠ Q-4, ♥ A-Q-J-6-4, ♦ Q-8-6-4, ♣ K-10? (Just for the record, reopening was NOT a success!)
Double Trouble, Bremerton, Wash.
You have so much in clubs that you should assume your partner probably does not have a penalty double. This makes it likely that he simply has a weak hand — and so the opponents probably have the spades. I'd probably let two clubs go, hoping that the opponents might have missed the boat in either black suit.
Facing an opening bid from partner in a red suit, when should you bid a five-card minor instead of a four-card major? If so, how would the doubler find an eight-card major suit?
Light Fitter, Monterey, Calif.
With game-forcing values, you won't lose the major by starting with the call of two of a minor. You bid your major at your next turn and partner knows what you have. The cutoff comes at about an 11-count, where you must decide whether to bid a minor and force to game, or bid the major first, and perhaps not get your suits bid in the best order, in exchange for finding the fit in your major cheaply. But don't ignore suit-quality issues; some four-carders look like five, and the reverse holds true as well.
When your partner opens one heart and the next hand overcall three clubs, should you double, raise the major, or do something else with ♠ Q-7-5-4, ♥ Q-5-4, ♦ A-10-2, ♣ 6-4-3?
Truly Scrumptious, Tupelo, Miss.
This feels like a three-heart bid to me. I'd rather get the hand off my chest at one go, in case my LHO competes further. My spades are not so good that I am not sure I want to find a 4-4 fit. When in doubt, support with support.
|
My partner and I were faced with a disagreement about what is standard and what is not. I'm an occasional duplicate player and heard my partner open one no-trump and the next hand overcall two diamonds. How do I get to hearts here? Is the default position to play transfers?
Can't Get There From Here, Dover, Del.
Assuming you play transfers in an uncontested sequence, should you play transfers in competition? I say no — though some do. I use double as takeout, two-level calls as natural and nonforcing, and all three-level calls as natural and game-forcing. I subvert responder's two-no-trump call to a sign-off in clubs or various other hands (if strong with a diamond guard) or an invitation in one major when I bid that suit next. A direct cue-bid is Stayman without a stopper. This method is called Lebensohl and is described here.
After a three- or four-level pre-empt, how good a hand do I need for me to double, either vulnerable or nonvulnerable?
Silent Witness, Danville, Ill.
The vulnerability is almost irrelevant; a minimum opener with shortness should suffice over any pre-empt, if facing an unpassed hand. Here a small doubleton equates to shortage, but if vulnerable, you'd now want a full opener. The standards increase still further for doubling a four-level pre-empt. But again, with real shortage you want to bid when you can. In the pass-out seat, one can be even more aggressive than in direct seat.
|
January 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
A man who is ungrateful is sometimes less to blame for it than his benefactor.
Duc de la Rochefoucauld
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8 2
♥ K Q 10 9 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ 8
♦ A J 9 4 3 2
♣ J 9 7 6 |
♠ Q 5
♥ A 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 10 6
♣ 10 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 7 6 4
♥ J 3
♦ K 7
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥8
If the opponents had not bid, the jump to four diamonds would have shown a hand with four hearts and six diamonds and the values to force to game. When the opponents intervene at a low level, I'd expect your partner to extrapolate from that agreement to the same point. You do not have to decide yet, though. Cue-bid five clubs — or jump to five hearts to ask partner to bid slam with a spade control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 2
♥ K Q 10 9 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
4♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal from the most recent American trials was generously reported by the victim of proceedings, Christal Henner-Welland. After stretching more than somewhat to respond one no-trump at her first turn (in competition the typical range for this action is 7-10), South was treated to a small-heart lead in three no-trump, and she won East's nine with the queen.
Now, should you play the clubs from the top, or finesse? Playing off the top clubs looks right to me; if West wins the club queen, there is no return he can make that will hurt you. As against that, if West has the club queen and East had ducked the heart king, you will end up with egg all over your face.
At the table, South elected to run the club 10 at trick two, losing to the queen. The spade 10 was returned. How should you play from here? If West started with a small singleton or doubleton, you must cover and win the trick. However, if West started with honor-doubleton, you must duck and the spade suit will be blocked.
At the table declarer ducked, playing for West to hold honor-doubleton in spades. Result: misery. Well done, Roger Lee as East, who overcame his distrustful partner’s opening lead. (The game goes down on a spade lead — but who leads partner’s suit?) When he shifted to the spade 10, he was in effect playing his partner for the spade eight and for declarer to misguess what to do. Clever stuff, eh?