November 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
Holding ♠ 10-9-8-4-3, ♥ A-J-10, ♦ K-J-9, ♣ Q-10, I heard my partner open one club. I responded one spade, of course, but was not sure what to do over a two-club rebid. Any ideas?
Clubbed to Death, Holland, Mich.
While no one would ever pass now, my proposal might surprise you. The choice would seem to be a simple raise to three clubs, or the more ambitious call of two no-trump. But I would guess it was right to bid three no-trump; my club builders and side aces mean I might be able to make game facing as little as seven clubs to the ace-king and the spade jack.
Recently you encouraged a player with 10 points and 4-4 in the red suits to respond one heart to a one-club opening. I've seen players miss diamond fits after this start. So what are the advantages of your method?
Wonder Horse, Newport News, Va.
The logic behind bypassing diamonds is to agree that opener's rebid of one no-trump over one diamond may conceal majors. That makes it harder for your opponents to defend the hand. Additionally, opener's bid of a major over one diamond always shows a semibalanced or unbalanced hand. Incidentally, responder's rebid of two of a major over one no-trump is strong and natural, so you really should still find your fits when you need to.
I've heard it suggested that the range for a one-no-trump or two-no-trump overcall should change in balancing seat compared to the call in second seat. Is that true, and if so, why?
Balancing Act, Phoenix, Ariz.
Most people use a direct overcall of one no-trump to show 15-18. However, in the balancing position the range is closer to 11-15 for a one-no-trump call and 14-16 for a balancing call over a weak two-bid. The reason is that second hand is supposed to pass with a flat minimum opening, which cannot double. Thus if fourth hand is not permitted to reopen with a moderate balanced hand, your side may miss out on partscores or even games. Just for the record: a jump to two no-trump in balancing seat shows 18-20.
|
I was faced with a problem as to what to lead after my opponents bid two no-trump – three no-trump and my partner doubled. I had been dealt ♠ 7-6-2, ♥ J-4-2, ♦ J-7-6-3, ♣ Q-3-2 and guessed badly on lead. What are your thoughts? If the hand that is not on lead doubles in a blind auction, should his partner lead a specific suit, or is there some other sensible agreement to have?
Floundering, Naples, Fla.
Without specific discussion I believe that sequence asks opening leader to lead either his weakest or his shortest suit. I do know some use this to call for hearts (or spades!), or for the shorter major. Here I think you have to guess which semisolid or solid major your partner has (I vote for spades).
Though North should be the person to keep score in our game, we have a player that grabs the scorecard from North and turns it around and moves the other players around so that he can be the one to keep score. Another called one of her friends over to bid for me when she made a strong forcing bid (incidentally, the friend passed!) I had thought of quitting bridge, but enjoy being with my friends too much. What should I say to those two?
Off to See the Wizard, Kansas City, Kansas
This is an interesting problem. I think this is not really a bridge issue but an etiquette question. I'd ask Dear Abby but I understand it may be too late… So I tried the next best thing, asking my wife, Judy. She said that it might be best to have a private word with these two players to say how upset you were, rather than making it into a federal case. I concur.
|
November 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A goal without a plan is just a wish.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 4
♥ Q J 7 4
♦ 6 3 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 9 7 5
♣ J 7 6 |
♠ 5
♥ A K 10 9 5
♦ J 10 4
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8
♥ 3
♦ A K 8
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
This is a forcing auction, and you have no reason not to bid your four-card suit. A double by you would now be takeout and might work if partner wanted to play for penalties, but would not be a good idea if your partner played you for four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 9 7 5
♣ J 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
It doesn't matter if you're born in a duck yard, so long as you are hatched from a swan's egg!
Hans Christian Andersen
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 8 7
♥ A Q 5 3 2
♦ 10 4
♣ 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ K 9
♦ K Q 6 5 3 2
♣ A Q 4 |
♠ 4
♥ J 10 7
♦ J 8 7
♣ 10 8 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 6 5
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 9
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
3♥* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Fit-jump: a raise to three spades with a heart suit
♦K
A simple jump to three spades would merely invite game — the same hand with a small diamond instead of the ace. Since you are too strong for that action, you should cue-bid three diamonds, planning to rebid three spades over three hearts. If you doubled two diamonds, it would be for takeout, but the cue-bid is clearer.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 9 6 5
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 9
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked.
Warren Buffett
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ A K J
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ A Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 10 8 6 3
♦ 9 7
♣ K 9 4 3 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 10 6 4 2
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 6 5 2
♥ Q 5 2
♦ 8
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♣* |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
*Stayman
♦9
While you would not have considered any action other than a one heart call had East passed, here you should not introduce a weak four-card suit when you are distinctly at the lower end of the range for a response. I'd suggest passing initially, with a view to balancing with one no-trump if the opponents come to rest in one spade.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10
♥ 10 8 6 3
♦ 9 7
♣ K 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Watchman, doth its beauteous ray Aught of hope or joy foretell? Traveller, yes! It brings the day, Promised day of Israel.
Sir John Bowring
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ A Q J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ J 7 5 2
♦ K 8 4 2
♣ 9 |
♠ K 8 6 4 3
♥ 9
♦ J 9 7
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 5 2
♥ A K Q 8
♦ A 5 3
♣ K 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT* |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing
♠10
A two-club rebid is acceptable given the quality of the clubs. That call suggests six clubs rather than five, but in an emergency the bid can be made with five. However, when you hold a singleton honor in partner's suit, an argument can be made for rebidding one no-trump. Even if partner opts to play spades with a chunky five-card suit, the bare ace is as good support as a small doubleton.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ A Q J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
There be triple ways to take, of the eagle or the snake, Or the way of a man with a maid.
Rudyard Kipling
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ K 10 8 3
♦ J 10 3 2
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 8 6 4
♥ A J
♦ K 9 8
♣ 9 8 5 |
♠ A 2
♥ 6 4
♦ Q 7 6
♣ J 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 3
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ A 5 4
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
All pass |
♣9
Your partner's double is for takeout, suggesting the unbid suit and values. You have a straightforward call of one no-trump, which simply suggests a balanced hand, typically one with a little something in both black suits. Of course, you will not always be dealt a hand with such ideal holdings in spades and clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 3
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ A 5 4
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Why, what a very singularly deep young man this deep young man must be!
W.S. Gilbert
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ A J 9 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 6 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 8 2
♥ Q 5 3
♦ Q
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10
♦ J 8 5 3 2
♣ A 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ A K
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦* |
2 NT |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Jacoby(!) Transfer to hearts
♠K
Today's hand looks as if it might belong in a club slam; but if partner does not have a spade control, you might not be able to make any game at all. Start with a cue-bid of two spades to ask partner to define his hand in terms of spade stoppers. After that, you can bid or jump in clubs.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ A K
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I used to have instructions about putting together a Bridge hand (I think it was called something like: Mississippi Riverboat Gambler hand) that looked unbeatable, and the bidder thought it would make a Grand Slam, but it usually didn't. Do you have something like that?
Poker Player, Berkeley, Calif.
Do you mean a deal referred to as 'The Mississippi Heart Hand'? You can find details here.
The dealer has six solid hearts and seven top winners in the other suits with a void in diamonds, but his LHO has the other seven hearts and six winning diamonds, so declarer scores only his six trump tricks. Please don’t use it on your friends…
My wife and I played duplicate for several years and found that we frequently finished near the bottom for a given evening. I have concluded that we are way too much into evaluating our hands by ONLY counting points. Can you recommend any reading material that would help us evaluate our hands better?
Out for the Count, Willoughby, Ohio
Hand evaluation is truly one of the more complex areas of the game. Evaluating trumps is well discussed by Larry Cohen in the "Law of Total Tricks"; "The Secrets of Winning Bridge" by Jeff Rubens is also very thought-provoking. Either of these might help, though both are moderately advanced. Mike Lawrence on hand evaluation is also excellent (and see the Wikipedia article on hand evaluation for further suggestions).
What is the most efficient style of responding to a weak two-bid when the next hand overcalls? Are new suits forcing or invitational? And does what you should do vary depending on whether the opponents double or bid a suit?
Changing Up, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Many play new suits as non-forcing after an overcall, with doubles being penalty. However, after a double, the priorities change since partner will probably end up on lead. A common treatment called McCabe allows new suits to be natural at the two-level, but lead-directional at the three-level, showing tolerance for partner. Redouble is strong and jump bids are natural but guarantee fit for partner. To sign off at the three-level, bid two no-trump as a puppet to three clubs, then pass or correct to your suit.
|
One of the areas that has always worried me is how to judge when an opponent's action takes you off the hook, in a situation where you might have responded or raised partner. Two examples: When the opponents double partner's minor, when do you pass on a hand where you would have bid in an uncontested sequence? And when do you pass when you would have raised partner's major?
Paso Doble, Union City, Tenn.
When you are minimum (in the range of 5-7) with a balanced hand or a weak four-card major, you do not have to bid one no-trump or introduce the major after a double on your right of partner's opening bid. Equally, when you have a minimum balanced hand with three weak trumps and what appear to be defensive values, you do not have to raise your partner's major in competition. Otherwise, I suggest you ignore the opponents' actions.
I was faced with a lead problem in our social game where my partner told me that I should have known what to do. My LHO opened one diamond, my RHO responded one no-trump, and my LHO jumped to three no-trump. My partner doubled and I held jack-fifth of hearts, jack-third of spades, a small doubleton diamond and three clubs to the jack. What should I have led?
Mother Jones, Springfield, Mass.
When your partner doubles a contract in a nncompetitive auction it tends to be lead-directing. The principle espoused by Theodore Lightner is that it asks for dummy's first-bid suit, so you should lead the top of your doubleton diamond, expecting partner to have a penalty double of diamonds.
|
November 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Nobody works better under pressure. They just work faster.
Brian Tracy
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 6 4 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ J 9 5 4 3 |
♠ K 7 3
♥ K Q J 9 7
♦ Q J 8
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 5
♥ A 8
♦ 9 3
♣ K 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
There is certainly a case for using two diamonds as natural here and two hearts as a raise of spades. Regardless, two hearts seem to be the most unambiguous way to show a constructive spade raise while keeping the partnership at a safe level. You would make a simple raise to two spades with a small diamond instead of the ace.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 6 4 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
In the meantime, in between time, Ain’t we got fun?
Gus Kahn and Raymond Egan
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 5 3
♥ 7 5 3 2
♦ K Q J 10
♣ Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 8 6
♦ 9 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 6 |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ J 9 4
♦ 8 4
♣ K 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 8 6 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ A
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 7♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Different partnerships use different methods over one no-trump, some transferring into diamonds via a two spade call, some via two no-trump, some via three clubs. I am not going to tell you which is best, but I strongly encourage you to make the transfer here; this hand will almost always play much better in diamonds than in no-trump. The bid does not imply values, just a long suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ 8 6
♦ 9 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Against four spades West leads the heart two, his conventional agreement being partner leads low from any three-card holding. How should you plan the play?
At the table declarer put up the jack, and East won his king and shifted to the diamond jack. South tried for an endplay by playing three rounds of diamonds after drawing trumps, but West won and played the heart eight through. Whether declarer covered or not, the defenders had safe exits in the heart suit. In the end South could do no better than take the club finesse for his contract. It lost.
Declarer can do better — but he must play low from dummy at trick one. East wins the heart nine and shifts to the diamond jack. Declarer takes the ace and king, East unblocking the 10 and indicating an original two- or three-card diamond suit in the process.
Next, declarer cashes the spade king and queen, then exits with the diamond eight. West wins and has no palatable choice. A trump to dummy’s ace sees declarer win and then endplay East with the heart queen by discarding a club from hand. Declarer makes the same play if West shifts directly to hearts. A diamond by West gives a ruff-sluff, while a club is no better. If he plays a low club, dummy also plays low and East is endplayed. If he shifts to the club jack, dummy’s queen is played and East wins his king, but must then concede the 10th trick.