January 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The distance is nothing; it is only the first step that is difficult.
Madame Du Deffand
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J 6 2
♥ 6 5 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 4
♥ A 10 8
♦ 4 2
♣ A K 8 6 |
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 9 3
♦ 6
♣ Q J 10 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 3
♥ K Q 7 4
♦ A J 10 9 7 5 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
When the two opponents have each bid a suit, a sequence like this implies worry about hearts, not clubs. Maybe your partner has three small hearts? In any event, since you can't bid no-trump or suggest a partial stopper, you can bid three diamonds to say where you live, and let partner make the next move.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 6 2
♥ 6 5 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
You would have understood me, had you waited; I could have loved you, dear! as well as he: Had we not been impatient, dear! And fated Always to disagree.
Ernest Dowson
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K Q J
♥ 6
♦ A 10 9 8 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q
♦ K J 6 4 3
♣ J 10 7 5 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 5 4 3
♥ A 9 8
♦ Q 7 5
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ 10 2
♥ K J 10 7 5 4 3 2
♦ —
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
♠9
Your partner is marked with values and relatively short diamonds, but he never acted or balanced, so my guess would be that this is most likely because he has spade length. So I would lead the spade two. I might lead the 10 in a different situation, but here I think I might need that card later.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 2
♥ K 8
♦ J 9 7 3 2
♣ 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
My partner was dealt ♠ K-5-4, ♥ A-4, ♦ J-10-2, ♣ A-Q-6-5-4. When I opened one club, he bid three no-trump, claiming that this was the best way to describe a balanced 13-15 hand without a four-card major. Since my heart suit was a singleton jack, this was not a success, and five clubs would have been very easy to make. Can you recommend methods that would have helped us?
Gidget the Gadget, Vancouver, Wash.
Two possible answers. In the old days you would play three clubs as forcing. Nowadays inverted minors (using two clubs to show a limit raise or better) are common. If you do not play either of these, then maybe you have to temporize with a one-diamond response — but frankly, the three no-trump response is a perfectly reasonable alternative.
What is the best way to handle a balanced hand with 4-4 in the majors with about 6-7 HCP opposite a strong no-trump opening? Until now I have passed, figuring we are probably in a reasonable spot. My assumption was that if I used Stayman and we didn't find a 4-4 fit, we would probably be worse off than if I had passed.
Misfit, Mitchell, S.D.
I suggest you look at the strength of your majors and doubleton and bid accordingly. With values in the majors, use Stayman, but equally clearly, with values in your short suits, you would pass. With the first hand a 4-3 fit might play better than one no-trump, while with the second hand, no-trump might play better than a 4-4 fit.
Say you hold ♠ 5, ♥ A-10-2, ♦ A-Q-8-5-4 ♣ K-J-9-3. You open one diamond and hear a one-heart response. Should you raise hearts (and to what level) as opposed to bidding two clubs?
Fielder's Choice, Harrisburg, Pa.
While your hand is suitable for raising hearts — the call shows four trumps or three and a ruffing value — your hand is a tad too strong for the simple raise. If you bid two clubs and then convert partner's club or diamond preference to hearts, you show extras and this precise shape. You are a dead minimum for the auction, but you are worth it because of your controls.
|
Playing five hearts, I lost the first trick. I was due to make 12 tricks, until an opponent revoked by ruffing, after which I took all of the remaining tricks for a total of 11. When the revoke was caught, the director declared that since we took all of the remaining tricks after the revoke was established, we should be awarded ONE overtrick for “equity” reasons. Why didn’t the revoke cost our opponents anything? They finished up with the same score they would have received without the revoke.
No Fair! San Antonio, Texas
The revoke law is NOT designed to restore equity as its primary function; it’s a penalty. If you revoke but do not personally win the trick, it is a one-trick penalty – but only if your side wins one trick or more. If you revoke and win the trick with the card you played on the trick, it is a two-trick penalty — but only if your side wins two more tricks. Most revokes cost blood, so your opponents just got lucky!
I assume you would open one diamond when holding ♠ K-Q-10-2, ♥ A-4, ♦ J-7-4-3-2, ♣ Q-10, and if you do, your partner will respond two clubs, natural and game-forcing. Should you rebid your feeble suit, bid two spades with a minimum, or make a somewhat off-center call of two no-trump to limit your hand?
At Sea, Richmond, Va.
The answer depends a little on your partnership style. In classic two-over-one, a two-diamond rebid simply shows five, but the meaning of a two-spade call (extra high cards, or extra shape, or, according to some, denying either!) is up to you. I like the two-spade call to show this pattern, so I have no problem with making that call. I'd prefer the call to show a slightly better hand, but once in a while you may have to compromise somewhere.
|
January 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Small Is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered.
Ernst Schumacher
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J
♥ K 10 9 6 2
♦ A 7 6 3
♣ 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ Q 8 7 4
♦ J 4
♣ A J 8 6 5 |
♠ K Q 8 7 5 4
♥ J 5 3
♦ 8 2
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 3 2
♥ A
♦ K Q 10 9 5
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♠10
When your partner as opener produces delayed support facing a hand that has shown minimum responding values, he guarantees a good hand and three trumps — say 15-17 in high cards. So your double fit means you have an easy jump to four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ K 10 9 6 2
♦ A 7 6 3
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
So was the huntsman by the bear oppressed Whose hide he sold — before he caught the beast!
Edmund Waller
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 4
♥ 10 5
♦ A K J 7 6 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10
♥ 8 7 3
♦ Q 10 5 4
♣ A 10 7 4 3 |
♠ A Q 7 6 3
♥ K J 9 6 2
♦ 3
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ J 9 8 5 2
♥ A Q 4
♦ 9 8
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
2♥ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥8
Some calls are made easier with the use of conventional calls; some are about judgment, not system. Here I would like to be able to show a spade raise with a diamond suit that I want partner to lead. If you play a convention called McCabe, then you can bid three diamonds to show precisely that. A jump to four diamonds would be diamonds and a spade fit (the same hand, but with the spade five, not the heart five).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4
♥ 10 5
♦ A K J 7 6 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To be alive is power, Existence in itself, Without a further function, Omnipotence enough.
Emily Dickinson
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 7 5 4
♥ J 7 2
♦ 2
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 6
♥ A 9 5 4
♦ 10 4
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ A Q 9 8 5 3
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
3♦ |
| 4♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This sort of double is not for penalties. When you start by making a takeout double, you can't turn your hand into a penalty double the next time around. This sequence shows a really good hand (one that would have cue-bid two clubs if the call hadn't been stolen). With extra values but no extra length anywhere and thus no clear bid, you can fall back on the cue-bid of three clubs to show precisely this.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
How can a rational being be ennobled by anything that is not obtained by its own exertions?
Mary Wollstonecraft
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 2
♥ A K 10 8
♦ J 9 8 6 5 3
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 6 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 7 4
♣ Q 9 5 3 |
♠ K 8
♥ Q J 9 6 3
♦ K Q 10 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 5 4
♥ 7
♦ A
♣ A J 10 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
Here a double by you is takeout, suggesting values and either the other two suits, or at least one of those suits plus secondary support for partner. Your plan might be to raise diamonds if partner bids them, and pass two spades, since your singleton king almost certainly won't be pulling its full weight.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ A K 10 8
♦ J 9 8 6 5 3
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 31st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Few are qualified to shine in company, but it is in most men's power to be agreeable.
Jonathan Swift
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 8
♥ K Q J 9 5
♦ A 9 5
♣ A Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ J
♣ K 10 6 3 |
♠ 7 6 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ K 8 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ A 10 8 6
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Here a call of two no-trump describes your values precisely. There is no reason to do more; your partner is not marked with real clubs — he could easily have a balanced minimum with just four clubs. However, the more clubs he has, the fewer values he will possess, given his pass at his second turn. It is easy to imagine that a club partscore might be your safest spot — but let your partner judge that for himself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 2
♥ A 10 8 6
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 16th, 2013
I went out to the woods today To hide away from you, From you a thousand miles away — But you came, too.
Jessie Rittenhouse
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ K Q 8 6
♦ A Q 9 5
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 7
♥ 9 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ A Q 6 5 |
♠ J 6 4
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ 10 8 3
♣ 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ K J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦* |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Balanced 11-13 or diamonds
♥9
If you trust your partner, he will have something resembling a three-suited hand with short hearts and close to an opening bid. (How else could he come into a live auction?) Lead a trump, since your opponents do not appear to be overloaded with high cards and have no obvious source of tricks outside trumps. Do not let them get a crossruff going.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 2
♥ 10 8 5
♦ J 9 5 3
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Would you ever open ♠ Q-10-8, ♥ A-4. ♦ K-5-4, ♣ A-J-9-5-2 with a strong no-trump, either for tactical reasons or because you believe the hand is worth that action?
Far From the Adding Crowd, Newark, N.J.
At matchpoints when nonvulnerable I can see the argument for getting the no-trump in first. A chunky five-card suit must be worth something, and since you might well want to play the hand your way up, it is not absurd to make the call. This is especially true in third seat when you should also aim to make the opponents' search for a major-suit fit rather more challenging.
I recently read an Aces column where you explained Bergen raises to the reader, implying that you weren’t particularly in favor of using them. I’ve used them ever since I read “To Bid or Not to Bid.” What don’t you like about them?
The Raiser's Edge, Winston-Salem, N.C.
They fall into the category of bids where judgment takes second place to system. They also allow lead-directing doubles rather too easily. One doesn’t always use Stayman when holding a four-card major; equally, one sometimes raises a major to two with four trumps and a defensive hand. That said, giving up jump responses in a minor is not a big loss, I agree. There are some sensible alternative “natural” uses, though weak jump responses may not be among them.
Imagine at matchpoints that you held ♠ A-10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-4, ♦ 9-7-5-4-2 ♣ — in third chair. Would you open the hand — and if so, what call would you prefer?
Open Sesame Paste, Orlando, Fla.
Since I am under oath, I think I'd pass if vulnerable and open nonvulnerable; I would marginally prefer a one-heart bid to the other choices. I really do not want to bid diamonds to see partner leading his doubleton ace, king or queen! Bidding long suits in third position is somewhat overrated; bidding good suits with one-bid hands has a lot to recommend it.
|
A friend gave me a somewhat garbled description of Snapdragon doubles. In what position do they apply, and how do they work exactly? More importantly, are they a good idea?
Boldly Advancing, Seneca, S.C.
When LHO opens, partner overcalls, and RHO makes a low-level bid, doubles of that bid should be for takeout. Doubling a bid-and-raised suit shows the unbid suits and a fair hand. If RHO introduced a new suit, double suggests values, with the unbid suit AND support for partner. Since you rarely have a penalty double in this position, the idea behind the convention is a sound one.
I always thought that if I had two equal or close to equal suits I should open with the higher of touching suits and the lower of nontouching suits. In one of your recent columns, you described a reverse as whenever the player bids any lower suit before a higher suit, in this case clubs and then hearts. Can you describe how these two ideas overlap?
Circle of Confusion, New York City, N.Y.
Anytime in an noncompetitive auction that you bid the low suit at the one-level, then a higher suit at the two-level, so that responder has to give preference to the first one at the three-level, it's a reverse. So, for example, opening one club, then bidding two hearts over one spade, guarantees reversing extras. You may have to repeat clubs or bid one no-trump without those extras.
|
|
North-South did well to reach an excellent game contract with their limited values in this deal, but South spoilt the effect by missing a logical point in the play.
The key to reaching game was South’s optimistic decision to reverse into two hearts. Over North’s (forcing by agreement) three-diamond call, South took a shot at five diamonds. West led the club king, on which East signaled with his queen.
South now decided there was nothing to the play. He required either the spade finesse to be right, or East to hold the heart ace. Accordingly he drew trump and took a losing spade finesse. Later he lost two hearts and so went one down.
South commented after the hand that he could have made the hand by leading a low spade from dummy to his king, but that there was no reason why East would be more likely to hold the spade king than West.
True enough — but South had overlooked something critical. West, who was marked with both top clubs from the play to the first trick, might also hold the spade king but could hardly hold the heart ace as well, for he had dealt and passed.
So leading a low spade from dummy after drawing one round of trump was the right way to play the suit. If East had the king, South would obtain two discards on the spades, and if West turned up with the king, it would have been certain that East would hold the heart ace.