December 31st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Few are qualified to shine in company, but it is in most men's power to be agreeable.
Jonathan Swift
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 8
♥ K Q J 9 5
♦ A 9 5
♣ A Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ J
♣ K 10 6 3 |
♠ 7 6 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ K 8 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ A 10 8 6
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Here a call of two no-trump describes your values precisely. There is no reason to do more; your partner is not marked with real clubs — he could easily have a balanced minimum with just four clubs. However, the more clubs he has, the fewer values he will possess, given his pass at his second turn. It is easy to imagine that a club partscore might be your safest spot — but let your partner judge that for himself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 2
♥ A 10 8 6
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 16th, 2013
I went out to the woods today To hide away from you, From you a thousand miles away — But you came, too.
Jessie Rittenhouse
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ K Q 8 6
♦ A Q 9 5
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 7
♥ 9 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ A Q 6 5 |
♠ J 6 4
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ 10 8 3
♣ 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ K J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦* |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Balanced 11-13 or diamonds
♥9
If you trust your partner, he will have something resembling a three-suited hand with short hearts and close to an opening bid. (How else could he come into a live auction?) Lead a trump, since your opponents do not appear to be overloaded with high cards and have no obvious source of tricks outside trumps. Do not let them get a crossruff going.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 2
♥ 10 8 5
♦ J 9 5 3
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Would you ever open ♠ Q-10-8, ♥ A-4. ♦ K-5-4, ♣ A-J-9-5-2 with a strong no-trump, either for tactical reasons or because you believe the hand is worth that action?
Far From the Adding Crowd, Newark, N.J.
At matchpoints when nonvulnerable I can see the argument for getting the no-trump in first. A chunky five-card suit must be worth something, and since you might well want to play the hand your way up, it is not absurd to make the call. This is especially true in third seat when you should also aim to make the opponents' search for a major-suit fit rather more challenging.
I recently read an Aces column where you explained Bergen raises to the reader, implying that you weren’t particularly in favor of using them. I’ve used them ever since I read “To Bid or Not to Bid.” What don’t you like about them?
The Raiser's Edge, Winston-Salem, N.C.
They fall into the category of bids where judgment takes second place to system. They also allow lead-directing doubles rather too easily. One doesn’t always use Stayman when holding a four-card major; equally, one sometimes raises a major to two with four trumps and a defensive hand. That said, giving up jump responses in a minor is not a big loss, I agree. There are some sensible alternative “natural” uses, though weak jump responses may not be among them.
Imagine at matchpoints that you held ♠ A-10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-4, ♦ 9-7-5-4-2 ♣ — in third chair. Would you open the hand — and if so, what call would you prefer?
Open Sesame Paste, Orlando, Fla.
Since I am under oath, I think I'd pass if vulnerable and open nonvulnerable; I would marginally prefer a one-heart bid to the other choices. I really do not want to bid diamonds to see partner leading his doubleton ace, king or queen! Bidding long suits in third position is somewhat overrated; bidding good suits with one-bid hands has a lot to recommend it.
|
A friend gave me a somewhat garbled description of Snapdragon doubles. In what position do they apply, and how do they work exactly? More importantly, are they a good idea?
Boldly Advancing, Seneca, S.C.
When LHO opens, partner overcalls, and RHO makes a low-level bid, doubles of that bid should be for takeout. Doubling a bid-and-raised suit shows the unbid suits and a fair hand. If RHO introduced a new suit, double suggests values, with the unbid suit AND support for partner. Since you rarely have a penalty double in this position, the idea behind the convention is a sound one.
I always thought that if I had two equal or close to equal suits I should open with the higher of touching suits and the lower of nontouching suits. In one of your recent columns, you described a reverse as whenever the player bids any lower suit before a higher suit, in this case clubs and then hearts. Can you describe how these two ideas overlap?
Circle of Confusion, New York City, N.Y.
Anytime in an noncompetitive auction that you bid the low suit at the one-level, then a higher suit at the two-level, so that responder has to give preference to the first one at the three-level, it's a reverse. So, for example, opening one club, then bidding two hearts over one spade, guarantees reversing extras. You may have to repeat clubs or bid one no-trump without those extras.
|
December 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is a very great thing to be able to think as you like; but, after all, an important question remains: what you think.
Matthew Arnold
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 5
♥ A Q 5
♦ A K 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 4 2
♥ K J 9 6 4
♦ —
♣ A K Q 10 |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 10 7
♦ Q J 10 9 7
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6 3
♥ 8 3 2
♦ 8 6 5 4
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦* |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*An opening bid with five hearts and four spades
♣K
You have a nice hand with real potential, but you do not need to communicate that message all at once. Your initial choice is either a cue-bid of two spades to show a limit raise or better in hearts, or a negative double to show both minors. The advantage of the double is that it keeps the auction low and lets partner describe his hand — if the opponents allow him to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A Q 5
♦ A K 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
To give an accurate and exhaustive account of that period would need a far less brilliant pen than mine.
Max Beerbohm
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 10 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ J 5 3
♦ A J 5 4
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
♠ A 9 8
♥ A 7
♦ 9 8
♣ A K J 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 5 4 3
♥ K 10 9 8 4 2
♦ 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| 2♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣9
If you play inverted minors, where a simple raise is forcing for one round, this hand is duck soup. Equally, if you play a double raise as forcing, you will have no problems. If you play a simple raise is weak and a double raise invitational, then your choice is to invent a club suit or (my preference — inelegant as it might seem) to bid three no-trump and protect your major-suit honors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 10 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
And the giant with his club, And the dwarf with rage in his breath, And the elder giants from far, They are all the children of Death.
Lord Dunsany
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 2
♣ K Q 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9
♥ Q 10 8 7
♦ J 9 8 7 4
♣ A 5 |
♠ K Q 8 4 2
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 6 5
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A J 6 5
♦ A K 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥* |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Four-card majors and a strong no-trump
♠10
While a leap to five clubs might be right, heading for the nine-trick game of three no-trump looks more practical to me. You might find partner with a diamond stopper or partial stopper, or West may have no entry to his suit. In five clubs there are just too many potential top losers, plus the risk of defensive ruffs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 2
♣ K Q 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Gamesmanship: The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating.
Stephen Potter
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ Q 10 9 5 4
♦ A 7
♣ 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 6 2
♥ —
♦ Q 9 2
♣ K Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K J 2
♦ J 10 8 5 4 3
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
After three suits have been bid (or if LHO had raised his partner instead of bidding a new suit), your partner's double is takeout. It shows values and typically both unbid suits, if there are two, or else the unbid suit, together with tolerance for partner's suit. Here you have a straightforward call of one no-trump to show your hand-type and honor location. Two clubs would be my second choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Speak in French when you can't think of the English for a thing.
Lewis Carroll
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A K 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ Q 10 7 6 5 3
♦ A J 9
♣ Q 10 4 |
♠ A J
♥ J 9 8 2
♦ 10 5 4 2
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 7 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ Q 8 7
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥6
When the opponents intervene over a transfer bid, you should not go out of your way to complete the transfer at the three-level with only three trumps, unless your hand offers considerable extra offense. Here your hand is only average for play in hearts so you should pass. By contrast, if partner had transferred into spades, your fourth trump would make it clear to bid three spades over three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A K 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The guardian spirit of the place She seemed, and I some ghost forlorn, Surprised by the untimely morn She made with her resplendent face.
Ambrose Bierce
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ A 9 3
♣ A J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10
♥ 7 5
♦ Q J 7 6
♣ K 10 6 2 |
♠ J 9 8 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 10 8 2
♣ 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ A J 10 9 6
♦ K 5 4
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Partner's failure to support hearts means he is probably short in the suit. That doesn't in and of itself mean the lead will cost a trick though — and it may be that the trick will come back one way or another. The other choice is to lead a spade — but here the risk of losing a trick with no return is too high. On balance, I will lead a heart. But you could certainly tempt me to lead a club if my holding were J-10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 3 2
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ K J
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
You hear two spades to your left, passed around to you, and you are holding ♠ 10-2, ♥ K-Q-7-5-4, ♦ Q-9, ♣ A-Q-5-4. Would you balance, and with what? And would the form of scoring influence your decision?
On the Spot, Grand Junction, Colo.
I don't think you can pass, but whether you balance with a double –catering to the penalty pass from partner — or a three-heart call to get your main feature across, is up to you. I vote for the double; we might find clubs or hearts just as often as diamonds. And yes, I'd bid at any form of scoring or vulnerability — they don't get to push me around!
At a club duplicate game, my partner opened one club and I held ♠ A-J-10-5-4, ♥ J-5-4, ♦ Q, ♣ A-K-7-4. I responded one spade, then over his two-club call I took a chance at three no-trump. We lost the first five tricks in diamonds. How would you have handled the bidding?
Sucker-Punched, Montreal
You have given me a chance to expound on a subtle principle that might get past quite a few good players. Since two diamonds at my second turn would obviously be forcing, showing diamond values if not necessarily length, is a call of three diamonds "more" forcing? Surely not! If a call at one level is forcing and natural, a bid one level higher in the same suit is a splinter-bid, showing shortage and agreeing on partner's suit. So bid three diamonds.
What simple agreement should one have when partner opens a suit, the next hand doubles, and you redouble? Given that this suggests invitational values or better, how far forcing is this, and what do subsequent doubles show? If penalties, would three trumps suffice?
Lightning in a Bottle, Riverside, Calif.
|
Unless you are facing a third-in-hand opening, which might be shaded, redouble guarantees a second call, with subsequent doubles strongly suggesting defending from either side. Yes, one might make the call with three good trumps if there is no fit for your side and the vulnerability argued for it. Opener, especially, should double when he can with three trumps and defense.
How do you apply the rule of 11 if using third-and-fifth (or third-and-lowest) leads?
Higher Math, Macon, Ga.
If the lead is third highest, subtract the spot-card lead from 12. The result is the number of cards higher than the lead held by the other three players. If a fifth-highest lead — and you will normally be able to work out from the auction which one it is — subtract the card led from 10. So if a fifth-highest two is led, subtract two from 10. The other three players have eight higher cards in that suit.
In second seat, I picked up ♠ A-K-Q-J, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-J-7, ♣ 10-9-8-2. My RHO opens one spade. I chose to pass, and the auction continued with one no-trump on my left and two spades on my right. I now doubled. Was it for penalties? And if my partner runs, what does an escape to two no-trump suggest?
Passing Fancy, Elkhart, Ind.
Your first pass makes sense, as opposed to doubling, since you do not really want to convert two hearts to two no-trump or three of a minor. Double on the second round is best played as heavy penalty or light takeout — Partner should know which! If he escapes, then a bid of two no-trump would be scrambling – suggesting two or more places to play.
|
|
On an unopposed sequence Gaylor Kasle declared six hearts as South. (It might be better not to ask why, but it involved North's missorting his hand). He received the spade queen lead, and he won the king and drew four rounds of trump,while East pitched a couple of diamonds and a couple of spades.
Now the simple analysis might be to assume that since West has four hearts and East none, West (who must hold the club king to give you a chance) is more likely to have the doubleton king than four clubs to the K-10.
However, Kasle saw there was no need to commit himself at once. He carefully found out more about the hand by playing ace and a second diamond toward the queen. East took his king and declarer saw the spade nine discarded on his left, after some thought.
Now the odds in clubs had changed dramatically. Since his LHO had started with five red cards and his RHO with six, the odds favored the double finesse in clubs rather than playing for the doubleton king onside — and that is what Kasle did, by running the club jack. When it was covered, he crossed back to hand to repeat the club finesse against the 10 to bring home the contract.