October 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Behold, I do not give lectures or a little charity, When I give I give myself.
Walt Whitman
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7
♥ A K 10 7 6 3
♦ A J 7 4
♣ K J |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 8 5 2
♥ Q 9
♦ 9 8
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ 6 4
♥ J 8 5 4 2
♦ 6
♣ A 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 3
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠K
The choice of leads is between the singleton diamond and a fourth highest heart. I'm going for the singleton lead — now the route to the target of four tricks is somewhat easier to predict, while finding partner with good hearts is not necessarily sufficient to beat the game.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ J 8 5 4 2
♦ 6
♣ A 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
| Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
October 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Please give me a quick synopsis of the Michaels Cue-bid. Does it interact with the unusual no-trump?
Having a Fit, Galveston, Texas
The two conventions mesh well. A jump in no-trump always shows the two lower unbid suits, while a Michaels Cue-bid of a minor suggests both majors, and a cue-bid of a major shows the unbid major and one minor. Responder can ask for the minor with a call of two no-trump. With a powerhouse (the hand that would have been suitable for an old-fashioned cue-bid), start by doubling, then take further strong action.
I have always been a fan of penalty doubles when the opponents overcall. But all the people I play with tell me they are outdated. Are there still positions where penalty doubles are appropriate?
Lost Boy, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Clearly in the middle or at the end of the auction one often wants to double the opponents for penalty. Equally clearly, at your first turn to speak or when the opponents bid and raise a suit, double is normally takeout. Here are some exceptions: Double of a no-trump opening or overcall, or any double when your partner has opened or overcalled with a pre-emptive action and thus defined his hand very precisely, should be for penalty.
My partner accused me of cowardice here. Was he right? I held ♠ Q-10-4, ♥ A-K-Q-10-7-3, ♦ Q-4, ♣ J-4, and when my partner responded with a forcing one no-trump to my one-heart opening bid, I tried two hearts. He raised to three hearts — were my solid hearts enough reason to bid on? I passed and made 10 tricks when hearts split 3-3.
Forever Amber, Londonderry, N.H.
My view is that you do have enough to bid on. However, I would seriously consider bidding three no-trump now, rather than four hearts. After all, my hand is likely to play well enough in no-trump, given my source of quick tricks and soft values outside. Partner can always put us back to four hearts if he thinks it wise.
|
Many of the experts at my club play a convention referred to as Smolensk in response to an opening bid of one no-trump. I tried to find any details of it, but was unable to locate it. Please explain how it works.
Tattooed Lady, Vancouver, British Columbia
It is Smolen, not Smolensk — and the convention handles game-forcing hands with 5-4 in the majors, in response to a one- or two-no-trump opening, transferring declarership to the strong hand. With this pattern, you bid Stayman, then jump in your shorter major over a two-diamond response. This allows your partner to play three no-trump with no fit, or declare the 5-3 major fit from the stronger side, while making declarer the hand whose shape is unknown.
Playing social rubber bridge, I picked up ♠ J-10-4-2, ♥ K-10, ♦ K-9-2, ♣ K-10-8-3 and after a one-heart overcall of my partner's opening bid of one club, I doubled to show four spades. When my partner rebid two clubs, I raised to three, then heard my partner bid three diamonds. What would you expect that to show and what should I have done next?
Sucker Punch, Selma, Alaska
Your partner appears to be making a game-try based on length, so it feels right to bid three no-trump now. Consider that you might make game facing six clubs to the ace and the diamond ace and nothing else at all!
|
October 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Think? Why think! We have computers to do that for us.
Jean Rostand
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 7 6
♥ A 8 6 4 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10
♥ 7
♦ 9 8 5
♣ Q 10 9 8 7 6 4 3 |
♠ 9 8 5 4 3 2
♥ 10 5
♦ K Q 6 3
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q J 9 3
♦ A 7 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
There is no point in trying to thread the needle by trying to stay out of game here. Your aces and fifth trump coupled with your builders in diamonds make this hand too good for an invitation. It is worth a straightforward jump to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6
♥ A 8 6 4 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Everything happens to everybody sooner or later if there is time enough.
George Bernard Shaw
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 9 7 6
♥ A Q 2
♦ K J 5 4
♣ Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 8 3
♥ 8 7
♦ 9 7 3
♣ J 9 6 |
♠ J 4 2
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 8 2
♣ K 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ K J 6 3
♦ A Q 10 6
♣ A 10 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Three-card heart support
♠K
Facing a takeout double, I'd simply bid three clubs rather than two hearts, trusting my RHO to hold the suit he has bid. If he is an untrustworthy customer, maybe a two-heart call would expose his psych — my failure to double one heart limits the strength of the heart suit I can hold. I'm not keen on introducing the three-card spade suit if I can avoid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 2
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 8 2
♣ K 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Eternal law has arranged nothing better than this, that it has given us one way into life, but many ways out.
Seneca
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ A 5 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 9 7 6 5 |
♠ A 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ K J 10 9 7 4 3
♣ 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ K Q J 7 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♦Q
Following your responsive double, your partner's cue-bid simply shows a good hand. You have been asked to bid your suits up the line regardless of suit quality, so simply bid three hearts. The objective here is to find a 4-4 major-suit fit, not necessarily the best fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 9th, 2013
Fates cannot find out a capacity Of hurting thee. From Thee their lean dilemma, with blunt horn, Shrinks, as the sick moon from the wholesome morn.
Richard Crashaw
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K J 10 8 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A K 4 3
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 3
♥ 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ A 7 6 5
♦ J
♣ J 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K J 10 9 4 2
♦ Q 10 6
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦2
In this position it looks more sensible to respond one no-trump than to introduce spades (and risk playing an unsatisfactory fit) or pass and let partner suffer in a 5-1 fit. While one can introduce spades here with only four, you would surely not care to do so with a relatively weak suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 7 3
♥ 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one.
Henry David Thoreau
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ A 6 3
♣ A K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ 9 5 2
♦ 4
♣ J 9 7 5 4 3 |
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A 10 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ K J 4 3
♦ K Q J 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣5
This hand is surely strong enough to drive to game, since even facing a minimum balanced hand, your singleton may still leave partner cold for game. That said, some play mini-splinters (a jump to three no-trump over one spade or to three spades over one heart showing a raise to game, with 9-12 points and an unspecified splinter). I'll write about this soon in the Sunday letters column.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A 10 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 7th, 2013
Think no more; 'tis only thinking Lays lads underground.
A.E. Housman
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ Q 6
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ J 10 5
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
♠ A 5 2
♥ A 9 7 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 7
♥ K Q
♦ A K
♣ K J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥J
My choice would be to lead a spade, even though my RHO bid that suit. After all, your fifth spade does suggest you might be able to set the suit up eventually. My second choice would be a diamond — both minor suits are equally dangerous but partner might have been able to double the club bid if that were the right lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 4 2
♥ K 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
October 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I know you are a fan of what some people would consider the old fashioned strong jump shift. Many of the newer players pooh-pooh it, saying it puts the auction one-level higher before enough information has passed. I always considered it was essential to show the values — but can you comment please?
Old Fashioned, Los Angeles, Calif.
The jump shift, as I play it, shows one of three specific hands. It always guarantees a good suit and either real support for partner (if your next call is to support partner or cuebid), or if you rebid no-trump it shows upwards of a strong no-trump. Finally, if you rebid your suit it shows at least six cards and a semi-solid suit or better. None of these hands are easy to show unless you jump at your first turn.
You are South, all vulnerable, at matchpoints with: ♠ K-Q, ♥ K-Q-10-9-4-2, ♦ K-J-4, ♣ A-6, and after opening one heart and hearing a one spade response you jump to four hearts. Now partner bids five no-trumps, the grand slam force. Opener doesn't know whether partner has the bare heart ace, or more than one card in the suit, does he? At the table opener settled for the small slam, worried about the heart jack. Was this overly pessimistic?
Johnny Walker, Muncie, Ind.
Where you have space, the responses to five no-trump should be that reversion to the trump suit is the weakest action. The less you bid the more you have, but all calls higher than six of the trump suit show two top honors. Where opener has promised a VERY good suit and hand — and incidentally has neither — he should nonetheless probably show two trump honors with a six spade call. Even facing a singleton ace his chance of running the hearts is better than 50 percent.
After opening one diamond and hearing a one heart overcall followed by a one no-trump response from your partner, what should you do next holding: ♠ K-4-3, ♥ K, ♦ A-Q-7-5-4, ♣ A-10-6-4? I was torn between bidding two clubs and three clubs — but what do you think?
Bright Spark, Wilmington, N.C.
Jumping to three clubs invites game, and seems about right to me. A two club call would be pessimistic while a two-heart cuebid would drive to game and be overly aggressive. There is, though, surely something to be said for simply inviting with a call of two no-trump, and putting the clubs on the back burner.
|
What should you respond to a one-level opening bid with invitational values and both a five-card minor and a four-card major of your own? When my partner opened one diamond I chose to respond two clubs holding ♠ K-10-8-5, ♥ Q-5, ♦ K-4, ♣ K-10-7-4-2, and I was told that I should have bid my spades first. But how would I get the clubs into play without overstating my hand?
Lily Pond, Charlottesville, Va.
The general rule in response to minor-suit opening bids is to introduce any four-card major, on a hand up to invitational strength. Here bid spades first, planning to raise clubs if your partner bids them and to ignore the suit if partner bids one no-trump. The tricky question is whether to pass, raise diamonds, or bid two no-trump if you hear a rebid of two diamonds from your partner. I think the diamond raise is safest.
What is your view on the minimum required for a two-level overcall? Playing duplicate I was dealt ♠ Q-4-3, ♥ K-Q-8, ♦ K-5, ♣ A-J-4-3-2, vulnerable, and heard my RHO open one diamond. Am I supposed to overcall in clubs, to double, or pass?
Tact and Discretion, Casper, Wyo.
Few experts would vote for passing this hand; but many would try an overcall of one no-trump, and some would double, since you are playable in all three side-suits. A bid of two clubs it too unilateral, and seems an unnecessary risk to me – I’d like a sixth club or more intermediates in the suit before I make a two-level overcall.
|
October 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 5th, 2013
Hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy.
Sir Isaac Newton
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 9
♥ J 3 2
♦ A 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 7 4
♦ K Q 10 9 2
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ J 7 5 4
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 5 3
♥ A K Q 6
♦ —
♣ A 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
You have far too good a hand to sign off in three diamonds, but no clear-cut way forward. Since you effectively denied spades at your first turn to speak, perhaps a raise to three spades will show your partner where your values lie and help him decide where to go next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9
♥ J 3 2
♦ A 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♦ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
A few years ago a charity bridge event was held at Mosimann’s Restaurant in London in aid of the Variety Club. The total raised for the charity was £30,000.
On the morning of the event Zia Mahmood was sick and couldn’t play. His replacement, Nicola Smith filled in, and she and her partner won their section. The following slam caused her no problem. While the play should be straightforward, it floored a number of players.
Although South has only 10 high-card points, his hand is strong in distribution and well worth an opening bid. (A two diamond opening would be wildly misleading.) After that start, there would be no stopping North, and the final contract would be six diamonds after the obligatory use of Blackwood.
On a spade king lead, declarer needs to set up dummy’s hearts, using trumps as entries. The simplest line is to win the lead, play a trump to dummy and ruff a heart, play another trump to dummy and ruff another heart. Now ruff a spade and try the ace and king of hearts (discarding a spade and a club). If hearts break, declarer can claim the rest. On the actual layout declarer ruffs another heart, setting up dummy’s 10, which he can reach with a second spade ruff. The remaining heart winner allows declarer to discard a second club, and the slam is made without needing to guess which opponent holds the club ace.