October 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
But what is past my help, is past my care.
John Fletcher
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 8 7 4 2
♥ A 6 5
♦ Q 10 9
♣ K 10 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 6
♥ 9 8
♦ A 7
♣ Q 8 7 6 5 |
♠ A J 3
♥ J 3
♦ J 5 4 3 2
♣ J 9 2 |
South |
♠ K 5
♥ K Q 10 7 4 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ A 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥9
The attractions of a diamond lead are that it is unexpected; the opponents sound as if they are prepared for a club lead. As against that, clubs offer a far better chance of setting up immediately, plus you have a fast entry to them on the side. So put me down for a small club lead. My thinking is also that since I didn't promise real clubs, they might not need such a great club stopper to bid no-trump.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10
♥ 9 6
♦ A J 7 5
♣ K Q 7 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
My partner and I have a bet on your answer here, and a lot of personal pride rides on this. You are in fourth seat and the auction goes three clubs on your left, three spades from partner, and five clubs on your right. You hold ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-Q-7-4-3, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3, ♣ A. What would you bid? One of us believes you would double, one that you would bid six spades — but did we miss another possibility?
Searching for Solomon, Honolulu, Hawaii
I might double at unfavorable vulnerability. especially if my opponents were known lunatics, but I'd actually drive to slam by bidding five no-trump. In contested auctions this is not a grand slam force, but says pick a slam. Since partner could easily be 6-4, I'd expect him to bid a second suit if he had one, while he could temporize with six clubs, or emphasize his spades by repeating them.
Is there a simple rule for when to respond in the higher or lower of suits of the same length, be it four or five cards, and when to bid a major rather than a minor? I get confused when I read contradictory advice.
Pure and Simple, Miami, Fla.
The simple answer is always to bid your longer suit first with game-forcing values and always to bid the higher of five-card suits first. Bid the lower of four-card suits first with the following exception: In a hand with less than solid invitational values, either with two four-card suits, one a major and one diamonds, or a four-card major and a five-card minor suit, bid the major before the minor.
Say you were responding to an opening bid of one club after your RHO overcalled two hearts. You hold ♠ K-8-3-2, ♥ A-4, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3, ♣ J-10. Would you make a negative double, or bid three diamonds to set up the game-force?
Simple Pleasures, Albuquerque, N.M.
|
You might lose the spades completely unless you double now. By contrast, over a one-heart overcall I would have no problems with a response of two diamonds, expecting to get spades in later and not lose the opportunity to bid diamonds cheaply.
What is the best meaning to assign to a jump cue-bid of the suit your RHO has opened? Does it matter whether that suit is a minor or a major?
Raising the Roof, Corpus Christi, Texas
Yes, it does matter. After your RHO opens a major suit, the best meaning to assign to a double jump in that suit is asking for a stopper, suggesting that you have a solid minor and want to play three no-trump if your partner can stop the suit. The jump in a minor is probably best played as natural and pre-emptive. This would typically be a seven-card suit since the likelihood of your RHO having real length there is higher than usual.
Why do some experts lead king from ace-king? How does your partner know which holding you are leading from? And what if your partner is void? Might he not ruff the trick?
Ken the Card, Atlanta, Ga.
The world is split between those who lead king and those who lead ace.The main disadvantage of the king-lead is how to signal in response to it with jack-third. As against that, the lead of the ace denies the king, so makes it easy to signal attitude on that lead. If the ace could be from ace-king or unsupported, it is hard to signal intelligently on it. That is why, regardless of what you lead at trick one, you must play king from ace-king in midhand, since cashing out is so important.
|
October 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I reason, earth is short, And anguish absolute. And many hurt; But what of that?
Emily Dickinson
South |
North |
Neither |
♠ 7 4
♥ A
♦ A Q 10 8 5
♣ 9 6 5 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A Q J 9 3
♥ K Q J 10 3
♦ 3 2
♣ 10 |
♠ 10 6 5 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 7 6
♣ Q J 7 4 |
South |
♠ K 8
♥ 8 5 4 2
♦ K J 9 4
♣ A K 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
2♦ |
2♠* |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
*Limit-raise or better in diamonds
♥K
It is very tempting to bid two no-trump, going for the big payout if you are right; but here you have a viable alternative, which is to bid two spades. The point is that with such a misfit and no real club stopper, your chances of making three no-trump are very slim. Also, if partner has extras, he can still bid on if he wants.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ A
♦ A Q 10 8 5
♣ 9 6 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I am tired. Everyone's tired of my turmoil.
Robert Lowell
North |
North |
East-West |
♠ A 8 6
♥ Q 9 7 4
♦ J 8 2
♣ K Q 9 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ K 8 6 3
♦ A K Q 10 5 3
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 9 5 3
♥ 5
♦ 9 7
♣ J 10 7 5 3 2 |
South |
♠ K Q J 4
♥ A J 10 2
♦ 6 4
♣ A 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
It's very tempting to double to show the unbid suits, but what are you attempting to achieve? Your partner rates to have a Yarborough, and you have no real shape. So all you are doing is setting yourself up for a large penalty. Let the opponents bid to their game and hope to beat it. If the opponents stop low, you may change your mind, of course.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 4
♥ A J 10 2
♦ 6 4
♣ A 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
'You mean you can't take less,' said the Hatter. 'It's very easy to take more than nothing.'
Lewis Carroll
North |
North |
North-South |
♠ 10 6 4 2
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ Q 3
♣ K Q 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ K 10
♦ A K J 5 4
♣ 10 9 7 4 |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 9 6 5 3 2
♦ 10 9 7
♣ J 8 |
South |
♠ A Q J 8
♥ Q J
♦ 8 6 2
♣ A 6 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦K
On this auction you would like to take a shot at three no-trump if partner has a spade guard. The way to find out when the opponents have bid two suits is to tell rather than ask. A bid of three clubs here shows the club guard and asks partner to bid three no-trump with a spade guard.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 4 2
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ Q 3
♣ K Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Such are the changes and chances the centuries bring to the nations. Surely, the ups and downs of this world are past calculation.
Charles Johnson
South |
North |
Neither |
♠ K J 6 5
♥ A K Q 8 7
♦ —
♣ J 7 5 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ 3
♦ A 9 8 6 3
♣ K Q 8 6 4 |
♠ Q 10 9 3
♥ 10 4
♦ K 7 5 4
♣ 10 9 2 |
South |
♠ A 8 2
♥ J 9 6 5 2
♦ Q J 10 2
♣ A |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
2 NT |
6♥ |
All pass |
♣K
It is typically correct to raise partner's overcall with three trump, but here you have a minimum (maybe sub-minimum) for that action and your values are primarily defensive. Worse: you do not want to encourage partner to lead clubs unless he has a natural lead of that suit. So pass, don't raise.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 3
♥ 10 4
♦ K 7 5 4
♣ 10 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
October 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
But if you try sometimes You just might find You get what you need.
Mick Jagger and Keith Richards
South |
North |
North-South |
♠ J 7 3
♥ A 4 2
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ Q 10 9
♣ K J 10 8 |
♠ 6 2
♥ K 9 7 5 3
♦ J 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
South |
♠ A K Q 9 8 5
♥ 8
♦ A K 8 6
♣ A Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥Q
A partnership needs to agree if pass here would be to play, or is the Pontius Pilate pass. (You got me into this; you get me out of it!) I prefer the simple agreement that all passes of redoubles after a pre-empt has been doubled are to play, so I have to bid here. I'd start by bidding two spades, perhaps planning to redouble if doubled.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 3
♥ A 4 2
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
? |
|
|
|
October 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
All strange and terrible events are welcome, But comforts we despise.
William Shakespeare
North |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 9 4
♦ A K 9 7 3
♣ A Q 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ J 6 5 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ K J 9 8 6 5
♥ 2
♦ Q 10
♣ K J 5 3 |
South |
♠ A 7
♥ A K Q J 8 3
♦ 8 2
♣ 8 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♠ |
6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
This is a close call between a diamond and a spade. Had partner opened one club, I would definitely prefer the spade lead. Here a spade lead has the better chance to set the game; the diamond lead is more likely to hold the overtricks. So I would lead a diamond at pairs, a spade at teams.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6 5 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ J 9 3
♣ Q 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 23rd, 2012
I held ♠ A-Q-8-3-2, ♥ 7-4, ♦ K-J-10, ♣ K-10-7. How should I advance at unfavorable vulnerability after hearing partner open three clubs in second seat and the next hand bid three diamonds? Is doubling unreasonable, or should I simply raise clubs, and if so, to what level? Or should I bid three spades?
Multiple Choice, Lakeland, Fla.
I'd expect a club contract facing seven decent clubs and maybe a queen on the side to make 10 tricks most of the time. But I'd close my eyes and bid three no-trump, expecting to beat three diamonds by no more than a trick. Double here would be penalties, but very risky, while three spades is nonforcing though encouraging.
My hand was ♠ 9-2, ♥ 7-4-3, ♦ K-Q-9-7, ♣ Q-10-6-4. I heard one spade on my left and two spades from my partner (Michaels cue-bid, showing 5-5 in hearts and a minor). My partner said a call of two no-trump was right, but I thought three clubs was better.
Up-or-Down Vote, Ketchikan, Alaska
The answer is more about partnership agreement than right or wrong. I like to play three clubs here as pass or correct, while two no-trump invites game and asks for the minor. So with your hand I'd simply bid three hearts to show weakness. With the same hand and the king of hearts, I'd bid three diamonds, which I play as inviting game in the MAJOR.
I know computers are beginning to dominate chess and backgammon. Why do they lag so far behind at bridge?
Following Hal, Trenton, N.J.
Off the cuff I'd say that the language of bidding is so flexible that you can't become an expert player without human as opposed to robotic qualities. In the play, computers are beginning to learn how to adapt their picture of the deal from additional information they acquire, but there are still too many variables for them to compete at even the level of a decent human player. Give it time, maybe 10-15 years.
|
Where do you stand on the spectrum of light opening bids, pre-empts and overcalls? And has your position changed as you grew older?
Sixties Swinger, Eau Claire, Wis.
I firmly believe that partnership trust is worth more than the IMPs won or lost on any single deal. So in second seat or when vulnerable, I tend to be very sound. I do open shapely minimum hands as often as the next man, but my two-level overcalls are disciplined. I might step out of line in third seat or when pre-empting nonvulnerable, but what is out of line for me might be seen as fuddy-duddy by the younger generation.
Recently you ran a problem where you had 11 points facing a two-no-trump opening bid. Eleven plus 21 comes to 32, which means you could be off two aces. Your partner's bid usually shows a balanced hand. How are you suggesting a slam without at least another jack?
Fear of Heights, Harrisburg, Pa.
When it comes to 11-counts facing a two-no-trump opening, I don't worry about aces too much. In my life and in that of most people, there has been an occasion or two where 32 points combined missed two aces. I saw Meckstroth and Rodwell do it once in the last decade! It won't happen again, I promise. As for you, don't worry about it. Of course, finding a fit means fewer HCP may be necessary; find the fit first, then check on aces later.
|
October 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
But Jack, no panic showing, Just watched his beanstalk growing, And twined with tender fingers the tendrils up the pole.
Guy Carryl
South |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ K Q 8 4
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 7 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 7
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ K Q J 10 8 5 4 |
♠ K 9 8 7 4
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ J 9 7
♣ 3 |
South |
♠ A Q J 6 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ A K 8 3
♣ 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your partner has shown a powerhouse, but at this moment it is not clear if he has secondary hearts to go with his diamonds. However, you don't have to guess. Simply bid three hearts and your partner will raise with four, give delayed spade support with three, or take some other descriptive action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 7 4
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ J 9 7
♣ 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal comes from an international match between Poland and Portugal. At first glance you might imagine it was a dull four-heart contract with the spade ace onside. The only thing that appears to be at stake is the overtrick.
In the closed room, on the lead of the spade 10, the Portuguese declarer made 11 tricks without raising a sweat, by guessing the diamond jack. But Jacek Romanski got a less helpful heart-nine lead to his 10. Can you see the best line?
Obviously you could simply play a spade to the king at some point after drawing trumps, then rely on your table presence to find the diamond jack — a line that is perhaps just a bit better than 75 percent. But you do have an even better chance once trumps turn out to be 2-2.
You should play the heart king at trick two, then ruff out the clubs by playing three rounds of the suit, and next play a diamond to the queen. When it holds, you run the diamond 10. Even if the defenders have two diamonds to cash, West will be endplayed after taking his winners. If the diamond queen loses to the ace, you can still succeed if East has either the diamond jack or the spade ace.
This line succeeds unless all three critical cards are badly placed. In other words, you come home seven times out of eight. The fact that the spade ace was onside all along does not spoil the elegance of this line.