October 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
To throw away the dearest thing he owned As ’twere a careless trifle.
William Shakespeare
East |
North |
North-South |
♠ 4 3
♥ K Q J 3
♦ Q 9 6 5 2
♣ A 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 3
♣ K 8 6 4 |
♠ K Q 10 8 6 5
♥ 9 2
♦ J 8 4
♣ Q 10 |
South |
♠ A 9 2
♥ A 6 5
♦ A 7
♣ J 9 7 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
As my problems go, this one is a bit of a gimme. Your choice is to rebid one no-trump or to repeat diamonds. Just for the record, a call of two hearts would be a reverse, forcing partner to give preference at the three-level and showing at least an ace more than you hold. Of the two choices, rebidding one no-trump limits the hand and describes what you have; two diamonds wrongly emphasizes diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K Q J 3
♦ Q 9 6 5 2
♣ A 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Nothing puzzles me more than time and space; and yet nothing troubles me less, as I never think about them.
Charles Lamb
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 6 5
♥ A Q
♦ J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 3
♥ 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 5 2
♣ 8 3 |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ 9 6
♣ K 9 7 |
South |
♠ A K 10 7
♥ J 10
♦ A K Q
♣ A J 10 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♥6
Your partner's jump to three diamonds is invitational, not forcing. (With a game-force, he would start with a cuebid.) So you can expect a 5-4 hand with extras, and in that context your best game is surely four hearts since it is easy to imagine hands where both red suits will have three top losers. So bid four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ A Q
♦ J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I boast myself the senior, th' others are Youths, that attend in free and friendly care Great-souled Telemachus, and are his peers….
George Chapman
South |
North |
Both |
♠ A 10 8
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 9 6 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ K Q 8
♦ A 8 7 5 3
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ 9 2
♦ 10 6 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ K Q 6 4 3
♥ A 7 5 4
♦ K
♣ A J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♣* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade support, 7-9 points
♣K
One no-trump here should guarantee a club stopper while not necessarily guaranteeing heart length. It would be quixotic to introduce a three-card suit here, so what are you left with? The answer is to double one heart. This shows hearts and is for penalty. When the opponents run to two clubs, you may decide to balance with two hearts. Even if East has four hearts, that would not be the end of the world.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 9 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Therefore the sage knows without going about, Understands without seeing.
Lao-Tzu
South |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A Q 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ A 6 2
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 3
♣ J 10 |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ J 7
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
South |
♠ Q 4
♥ A K 7 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ A K Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦10
You are clearly too good to pass here, but equally you can't drive to game — partner could have a Yarborough. A continuation of one no-trump shows 18-20 high cards, so you can bid two no-trump to suggest a good two-no-trump opening bid and let partner decide what to do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ A K 7 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ A K Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Sometimes these cogitations still amaze The troubled midnight and the noon’s repose.
T. S. Eliot
North |
North |
East-West |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ A J
♦ J 9
♣ Q 10 8 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ 9 8 6 4 3
♦ K 10 5 4
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 5
♥ K 10 7 5 2
♦ A 8 7 3
♣ K J 2 |
South |
♠ Q J 10 8 4 2
♥ Q
♦ Q 6 2
♣ A 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
3♣* |
3♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
* Heart raise, 6-9 points
The opponents have surely reached a 4-3 or 5-3 fit, with dummy likely to offer a ruffing value. One line of defense might be to lead trump, but then declarer's diamonds will surely set up. Another approach is to keep leading hearts to try to build trump tricks for your partner. The most passive option is to lead clubs, and I think I'd do that.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ K 9 7 5 3
♦ J 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
September 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Recently my partner opened one heart in third seat and rebid two no-trump over my response of one no-trump, with: ♠ A-Q-9-7, ♣ Q-10-4-3-2, ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-7. I argued that he should bid two spades, or invent a minor-suit. What do you say?
Trapper John, Memphis, Tenn.
You've covered quite a lot of suggestions here but no one has hit on my preferred action (or inaction, you might say). Passing is clearly right here; responder has neither hearts nor spades, and has a weak hand – why with a misfit would you want to raise the level of the auction. Pass and keep your fingers crossed, I say.
Could you please answer a beginner's question: how does the forcing no-trump work to distinguish good and bad raises? And is there a simple cut-off point for raising partner's major-suit openings or overcalls to three – what do you do with a 10-count in general?
Hamburger Helper, White Plains, N.Y.
The simple rule is that a direct raise shows 7-10 with three or possibly four trump. Going through the forcing no-trump suggests 6-10 and two trump, or 4-7 and three trump. The direct raise to three and the indirect raise via the forcing no-trump suggest unbalanced and balanced hands respectively in the range 10-12. With a 10-count and four trump upgrade the hand, with three trump only upgrade when you have a side source of tricks or a singleton.
Can you help me with the definitions of a weak jump and what you describe as a mixed raise. For example if you hold: ♠ 9-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ 10-8-6-4-3 would you consider this to be a preemptive raise of clubs or would you think it was a mixed raise? And when do you use preemptive raises of your partner's opening bid?
Scrambled Eggs, Galveston, Texas
|
A simple rule is that a mixed raise of a minor asks partner to bid three no-trump with 18-19 balanced, so today's deal is on the cusp; I'd say it qualified as mixed. I use preemptive raises of opening bids in competition when non-vulnerable and mixed raises (6-9 HCP) when vulnerable.
I've recently been encountering some problems with using the blanket rule of 'third hand plays high'. Specifically when dummy has the jack or the queen in a three-card suit working out whether to put in the nine or 10 from a three-card suit headed by a top honor has been giving me fits. Could you give me some guidance here, please?
Saving Grace, Boise, Idaho
I'll try, but circumstances do alter cases. Typically when partner leads a low card and declarer plays low from a dummy that has jack- or queen-third and you have the queen or king accompanied by the nine or 10, the right play is the intermediate card. This looks VERY silly when partner has underled the ace-king against no-trump but how often does that happen? Against suits the same principle applies even more strongly – though it is not always right!
For those of us learning new bidding conventions, it would be helpful if someone had compiled a list showing how often a chance for the convention could be expected to occur. For instance it would be better to learn a convention which might occur once every 50 hands versus one which might occur once every 100 hands. Has anyone compiled such a list?
Rob Roy, Grand Forks, N.D.
The list of 25 conventions in Barbara Seagram's list is a good place to start. Even 25 conventions sounds like a lot for intermediate players. You can explore further here.
|
September 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
On the whole, I'd rather be in Philadelphia.
epitaph of W.C. Fields
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ A 10 9 8 5 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 9 7 3
♣ J 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
♠ 4 2
♥ K 8 4 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ K Q 10 5 |
South |
♠ K Q J 7
♥ A J 9
♦ A J 10
♣ A 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
4♥* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas transfer to spades
♥2
Responding one no-trump suggests approximately these values and is a perfectly reasonable call. It is the action I would take unless facing a third-in-hand opening bid. But your hand looks very defensively oriented to me, so I would give partner a little latitude and take the more discreet route of passing and seeing what happens next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
This were the cost to me, This were my winning — That he were lost to me.
Richard Gilder
East |
North |
North-South |
♠ K J 7 3
♥ A Q 10 9
♦ 8 3
♣ 9 7 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 5 4
♣ K 5 3 |
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ 7 3
♦ A K 9 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
South |
♠ A 6 2
♥ K J
♦ Q J 7
♣ A Q J 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦4
Reluctant as I am to lead my readers into bad habits, in third seat at any form of scoring or vulnerability I'd be most unwilling to pass here. With a good suit I know what I want partner to lead, so I feel obligated to open one diamond. It may not work out, but the negative inferences from my failing to act are almost as important as the positive ones. Partner will never play me for a good suit if I pass here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ 7 3
♦ A K 9 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Once harm has been done, even a fool understands it.
Homer
South |
North |
Both |
♠ J 10 9 6 5
♥ 3 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ A K 8 6 5 4
♦ A 7 6 3 2
♣ 5 4 |
♠ K 3 2
♥ Q 10
♦ 5 4
♣ A Q J 8 7 6 |
South |
♠ A Q 8 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ K Q
♣ K 10 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
If you feel tempted to bid, expecting partner to hold the unbid suits, reconsider. Your partner passed over one club. Would he have done that with values and any kind of two-suiter? No, he wouldn't. This auction shows a respectable hand with a good club suit — virtually the only sort of good hand with which your partner would pass initially and then back into a live auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 6 5
♥ 3 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.
Samuel Butler
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ 7 4
♦ A K J 5 4
♣ J 7 3 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 5 4
♥ Q J 10 9 8
♦ 7
♣ K 8 4 |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 5 3 2
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
South |
♠ A Q J
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 3
♣ A 10 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
A simple raise to two spades gets your values across satisfactorily, and if you are on defense against a club contract, you will know what to lead. But what if West plays four hearts? To get the diamond lead you want, you are much better advised to bid diamonds now or to double, suggesting values, diamonds and spade tolerance.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6
♥ 7 4
♦ A K J 5 4
♣ J 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal from the United Kingdom occurred in a Gold Cup match, a knockout tournament that is organized in its early stages across the whole country until the field is reduced to eight teams, whereupon the final stages are played at a single venue.
The hero of the deal was Gunnar Hallberg, who sat West. Gunnar is an expatriate Swede who came to London for the rubber bridge two decades ago and has since won a series of European and world titles for the English senior team.
You may want to cover up the South and East hands to see whether you would have found the winning play.
Against three no-trump the defense started with three rounds of spades, declarer holding up his ace until the third round. Declarer now needed to establish one of the minors, and the diamond suit is clearly the more promising option. It looks as if South will succeed because East cannot gain the lead to cash his spades.
However, when declarer cashed the diamond ace, Hallberg dropped his king! Now there was no way East could be prevented from gaining the lead with his jack, and three no-trump had to go down.
It was just as well for Hallberg’s team that he found such a good defense because in the other room North-South had lost their way and ended up in a hopeless five clubs. But Gunnar’s defense helped to level the board.