September 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Pleasure might cause her read, reading might make her know, Knowledge might pity win, and pity grace obtain….
Sir Philip Sidney
South |
North |
Neither |
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ K 8 5 3
♦ K 10
♣ A K 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 7 6 2
♥ 6 2
♦ 5 2
♣ J 10 7 3 |
♠ 10 8
♥ Q J 7 4
♦ J 9 8 7 4
♣ 9 8 |
South |
♠ J 4
♥ A 10 9
♦ A Q 6 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♠6
Jumping to three no-trump would be premature. You could be cold for a slam or end up playing in a hopeless spot, facing unexpected shortage in a major suit. The simple choice is to bid two clubs and hope to get diamonds in later; or to raise diamonds via the cue-bid, then bid no-trump next. Given the suit disparities, put me down as a cue-bidder. Switch the minors and I'd go the other way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ A 10 9
♦ A Q 6 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
You may tempt the upper classes With your villainous demitasses, But Heaven will protect the working girl.
Edgar Smith
East |
North |
Neither |
♠ A K 6
♥ Q J 8
♦ 10 7 6 3
♣ 7 6 3 |
West |
East |
♠ J 2
♥ K 10 7 6 5 4 3
♦ 9 2
♣ A J |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A 9 2
♦ 8 4
♣ K Q 5 4 2 |
South |
♠ Q 7 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ A K Q J 5
♣ 10 9 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
4♣ |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣A
Lead the spade jack. When leading partner’s suit, lead the top of a two-card sequence. The spade jack might cost you a trick in the suit if partner were short, but when your side has nine-plus cards in a suit, leading the top honor should be safe and more revealing than a low card.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 2
♥ K 9 7 5
♦ A Q 4
♣ 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
4♣ |
All pass |
|
September 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 9th, 2012
If your partner opens one club, would you ever consider responding three no-trump, holding ♠ A-Q-10, ♥ 9-8-3-2, ♦ A-7-4, ♣ Q-9-7? Or would you bid one heart?
High-Wire Act, Monterey, Calif.
I believe that Eddie Kantar once posited that on moderate hands with a very weak four-card major you might respond one no-trump for fear of being raised with three trumps perhaps. But with a decent hand, that does not apply. Over a raise of hearts you might simply bid three no-trump to offer the choice of games. Concealing the major has a variety of ways to lose — not least that in three no-trump you might receive a painful heart lead!
We play Chicago bridge, and one person in our group claims that you cannot be doubled into game. Another says that if you are doubled, you would get game.
Official Scorer, Midland, Mich.
The key is that at duplicate you use the same basic score as at rubber. To score below the line you must make a contract – overtricks going above the line. If you are doubled, the value of the doubled contract goes below the line. Let’s look at a contract of three diamonds. It is worth 60 (plus 50 for partscore) or 110 at duplicate. Three diamonds doubled is 120 plus 50 plus either 300 or500 for game, thus 470 or 670. What makes it game is that the number to be doubled up is 60, which gets you to more than 100. Check out duplicate bridge scoring here.
When responding to a takeout double in the balancing seat, how do I judge the level to bid at — and what do my doubles mean if the opening bidder acts again? Say I hold: ♠ K-8-4-2, ♥ A-J-3, ♦ Q-6-4-3, ♣ 10-2 and hear one diamond passed around to my partner, who doubles. What would you bid if RHO passes, and what if he bids one heart?
Balancing Act, Danville, Ill.
|
Because your partner's double can be up to a king lighter than in the direct seat, you need a little more to jump here than in direct seat. I'd consider this hand on the cusp of a two-spade call over a pass on my right, but over a one-heart call I'd be happy just to bid one spade and get to show some values in the process — say 7-10 points.
I'm looking for books of declarer-play hands to try to improve. What collections of deals do you recommend?
Bookworm, Great Falls, Mont.
Of the current crop of writers Eddie Kantar and Julian Pottage produce splendid work. The former has works designed for all possible levels of players. The late Hugh Kelsey and Terrence Reese always challenged readers with more-advanced ideas. Paul Lukacs also produced very interesting deals.
I enjoy your bridge column, though much of the bidding is of a considerably more complex nature than my friends and I use. And I love the quotations that begin the columns and wonder if they are available as a collection or if they have been randomly gathered by you.
Marseillaise, Raleigh, N.C.
I'm often in retrospect surprised that I don't get more questions about the quotations. My routine is to find a theme word from the article and consult a couple of dictionaries of quotations to find something relevant. Once in a while I'll look for a popular song along the theme of the puzzle — but nothing more organized than that.
|
September 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Who overcomes By force hath overcome but half his foe.
John Milton
South |
North |
North-South |
♠ K 10 4
♥ A K 10 6 4 2
♦ A 6 4
♣ 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 3
♥ 5
♦ Q 9 7 3
♣ K 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 9
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ K 10 8 5 2
♣ J 4 2 |
South |
♠ A 8 7 6 5 2
♥ Q 7
♦ J
♣ A Q 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♦3
The hand is too good for a rebid in either hearts or spades. Best is to cuebid two clubs, simply showing a good hand, planning to bid two spades over two of a red suit from partner. This way your partner will know of real extras opposite (typically extra high-cards rather than four-card trump support). If you play — as I do — that one spade promises five, cuebid, then jump to three spades to force to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 4
♥ A K 10 6 4 2
♦ A 6 4
♣ 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A Dresden shepherdess was one day Milking a small Delft cow, When a Sevres Marquis came along — I saw him smile and bow.
George Hellman
East |
North |
Neither |
♠ A K 5 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ K 8 5
♣ J 9 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7
♥ 9 6
♦ A J 10 7 2
♣ K 10 7 |
♠ 10 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 6 4
♣ A Q 5 4 2 |
South |
♠ J 8 6
♥ A K J 10 7 4
♦ Q 3
♣ 8 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣7
There is no single right answer here (and my suggested answer would get me burned at the stake in 14 states in the United States), but I believe that with only three clubs you should rebid one no-trump, not one spade. If you are facing extras, partner will be able to find a spade fit. If he has limited values, you do not want to make him think you have a shapely hand when you are as balanced as possible.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ J 9 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Nothing contributes so much to tranquilize the mind as a steady purpose — a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye.
Mary Shelley
West |
North |
Both |
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ K 10 9 7 6 2
♦ —
♣ A Q 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K J 4 3
♥ J 5 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ 10 8 7 |
♠ 5
♥ A 8
♦ A K 8 7 6
♣ K J 9 6 2 |
South |
♠ Q 8 7 2
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 9 5 2
♣ 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
2 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
♣7
You have more than enough in the way of shape and values to bid two spades now. Remember, at your second bid you showed a bad hand and strongly suggested no major. In context you have real extras in high cards, and real additional values in terms of shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7 2
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 9 5 2
♣ 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
2♥ |
? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Ignorance of the law excuses no man….
John Selden
East |
North |
East-West |
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 6 3 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
♠ A 9 7 6
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ 5 2
♣ J 8 |
South |
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣K
Your partner is a passed hand. Do you really think he has a long club suit with which he can back in at the four-level after not being able to open? Of course not! He has a real fit for spades, and a hand inviting you to lead clubs against the opponents' heart contract. Bid four spades now and await developments.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
3♥ |
4♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
Throb, baffled and curious brain! throw out questions and answers! Suspend here and everywhere, eternal float of solution!
Walt Whitman
East |
North |
North-South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ K
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 8 7 5 3
♦ 8 7
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ K Q J 7 3
♥ 10 6 4
♦ Q 9 6
♣ J 2 |
South |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
A double here by you would be takeout but would normally see you hold both majors. Your choice is a simple call of two diamonds, an aggressive three-diamond bid, or a double, expecting to play a 4-3 fit. I'd bid just two diamonds — You are a long way from game, but if you can make something significant, partner will surely bid again.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
From things that differ comes the fairest attunement; all things are born through strife.
Heraclitus
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ A J 7 6 5
♥ J 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ Q 10 7 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K 9 7 6 2
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 9 8 5 |
South |
♠ K Q 9 2
♥ A 4
♦ A 10 9 7
♣ A K 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Offering a choice of slams
♥3
On an auction of this sort there seems to be no obvious urgency to lead diamonds. If declarer is going to set up clubs or hearts successfully, he will probably be making his contract whatever you do. But what may be relevant is the need to kill a ruff in dummy. And when your side holds the balance of high cards, as appears to be the case here, repeated trump leads might be effective.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3 2
♥ K 3 2
♦ K 10 7 4
♣ Q 8 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
September 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 2nd, 2012
I assume you and your partner play Michaels. What would it mean to you if, after your RHO bid one diamond, you passed, your LHO bid two clubs, and your partner then bid three clubs? I bid this with ♠ Q-9-8-3-2, ♥ J-10-9-7-4, ♦ K-Q-9, ♣ —, thinking that it would be obvious that, since I didn't double, I had less than an opening bid and had two five-card majors. Was I wrong?
How's That Again?, Augusta, Ga.
You are theoretically right. But since double is takeout showing a good hand and two no-trump would be unusual for the unbid suits, it is at least arguable that there is potentially some confusion. Incidentally, I'd pass your hand rather than bid. Why tip the opponents off to bad breaks when there is virtually no chance that the hand belongs to your side?
Recently, during a game of rubber bridge, I was the declarer. I was the fourth player to a trick led from my left. I somehow detached the wrong card (too small in value to win the trick) from my hand. I realized it was the wrong card when I tabled it. I then exchanged it for the card I had intended to play to win the trick. My defenders would not allow me to correct this error. Which law should apply?
Lucky Luke, Tucson Ariz.
In layman's terms you can only change your card if it was played with no intention of playing it. The law refers to dropping a card, not playing a card that was wrong. Rightly or wrongly you put a card on the table — not the one that you should have, but the one you intended to play before you realized it was a mistake. You have an extremely high threshold for your play to qualify as "accidentally played."
With this hand would you bid over a weak two diamonds: ♠ J-9-8-3-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ A-K? Would your answer change depending on the form of scoring, on position, or on vulnerability?
Plumb Tuckered, Grand Junction, Colo.
|
This is a tough one; You would overcall one spade over one diamond without a flicker, but this case is not so clear. For what it is worth, I would bid except facing a passed partner at teams or rubber. But make my diamond seven the club seven, and double makes good sense too.
We play New Minor Forcing for only one round so that we can find a 5-3 major fit, and then decide whether game is there by making an invitational or help-suit bid. Is this standard, or should we play it as game-forcing?
Musical Chairs, Laredo, Texas
If you play New Minor, then you should use a direct jump by responder at his second turn as invitational, and new minor then three of a new suit as game-forcing. Similarly responder's jumps at his second turn after three suits have been bid (as opposed to a no-trump rebid) are ALL invitational, while all game forces go through fourth suit.
What is the sensible meaning of a sequence where the partner of a no-trump opener uses Stayman, then in response to a major bids the other major ? Should that be natural or artificial — and what would it show?
High Hopes, Torrance, Calif.
After the Stayman inquiry finds a major, you should use responder's jumps as splinter raises of that major. But bidding the other major at the three-level shows a balanced hand agreeing partner's major, with slam interest. Meanwhile, a jump to four no-trump is quantitative, without a fit for partner's major.
|
|
I am always happy to receive deals from my readers. It doesn't matter that they didn't find the right play at the table, as long as the theme is an interesting one. We can all learn from real-life hands, even when not played by experts.
Today, Orville St. Clair, declarer in six no-trump, won the helpful spade lead in hand with the jack. West should surely have led a heart here — not that it would have worked out any better.
Now declarer finessed the spade queen, more to find out how many tricks he needed in the other suits than with great confidence that it would hold. Once the finesse worked, South was up to 11 sure winners, so correctly decided to set up a threat in hearts by leading a low one from dummy and putting in the nine. He was delighted to see it hold the trick.
Of course, if East had split his honors, declarer would have had 12 top tricks. As it was, South was now playing for a 13th winner. The best order to take the tricks is the heart ace, then one club and the spade ace, discarding a heart from hand. East has to pitch a diamond, and declarer must decide if he had begun with three diamonds and four clubs (when the three top diamonds would squeeze him in clubs and hearts) or with his actual hand, when cashing the clubs squeezes East in diamonds and hearts. St. Clair read the position accurately and brought home 13 tricks.