November 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Times go by turns and chances change by course, From foul to fair, from better hap to worse.
Robert Southwell
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K J 3 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ 7 5
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 6
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ J 9 4
♣ Q 9 |
♠ Q 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K J 8 4 |
| South |
♠ 5 4
♥ A K 3
♦ A K 3 2
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
When our side has bid hearts and theirs spades, it makes sense to me for your partner's call of four clubs to show hearts and clubs — in order to help with the decision over the almost inevitable call of four spades. On this occasion, your clubs are good but your trumps feeble, and you have soft cards in the other two suits, thus no idea what to do. When you don't know what to do, pass and let partner decide.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
3♠ |
4♣ |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Traffic signals in New York are just rough guidelines.
David Letterman
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 7
♥ J 8 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ K Q 9 2
♦ A 8
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
♠ 9 8 3 2
♥ A 10 6
♦ J 7 6 3 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A K Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
Your hand looks as if it is worth a second call, since you might well find that your side can make nine tricks in clubs while your opponents could make eight tricks in whichever red suit they settle in. While a double here would be takeout, you should only make that call with four spades, or with better spades and worse clubs than this. A simple call of three clubs looks right.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A K Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You should not honor men more than truth.
Plato
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ A Q 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8
♥ 8 7 6 4 2
♦ 9 8
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ A K 10
♥ J 9 3
♦ A 6 5
♣ K 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ A K 10 5
♦ Q J 10 3 2
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠J
Your partner's call of two diamonds is the fourth suit, a forcing inquiry. It asks you to show support for your partner, rebid no-trump with a stopper in the fourth suit, or to show extra shape in either of your two long suits. Here, your diamond stopper is more than sufficient for a call of two no-trump. For the record, a bid of three no-trump would have shown 15-17.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ A Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I know that I shall meet my fate Somewhere among the clouds above. Those that I fight I do not hate. Those that I guard I do not love.
W.B. Yeats
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 4
♥ K 5
♦ J 9 7
♣ A 10 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ 10 7 6 4 2
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ 5 4 |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ A Q 9
♦ K 4 3 2
♣ K 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 5
♥ J 8 3
♦ A 10
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦5
At your partner's previous turn, two no-trump would not have been forcing. But how much does your partner have in the way of extras? This is unclear in Standard American. I'd expect him to hold about a strong no-trump. With more, he would have cue-bid first. So it seems that you do not have enough extras to raise to four no-trump, quantitative. Give me the diamond queen instead of the jack, and I would bid on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ K 5
♦ J 9 7
♣ A 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul.
Joseph Addison
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ Q 8 7
♦ K J 10 6 5
♣ A 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 5
♥ J 4 3
♦ 4 3 2
♣ J 8 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ A K 10
♦ Q 9
♣ 10 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠6
Just because your opponents have announced a stopper in your suit should not be enough on its own to put you off leading it. But you have an attractive alternative in your spade suit. Yes, declarer rates to have four, but so does your partner, and as long as he has any of the three missing top spades, you should be able to set the suit up for your side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 3
♥ K 7 5 2
♦ 9 7
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
November 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I have been playing for three years and I am not sure if I know what I am doing, but I am past the frustration-stress stage now. I think that a bridge guru like you could really help explain to us newbies how to think like a bridge player. As a suggestion, would you please include one beginner-intermediate question-and-answer in your column?
Back to Basics, White Plains, N.Y.
Good idea. I can't guarantee to do as you so nicely ask — but I hear you and will try to remember. So let me start by giving you a piece of general advice. When you are in the range for a one-no-trump opening but have a five-card suit, treat the hand as balanced and do open one no-trump. Equally, don't worry about a small doubleton. If your hand is balanced and that is the only flaw, start with one no-trump.
When I was dealt ♠ K-J-9-3, ♥ A-K-Q-3, ♦ 10-8-5-4-2, ♣ –, I opened one diamond and was faced with a rebid problem over my partner’s call of two clubs. Would your decision about what to do differ depending on whether this was a game force or not?
Four Square, Montreal, Canada
If two of a major shows extra strength here (and I believe it should), then two diamonds could be played simply as a catch-all with five plus diamonds, regardless of strength. I don’t have a good answer for you here, though, since the diamond suit is so weak. I might lie by bidding two hearts (planning to raise a bid in the fourth suit of two spades to three to show my length/strength). I’d rebid two no-trump with a 4-4-4-1 pattern, by the way, but not here.
In an earlier column this year you briefly described a conventional response to partner's no-trump opener. Three clubs showed both minors, invitational, while three diamonds was forcing with both minors, and three of a major showed shortage in the other major and 5-4 in the minors. This sounded promising and I would like to read more about it. What is the name of this convention?
Name It and Claim It, Columbia, S.C.
|
This method is very popular on the East Coast, and for what it is worth, I've heard it referred to as seven-way transfers. This is the term used at the Regency Bridge Club in New York, so if you prefer Regency transfers, so be it! One other wrinkle I've encountered is for players to use the three-club call as Puppet Stayman to check for 5-3 fits.
Please tell me what I should have done after my LHO opened three clubs and my partner doubled. (I held ♠ K-4, ♥ A-Q-3, ♦ A-Q-10-5-4, ♣ 7-3-2.) I tried five diamonds, and without going into details, this was not a success facing a 4-5-2-2 hand.
Lost in Yonkers, The Bronx, N. Y.
This is a nasty kettle of fish. I might well double with a hand like your partner's. And I might well do what you did here! If you cue-bid four clubs, are you supposed to pass a four-heart response? You might well be cold for slam in diamonds. This looks like a result where no one was really to blame.
As a director, I had always thought that in a pairs game, North fills in the score at the end of the played board. East or West then checks and agrees to the score, gives the traveler back to North, who then inserts it into the board. We have a pair who will not initial and who will not return the traveler to North. They just cram it into the board, which makes it very unpleasant.
Bridge in the Menagerie, Wausau, Wis.
Thanks for your letter. My experience is that it is somewhat unusual for pairs to initial scores anymore. They tend simply to look and then agree orally. I would not get too hung up on the etiquette here. Times have changed, and we must change with them.
|
November 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Lottery tickets are a surtax on desperation.
Douglas Coupland
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ 6 2
♦ J 9 8 6 5
♣ K 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ 10 3
♦ A Q 4 2
♣ 10 9 6 4 |
♠ 9 7
♥ A J 9 7
♦ K 10 7 3
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 2
♥ K Q 8 5 4
♦ —
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣* |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two-plus cards, balanced, or clubs
♣9
The cue-bid in response to a takeout double is normally looking for a major-suit fit, so I would bid three hearts here, rather than three diamonds. The cue-bid is not a game-force at the two-level, but is forcing to suit agreement. But here, since you can hardly agree on a suit and stay out of game, the cue-bid becomes a game-force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ A J 9 7
♦ K 10 7 3
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If I'd observed all the rules, I'd never have got anywhere.
Marilyn Monroe
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K
♥ A J 8 5 3
♦ A K Q J
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ Q 6
♦ 10 4
♣ K 10 7 4 2 |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 10 7 4 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ J 9 6 5 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
Where you have huge support for your partner, showing that should take precedence over limiting your hand by defining your high cards. So here I would jump to four hearts, a splinter bid promising short hearts and spade support. With only four trumps, I might refrain from making a slam-try.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6 5 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
My limbs are wasted with a flame, My feet are sore with travelling, For calling on my Lady’s name My lips have now forgot to sing.
Oscar Wilde
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 4 2
♥ A K J 2
♦ K Q 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q 5
♦ 9 8 7 6
♣ 9 8 7 5 |
♠ 9 7 5 3
♥ 9 8 7 6
♦ 5 4 3
♣ K 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 6
♥ 10 4 3
♦ A J 10
♣ A J 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♦9
Your spade guard strongly argues for bidding no-trump here. There are two clear downsides to that action: The opponents may be able to cash out hearts against you, and if partner has real extras, you may miss a slam. But you cannot cover every eventuality. When three no-trump looks like a sensible contract, just up and bid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6
♥ 10 4 3
♦ A J 10
♣ A J 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
When is the perfect time? Who can say, but probably somewhere between haste and delay — and it's usually most wise to start today.
Rasheed Ogunlaru
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 9 4
♥ A 10 7
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ 9 2
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
♠ Q J 8 5 2
♥ Q J 8 6
♦ 5 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
♠ K 6 3
♥ K 5 4 3
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣Q
What defense do you have when the opponents open one no-trump? No matter what convention you use, the number-one priority is to be able to show both majors with a method such as Landy, where a call of two clubs is artificial and shows the majors. As a passed hand I would act — if necessary bidding two spades, should two clubs not be available to me for the majors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 8 5 2
♥ Q J 8 6
♦ 5 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
With 26 high-card points and no substantial trump suit, North-South should reach the no-trump game. South's two-no-trump rebid indicates an 18-19 count, and now North has more than enough to continue to game. He could explore for a 5-3 spade fit, but it looks so much better for South to be declarer here that he might as well simply drive to the no-trump game.
Against this contract West leads the heart queen. Declarer can either win or duck the trick, but when he gains the lead, he should know that success or failure in three no-trump will hinge on the play of the spade suit. What are the options?
Since the club suit provides too remote a chance for extra tricks, declarer must attempt to take four spade tricks, and there are no side entries to dummy. By ducking the first spade trick completely, then leading a spade to the ace when he regains the lead, South will garner the necessary tricks if the spades divide 3-3 or if either opponent holds a doubleton queen. This line of play gives a better chance than any other method of managing the spade suit, since the chance of a 3-3 break or the queen coming down in two rounds is approximately 50 percent. By finessing first and then cashing the ace and king, you would hold yourself to at most three spade tricks unless the suit breaks 3-3, and that happens only one third of the time.