December 1st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I have a problem with the concept of a reverse in competition. I held ♠ Q-10-9-2, ♥ A-3, ♦ A-5, ♣ Q-J-6-4-2. I opened one club, intending to rebid one spade over my partner’s response in a red suit. Alas, over my partner’s response of one heart, my RHO overcalled two diamonds. What was I supposed to do now?
Stuck in Park, Honolulu, Hawaii
Since you cannot rebid two spades without significant extras, while a call of three clubs would show at least a six-carder, and you cannot raise hearts, the best action is to pass. You hope that your partner can act – perhaps with a takeout double so that you can get to bid your spades. If he passes, you didn’t really miss anything.
Somebody sprang the term "minisplinter" on me recently. It sounded interesting –but would you please explain it? Is it worth the effort of learning a new convention?
Too Cool for School, Detroit, Michigan
Two conventions go by this name; I'll give you the one I think comes up more often and is more useful. Responder's first call of one over the limit-raise of a major (three spades or three no-trump over one heart and spade respectively) shows 9-12 with an unspecified singleton and four-card support for partner. Opener can ask for the shortness or can sign off. Thus other double jumps are splinters with 13-15 HCP, three no-trump over one heart showing a good hand with spade shortage. This gives up very little and is useful in defining values and shortness.
When my LHO heard me open one spade, he jumped to four clubs at favorable vulnerability, holding ♠ 4, ♥ Q-3, ♦ 10-5-4, ♣ K-Q-J-7-6-3-2. His partner saved over four spades and went for 500, but that was still a good score for them. When I asked if that did not promise eight clubs he said that he thought he had an eight-card suit –but I don't believe him! Was his call right?
Number-Cruncher, Hamilton, Ontario
When it comes to pre-empting, like so much in life, inflation has struck hard. Since at this vulnerability some would make a weak jump with only a moderate six-carder, you can understand why he went the extra mile. And since it worked, one can hardly criticize his choice too harshly!
|
Can you provide some simple guidelines for when one should open strong two- or three-suiters with two clubs, as opposed to bidding the long suit first at the one-level? I've always been taught to open low — but I seem to be in the minority these days.
Aim-Low Club, Laredo, Texas
I tend to open three-suiters at the one-level with 21 or fewer points, though with a singleton honor in a major and 4-4-4-1 shape, one can sometimes cheat and open two no-trump. On two-suited hands with a longer minor than major, one tends to save space by opening the long suit, so unless you have game in your own hand. I'd eschew the two-club call.
Either times have changed (quite likely!) or I seem to have forgotten a few things, such as what should happen in the following bidding sequence. I passed my partner's one-club opening and my LHO balanced with one diamond. Now my partner bid one no-trump, showing more than a strong no-trump, right? But do transfers apply here if I choose to act?
Risk Averse, Fayetteville, N.C.
I think once a suit has been bid by the hand that rebids at no-trump, transfers would only apply by special agreement. It is too likely you might want to play two clubs here, for example. However, just for the record: In an unopposed auction, responder can use transfers after a two-no-trump response — though that would require an unusual agreement.
|
November 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.
Confucius
| North-South |
North |
| East |
♠ J 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ K Q 4
♣ A 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 5
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ 7
♣ Q 10 9 3 |
♠ A Q 9 8 4 3
♥ J 9 8
♦ J 5 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A K 3
♦ A 10 9 8 6 3
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| 3♦ |
4♠ |
5♦ |
All pass |
♠5
Yes, you have nice-fitting cards in partner's suits, and yes, you have a little extra in high cards. But there is still no need to do more than bid two spades. With the best will in the world your hand still adds up to a 10-count with a doubleton trump support. Passing two diamonds or raising to three diamonds would be wrong — don't ever raise the second suit with only three trumps if you can avoid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ K Q 4
♣ A 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Times go by turns and chances change by course, From foul to fair, from better hap to worse.
Robert Southwell
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K J 3 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ 7 5
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 6
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ J 9 4
♣ Q 9 |
♠ Q 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K J 8 4 |
| South |
♠ 5 4
♥ A K 3
♦ A K 3 2
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
When our side has bid hearts and theirs spades, it makes sense to me for your partner's call of four clubs to show hearts and clubs — in order to help with the decision over the almost inevitable call of four spades. On this occasion, your clubs are good but your trumps feeble, and you have soft cards in the other two suits, thus no idea what to do. When you don't know what to do, pass and let partner decide.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ K J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
3♠ |
4♣ |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Traffic signals in New York are just rough guidelines.
David Letterman
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 7
♥ J 8 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ K Q 9 2
♦ A 8
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
♠ 9 8 3 2
♥ A 10 6
♦ J 7 6 3 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A K Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
Your hand looks as if it is worth a second call, since you might well find that your side can make nine tricks in clubs while your opponents could make eight tricks in whichever red suit they settle in. While a double here would be takeout, you should only make that call with four spades, or with better spades and worse clubs than this. A simple call of three clubs looks right.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A K Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You should not honor men more than truth.
Plato
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ A Q 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8
♥ 8 7 6 4 2
♦ 9 8
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ A K 10
♥ J 9 3
♦ A 6 5
♣ K 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ A K 10 5
♦ Q J 10 3 2
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠J
Your partner's call of two diamonds is the fourth suit, a forcing inquiry. It asks you to show support for your partner, rebid no-trump with a stopper in the fourth suit, or to show extra shape in either of your two long suits. Here, your diamond stopper is more than sufficient for a call of two no-trump. For the record, a bid of three no-trump would have shown 15-17.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ A Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I know that I shall meet my fate Somewhere among the clouds above. Those that I fight I do not hate. Those that I guard I do not love.
W.B. Yeats
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 4
♥ K 5
♦ J 9 7
♣ A 10 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ 10 7 6 4 2
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ 5 4 |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ A Q 9
♦ K 4 3 2
♣ K 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 5
♥ J 8 3
♦ A 10
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦5
At your partner's previous turn, two no-trump would not have been forcing. But how much does your partner have in the way of extras? This is unclear in Standard American. I'd expect him to hold about a strong no-trump. With more, he would have cue-bid first. So it seems that you do not have enough extras to raise to four no-trump, quantitative. Give me the diamond queen instead of the jack, and I would bid on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ K 5
♦ J 9 7
♣ A 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul.
Joseph Addison
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ Q 8 7
♦ K J 10 6 5
♣ A 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 5
♥ J 4 3
♦ 4 3 2
♣ J 8 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ A K 10
♦ Q 9
♣ 10 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠6
Just because your opponents have announced a stopper in your suit should not be enough on its own to put you off leading it. But you have an attractive alternative in your spade suit. Yes, declarer rates to have four, but so does your partner, and as long as he has any of the three missing top spades, you should be able to set the suit up for your side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 3
♥ K 7 5 2
♦ 9 7
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
November 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I have been playing for three years and I am not sure if I know what I am doing, but I am past the frustration-stress stage now. I think that a bridge guru like you could really help explain to us newbies how to think like a bridge player. As a suggestion, would you please include one beginner-intermediate question-and-answer in your column?
Back to Basics, White Plains, N.Y.
Good idea. I can't guarantee to do as you so nicely ask — but I hear you and will try to remember. So let me start by giving you a piece of general advice. When you are in the range for a one-no-trump opening but have a five-card suit, treat the hand as balanced and do open one no-trump. Equally, don't worry about a small doubleton. If your hand is balanced and that is the only flaw, start with one no-trump.
When I was dealt ♠ K-J-9-3, ♥ A-K-Q-3, ♦ 10-8-5-4-2, ♣ –, I opened one diamond and was faced with a rebid problem over my partner’s call of two clubs. Would your decision about what to do differ depending on whether this was a game force or not?
Four Square, Montreal, Canada
If two of a major shows extra strength here (and I believe it should), then two diamonds could be played simply as a catch-all with five plus diamonds, regardless of strength. I don’t have a good answer for you here, though, since the diamond suit is so weak. I might lie by bidding two hearts (planning to raise a bid in the fourth suit of two spades to three to show my length/strength). I’d rebid two no-trump with a 4-4-4-1 pattern, by the way, but not here.
In an earlier column this year you briefly described a conventional response to partner's no-trump opener. Three clubs showed both minors, invitational, while three diamonds was forcing with both minors, and three of a major showed shortage in the other major and 5-4 in the minors. This sounded promising and I would like to read more about it. What is the name of this convention?
Name It and Claim It, Columbia, S.C.
|
This method is very popular on the East Coast, and for what it is worth, I've heard it referred to as seven-way transfers. This is the term used at the Regency Bridge Club in New York, so if you prefer Regency transfers, so be it! One other wrinkle I've encountered is for players to use the three-club call as Puppet Stayman to check for 5-3 fits.
Please tell me what I should have done after my LHO opened three clubs and my partner doubled. (I held ♠ K-4, ♥ A-Q-3, ♦ A-Q-10-5-4, ♣ 7-3-2.) I tried five diamonds, and without going into details, this was not a success facing a 4-5-2-2 hand.
Lost in Yonkers, The Bronx, N. Y.
This is a nasty kettle of fish. I might well double with a hand like your partner's. And I might well do what you did here! If you cue-bid four clubs, are you supposed to pass a four-heart response? You might well be cold for slam in diamonds. This looks like a result where no one was really to blame.
As a director, I had always thought that in a pairs game, North fills in the score at the end of the played board. East or West then checks and agrees to the score, gives the traveler back to North, who then inserts it into the board. We have a pair who will not initial and who will not return the traveler to North. They just cram it into the board, which makes it very unpleasant.
Bridge in the Menagerie, Wausau, Wis.
Thanks for your letter. My experience is that it is somewhat unusual for pairs to initial scores anymore. They tend simply to look and then agree orally. I would not get too hung up on the etiquette here. Times have changed, and we must change with them.
|
November 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Lottery tickets are a surtax on desperation.
Douglas Coupland
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ 6 2
♦ J 9 8 6 5
♣ K 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ 10 3
♦ A Q 4 2
♣ 10 9 6 4 |
♠ 9 7
♥ A J 9 7
♦ K 10 7 3
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 2
♥ K Q 8 5 4
♦ —
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣* |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two-plus cards, balanced, or clubs
♣9
The cue-bid in response to a takeout double is normally looking for a major-suit fit, so I would bid three hearts here, rather than three diamonds. The cue-bid is not a game-force at the two-level, but is forcing to suit agreement. But here, since you can hardly agree on a suit and stay out of game, the cue-bid becomes a game-force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ A J 9 7
♦ K 10 7 3
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If I'd observed all the rules, I'd never have got anywhere.
Marilyn Monroe
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K
♥ A J 8 5 3
♦ A K Q J
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ Q 6
♦ 10 4
♣ K 10 7 4 2 |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 10 7 4 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ J 9 6 5 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
Where you have huge support for your partner, showing that should take precedence over limiting your hand by defining your high cards. So here I would jump to four hearts, a splinter bid promising short hearts and spade support. With only four trumps, I might refrain from making a slam-try.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6 5 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Over the course of the last few years, money tournaments, in particular Invitational Pairs and Auction Pairs, seem to have sprung up all over the world. P.G. Eliassen of Sweden was playing in one of these events when he declared a deceptively simple hand, which nonetheless illustrates a useful theme.
Against five diamonds, West led a spade to the ace, and East switched to a heart, which Eliassen won in hand. The important message to bear in mind on a hand like this is that when things appear straightforward, you should plan for unfriendly distribution, then see what can be done about it. Here it was easy to work out that if clubs were splitting, there would not be too many problems, but if anyone was going to be short, it would be East. Eliassen carefully did not draw any trump, but instead led the club ace, then a club toward his king. If both opponents had followed, he would simply have given up a club and claimed. As it was, when East showed out, declarer won the club king and gave up a club. He could win the return and still have two entries to dummy to ruff out the clubs and draw the trump.
The key to the hand was not drawing even one round of trump. If you release the diamond ace, you allow East to score his jack of trump on the fourth round of clubs, and if you lead to dummy’s diamond honors, you take out a critical entry for establishing the clubs. East could have defeated the game by ruffing in on the second club, (or even by pitching a heart) but once he pitched a spade declarer saw his chance and took it.