August 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
I see but one rule: to be clear. If I am not clear, all my world crumbles to nothing.
Stendhal
North |
North |
North-South |
♠ Q 8 4
♥ 9 7
♦ A K J 8
♣ A 6 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ Q J 5 4 2
♦ 9 6 4
♣ 10 3 |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ A K 10 8 6
♦ 10 2
♣ K Q 9 |
South |
♠ A K J 2
♥ 3
♦ Q 7 5 3
♣ J 8 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
A heart lead looks to be a very long shot, so we really have to choose one of the other three suits. A diamond looks far too dangerous; thus the choice is a club or a spade. Since no one has bid clubs, maybe this should be the default lead rather than spades. I would lead a low club of course, but you might tempt me to lead the spade nine if I were to attack that suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 4
♣ J 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
August 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 12th, 2012
In second seat would you overcall one diamond with one spade, holding ♠ Q-9-8-3-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ J-4? If not, what is the smallest change you would make to this hand to make it worth an overcall?
Chicken Little, Texarkana, Texas
The vulnerability and scoring do matter here. I'd pass if vulnerable — especially if my partner was a passed hand — although I suppose at pairs I might be tempted to overcall. However, I'd be unable to resist bidding if the spade nine were the jack. One can rarely afford to stay silent with the boss suit.
Is it appropriate to defend the same way against a strong and a weak no-trump? What should be the cut-off in high cards for going one way or the other — assuming you recommend a separate defense?
Foxy Grandpa, Hartford, Conn.
Against a weak no-trump (anything where the minimum high cards are fewer than 14) you must play a penalty double. A defense that lets you show one- and two-suiters such as Cappelletti is simple and reasonably effective. Against a strong no-trump you can do the same, but you may prefer to get in more actively, in which case Woolsey or DONT achieves that target. You can find a summary here.
I held ♠ Q-7-4-2, ♥ Q-9-7, ♦ A-Q-10 ♣ J-10-7 in third seat. When the auction came around to me, I opened one diamond and passed my partner's response of one heart. When I put my dummy down, my LHO said I should have opened one club with 3-3 in the minors. Is that true?
Grindstone, Calgary, Alberta
|
You can do what you like, of course. If you can't stand to pass this hand of power and quality, then opening one diamond for the lead has something to recommend it. Whatever the technical merits of opening one club, it IS your weakest suit after all, so why encourage partner to lead it — or support it?
I'm an ancient bridge novice, who deeply appreciates your daily column in Contra Costa Times. Please tell me the meaning of "signaling count."
Number Cruncher, Macon, Ga.
Signaling count means showing an even number of cards by playing high then low, an odd number by playing low then high. After you have followed suit as third hand in an attempt to win the trick, at your next turn signal count from your remaining (not original) cards.
What is my best rebid after I opened one diamond and heard a one-heart response? I held ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ 4, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3, ♣ A-Q-10. Would you bid no-trump, or spades? If spades, at what level would you bid them?
Easing Down the Road, Mason City, Iowa
A no-trump call is inappropriate when you have a shapely hand. You should bid spades, and the fact that you have no fit for your partner's suit should argue for caution. In my opinion it is better to bid one spade and risk missing game, than to bid two spades and force to game. Switch the hearts and clubs, and you would happily bid two spades.
|
August 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
In the fell clutch of circumstance, I have not winced nor cried aloud….
W.E. Henley
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ J 9
♦ A K Q 9 3
♣ Q 7 5 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ 7 2
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ A K 9 4
♥ 6 4
♦ J 10 8 6
♣ J 9 3 |
South |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K Q 7 5
♦ 5 4
♣ A 6 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠Q
A cuebid of two diamonds might sound like a strong hand, but if you had opening values, you'd start by doubling here. So the cuebid should be a limited but shapely hand with both majors — exactly like this hand. Note that this principle only applies over a response in no-trump (and not to a suit bid) by your RHO.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ 7 2
♣ K 10 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
? |
|
|
|
August 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
If there were dreams to sell, What would you buy? Some cost a passing bell; Some a light sigh….
Thomas Beddoes
South |
North |
Neither |
♠ Q
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ A 10 7 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 7 2
♥ K 10 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ J 8 5 4 |
♠ A 8 6 5 4 3
♥ Q 9 8 5
♦ 8
♣ Q 9 |
South |
♠ K 10 9
♥ A
♦ J 10 7 6 3 2
♣ K 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
2♠ |
5♦ |
All pass |
♠2
You do not have enough to drive to game, but it would be cowardly not to suggest your invitational values. The easiest way to do this is to jump to two no-trump at once. Since a call of one no-trump could show an 11- or 12-count, your call suggests the values you have and will let partner decide where to go from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ A 10 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 9th, 2012
I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me.
Abraham Lincoln
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ J 10
♦ A 10 9 8
♣ A K Q 3 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J
♥ 6
♦ Q J 7 2
♣ J 10 6 5 4 |
♠ A 9 6 5 3
♥ 9 7 4 3 2
♦ 4 3
♣ 8 |
South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q 8 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ 9 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Whenever a responder has game-forcing values, he should consider at his second turn using the fourth suit. Here, a call of two diamonds sets up a game force and helps South find out more about his partner's shape and stoppers. Since partner could have six clubs and a void in hearts, it is time to explore whether clubs, hearts or no-trump is the best strain to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q 8 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ 9 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Things have their due measure; there are ultimately fixed limits, beyond which, or short of which, something must be wrong.
Horace
North |
North |
North-South |
♠ 7 3
♥ A 9 7
♦ K 6
♣ A 10 7 5 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 8 5 3
♦ J 9 7 5 3
♣ K J 9 4 |
♠ A K J 10 6 4
♥ 2
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ Q 8 |
South |
♠ Q 9 8 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6 4
♦ A 4
♣ 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Your partner's double is for takeout, suggesting both majors, or one of the majors with club tolerance, and decent values (about a nine-point minimum). The choice is to rebid clubs or to introduce a three-card major. I slightly prefer the latter course of action — the club spots seem a little too feeble for a rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 3
♥ A 9 7
♦ K 6
♣ A 10 7 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 7th, 2012
Director to young man watching the bridge tournament: “Would you care to kibitz, sir? Young man: “No thanks, I’ll just watch.
Anon.
East |
North |
East-West |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 4 2
♦ A 5 4 3
♣ J 10 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ 2
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 |
♠ 6
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ K Q J 10 9
♣ A K 8 |
South |
♠ K J 10 8 7 5
♥ 5
♦ 8 7 6
♣ 5 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦2
Your partner's three spades should be initially interpreted as looking for a spade stopper for no-trump. But he may also be cuebidding, looking for slam, about to bid again. Either way, you should have no problem if you cuebid four clubs. Since you limited your hand at your previous turn, your partner won't expect you to have significant extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ K Q J 10 9
♣ A K 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
One principle must make the universe a single complex living creature, one from all.
Plotinus
South |
North |
Both |
♠ A K 9 5 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 4 2
♣ Q J 10 |
West |
East |
♠ J 6
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ Q J 10
♣ A 9 8 4 |
♠ 8 4
♥ J 10 8
♦ 9 8 6 3
♣ K 7 5 2 |
South |
♠ Q 10 7 3
♥ A Q 5
♦ A K 7 5
♣ 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
On this sequence I would much rather lead a spade than a heart. The logic is that though East bid spades, he did not try to explore further in the suit. Also, my spade intermediates strongly suggest that if partner has a spade honor we might well be able to set up the suit for our side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 6
♥ Q 9 8 4
♦ 7 5
♣ Q 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
August 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 5th, 2012
What is the lower threshold for a game-invitational response to a strong no-trump? For example, holding ♠ A-Q-10, ♥ 9-8-3-2, ♦ 10-7-4, ♣ Q-9-7, would my intermediates be enough for me to invite game? If so, should I use Stayman, or invite in no-trump with such square shape?
At Loose Ends, Naples, Fla.
I would pass here, a flat eight-count not offering quite enough for an invitation. But change a small diamond into a small spade and the presence of both four-card majors would be just enough to tempt me into using Stayman. Just for the record: With your actual hand, but the diamond jack instead of the10, I'd bid two no-trump and ignore my four-card major.
I remember in the past that at least twice you have advocated two-club openings with good two-suiters, to avoid getting passed out and missing a major-suit game. It would seem that the same principle applies to a good three-suiter, dummy passing with as little as king-third in your long suit. What are your thoughts here?
Tony the Tiger, Houston, Texas
I'm more inclined to open two clubs than some, but three suiters ARE awkward. That extra round of bidding you lose at the first go often comes back to bite you. Opening at the one-level with a three-suiter based on a long minor is surely right, unless you have at least 24 HCP.
Playing the forcing no-trump, I opened one heart with ♠ Q-9-3-2, ♥ A-J-7-4-3, ♦ K-4, ♣ K-10. Over my partner's one-no-trump response I bid two clubs. (I considered passing, but did not want my partner to have a coronary.) Now my partner bid two spades! I decided to pass to avoid a disaster but instead found I had created one. What should I have done?
Lawless Lucy, Greenville, S.C.
|
Yes, passing one no-trump might have worked, but I understand your action. When your partner bid two spades, an impossible suit, you should have played him for a maximum hand and a club raise. (He cannot have spades, or he would have bid them over one heart.) You must bid two no-trump, suggesting a minimum balanced hand, to let your partner work it out from there.
I've noticed that many major events at the U.S. Nationals are won by foreigners. Are the events open to everyone?
Circumnavigator, Fredericksburg, Va.
As recently as 20 years ago there was a proposal to close the events that determined who would play in the U.S. Trials, making them available only for U.S. players. Thankfully, when the trials system changed and became open to everyone, we started attracting a huge foreign base of players to our national events. These days our nationals are as strong as world championships — in some cases stronger.
How do suit-preference signals work? Do they take precedence over attitude or count signals, or are they an adjunct to them.
Jumping Jack, Casper, Wyo.
When your holding in a suit as a defender is already known, or is just about to be known, do not tell your partner the same message again. Instead, use your irrelevant small cards to show your interest in the higher or lower of the other suits. When your partner opens a weak two and leads the king in that suit, dummy having three cards and you four, you know that declarer will be ruffing and that partner will work out what you have. Don't tell him again; your signal should be suit preference.
|
August 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
How doth the little crocodile Improve his shining tail.
Lewis Carroll
North |
North |
Neither |
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ A J 3
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K Q 9 8 6
♦ A J 9 7
♣ K J 3 |
♠ K 8 3
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
South |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥K
Even though your RHO has suggested a four-card spade suit, your intermediates look good enough for an advance with a call of one spade. In auctions of this sort, you are not necessarily trying for game when you bid, just looking for your side's best fit and trying to compete efficiently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
|
It is normal these days to use a negative double to show both majors after your partner opens one club and the next hand bids one diamond. Conversely, the negative double of a one-heart overcall shows precisely four spades. However, South in this deal decided that since he was happy to play in a 4-3 spade fit, it was more descriptive to bid one spade himself, suggesting five. That got him to a delicate spot, but at least it was a game that had play. Five diamonds would have been nearly hopeless.
The defenders led the heart queen and played a second heart, ruffed by declarer. Now what to do? Declarer needed trumps to be 3-3 of course, but he also had to establish a second club trick while he still had trumps in both hands, to avoid being forced. So he played the club ace and a low club to the next two tricks, East winning the club queen.
If East returned a heart, that would provide the 10th trick via a ruff and sluff, whereas if he played anything else, declarer would win and play a third round of clubs to set up his 10th trick. When he chose to lead a diamond, declarer won in dummy and played a third club. West could discard a diamond, but still had one left when East played a second diamond himself. Declarer could now win and turn his attention to trumps. When they split 3-3, he claimed the balance.