August 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, July 24th, 2012
I presume you're mortal and may err.
James Shirley
East |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 10
♥ 8 5 4
♦ 6 2
♣ J 9 7 6 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 4 2
♥ J 2
♦ Q 10 9 8 5 4 3
♣ K 10 |
♠ 6
♥ A K Q 10 7 6 3
♦ J
♣ A Q 8 5 |
South |
♠ A K J 9 8 7 5 3
♥ 9
♦ A K 7
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
5♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
5♠ |
All pass |
♥J
I may not be in line with modern thinking, but my answer would vary here depending on the vulnerability. I would open this hand three diamonds if nonvulnerable, though I would understand passing if vulnerable. My partners would expect a better suit for a three-level pre-empt. If it is not good enough to open at the three-level, I would pass, rather than open two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 2
♥ J 2
♦ Q 10 9 8 5 4 3
♣ K 10 |
August 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest.
Thomas Jefferson
South |
North |
Both |
♠ J 7
♥ K 4
♦ A 9 8 7 6 3
♣ 9 8 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ K Q 10
♣ Q 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 8 4 3 2
♥ J 7 6 5 2
♦ 2
♣ J 10 |
South |
♠ A 9 6 5
♥ A 9
♦ J 5 4
♣ A K 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥3
Leading a spade rates to cost a trick a fair amount of the time when declarer might take a finesse. But, then again, it helps to establish your side's long suit, and you know partner has the entries to finish the task. Since the lead of any four-card suit might cost a trick or tempo or both, lead your spade.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ A 8 6 2
♦ 9 8 4 2
♣ J 8 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
August 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
If you are in fourth seat with ♠ K-3, ♥ K-10-6, ♦ A-K-7-2, ♣ J-4-3-2 and hear a weak two-spade opening passed around to you, what are your thoughts on bidding? And if you do act, would you overcall two no-trump or double?
Splitting Hares, Kansas City, Mo.
This hand is on the cusp for action. Your badly placed spade honor makes the decision especially awkward. I can see that doubling might get you to the right partscore, but you probably won't make game unless partner has spade length and opening values. A call of two no-trump is just about possible; at least it protects your spade king.
I read recently that Bill Gates and Warren Buffett were keen bridge players. Do they play in tournament events at all? And are there any other celebrities who play seriously?
Star Search, Dover, Del.
Both Warren and especially Bill are regular visitors to national events. Bill plays in the very top events and does respectably. I've seen Isaac Mizrahi play in New York events, and NASA astronaut Greg Johnson and author Michael Palmer are also regulars on the tournament scene — among many other famous people.
Last week at our friendly bridge club we encountered an incredibly odd hand that generated several suggested bidding sequences for reaching the right contract. Dealer held ♠ A-K-J-10-7-4-3, ♥ A-K-Q-10-6-2, ♦ —, ♣ —. How should you explore properly here?
Major Major, Mitchell, S.D.
|
I think I'd open two clubs, rebid two spades, then jump to seven hearts to get partner to choose a suit. My partner will know all I need him to do is to pick the better trump suit. Mind you I might just bid seven spades at my first turn, doing that for the first (and probably last) time in my life. The other approach is far sounder, though.
Do you have strong views about two-level pre-empts when it comes to the question of good or bad suits, and would you ever pre-empt with a five-carder?
Over the Top, Wilmington, N.C.
At favorable vulnerability in either third (or even first) chair, I've been known to treat a two-suiter with a very good five-carder as a weak two. But I would not recommend this style to others. Equally, in the same seats I might open a six-card suit which was missing two of the top honors — especially if holding decent intermediates, which are often a good substitute for the missing high card.
I was in third seat, my having partner opened one diamond and the next hand having bid two spades. I held ♠ K-4, ♥ K-Q-10-6-2, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ 10-4-3. What were my choices now?
Options Trader, Huntingdon, W.Va.
The best way forward now looks to be a negative double. This way you find your heart fit when you have one, and if your partner rebids two no-trump, you can pass. I suggest you correct three clubs to three diamonds, and pass a three-diamond rebid. This would be a much harder task if you had three spades and two diamonds, when a double might get you to an inferior partscore.
|
August 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, July 21st, 2012
To travel hopefully is a better thing than to arrive, and the true success is to labor.
Robert Louis Stevenson
West |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 4
♥ K J 8 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 6 |
West |
East |
♠ J 2
♥ A 10 7 6
♦ Q 10 9 5 2
♣ 7 2 |
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ A J 8 3
♣ J 4 3 |
South |
♠ A K Q 8 3
♥ Q 9
♦ 7 6
♣ K 9 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠* |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Longer spades than clubs (canape)
♦10
I've often advised my readers not to overcall at the two-level except with values and a six-card suit (the latter being perhaps more important than the former). But here you have the template for the absolutely minimum acceptable overcall. Key is that two hearts over one spade consumes the maximum space from the opponents.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4
♥ K J 8 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
? |
|
|
|
August 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The secret which the mountains kept The river never told.
John Greenleaf Whittier
South |
North |
Both |
♠ A 7 6 5 3
♥ A 8
♦ A Q 4 2
♣ A K |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ 10 9 7 3 2
♦ 8
♣ J 8 5 2 |
♠ Q J 2
♥ J 4
♦ 10 9 7 5
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
South |
♠ K 9
♥ K Q 6 5
♦ K J 6 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♣* |
Pass |
7♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Showing the trump queen and club king
♥10
This hand has the values for a jump to two no-trump, which is natural and encouraging, but not forcing. If you decide you want to play game facing anything but a rank minimum overcall, you can cuebid, then bid two no-trump, which is all but forcing. I'd make that call with the club 10 instead of the two.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ K J 6 5
♣ Q 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Anybody can be good in the country.
Oscar Wilde
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ K 6 3
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ A Q J 7 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 5
♥ K 10 7 5
♦ 7 6
♣ 10 6 4 |
♠ Q 9 4 2
♥ 2
♦ Q J 3 2
♣ 9 5 3 2 |
South |
♠ A 7
♥ J 9 8 6 4
♦ A K 8 4
♣ K 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
♠J
However risky your initial response to one heart was, your partner has set up a game-force. Passing now would be a breach of discipline even though it might work. Your best chance to put the brakes on is to bid three no-trump. You may not make it, but at least you won't tempt partner to flights of fancy. Raising clubs might see him reaching for the sky.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4 2
♥ 2
♦ Q J 3 2
♣ 9 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The Government are carrying an immense weight. Untold treasures are in their hands. They are doing the very best they can. Don't badger them.
Abraham Lincoln
South |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 7 2
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A 10 7
♣ A 9 7 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 5
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ 8 6 5 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
♠ A K 9 8 4 3
♥ 10 4
♦ J
♣ K J 3 2 |
South |
♠ J 6
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K Q 9 4
♣ Q 10 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦3
Once you bid one no-trump to show 6-10 points, denying a major, your partner won't play you for the earth whatever you do. Here you should double. This is NOT penalties — how could it be? It shows a maximum hand and suitability for defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 2
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A 10 7
♣ A 9 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Come, Watson, come! The game is afoot.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 9 3
♥ A 6 4 3
♦ 9 4
♣ Q J 8 7 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ K J 9 7 5 2
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ 10 |
♠ Q J 8 7
♥ Q 10 8
♦ J 10
♣ K 6 5 3 |
South |
♠ A K 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ A Q 8 7 6
♣ A 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
You can pass, playing partner for long hearts in a weak hand, which he has suggested he holds. Equally, you can bid two no-trump, two spades or even three diamonds, to improve the partscore. If one of your small clubs were a heart, it would be clear to pass. Even though passing seems to me to be the most trusting action, three diamonds may be your best chance to improve the contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ A Q 8 7 6
♣ A 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
And even the ranks of Tuscany Could scarce forbear to cheer.
Lord Macaulay
West |
North |
Neither |
♠ Q 8 7 6 5
♥ —
♦ A 9 7 3
♣ J 10 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ 9 8 7 5
♦ Q J 2
♣ 9 6 |
♠ A K 10
♥ Q J 10 6 2
♦ K 10 5
♣ 8 7 |
South |
♠ 4
♥ A K 4 3
♦ 8 6 4
♣ A K Q 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
2♣ |
2♥ |
5♣ |
All pass |
♦Q
The hearts can wait. Your priority here is to lead trumps to prevent declarer from ruffing his spades in dummy. The typical dummy will contain a small spade or two, and the best defense will consist of keeping declarer from setting up the spades successfully. Whenever declarer plays in his second suit, you should think about a trump lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4 2
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 10 7 6
♣ Q 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♦ |
All pass |
|
|
|
July 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 15th, 2012
How do you decide between opening a very strong hand at the one-level as opposed to opening two clubs and then bidding your suit? Does your decision depend on whether you have a one- two- or even three-suiter?
Rock-Crusher, Nashville, Tenn.
Opening two clubs on marginal hands with long minors and a second suit works badly; you pre-empt yourself out of two levels of the auction and often lose the ability to define of your hand. Equally, true three-suiters in the range of 21-23 may be best handled by opening a minor. Somebody else normally bids!
Say you open one club with the following hand: ♠ K-7-3, ♥ K-10-6-2, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ A-J-4. Your partner responds one spade, and the next hand doubles. Should you rebid one no-trump, raise spades, or pass?
Options, Bellingham, Wash.
One no-trump is acceptable, but another conventional action that might (by partnership agreement) be available is to redouble. Some people play this to show three trumps, so a call of one no-trump would deny three trumps. A raise to two spades would show four trumps, whatever your methods, and passing would be a balanced or semibalanced hand unsuitable for a call of one no-trump.
I will be playing in my first pair game next week, having only played rubber bridge and team games till now. Please explain how the scoring works.
Tyro-Maniac, Kenosha, Wis.
Pairs is all about beating the other pairs sitting the same way as you, holding your cards. (The margin by which you beat them is irrelevant.) Imagine 10 results on a single deal. Nine matchpoints are available, one fewer than the number of pairs. Five pairs bid a small slam making exactly, one makes the grand slam, one goes down in it, three make the overtrick. As one of those three pairs, you score a point for beating the five pairs who made 12 tricks in slam, and the pair who went down in slam, and get half a point for each of the pairs who made 13 tricks in the small slam. So you get 7 matchpoints out of 9.
|
How do you judge what level to pre-empt to when your partner opens two spades and the next hand doubles? With nobody vulnerable you hold ♠ K-9-8-5-4, ♥ 10-2, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ Q-10-6. Is this a hand where you want to force the opponents to bid a slam, or do you want to time the auction to keep them out of slam?
Levelheaded Louis, Elkhart, Ind.
I'd guess our side will lose six tricks in a spade contract so four spades should be high enough for our side as a sacrifice. But can we beat our opponents' slam? Even facing a hand with no side-cards, I'd guess we have more than a 50 percent chance of scoring a trick in each minor or one trick from the minors and a spade. So bidding four spades will give the opponents enough rope to hang themselves. We may go down 500, but it is still worth the effort to make the opponents' life harder.
I use Rosenkranz doubles and redoubles with my partners, these actions showing a high trump for partner, typically in a two- or three-card holding. We have never discussed whether it applies when partner makes a simple overcall of a weak two-bid. What are your views on an auction such as a two-diamond opening on my left, a two-heart overcall from partner and a three-diamond bid on my right?
Zen and Now, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I really don't like the double to mean support for partner. It is more important to get the unbid suits in, in other words, values and no clear call. Here a bid of three hearts would buy the hand (the opponents won't bid four diamonds), so there is no need for a Rosenkranz double, which is most useful in auctions where you rate to be defending.
|
|
Today's deal comes from Robert Ewen and Jeff Rubens' "It's All in the Game," a compendium of articles written over the last 50 years by the world's foremost bridge editor.
Here is Rubens explaining a hand to his wife. “There will be a lot of competitive bidding on this deal,” Rubens said, “but the player with the spades will usually prevail. Suppose South buys the contract in five spades. East has bid hearts vigorously, and the defense starts with two rounds of that suit, South ruffing.”
“It’s a laydown. South trumps the losing diamond in dummy.”
“Well, it’s not quite that simple. East has a singleton diamond and will trump the second diamond.”
“That’s peeking. I would have gone down.”
“What South should do is play just one round of trump before he goes after the diamonds. As luck would have it, this extracts East’s only trump and the contract rolls home. The incomplete trump removal is an interesting theme, and if this deal popped up (as it did at the club this afternoon), you could send it in to the papers if it had been played correctly.”
“Was it played correctly?”
“Yes, but not at five spades. North-South tried to mess up the story by doubling East in five hearts. South led the diamond king and switched to the spade king and ace. East ruffed, cashed one round of hearts, and was then able to trump his losing club safely in dummy. So the incomplete trump removal showed up anyway. That’s what I mean about things straightening themselves out.”