April 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When you know what you want, and want it bad enough, you will find a way to get it.
Jim Rohn
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 4
♥ J 10 4 2
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 6
♥ —
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ 9 8 6 4 2 |
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 10 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ K 8 6 5 3
♦ A K 7
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Since you'd double with any strong balanced hand, any action you take in a suit will be somewhat limited in high cards. A simple call of two spades (planning to come again in hearts) would be sensible enough. An alternative approach (if you trust your partner to be on the same wavelength) would be to cuebid two clubs to show both majors and a limited hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ A Q 9 5
♦ 10 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Better be ignorant of a matter than half know it.
Publilius Syrus
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 5
♥ K 6 3
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 6 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ A 8 7 |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 7 5 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 4
♥ A Q 10 9 4
♦ K 3
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥** |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three hearts
**Two of the five keycards (the four aces and the trump king)
♠6
A diamond looks to be slightly safer than a heart lead, but when the opponents have bid a suit, there is certainly a good case for looking elsewhere for your choice of opening lead. Yes, dummy could be 4-4 in the majors with three diamonds, but there are many more hands where a heart lead is necessary to set up your side's suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ J 10 5 2
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 7th, 2013
|
Recently you ran a problem where in fourth chair you heard one club on your left, one diamond from partner, and you held ♠ Q-10-6-4, ♥ K-Q-8-5, ♦ Q-2, ♣ Q-10-4. The choice you gave was between a call of one- or two-no-trump. I wondered whether your intermediates would make the hand worth a two-no-trump call, since if partner’s overcall was little more than six good diamonds and the club king, there might be a play for the no-trump game.
Cashing In, Torrance, Calif.
Yes, jumping in no-trump is reasonable on values – but I’d like just a little more. Bear in mind that if partner bids on over my no-trump call, I can act again. My concern here is the absence of quick tricks. If we have only one club stopper, my major-suit cards do not translate into quick tricks.
In a recent column in the paper, a Stayman sequence after a two-no-trump opening bid saw opener deny a major. Then a call of three spades by responder was footnoted, saying it showed five hearts and four spades plus a good hand. Can you explain further?
Mystery Bid, Edmonton, Alberta
This is a specific agreement called Smolen that operates like a transfer. In the same way that hands with both majors may want to transfer declarership to the strong hand, you can do the same over a two-no-trump opening after Stayman. Visit here.
I have always played that after an uncontested auction by us started: one heart – one spade – two clubs, a jump to three spades by responder was invitational, not forcing, but my partner on OK Bridge said it was 100 percent forcing. I think he is wrong — but maybe things have changed.
The Force Be With You, Albuquerque, N.M.
|
You are absolutely right and he is wrong. On the auction you quote, responder sets up a game-forcing sequence by bidding the fourth suit, two diamonds. In this auction jumps by responder to three hearts or three spades or a raise to three clubs would invite game.
What I should have expected from my partner on the following auction? I held ♠ Q-9, ♥ J-4-3, ♦ Q-10-8-5-4, ♣ K-10-2 and when my partner doubled one club and the next player bid one spade, I tried two diamonds. Now my partner bid two spades. What should that be, other than confusing?
Fog of War, Mitchell, S.D.
A good default agreement to have is that when a player doubles or opens two clubs and hears a suit on his left, his first bid in that suit is natural, not artificial (unless it is clear that with length he would pass – for instance, because his partner had doubled). So here I’d play two spades as spades, and raise to three spades.
I grew up believing that I could answer an opening bid of one of a suit with as few as six points, if I replied at the one-level. But does the same apply to making a negative double, or acting at the two-level? A friend says I need more points to respond in a new suit, even at the one level. Where do you stand?
Bottom Line, Ketchikan, Alaska
This is a complex question, but I'd say a free bid (acting in competition when you could have passed) starts at a six-count at the one-level, and this also applies to raises of partner. Negative doubles at the one-level also start at six points. At the two-level nine-plus is required. The higher the level you commit to, the more points you need.
|
April 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There are no safe choices. Only other choices.
Libba Bray
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 10 7 4 2
♥ A
♦ A 7 4 3
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6
♥ K Q 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ 10 4 2
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ K 6 5
♣ A Q J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♥K
However tempting it might be to rebid your hearts here, that virtually guarantees a six-card suit. If you had the heart 10 instead of the five, you might make that call because the suit would be quite playable facing a singleton; but here a rebid of one no-trump is more descriptive of your hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6
♥ K Q 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ 9 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He that diggeth a pit shall fall into it.
Ecclesiastes 10:8
| East |
North |
| Nil |
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 6 2
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 2
♣ Q J 10 6 3 |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ Q J 10 8 5 3
♦ 5
♣ 9 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 2
♥ K 9
♦ A Q J 8 6 4
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣Q
This column may sometimes err too far toward the modernist approach of arguing that every double is for takeout, not penalties. Today's deal will no doubt be a welcome exception to that approach. When your side has no fit and you have suggested clubs and values, partner's double indicates that the opponents have made a mistake. Pass, and let's see who's right!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 6 2
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
To laugh at men of sense is the privilege of fools.
Jean de La Bruyere
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K Q J 4
♥ Q J 7 5 3
♦ 10 7 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 3 2
♥ A 4
♦ 3
♣ 9 8 6 4 2 |
♠ 9 5
♥ K
♦ A Q J 8 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ 10 9 8 6 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ A K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♦ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
In this position, a double by you would be takeout, saying that you would pass if your partner had a penalty double of clubs. But would you? I think not. You'd surely remove the double to two hearts. If that is what you would do, then you should bid two hearts yourself immediately, emphasizing your extra shape and lack of suitability for defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 4
♥ Q J 7 5 3
♦ 10 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
In married life three is company and two none.
Oscar Wilde
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 3
♥ A 6
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ K J 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4 2
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ — |
♠ 10 6
♥ 5 3 2
♦ 8 5 4 3
♣ 10 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ K
♣ A Q 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Had you doubled in direct seat and heard partner respond one heart, you would surely have passed now. With the diamond king not pulling its full weight, you would be unwise to indicate you had real extras. But your partner could easily have up to a 10-count and might do no more than bid one heart when facing a balancing double. So you should make a mild invitation to game by raising to two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ K
♣ K Q 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013
There is no finer investment for any community than putting milk into babies.
Winston Churchill
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ 10
♦ K Q J 8 5 3
♣ 10 9 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6
♥ Q J 7 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K Q 10 8 5
♥ 5 2
♦ 2
♣ A J 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 4 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 3
♦ 10 9 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
| 5♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦A
When partner responds one spade to one heart, you are encouraged to raise to two spades with three trumps and a ruffing value –so long as that call looks more appropriate than a one-no-trump rebid. Here, with useful stoppers in both minors and with weak spades, the one-no-trump call looks more descriptive. Interchange the diamond ace and spade jack, and I'd raise spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6
♥ Q J 7 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Not that the story need be long, but it will take a long while to make it short.
Henry David Thoreau
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 4
♥ A 10 9 8 7
♦ K 10 8
♣ 6 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7 6 5
♥ J 5 3 2
♦ 6 5
♣ 9 2 |
♠ J 2
♥ K Q 6 4
♦ A 3 2
♣ A J 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 3
♥ —
♦ Q J 9 7 4
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣9
This is a close decision. Should you lead the club queen, playing for ruffs or to set up partner's suit, or a relatively passive spade, looking not to give anything away? With a seven-count, you know your side has half the deck, which argues for going passive. You can always be a hero tomorrow.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4
♥ 9 7 2
♦ A J 5 3 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
After your LHO opens one club and your partner doubles, your RHO bids one heart. You hold ♠ J-8-2, ♥ K-9-4, ♦ K-3, ♣ A-9-5-4-2. How would you plan to develop the auction?
Decked Out, Newark, N.J.
There do seem to be a lot of points in this deck. I’d guess not to try for game but simply to bid one no-trump and await (hope for) further developments. I’m guessing the opponents cannot make anything — I’d like to get a chance to double them.
It occurred to me that when I am on the road a lot, I never seem to find a magazine on the subject of bridge. I would enjoy reading about different hands and how to play them as well as what is going on currently in the competitive world of bridge. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Finder’s Fee, Greenbrae, Calif.
Bridge magazines come in all shapes and sizes, but they are becoming fewer and farther between as printing costs rise. Bridge Magazine in the U.K. and Bridge World in the U.S. are the two leading publications. Google these two names and you will find plenty of material — and of course the ACBL magazine has a lot of good material too.
What do you believe is the right approach to responding when partner balances with a call of one no-trump after an opening bid is passed around to him? If you assume, as I currently do, that the range for this action might be 11-15 points, then Stayman on its own doesn’t seem to address the wide range one might be facing.
Checked Off, Grand Forks, N.D.
|
You might use a two-club response to guarantee game-invitational values, and for the overcaller to respond at the two-level with a minimum hand, and bid at the three-level with a maximum hand. Alternatively, you can respond two diamonds with any minimum hand, any other bid at the two-level showing a medium hand, and any call at the three-level showing a maximum hand.
I had the following unremarkable hand: ♠ 8-6-2, ♥ J-9-4, ♦ K-Q-5, ♣ Q-10-9-6 and heard the auction (at favorable vulnerability) start with a four-heart call from my partner and a four-spade bid to my right. I tried five hearts (would you have done so?), and now came six spades to my left! What would you bid? If you passed it out, what would you lead?
Saving Grace, Muncie, Ind.
I would surely pass this out and lead a heart, hoping my minor honors might be enough to take two tricks even if our side has no heart tricks. Sacrificing is generally a mug’s game.
Why is it at duplicate bridge, that if declarer has honors, they do not get points for him as they would in party bridge?
Settled Out of Court, Union City, Tenn.
In some tournaments they do — but only those played for total points. I think playing honors in duplicate would be fun — but the rules of duplicate bridge generally mean that everyone who has the same hand gets the honors. This is somewhat misguided, but we are not going to change the minds of tournament organizers after such a long time.
|
|
When this deal came up at the rubber-bridge table, where the priority is to make your contract, not struggle for possibly irrelevant overtricks, declarer played too fast and suffered the consequences.
After a Stayman auction, North-South identified their heart fit, and the opening lead was the spade king to the ace. Declarer immediately won and led a diamond to the queen to play a trump to the king. When this held, but West showed out, declarer was doomed to lose three trump tricks and a spade, since East was left with the A-Q-9 of trumps poised over dummy’s J-10 of hearts.
The best policy on the deal is to focus on what you can afford to lose. The answer is that you do not mind losing two trump tricks, just so long as you do not lose three. After the initial spade lead, the defenders are not threatening a ruff, so you can afford to tackle trump safely.
Win the spade lead, then immediately lead a low heart at trick two toward the J-10. This limits declarer’s losses to two trumps and a spade, no matter which defender has the four trumps. The point is that once you discover who has the long trump, you can take the appropriate evasive action to negotiate the hearts, and the defenders can score only their two high trumps whatever they do.