January 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
My RHO pre-empted to two diamonds and I held ♠ A-Q-7-3, ♥ K-4-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ A-Q-3-2. I chose to double rather than to bid two no-trump, and raised my partner's two-spade response to three spades, but he passed, and we missed game. Should I have done more?
Hanging Back, San Francisco, California
Your initial double was better than a two-no-trump call (even a 4-3 major-suit fit could be best here). After your partner responds two spades, which tends to have an upper limit of 8 HCP, your choice is to pass, which would be a little pessimistic, to rebid two no-trump (which you might do over a two-heart response) or to raise to three spades. There is certainly no case for doing more.
Is there an unambiguous rule as to when to respond in a major as opposed to a minor, or even when to bypass a four-card suit in response to an opening bid of one club?
Miss Manners, Orlando, Fla.
With a four-card major and less than invitational values, you should generally bid it, rather than diamonds. One exception comes if the major suit is very weak and you have an absolutely flat hand with honors in each of the other suits and about 8-10 points, when bidding one no-trump in response to one club makes sense. You can also bypass a major if the second hand doubles, though. Incidentally, with game-forcing values, I tend to bid my best suit first, if holding four cards in diamonds and a major.
I was dealt ♠ A-Q-7-6-5, ♥ Q-4, ♦ Q-7-3-2, ♣ 9-4, and made a one-spade overcall over my opponent's one-heart opening bid. My partner bid two hearts, which I took as asking me to describe my hand, so I bid three diamonds. When we got too high, my partner told me I should have rebid my spades. Is that right with only a five-card suit? If so, how do I show extras?
Busy Bee, Albany, Ga.
|
A cuebid in response to an overcall implies values and support for partner. So, with a minimum overcall, just repeat your suit, rather than taking the auction up an extra level. If your partner simply has a good hand with a suit of his own, he will make a descriptive call next. Bid three diamonds with the diamond king instead of the two.
In third seat, when I picked up ♠ A-J-4-3-2, ♥ Q-J-7-3, ♦ Q-J-2, ♣ 5, I elected to jump to four spades facing a one-spade opener. My partner held a 5-4 pattern with 16 points and four little clubs so slam was where we belonged. He said I was too strong, while I thought with three aces he owed me a bid. Who is right?
Stumbling by the Wayside, Portland, Maine
I am sorry to say that your partner was right. Typically, when you hold game-going values with a big trump fit and side-shortage as you did, the modern technique is to jump to a new suit at the four-level — though your hand is dead minimum for this action. This is called a splinter bid, and that would let your partner judge if he had the right hand to stay low or aim high. Today, he'd know what to do.
What are the restrictions on the use of the support double? Which players can use a double to show three-card support, and how late in the auction do such doubles apply?
Backbones, Seneca, S.C.
To clarify the question, if support doubles are in use, then at opener's second turn to speak, in a contested auction, his double shows precisely three-card support for his partner's suit. The conditions are rigid: the bidding must be at or below two of partner's suit, and it applies only to opener at his second turn to call. For higher intervention, opener's double tends simply to be real extra values.
|
January 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Eternity was in that moment.
William Congreve
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ K J 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 4 3
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A
♥ Q 10 9 8 3
♦ J 9 6
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 7 6 4 2
♦ A 8
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
The raise to two spades is a constructive game-try, not obstructive. Accordingly, it suggests around 16-17 high cards with four trump. Your balanced shape and apparently unattractive club holding probably argues that pass would be best. However, you are on the cusp of action (if the club queen were the diamond queen, you would be worth a try of three diamonds.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ K J 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A wise skepticism is the first attribute of a good critic.
James Lowell
| Both |
North |
| North |
♠ A K 5
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ A Q J 4 2
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 9 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 2
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 9 8 5 3
♣ 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 6 4 3
♥ K J
♦ 10 7
♣ A K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
You can play the pass as either a desire to play for penalties or an escape request, and the latter may come up more frequently. But if you do want to play for penalties, it is very irksome to be unable to do so when your RHO psyches a redouble, isn't it? I suggest passes or redoubles are always to play except at the one-level. It is a simple blanket agreement and an easy one to remember.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ A Q J 4 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♣ |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Beauty is but a flower Which wrinkles will devour; Brightness falls from the air; Queens have died young and fair.
Thomas Nash
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A J 9
♣ K 10 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9
♥ A 10 8
♦ K Q 7 5 3 2
♣ J 5 |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ Q 3
♦ 10 4
♣ Q 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 5 4
♥ K J 9 7 2
♦ 8 6
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦K
The choice here is between a simple preference to two diamonds, which understates your values while insuring the plus-score, and the aggressive call of two no-trump. The no-trump call is my choice, while the rebid in diamonds would be an underbid, but both are better than rebidding the hearts, which would guarantee six or a better suit than this.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 5 4
♥ K J 9 7 2
♦ 8 6
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so.
Josh Billings (Henry Wheeler Shaw)
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ 7 2
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ Q 7 5 2
♣ J 9 8 6 |
♠ 10 7
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 5 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
Though your club honors are well placed, you are not really worth a game-try. Partner could have jumped to three spades with anything approaching extras, so he rates to be balanced and minimum (with only three spades on a really bad day). I could understand moving on with the spade 10 in addition to your assets, but here discretion looks to be the better part of valor; so pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ 7 2
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, December 19th, 2013
To be alive is power, Existence in itself, Without a further function, Omnipotence enough.
Emily Dickinson
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 7 5 4
♥ J 7 2
♦ 2
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 6
♥ A 9 5 4
♦ 10 4
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ A Q 9 8 5 3
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
3♦ |
| 4♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This sort of double is not for penalties. When you start by making a takeout double, you can't turn your hand into a penalty double the next time around. This sequence shows a really good hand (one that would have cue-bid two clubs if the call hadn't been stolen). With extra values but no extra length anywhere and thus no clear bid, you can fall back on the cue-bid of three clubs to show precisely this.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
A man travels the world over in search of what he needs and returns home to find it.
George Moore
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 7 5
♥ 7 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ 9 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 10 9 2
♦ A 9 4 2
♣ K 4 3 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ J 10 6 5
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 9 8 3
♥ A K Q
♦ Q 7
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two of the five key-cards from the four aces and trump king
♥J
Your partner's failure to raise spades denies four — in some circles, where support doubles are used, it denies three. Since he clearly has relatively short spades and diamonds, he must have real clubs and a minimum hand, so compete to three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 7 5
♥ 7 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 31st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
And that there is no flaw or vacuum in the amount of the truth — but that all is truth without exception.
Walt Whitman
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 2
♥ A 9 5
♦ Q 5 3
♣ A 9 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 6 4
♥ J 8
♦ A 7 2
♣ J 6 5 |
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 10 7 6 4 3
♦ 9 6 4
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 5 3
♥ K 2
♦ K J 10 8
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*11-16
♠6
Did you work out that the double was Lightner, suggesting a void somewhere and asking you for an unusual lead? Well done: but did you also work out not to lead your lowest spade in case partner ruffs and tries to underlead his club honors, hoping to find you with a high club honor? Lead the spade six and you will avoid that particular accident.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 6 4 3
♥ K 8
♦ Q 2
♣ 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
4♣ |
4♥ |
| 5♣ |
5♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
December 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I know that if I am on lead against no-trump and my partner has doubled dummy's suit bid that I must lead that suit (unless I have a very good reason not to). However, say that I bid one heart over one club and LHO bids diamonds, RHO ending up in three no-trump, doubled by my partner. Does my partner's double demand that I lead diamonds, or does it show that he has something in hearts and thinks that we can set three no-trump? (I led a heart, and my partner didn't approve!)
Dick Deadeye, Marco Island, Fla.
Here is a simple rule: Double asks opening leader to lead his suit if the doubler has not had a chance to support cheaply. But if he did have a chance and didn't take it — as here — it demands an alternative lead. On the auction shown I'd guess diamonds, not spades.
In fourth chair I held ♠ Q-J-4, ♥ Q-7-4, ♦ 10-9-2, ♣ A-10-8-7. My partner opened one heart. I chose to raise to two hearts, rather than bid one no-trump, but when my partner bid three diamonds I thought I had nothing extra and rebid three hearts, missing a game. Was I wrong?
Slow Developer, Toronto, Ontario
Your raise to two hearts looks right – support with support is a sound principle. Over three diamonds you might have tried three no-trump with your solid black-suit stops, but your actual choice of three hearts is reasonable too.
Can you please explain what you mean by "attitude" signals? How does this interact with what my friends call the obvious shift?
Last Call, Palm Springs, Calif.
|
Attitude signals mean that third hand plays a high card to encourage continuation of the suit (or to suggest NOT switching) and a low card to discourage or ask for the obvious shift. High says Ay, Low says No as English International Andrew Robson says..Defining the obvious shift is not as easy as it might sound, though…
I opened one diamond, holding ♠ J-7, ♥ A-4, ♦ A-K-8-4-3, ♣ Q-J-7-5, and my partner responded one spade. When I rebid two clubs, he supported me to two diamonds. Should I bid three diamonds, or two no-trump now, or explore with two hearts?
High Hopes, Boulder, Colorado
When partner gives preference to two diamonds, he typically has only two or three diamonds and 6-10 points. To my mind, passing two diamonds is the percentage action — any advance may get you uncomfortably high. But perhaps the diamond 10 might be enough to persuade me to make a slightly pushy game-try of two no-trump?
I notice that the lead in partner's suit is typically the smallest card in that side's bid suit. Many years ago when I learned to play I was 'taught' to always lead the highest card in my partner's bid suit, if for no other reason my partner 'would know where that card was' since it is our suit. Please help me understand what the downside is in leading my highest card in our suit on the opening lead.
Jungle Jim, Indianapolis, Indiana
The danger of leading high (especially the ace, king or queen) from three cards when your partner has five or six cards is that you give up an honor unnecessarily when declarer has length with a top honor and the jack such as K-J-x or A-J-x. Also, partner may think you have two cards only and switch prematurely, or try to give you a ruff and cost a trick or a tempo.
|
December 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 15th, 2012
A straw vote only shows which way the hot air blows.
O. Henry
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ 8 5 4 2
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8
♥ K 10 8 7 3
♦ K J 7 3
♣ J 9 |
♠ 5 2
♥ A 2
♦ Q 10 9 6
♣ Q 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 7 6 3
♥ 5
♦ A
♣ K 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♠ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠9
Three clubs here is a forcing call, asking you to assess your suitability for the suit game or no-trump. Your hand is minimum with no diamond stop so a simple rebid of three spades seems best to me. With ace-fourth of diamonds and a singleton club, a three-diamond bid would make sense, but not here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ 8 5 4 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Here is a neat declarer play by Barnet Shenkin's from a Pairs game where he shrugged off the nasty splits to bring home his four-spade contract.
West led the diamond king to Shenkin’s ace — and, yes, as the cards lie, it might have been better to duck this trick). Shenkin then played the spade king at trick two to East’s ace. The diamond jack came next, followed by a third round of the suit, ruffed by Shenkin, who got the bad news in trumps when he cashed the spade queen. Undaunted, he continued with a heart to dummy’s king (it would not have profited West to ruff) and a club to his jack. Shenkin then cashed the club ace and played a spade to dummy’s nine. East was already starting to feel the pressure. He pitched one club and one heart, but was really under the gun when Shenkin cashed the spade jack.
A heart discard was out of the question, so he had to let go a club. Shenkin then exited with the club queen, putting East on play with the king in the two-card ending with the heart Q-10 left, obliged to lead into dummy’s tenace. Contract made; but have you noticed the defensive slip? East should win his spade ace and return the heart 10 — suit preference — to let West ruff. Now a diamond to the jack allows the defenders to take a second ruff and set the hand. That is why ducking the first trick was essential.