January 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
I am a part of all that I have met; Yet all experience is an arch where through Gleams that untraveled world, whose margin fades For ever and for ever when I move.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 6
♥ A 6 3
♦ K 8 4
♣ Q J 9 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ Q 10 9 4 2
♦ J 6 5
♣ A 10 5 2 |
♠ A 9 7 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ Q 7 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 8 4
♥ K 8 5
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥4
Despite the fact that your partner has bid and rebid hearts, I don't think you have to lead the heart ace here. Your partner could easily be competing on a hand with five hearts and extra side-suit shape, or a weak six-card suit. With a decent alternative in the form of your diamond sequence, I think you should opt for that.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ A 4 3
♦ J 10 8 5 4
♣ 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I see the use of the term "cue-bid" in your columns, but frequently the player making the call has no control in the opponent's suit at all! Has the meaning of the term suffered from inflation the same way my pension has?
Harry Lime, Olympia, Wash.
In slam-going auctions, cuebids still show controls in the suits bid — though nowadays they may show first- or second-round control. In contested auctions, the ubiquity of weak jump raises forces players to cuebid as an indication of high cards, unlinked to values in the opponents' suit bid. Equally, when you are in a game-force, such cuebids — especially if they are below three no-trump — often ask rather than tell. That is the easiest way to reach no-trump when it is correct.
My partner and I have been discussing the purpose of a discarding system. Should we be using our signals or discards as instructions or should we be describing what is in our hand and letting partner take it from there?
Descriptive or Prescriptive?, Santa Monica, Calif.
I'm strongly of the opinion that the best methods of discarding are informative, not issuing commands. Frequently, though, discards involve telling partner which suits not to play. And if you do send a strong signal to play a suit, it is generally because you know what is right. Count and suit-preference signals tend to be more discreet messages, advisory, not prescriptive.
Recently we had a disaster where I reopened over an opening of one heart with a double, and my LHO reraised himself to two hearts. When my partner doubled, he meant it as penalty, but I thought he was asking me to bid a suit. Can you recommend a treatment for us in future and provide a rationale for why one method is better than the other?
Shoeless Joe, Edmonton, Alberta
|
I'm glad you are not apportioning blame here, since both treatments make sense. On balance I think you will have the responsive double more often, and the key is that when you DO have the trump stack, you may still catch the opponents when the balancing hand has enough for a second takeout double.
When you are playing pairs, what is the right way to treat eight-counts or nine-counts facing a strong no-trump? Do you invite on all eight-counts, and do you drive to game with all nines?
Hope Springs, Laredo, Texas
Balanced eight-counts without two majors should probably be passed, unless the intermediates are very good. Similarly, do not drive a nine-count to game unless there is a source of tricks. Going plus at pairs is vital, and Stayman gives the opponents a lot of information to work with — so be chary of betraying too much without a good reason.
Here is a problem my opponents had last week. (I might have fallen into the same trap.) My RHO held ♠ 5, ♥ Q-10-4-3, ♦ A-Q-8-5-4, ♣ A-K-2. He doubled one spade and heard me raise to four spades, doubled by his partner. He had no special agreements here. Would you think it right to bid or pass, and if you do bid, what would you say?
Spruce Goose, Dayton, Ohio
Unless at unfavorable vulnerability, I'd bid four no-trump, suggesting a two-suited hand and planning to correct a five-club response to five diamonds to show the red suits. I play my partner's double as suggesting that I defend unless I have extra shape — and I think this hand just about qualifies as being worth a bid. One should not double four spades on a weak hand with a trump stack. Wait for partner to reopen with a double.
|
January 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Civility costs nothing and buys everything.
Lady Mary Wortley Montagu
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 8 5 4 3
♥ 10
♦ A Q J 6 4 2
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6
♥ K Q 8 6 5
♦ 10 7 3
♣ J 8 2 |
♠ A J 2
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ K 9
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10
♥ A 4 3
♦ 8 5
♣ A K 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Once your partner passes one heart, you have no reason to assume that your side can make game. (North rates to have 10-13 points and three hearts or so.) You should simply bid one no-trump now, and let partner pass or correct to whatever strain he considers appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 2
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ K 9
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Which of us … is to do the hard and dirty work for the rest — and for what pay? Who is to do the pleasant and clean work, and for what pay?
John Ruskin
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J
♥ A 7 3 2
♦ K 4 3
♣ A K 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 6 3
♥ Q 10
♦ 8
♣ 9 8 7 6 5 |
♠ K 10 9 2
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ J 3 |
| South |
♠ 5 4
♥ K 9 6
♦ A J 10 9 7 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠6
At any vulnerability this is a reasonable example of a maximum weak two-bid. When you have a 10-count, you will typically not upgrade to a one-level opening unless you have a 6-4 hand pattern. With an 11-count, look at your controls and whether your honors are guarded. If you have an ace and king, and no singleton honors, open at the one-level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4
♥ K 9 6
♦ A J 10 9 7 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I am glad daylong for the gift of song, For time and change and sorrow; For the sunset wings and the world-end things Which hang on the edge of to-morrow.
William Braithwaite
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ A 5 3
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 4
♥ 9 6
♦ J 10 9
♣ A K 10 7 3 |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ A 8
♦ K 6
♣ Q J 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 5
♥ K Q 5 3 2
♦ Q 8 7 4 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
Your partner's double is take-out, even though you have shown both majors already. He rates to have extras, probably without a four-card major, but you do not have to second-guess what he has. When you bid two hearts you expect him to advance with a descriptive call, be it a club bid, a cue-bid or a bid in no-trump. So leave him space to tell you what he has.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ A 5 3
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
All we know is still infinitely less than all that still remains unknown.
William Harvey
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K Q
♦ A Q 6 5 2
♣ J 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10
♥ 8 2
♦ 10 9 7 3
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
♠ A J 4 3 2
♥ 5 4 3
♦ K J
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 5
♥ A J 10 9 7 6
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Your partner has made a slam-try, suggesting short clubs and huge diamond support. When the opponents compete to five clubs a double from you should suggest real defense to clubs not just a minimum opener (switch the heart queen and club three perhaps). Since a pass by you would be forcing it feels right to rebid five diamonds – suggesting good trump and low slam interest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K Q
♦ A Q 6 5 2
♣ J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♣ |
4♣ |
5♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 25th, 2012
At Christmas play and make good cheer, For Christmas comes but once a year.
Thomas Tusser
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ A 10 9 5
♦ A 10 4
♣ 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 3
♥ —
♦ Q J 9 3
♣ K Q J 9 5 4 |
♠ A K 7 5
♥ K J 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10
♥ Q 8 7 6 4 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
2♥ |
2 NT |
| 3♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
With three decent trump you do not have to be over-intellectual and reconstruct the 52-card diagram in your head. Simply raise partner to three diamonds and let the chips fall where they may. Whenever you have trump support you should have it as your first priority to let partner know that, rather than finding a reason to pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ Q 8 7 6 4 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
1 NT |
2♦ |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
A verse may catch a wandering Soul, that flies Profounder Tracts, and by a blest surprise Convert delight into a Sacrifice.
William Wordsworth
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 4
♥ 3
♦ A 10 9 6 4 3
♣ 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ K J 10 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ K Q |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 8
♦ 8 7 5
♣ J 10 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 6
♥ 9 7 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
The question is whether you should lead trump to stop heart ruffs, or diamonds to prevent declarer from discarding his diamond losers on clubs. My instincts are that my club stopper should be good enough to prevent declarer from running the clubs, so I should kill the ruffs while I can. I would therefore lead a trump.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ A J 6 2
♦ 9 8 6
♣ Q 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
January 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
My RHO pre-empted to two diamonds and I held ♠ A-Q-7-3, ♥ K-4-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ A-Q-3-2. I chose to double rather than to bid two no-trump, and raised my partner's two-spade response to three spades, but he passed, and we missed game. Should I have done more?
Hanging Back, San Francisco, California
Your initial double was better than a two-no-trump call (even a 4-3 major-suit fit could be best here). After your partner responds two spades, which tends to have an upper limit of 8 HCP, your choice is to pass, which would be a little pessimistic, to rebid two no-trump (which you might do over a two-heart response) or to raise to three spades. There is certainly no case for doing more.
Is there an unambiguous rule as to when to respond in a major as opposed to a minor, or even when to bypass a four-card suit in response to an opening bid of one club?
Miss Manners, Orlando, Fla.
With a four-card major and less than invitational values, you should generally bid it, rather than diamonds. One exception comes if the major suit is very weak and you have an absolutely flat hand with honors in each of the other suits and about 8-10 points, when bidding one no-trump in response to one club makes sense. You can also bypass a major if the second hand doubles, though. Incidentally, with game-forcing values, I tend to bid my best suit first, if holding four cards in diamonds and a major.
I was dealt ♠ A-Q-7-6-5, ♥ Q-4, ♦ Q-7-3-2, ♣ 9-4, and made a one-spade overcall over my opponent's one-heart opening bid. My partner bid two hearts, which I took as asking me to describe my hand, so I bid three diamonds. When we got too high, my partner told me I should have rebid my spades. Is that right with only a five-card suit? If so, how do I show extras?
Busy Bee, Albany, Ga.
|
A cuebid in response to an overcall implies values and support for partner. So, with a minimum overcall, just repeat your suit, rather than taking the auction up an extra level. If your partner simply has a good hand with a suit of his own, he will make a descriptive call next. Bid three diamonds with the diamond king instead of the two.
In third seat, when I picked up ♠ A-J-4-3-2, ♥ Q-J-7-3, ♦ Q-J-2, ♣ 5, I elected to jump to four spades facing a one-spade opener. My partner held a 5-4 pattern with 16 points and four little clubs so slam was where we belonged. He said I was too strong, while I thought with three aces he owed me a bid. Who is right?
Stumbling by the Wayside, Portland, Maine
I am sorry to say that your partner was right. Typically, when you hold game-going values with a big trump fit and side-shortage as you did, the modern technique is to jump to a new suit at the four-level — though your hand is dead minimum for this action. This is called a splinter bid, and that would let your partner judge if he had the right hand to stay low or aim high. Today, he'd know what to do.
What are the restrictions on the use of the support double? Which players can use a double to show three-card support, and how late in the auction do such doubles apply?
Backbones, Seneca, S.C.
To clarify the question, if support doubles are in use, then at opener's second turn to speak, in a contested auction, his double shows precisely three-card support for his partner's suit. The conditions are rigid: the bidding must be at or below two of partner's suit, and it applies only to opener at his second turn to call. For higher intervention, opener's double tends simply to be real extra values.
|
January 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Eternity was in that moment.
William Congreve
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ K J 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 4 3
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A
♥ Q 10 9 8 3
♦ J 9 6
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 7 6 4 2
♦ A 8
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
The raise to two spades is a constructive game-try, not obstructive. Accordingly, it suggests around 16-17 high cards with four trump. Your balanced shape and apparently unattractive club holding probably argues that pass would be best. However, you are on the cusp of action (if the club queen were the diamond queen, you would be worth a try of three diamonds.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ K J 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Good technique was rewarded on this deal, where the field reached three no-trump on a heart lead.
The auction put West on lead with an easy choice of the heart 10. With the heart suit lying as it does, it is necessary to consider your first move carefully. If the heart suit splits 4-3, it is irrelevant whether you win the first or second round of the suit. But as the cards lie, look at what happens if you take the first heart and drive out the spade ace (it is clearly more attractive to go after spades because of the intermediates in that suit, though playing on clubs might work, as the cards lie).
When East takes the spade ace and returned the heart jack, West overtakes and can clear the suit while retaining the club ace as an entry. Once spades do not behave, you are very short of tricks, and will have to let West in to cash out his hearts.
By contrast, if you duck the first heart and win the second in hand, then drive out the spade ace, East will have no hearts left to lead, and will have to exit passively, letting you drive out the club ace at your leisure.
Ducking trick one makes the difference between an undertrick and an overtrick.