Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 15th, 2012

It is commonly said, and more particularly by Lord Shaftesbury, that ridicule is the best test of truth.

Lord Chesterfield


South North
East-West ♠ 8 5
 Q 5
 K 10 9 6
♣ K Q 9 3 2
West East
♠ Q 9
 K J 9 7 6 2
 7 5 4
♣ 6 5
♠ J 10 4
 A 10 4
 J 8 2
♣ A 10 8 4
South
♠ A K 7 6 3 2
 8 3
 A Q 3
♣ J 7
South West North East
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2♠ All pass    

♣6

While a fair percentage of the North-South field reached four spades on this deal from a major pairs game, with mixed success, two spades was a sensible partscore.

The club six was often the lead from West, and declarer usually put up dummy’s king to muddy the waters. When East took the ace, he had the problem of whether to play for a ruff or to cash the hearts. It looked reasonable to return a club, and now declarer was in with a shout to make his game.

However, when he takes the club jack, he has to decide what to do next. Obviously, he has two potential winners in dummy for his heart losers. And indeed if diamonds are 3-3, he might emerge with 11 tricks, but if he plays for the diamond break, he might finish with only nine winners. For example, if he tests diamonds after cashing the top spades and the suit breaks 4-2, he might not get the club discard in time.

The best play is to enlist the opposition’s help by leading the diamond queen before cashing the spade ace-king. Both defenders can be expected to give honest count, perhaps each assuming their partner has the diamond ace. Now when the suit seems to be 3-3, declarer can cash the top spades, unblock the diamonds, and follow up with the club queen. When the same hand is long in both black suits, declarer can next play the 13th diamond and get both his hearts away for an additional, and valuable, overtrick.



This is a simple choice between the majors. Is a spade lead more likely to give declarer something he cannot do for himself, given that partner rates to be 5-5 or 5-4 in the majors (and unsuitable for a reopening double)? I lean toward a heart if only because this might go some way to insuring a ruff or overruff for our side.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 4 3
 8 6
 K 7 5 2
♣ Q 9 4 3
South West North East
1♠ 2♣
Pass Pass 2 Pass
2♠ 3♣ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 14th, 2012

Please assess the blame. West opened three spades to my right, and I held 14 points in aces and kings, with two spades, three hearts, and four cards in each minor. I passed, and when my partner let it go with four decent spades and 12 points, it was passed out; down five for 500! Meanwhile, we could have made 660 in three no-trump. Did either of us do anything wrong?

Finger-Pointer, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.

If you forced me to act with one of the hands, I would double three spades in the direct seat, aware that this is an overbid but feeling obligated to take the pressure off partner. With the responding hand I would surely pass if three spades came around to me; one can't balance and play partner to hold this much. Nobody did anything silly at your table.

Do you like the idea of signaling suit preference on the suits attacked by your opponents? When if ever should you instead signal count or attitude?

Signal Corps, Rockford, Ill.

Never signal attitude on a suit played by your opponent. You never need to do that – if your opponent has played the wrong suit you should already be doing just fine! Signal count only if you think partner's play in that suit or another suit will depend on the number of cards you hold. Otherwise play up the line as a default, or if you think partner is paying attention, use your small cards for suit preference.

I was confronted with an unusual auction in a recent club match. I opened one club, my LHO doubled, my partner passed, and and my RHO bid one heart. This was passed back to my partner, who doubled. Holding ♠ Q-9-8-3,  J-10,  K-Q-9, ♣ A-Q-5-2, should I pass or bid?

Torn in Two, Levittown, Pa.

Unfortunately, your doubleton heart does not tell you whether partner has scattered values with two or three hearts, or if he has a strong hand with four hearts and is looking for a penalty. Since with the latter hand he might have redoubled on the round before, I will play safely and bid one spade, then apologize later.

At my club, the reigning expert opened three spades against me. I passed, holding two small cards each in spades and hearts, six diamonds to the ace, and three low clubs. My RHO bid three no-trump, and now my partner sacrificed in four clubs. The expert bid four spades, raised to six spades! At favorable vulnerability would you sacrifice when the bidding comes back to you, and if not, what would you lead?

Biting the Bullet, East Brunswick, N.J.

I would never sacrifice here. Even if you are right, you are probably going to get a zero for minus 800. I'd lead the diamond ace. Dummy surely has all the other first-round controls. Maybe I can give my partner a ruff, or cash a second diamond.

I play contract bridge with a group of friends. Recently one of the players mentioned a rule I had never heard of nor could I confirm it in my bridge books. If I open with one in a suit, she said I may not rebid that suit, unless I have six there. Is that sensible advice?

Second Hand Rose, Jackson, Tenn.

This is sensible advice but is not a rule, more a guideline. A better way to put it is that facing a one-level response, you would only rebid a five-card minor if it looked like six and had no viable alternative. But situations sometimes demand it, when you cannot bid one no-trump and have no second suit.

For the record, facing a two-level response, you are often faced with a flawed two no-trump rebid, or the need to repeat a moderate five-carder. In general what you do here is more about style than right or wrong.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 13th, 2012

And who's of this or that estate
We do not wholly calculate,
When baffling shades that shift and cling
Are not without their glimmering.

Edwin Arlington Robinson


North North
East-West ♠ A 10 2
 A K J 5
 10 5 4 3
♣ 10 7
West East
♠ 8 5 4
 10 9 8 4
 7 2
♣ A J 9 2
♠ J 9
 Q 6
 K Q 9 8
♣ Q 8 5 4 3
South
♠ K Q 7 6 3
 7 3 2
 A J 6
♣ K 6
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
2♠ Pass 3♠ Pass
4♠ All pass    

10

In the 2011 Bermuda Bowl Seniors match between France and Poland, both tables defended four spades. Jerzy Russyan for Poland led the spade five to the nine and queen, and Francois Leenhardt took the heart finesse at trick two, losing to the queen. Krzysztof Lasocki led the diamond king back, and Leenhardt won the ace, drew trumps, and tried to split the hearts. When that failed, he tried a club to the king and was one down when that suit too was unfriendly : minus 50.

For France, Philippe Vanhoutte led the diamond seven to the queen and ace and Apolinary Kowalski drew trumps in three rounds, ending in dummy. Now he led a diamond toward his jack, which East had to duck. (Had he taken his queen, he would have built a discard for declarer’s heart loser.)

Now Kowalski followed up by cashing the heart ace and king. When the queen appeared, two more rounds of hearts (with the diamond loser being pitched) endplayed Vanhoutte to concede a trick to the club king. That was plus 450 for 11 IMPs to Poland.

Given that diamonds were 4-2, Kowalski understood that if the heart finesse was working, he did not need to take it — at least if the hearts were breaking 3-3 or 4-2. Had the heart queen not appeared, he could have played a third heart anyway. Even if West could win cheaply and play the fourth heart, Kowalski would simply discard his diamond loser, and the endplay would still ensure the contract.



Three diamonds. Although I'm loath to suggest additional conventions for the intermediate player, I believe that a raise to three diamonds should be forcing now. With a weak hand here, South should bid either fourth suit or two no-trump (whichever is cheaper) as an artificial statement of weakness, denying five cards in his original suit. Repeating his own suit should simply show five cards and be a one-round force.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 7 6 3
 7 3 2
 A J 6
♣ K 6
South West North East
1 Pass
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 12th, 2012

Practice is the best of all instructors.

Publilius Syrus


South North
North-South ♠ 10 7 3
 Q 7 5 3
 A K J 4
♣ 9 7
West East
♠ 4
 10 8 6 4 2
 10 8 6
♣ 10 8 4 2
♠ Q J 9 6 5
 K 9
 Q 9 5 2
♣ J 3
South
♠ A K 8 2
 A J
 7 3
♣ A K Q 6 5
South West North East
2♣ Pass 2♠* Dbl.
3♣ Pass 3 Pass
3 NT Pass 6 NT All pass

*Three controls (two for an ace, one for a king)

♠4

At the world championships in Veldhoven last year, everyone was impressed by the performance of the Indonesian women. In this deal from their semifinal against England, Grace Tueje made a nice play, one that decided the match in her side's favor.

When South upgraded her hand to a two-club opener, North was now happy to let her partner try for the slam bonus.

Against six no-trump West led the spade four, covered by the seven, nine and ace. Declarer went after clubs first, and things did not look good for her side when East discarded the spade five on the third round. A fourth round of clubs saw declarer pitch a diamond from dummy (having let go a heart on the third club), and East discarded the spade six.

Now West switched to the diamond six, and declarer put up dummy’s ace and played a heart to the jack. When that held, she cashed the last club, West discarding the heart six, dummy the spade three, and East the diamond five. She next cashed the heart ace, and when the king fell, she had to decide who held the diamond queen. If it was West, a simple finesse would suffice, but since East appeared to have started with four cards in that suit, she played her for that card by leading a diamond to the king. Now the heart queen squeezed East between spades and diamonds for the contract.



In the context of limit raises, you couldn't have a better hand. While there is a slim chance that you have three fast spade losers, I think your third-round club control allows you to bid five diamonds now, suggesting an additional diamond control and no spade control. The five-level really should be safe.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 7 3
 Q 7 5 3
 A K J 4
♣ 9 7
South West North East
1 Pass
3 Pass 4♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 11th, 2012

The nicest child I ever knew
Was Charles Augustus Fortescue.
He never lost his cap, or tore
His stockings or his pinafore.

Hilaire Belloc


South North
Both ♠ 6 5
 J 7
 A Q 8 7 5
♣ A Q J 3
West East
♠ A 10 9 2
 8 2
 J 10 9 4
♣ 9 7 5
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
 A 4 3
 2
♣ K 10 6 2
South
♠ K J
 K Q 10 9 6 5
 K 6 3
♣ 8 4
South West North East
1 Pass 2 Pass
2 Pass 2♠ Pass
3 Pass 3 Pass
4 All pass    

♣7

Today's deal from last year's Bermuda Bowl features the match between the young USA-2 squad and Bulgaria. It shows both U.S. pairs combining nicely for a gain.

Against four hearts both Wests led a small club. John Hurd realized that if the club finesse was right he really did not need to take it. He put up dummy’s club ace, won the second trick with his heart jack, and continued with the heart seven. Victor Aronov took his ace and led a small spade, declarer getting it right by playing the jack. West won the trick with his ace and shifted to the diamond 10, but declarer won the trick, played a trump, and claimed. He still had to lose a club trick when diamonds did not behave, but he had his contract.

In the other room the Bulgarian declarer played dummy’s club queen at trick one and could no longer make his contract. Justin Lall played his club king and switched to the diamond two, the only card to defeat the contract. Declarer won the trick with dummy’s queen and played a heart. Lall ducked this trick, then won the next trick with his heart ace to switch to a small spade. Seeing the ruff coming, declarer took his only legitimate chance by playing his king. Joe Grue won with his ace and returned a diamond for his partner to ruff. East now cashed the spade queen for two down.



In competition your partner's two-heart bid shows extras. A reversion to three clubs by you would be nonforcing. With a good hand you could cuebid, but that might deny a clear direction. Here you know you want to play clubs, so jump to four clubs, which is forcing. You can cuebid later.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 8 7 4 3
 A 4 3
 2
♣ K 10 6 2
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1♠ 2 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 10th, 2012

I left both ship and seas, and on
Along the sacred valleys all alone
Went in discovery.

Homer’s “Odyssey,” Edward Chapman, trans.


South North
Neither ♠ A 3
 K 9
 Q 10 7 6 5 4 3
♣ 4 3
West East
♠ 8 6 5
 A Q 6 2
 9
♣ K J 7 6 2
♠ K 10
 J 10 5 3
 K 8
♣ A 10 9 8 5
South
♠ Q J 9 7 4 2
 8 7 4
 A J 2
♣ Q
South West North East
2♠ Pass 3♠ All pass

9

At last year's Bermuda Bowl in the match between Israel and Poland, the Poles showed their ability in defense.

After a simple auction, South had to declare three spades and West led his singleton diamond. Ophir Herbst won this in hand and went on to play spade ace and another spade. East won and thoughtfully shifted to the heart jack, ducked by West to leave the defenders’ communications intact. Declarer could do no better than exit from dummy with a club. East won the ace (West giving reverse count by following with the seven) and gave his partner the diamond ruff.

West now did not know which of the club or heart winners were standing up. He solved his problem by underleading his hearts, his low card suggesting a remaining three-card holding. East won the heart 10 and knew to return another heart; thus declarer had to lose two hearts, a club and the diamond ruff for down one. Poland: plus 50.

Jacek Kalita was also in three spades against the lead of the diamond nine. He too won in hand, but immediately ran the spade jack. Of course, East won his king and could now give partner a diamond ruff, but the defense had only their two aces now. Had East returned a heart immediately, South would have won and played a club, and thus have been able to ruff the third heart with the spade ace. The fall of the spade 10 would have allowed declarer to come home.



Start by redoubling to show that you believe your side has the balance of power. At your next turn you can raise spades. This route will suggest a doubleton trump and approximately a minimum for the auction thus far. Some people play the redouble as conventional here, but I believe it is far more valuable to show a decent hand than to show a top trump honor, for example.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10
 J 10 5 3
 K 8
♣ A 10 9 8 5
South West North East
1 1♠ Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp,
Or what’s a heaven for?

Robert Browning


Both North
North ♠ A 9 6
 A 10 7 2
 A K
♣ 10 9 8 4
West East
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
 K J 8
 10 8
♣ K J 7
♠ K 5 2
 6 4 3
 7 6 4 3 2
♣ 5 2
South
♠ J 10
 Q 9 5
 Q J 9 5
♣ A Q 6 3
South West North East
1♣ Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

♠4

This week's deals all come from last fall's Bermuda Bowl in Veldhoven, won by the Dutch. On this deal from Australia's qualifying match against USA-1 in the Bermuda Bowl, Sartaj Hans played skillfully to land a three-no-trump contract that failed at many tables.

For the U.S., Martin Fleisher led the spade four, ducked by declarer and taken by Mike Kamil with the king. On the spade return, Fleisher played low on declarer’s jack. Hans played a diamond to dummy’s ace, cashed the diamond king, and then ran the club 10 to West’s jack. A low spade cleared the suit and put the lead in dummy.

This position was reached at many tables, but whereas many of the unsuccessful declarers took a second club finesse, letting West win and cash out his spades for down one, Hans instead played a club to his ace, realizing that he wanted to keep West off play, at least for the time being.

Next he cashed his two diamond winners. Fleisher could spare a heart on the third round of diamonds, but he had to let a spade go on declarer’s final diamond.

Now Hans exited with a club, leaving Fleisher on lead. That player could cash a spade, but then had to lead a heart, giving declarer his eighth and ninth tricks with a club and heart winner.

Had West discarded a heart instead on the fourth diamond, declarer would have led a heart himself and built an extra trick for his side in that suit.



With a minimum hand and not even half a spade stopper, just bid three diamonds. If your partner has a full opener, he will bid again. If he does not, you are surely high enough. A two-spade call here would suggest a better hand or better spade fragment.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 10
 Q 9 5
 Q J 9 5
♣ A Q 6 3
South West North East
1♣ Pass 1 1♠
2 Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 8th, 2012

It's true, I never assisted the sun materially in his rising, but, doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at it.

Henry David Thoreau


West North
Both ♠ 10 2
 6 5
 Q 9 8 6
♣ A K J 8 6
West East
♠ A Q J 3
 J 8 7
 K 4 3 2
♣ 10 4
♠ K 8 7 6 5 4
 —
 A J 7
♣ 9 7 3 2
South
♠ 9
 A K Q 10 9 4 3 2
 10 5
♣ Q 5
South West North East
Pass Pass 2♠
4 4♠ 5♣ Pass
5 All pass    

♠A

All this week's deals come from the 2011 Bermuda Bowl from Veldhoven in the Netherlands. Today's deal features a defensive maneuver that eluded one of the players at the, table who was faced with the problem. See if you can do better!

At both tables West passed initially, then upped the ante to four spades at his next turn. Neither East nor West could bid on to five spades over five hearts though; perhaps if East had doubled to show extra shape (NOT penalties), that might have got West to do the right thing.

Anyway, with five spades easy to make, the East-West pairs had to defeat five hearts to avoid disaster.

When Bobby Levin was on lead, he started with the spade ace, on which Steve Weinstein played a suit-preference eight, calling for the higher of the unbid suits. Making sure there was no confusion, Levin thoughtfully played the diamond king at trick two and continued the suit for one down and plus 100 for USA 1.

In the other room Joe Grue also started with the spade ace, and he too switched to a diamond at trick two, but he played a low diamond rather than the king. Justin Lall had to decide whether the spade king was standing up or if his partner had the diamond king. He got it wrong when he won the diamond ace and then tried to cash a second spade. Declarer, Lew Stansby, could ruff and was able to claim 11 tricks.



The choice is between an attacking heart and a more passive club — though you could get lucky and hit partner's suit. If you gave me one more heart intermediate (say the 10 instead of the five), a heart lead would be more attractive; but here a heart lead could easily give up a cheap trick even if partner had an honor in the suit. Put me down for a low-diamond lead (or the nine).

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10 4
 Q 9 7 5 2
 9 5 4
♣ K 3
South West North East
1 NT
Pass 2♣ Pass 2
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 7th, 2012

At our club my partner thought he should have tried for a grand slam on a hand where we bid six, making seven. The club expert's response was that in a local game, even if the grand seems likely to make, stay at six no-trump, because club players rarely bid grand slams. So bidding a small slam at no-trump will virtually always tie for a top at matchpoints. Do you agree?

How High Is Up? Sioux Falls, S.D.

Your adviser was absolutely on the money. Grand slams are bid so rarely that you need to know EVERYONE will be in the small slam before you start thinking of one. Sometimes you will have a keycard auction that lets you count 13 tricks, but rarely otherwise.

When playing with an expert, I had an accident on this pair of hands. I held ♠ A-J-10-8-3-2,  A-K-4,  J-8-7, ♣ A, facing ♠ K-7-4,  Q-J-10-7,  A-K, ♣ 10-7-5-2. We were playing two-over-one game-forcing, and the bidding went one spade – two clubs – two spades – four spades – pass. Where did we go wrong?

Missing Link, Lorain, Ohio

I agree with all the calls you made (a jump to three spades by opener should be a better suit). However, opener should continue with five clubs, and should not think of passing. I don't mind Blackwood with an open suit when my values suggest I don't have any real likelihood of two fast losers. Then responder can show his diamond control, and opener will not stop short of the small slam.

What are your views on leading from three, four or five small at no-trump? If you select this suit to lead, should you lead high, middle or low?

Small, Medium, Large; Pueblo, Colo.

Circumstances alter cases, but with that caveat I suggest high or low from three small (certainly high from touching cards) and second highest from four small. From five, a lot depends on whether I think I might want a shift if my lead doesn't work out. If so, I'd lead second highest; otherwise, fourth highest.

Recently you presented this bidding problem: ♠ 8-5-4,  5,  K-Q-8-3-2, ♣ A-10-8-4. After your partner doubled two spades and the next hand raised to three spades, you suggested a cautious call of four diamonds, in case partner had a one-suiter in hearts. If your partner had such a hand, why would he not just bid four hearts himself, directly, rather than doubling first?

Getting to the Point, Bremerton, Wash.

You might double, then bid hearts, with a hand based on high cards not tricks, since your values would be more flexible. By contrast, with a long solid suit and less in high cards, you might bid hearts directly.

I was just reading one of your columns where, after an overcall of a strong no-trump, a pair of French experts bid to a major-suit game. This was allowed to make on a sort of crossruff, leaving me wondering how often a trump lead would be close to automatic on such auctions.

Trump Attack, Dallas, Texas

Right you are! It is surprising how often it is true that when you are facing a strong balanced hand, you should lead trumps against the opponent's contract. The fewer points they have, the more likely that they are going to need to take their trumps separately.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 6th, 2012

Nothing has scathed me,
Nothing ever, nor ever will.
I have touched pitch, I have reveled in it and rolled in it….

Orrick Johns


West North
Neither ♠ 7 6
 7 6 2
 A K 2
♣ K Q J 8 3
West East
♠ K Q 9 8 4 3 2
 9 5 4
 Q J 10
♣ —
♠ J 10
 Q J 10
 —
♣ A 10 9 7 6 5 4 2
South
♠ A 5
 A K 8 3
 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
♣ —
South West North East
3♠ Pass Pass
4 Pass 5 All pass

♠K

Per-Olav Sundelin, known universally as P.O., was not playing for his native Sweden in the 2008 European Championships. His other duties as Vugraph commentator, Daily Bulletin journalist and proofreader precluded this. P.O.'s command of English is such that he is able to correct not only the analysis but also the grammar of the native English-speaking scribes. Additionally, he wrote a series of bridge problems for the bulletins. Here is one of them, perhaps the hardest of the fortnight.

West leads the spade king against five diamonds, East contributes the jack, and you play the ace. On a diamond to the ace, East shows out, discarding a club. What continuation guarantees your contract?

Answer: play a top club, and regardless of what card East contributes, even the ace, discard your losing spade! Should the club hold, give up a heart then cash the ace and king of that suit. If West trumps in at any point, ruff the spade return, cash the diamond king, and ruff the fourth heart in dummy. If West has the club ace and takes it, win the major-suit return, give up a diamond, then draw the last trump and discard the two losing hearts in hand on the queen and jack of clubs.

And if East plays the club ace, discard a spade, win the return, and give up a trump. The trap is that should you mistakenly ruff the club ace, West can overruff, then play a low spade to East for another club ruff.



I don't advocate rebidding one no-trump with three hearts and a side-suit small doubleton. Equally, raising with three small trumps is not ideal. Here you can also rebid clubs — which might get you to no-trump the right way up, plus your clubs are almost as good as a six-card suit. In favor of the raise is that if you always support with three trumps and a doubleton, partner will have strong negative inferences when you don't raise. I call it a tie!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 6
 7 6 2
 A K 2
♣ K Q J 8 3
South West North East
1♣ Pass 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].