October 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It is commonly said, and more particularly by Lord Shaftesbury, that ridicule is the best test of truth.
Lord Chesterfield
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 5
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ K Q 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9
♥ K J 9 7 6 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ 6 5 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ A 10 4
♦ J 8 2
♣ A 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 6 3 2
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 3
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
This is a simple choice between the majors. Is a spade lead more likely to give declarer something he cannot do for himself, given that partner rates to be 5-5 or 5-4 in the majors (and unsuitable for a reopening double)? I lean toward a heart if only because this might go some way to insuring a ruff or overruff for our side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 3
♥ 8 6
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ Q 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
3♣ |
All pass |
|
October 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Please assess the blame. West opened three spades to my right, and I held 14 points in aces and kings, with two spades, three hearts, and four cards in each minor. I passed, and when my partner let it go with four decent spades and 12 points, it was passed out; down five for 500! Meanwhile, we could have made 660 in three no-trump. Did either of us do anything wrong?
Finger-Pointer, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
If you forced me to act with one of the hands, I would double three spades in the direct seat, aware that this is an overbid but feeling obligated to take the pressure off partner. With the responding hand I would surely pass if three spades came around to me; one can't balance and play partner to hold this much. Nobody did anything silly at your table.
Do you like the idea of signaling suit preference on the suits attacked by your opponents? When if ever should you instead signal count or attitude?
Signal Corps, Rockford, Ill.
Never signal attitude on a suit played by your opponent. You never need to do that – if your opponent has played the wrong suit you should already be doing just fine! Signal count only if you think partner's play in that suit or another suit will depend on the number of cards you hold. Otherwise play up the line as a default, or if you think partner is paying attention, use your small cards for suit preference.
I was confronted with an unusual auction in a recent club match. I opened one club, my LHO doubled, my partner passed, and and my RHO bid one heart. This was passed back to my partner, who doubled. Holding ♠ Q-9-8-3, ♥ J-10, ♦ K-Q-9, ♣ A-Q-5-2, should I pass or bid?
Torn in Two, Levittown, Pa.
|
Unfortunately, your doubleton heart does not tell you whether partner has scattered values with two or three hearts, or if he has a strong hand with four hearts and is looking for a penalty. Since with the latter hand he might have redoubled on the round before, I will play safely and bid one spade, then apologize later.
At my club, the reigning expert opened three spades against me. I passed, holding two small cards each in spades and hearts, six diamonds to the ace, and three low clubs. My RHO bid three no-trump, and now my partner sacrificed in four clubs. The expert bid four spades, raised to six spades! At favorable vulnerability would you sacrifice when the bidding comes back to you, and if not, what would you lead?
Biting the Bullet, East Brunswick, N.J.
I would never sacrifice here. Even if you are right, you are probably going to get a zero for minus 800. I'd lead the diamond ace. Dummy surely has all the other first-round controls. Maybe I can give my partner a ruff, or cash a second diamond.
I play contract bridge with a group of friends. Recently one of the players mentioned a rule I had never heard of nor could I confirm it in my bridge books. If I open with one in a suit, she said I may not rebid that suit, unless I have six there. Is that sensible advice?
Second Hand Rose, Jackson, Tenn.
This is sensible advice but is not a rule, more a guideline. A better way to put it is that facing a one-level response, you would only rebid a five-card minor if it looked like six and had no viable alternative. But situations sometimes demand it, when you cannot bid one no-trump and have no second suit.
For the record, facing a two-level response, you are often faced with a flawed two no-trump rebid, or the need to repeat a moderate five-carder. In general what you do here is more about style than right or wrong.
|
October 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
And who's of this or that estate We do not wholly calculate, When baffling shades that shift and cling Are not without their glimmering.
Edwin Arlington Robinson
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 2
♥ A K J 5
♦ 10 5 4 3
♣ 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ 7 2
♣ A J 9 2 |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 9 8
♣ Q 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ A J 6
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Three diamonds. Although I'm loath to suggest additional conventions for the intermediate player, I believe that a raise to three diamonds should be forcing now. With a weak hand here, South should bid either fourth suit or two no-trump (whichever is cheaper) as an artificial statement of weakness, denying five cards in his original suit. Repeating his own suit should simply show five cards and be a one-round force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ A J 6
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Practice is the best of all instructors.
Publilius Syrus
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ A K J 4
♣ 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 10 8 6 4 2
♦ 10 8 6
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ Q J 9 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 9 5 2
♣ J 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 2
♥ A J
♦ 7 3
♣ A K Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠* |
Dbl. |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
*Three controls (two for an ace, one for a king)
♠4
In the context of limit raises, you couldn't have a better hand. While there is a slim chance that you have three fast spade losers, I think your third-round club control allows you to bid five diamonds now, suggesting an additional diamond control and no spade control. The five-level really should be safe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ A K J 4
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The nicest child I ever knew Was Charles Augustus Fortescue. He never lost his cap, or tore His stockings or his pinafore.
Hilaire Belloc
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 7
♦ A Q 8 7 5
♣ A Q J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 2
♥ 8 2
♦ J 10 9 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
♥ A 4 3
♦ 2
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ K Q 10 9 6 5
♦ K 6 3
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
In competition your partner's two-heart bid shows extras. A reversion to three clubs by you would be nonforcing. With a good hand you could cuebid, but that might deny a clear direction. Here you know you want to play clubs, so jump to four clubs, which is forcing. You can cuebid later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
♥ A 4 3
♦ 2
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I left both ship and seas, and on Along the sacred valleys all alone Went in discovery.
Homer’s “Odyssey,” Edward Chapman, trans.
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 3
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 7 6 5 4 3
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ 9
♣ K J 7 6 2 |
♠ K 10
♥ J 10 5 3
♦ K 8
♣ A 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ A J 2
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
All pass |
♦9
Start by redoubling to show that you believe your side has the balance of power. At your next turn you can raise spades. This route will suggest a doubleton trump and approximately a minimum for the auction thus far. Some people play the redouble as conventional here, but I believe it is far more valuable to show a decent hand than to show a top trump honor, for example.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10
♥ J 10 5 3
♦ K 8
♣ A 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what’s a heaven for?
Robert Browning
| Both |
North |
| North |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A 10 7 2
♦ A K
♣ 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 8
♦ 10 8
♣ K J 7 |
♠ K 5 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 7 6 4 3 2
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10
♥ Q 9 5
♦ Q J 9 5
♣ A Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠4
With a minimum hand and not even half a spade stopper, just bid three diamonds. If your partner has a full opener, he will bid again. If he does not, you are surely high enough. A two-spade call here would suggest a better hand or better spade fragment.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10
♥ Q 9 5
♦ Q J 9 5
♣ A Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
It's true, I never assisted the sun materially in his rising, but, doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at it.
Henry David Thoreau
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 2
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 9 8 6
♣ A K J 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ J 8 7
♦ K 4 3 2
♣ 10 4 |
♠ K 8 7 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ A J 7
♣ 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q 10 9 4 3 2
♦ 10 5
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| 4♥ |
4♠ |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠A
The choice is between an attacking heart and a more passive club — though you could get lucky and hit partner's suit. If you gave me one more heart intermediate (say the 10 instead of the five), a heart lead would be more attractive; but here a heart lead could easily give up a cheap trick even if partner had an honor in the suit. Put me down for a low-diamond lead (or the nine).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 4
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
October 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 7th, 2012
|
At our club my partner thought he should have tried for a grand slam on a hand where we bid six, making seven. The club expert's response was that in a local game, even if the grand seems likely to make, stay at six no-trump, because club players rarely bid grand slams. So bidding a small slam at no-trump will virtually always tie for a top at matchpoints. Do you agree?
How High Is Up? Sioux Falls, S.D.
Your adviser was absolutely on the money. Grand slams are bid so rarely that you need to know EVERYONE will be in the small slam before you start thinking of one. Sometimes you will have a keycard auction that lets you count 13 tricks, but rarely otherwise.
When playing with an expert, I had an accident on this pair of hands. I held ♠ A-J-10-8-3-2, ♥ A-K-4, ♦ J-8-7, ♣ A, facing ♠ K-7-4, ♥ Q-J-10-7, ♦ A-K, ♣ 10-7-5-2. We were playing two-over-one game-forcing, and the bidding went one spade – two clubs – two spades – four spades – pass. Where did we go wrong?
Missing Link, Lorain, Ohio
I agree with all the calls you made (a jump to three spades by opener should be a better suit). However, opener should continue with five clubs, and should not think of passing. I don't mind Blackwood with an open suit when my values suggest I don't have any real likelihood of two fast losers. Then responder can show his diamond control, and opener will not stop short of the small slam.
What are your views on leading from three, four or five small at no-trump? If you select this suit to lead, should you lead high, middle or low?
Small, Medium, Large; Pueblo, Colo.
|
Circumstances alter cases, but with that caveat I suggest high or low from three small (certainly high from touching cards) and second highest from four small. From five, a lot depends on whether I think I might want a shift if my lead doesn't work out. If so, I'd lead second highest; otherwise, fourth highest.
Recently you presented this bidding problem: ♠ 8-5-4, ♥ 5, ♦ K-Q-8-3-2, ♣ A-10-8-4. After your partner doubled two spades and the next hand raised to three spades, you suggested a cautious call of four diamonds, in case partner had a one-suiter in hearts. If your partner had such a hand, why would he not just bid four hearts himself, directly, rather than doubling first?
Getting to the Point, Bremerton, Wash.
You might double, then bid hearts, with a hand based on high cards not tricks, since your values would be more flexible. By contrast, with a long solid suit and less in high cards, you might bid hearts directly.
I was just reading one of your columns where, after an overcall of a strong no-trump, a pair of French experts bid to a major-suit game. This was allowed to make on a sort of crossruff, leaving me wondering how often a trump lead would be close to automatic on such auctions.
Trump Attack, Dallas, Texas
Right you are! It is surprising how often it is true that when you are facing a strong balanced hand, you should lead trumps against the opponent's contract. The fewer points they have, the more likely that they are going to need to take their trumps separately.
|
October 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Nothing has scathed me, Nothing ever, nor ever will. I have touched pitch, I have reveled in it and rolled in it….
Orrick Johns
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 6
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 2
♣ K Q J 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 9 8 4 3 2
♥ 9 5 4
♦ Q J 10
♣ — |
♠ J 10
♥ Q J 10
♦ —
♣ A 10 9 7 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♠K
I don't advocate rebidding one no-trump with three hearts and a side-suit small doubleton. Equally, raising with three small trumps is not ideal. Here you can also rebid clubs — which might get you to no-trump the right way up, plus your clubs are almost as good as a six-card suit. In favor of the raise is that if you always support with three trumps and a doubleton, partner will have strong negative inferences when you don't raise. I call it a tie!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 2
♣ K Q J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
While a fair percentage of the North-South field reached four spades on this deal from a major pairs game, with mixed success, two spades was a sensible partscore.
The club six was often the lead from West, and declarer usually put up dummy’s king to muddy the waters. When East took the ace, he had the problem of whether to play for a ruff or to cash the hearts. It looked reasonable to return a club, and now declarer was in with a shout to make his game.
However, when he takes the club jack, he has to decide what to do next. Obviously, he has two potential winners in dummy for his heart losers. And indeed if diamonds are 3-3, he might emerge with 11 tricks, but if he plays for the diamond break, he might finish with only nine winners. For example, if he tests diamonds after cashing the top spades and the suit breaks 4-2, he might not get the club discard in time.
The best play is to enlist the opposition’s help by leading the diamond queen before cashing the spade ace-king. Both defenders can be expected to give honest count, perhaps each assuming their partner has the diamond ace. Now when the suit seems to be 3-3, declarer can cash the top spades, unblock the diamonds, and follow up with the club queen. When the same hand is long in both black suits, declarer can next play the 13th diamond and get both his hearts away for an additional, and valuable, overtrick.