September 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Ignorance of the law excuses no man….
John Selden
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
♠ A 9 7 6
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ 5 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣K
Your partner is a passed hand. Do you really think he has a long club suit with which he can back in at the four-level after not being able to open? Of course not! He has a real fit for spades, and a hand inviting you to lead clubs against the opponents' heart contract. Bid four spades now and await developments.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
3♥ |
4♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
Throb, baffled and curious brain! throw out questions and answers! Suspend here and everywhere, eternal float of solution!
Walt Whitman
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ K
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ K 9 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 8 7 5 3
♦ 8 7
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ K Q J 7 3
♥ 10 6 4
♦ Q 9 6
♣ J 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
A double here by you would be takeout but would normally see you hold both majors. Your choice is a simple call of two diamonds, an aggressive three-diamond bid, or a double, expecting to play a 4-3 fit. I'd bid just two diamonds — You are a long way from game, but if you can make something significant, partner will surely bid again.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
From things that differ comes the fairest attunement; all things are born through strife.
Heraclitus
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 7 6 5
♥ J 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ Q 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K 9 7 6 2
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 2
♥ A 4
♦ A 10 9 7
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Offering a choice of slams
♥3
On an auction of this sort there seems to be no obvious urgency to lead diamonds. If declarer is going to set up clubs or hearts successfully, he will probably be making his contract whatever you do. But what may be relevant is the need to kill a ruff in dummy. And when your side holds the balance of high cards, as appears to be the case here, repeated trump leads might be effective.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3 2
♥ K 3 2
♦ K 10 7 4
♣ Q 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
September 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 2nd, 2012
|
I assume you and your partner play Michaels. What would it mean to you if, after your RHO bid one diamond, you passed, your LHO bid two clubs, and your partner then bid three clubs? I bid this with ♠ Q-9-8-3-2, ♥ J-10-9-7-4, ♦ K-Q-9, ♣ —, thinking that it would be obvious that, since I didn't double, I had less than an opening bid and had two five-card majors. Was I wrong?
How's That Again?, Augusta, Ga.
You are theoretically right. But since double is takeout showing a good hand and two no-trump would be unusual for the unbid suits, it is at least arguable that there is potentially some confusion. Incidentally, I'd pass your hand rather than bid. Why tip the opponents off to bad breaks when there is virtually no chance that the hand belongs to your side?
Recently, during a game of rubber bridge, I was the declarer. I was the fourth player to a trick led from my left. I somehow detached the wrong card (too small in value to win the trick) from my hand. I realized it was the wrong card when I tabled it. I then exchanged it for the card I had intended to play to win the trick. My defenders would not allow me to correct this error. Which law should apply?
Lucky Luke, Tucson Ariz.
In layman's terms you can only change your card if it was played with no intention of playing it. The law refers to dropping a card, not playing a card that was wrong. Rightly or wrongly you put a card on the table — not the one that you should have, but the one you intended to play before you realized it was a mistake. You have an extremely high threshold for your play to qualify as "accidentally played."
With this hand would you bid over a weak two diamonds: ♠ J-9-8-3-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ A-K? Would your answer change depending on the form of scoring, on position, or on vulnerability?
Plumb Tuckered, Grand Junction, Colo.
|
This is a tough one; You would overcall one spade over one diamond without a flicker, but this case is not so clear. For what it is worth, I would bid except facing a passed partner at teams or rubber. But make my diamond seven the club seven, and double makes good sense too.
We play New Minor Forcing for only one round so that we can find a 5-3 major fit, and then decide whether game is there by making an invitational or help-suit bid. Is this standard, or should we play it as game-forcing?
Musical Chairs, Laredo, Texas
If you play New Minor, then you should use a direct jump by responder at his second turn as invitational, and new minor then three of a new suit as game-forcing. Similarly responder's jumps at his second turn after three suits have been bid (as opposed to a no-trump rebid) are ALL invitational, while all game forces go through fourth suit.
What is the sensible meaning of a sequence where the partner of a no-trump opener uses Stayman, then in response to a major bids the other major ? Should that be natural or artificial — and what would it show?
High Hopes, Torrance, Calif.
After the Stayman inquiry finds a major, you should use responder's jumps as splinter raises of that major. But bidding the other major at the three-level shows a balanced hand agreeing partner's major, with slam interest. Meanwhile, a jump to four no-trump is quantitative, without a fit for partner's major.
|
September 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
An event has happened, upon which it is difficult to speak, and impossible to be silent.
Edmund Burke
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 10 4 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 6 3 2
♥ Q
♦ 6 5 3
♣ A 5 4 2 |
♠ A J 10 8 4
♥ A 9 8 7 6
♦ 2
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K J 5 3
♦ A J 10 9 7 4
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
2 NT* |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Spade raise
♠2
Your partner has shown a strong hand with both minors and implicitly short hearts, so your cards appear to be working overtime. The choice is to give preference to three diamonds (which sounds like three-card support since you did not raise at your previous turn) or to raise to four clubs. I prefer the first option.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 10 4 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The battle rent a cobweb diamond-strung And cut a flower beside a ground bird’s nest Before it stained a single human breast.
Robert Frost
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K Q 9 7 6 3
♦ 4
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 6 4
♥ A J 10 8 4
♦ Q
♣ K Q 5 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 5 2
♦ 10 9 8 6 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 3
♥ —
♦ A K J 7 3 2
♣ A J 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT* |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*[IS SOMETHING MISSING HERE?]
♣K
You have three choices: an invitational two no-trump; a reverse to two spades to show the major-suit pattern; and a cautious two clubs, planning to come in again if partner does not pass this call. The first two bids are right on values; the third leaves you space to explore. Put me down as a two-club bidder, but don't ask me to justify it!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6 4
♥ A J 10 8 4
♦ Q
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
By the work one knows the workman.
Jean de La Fontaine
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 8 3
♥ 2
♦ K 9 6 5 4
♣ A J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ K 10 9 7 4
♦ 7 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ A Q J 8 6 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 6
♥ 3
♦ Q J 2
♣ K 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
3♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Though partner has not acted here, there are reasons to assume that he has a few values (e.g., the opponents' attempts to stay low).. To involve him here, double three clubs for takeout. This suggests your precise hand pattern, though it may be a slight overbid. If you are worried that this sounds like penalty, remember the opponents have bid and raised the suit three times, so you can't hold a trump stack.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 2
♥ A Q J 8 6 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Gaze upon the rolling deep (Fish is plentiful and cheap).
Edward Lear
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K 9 5
♥ K 9 8
♦ A 9 6 5 4
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ 10
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ K 6 4 3 2 |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ A Q J 7 6 3
♦ 10 2
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
♠2
Passing here would be truly pessimistic, so a simple raise to three clubs looks reasonable. But I think you can be more descriptive than that. Bid two spades instead, which cannot show a long spade suit since you already denied that. This shows a club raise with spade cards, suggesting a maximum hand for the auction: perfect!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 28th, 2012
'Oh! Love,' they said, 'is King of Kings, And Triumph is his Crown. Earth fades in flame before his wings, And Sun and Moon bow down.’
Rupert Brooke
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 9 7 6 5 4
♥ A Q 9
♦ A 7 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ 7 6 2 |
♠ Q
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q J 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥* |
Pass |
| 3♠** |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
Pass |
7 NT |
All pass |
*transfer to spades
**super-accept
♦Q
There is no need to commit the hand to four spades yet. Three no-trump, or even a part-score, may be the highest scoring spot. Start with a two -diamond cuebid to show a spade raise. You can always bid game later when you have found out more about the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
When the hurlyburly's done, When the battle’s lost and won….
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 7
♥ K 9 4
♦ A K 10 9 3
♣ A 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 7 6 2
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 4 2 |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ Q J 8 5
♦ Q 7 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 4 3
♥ A 10 3
♦ J 8
♣ K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
*three-card spade raise
♥6
On an auction of this sort, where declarer may well have a void, leading an ace looks like a bad idea. A trump looks safe enough; I might choose the seven for deceptive purposes in case partner has the bare queen, but there is very little to choose from among the small spot-cards.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 3
♥ J 7 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
In today's deal, from the World Olympiad four years ago in Beijing, West has a splendid hand, but until he finds a fit, he can hardly drive his hand to the four-level,
Few pairs judged the East-West cards that well; let’s focus on the match between Norway and China.
In one room Glenn Groetheim as West played four clubs doubled after he had overcalled two no-trump to show the minors, then had doubled three spades. The defenders cashed their hearts and played a third heart, ruffed with the queen and overruffed. That had the effect of promoting a trump trick for the defenders, to go with their diamond winner, for down one.
It was good, but not good enough. In the other room the Chinese West overcalled two no-trump and also balanced with a double of three spades, which East gambled to pass for want of anything better to do. After three rounds of clubs, ruffed and overruffed, declarer played the side-suits, ruffing diamonds high and hearts low, and made nine tricks.
In England v. Romania both East-West pairs defended to three spades (one contract doubled, one not). Both Wests led three rounds of clubs and both Easts ruffed in and were overruffed. In each case declarer handled the trump spots sensibly to bring home nine tricks. None of these three Easts noticed they had a guaranteed way to set the hand. All they had to do was discard a diamond on the third club, instead of ruffing in, to ensure they could collect their ruff and beat three spades.