May 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections. You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.
Vilfredo Pareto
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ —
♦ A K J
♣ A J 9 8 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ A K Q 10 5
♦ 7 5
♣ K 7 |
♠ J 8
♥ J 9 8 6 3 2
♦ Q 6
♣ Q 10 6 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 7
♥ 7 4
♦ 10 9 8 4 3 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
2♣ |
4♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
There are two reasons to bid just one heart and not jump to two hearts. The first is that with bad hearts and scattered defensive values, you are unsuitable for a pre-empt. The second is that using a jump by a passed hand as weak when you did not pre-empt initially seems a poor use for the call. I prefer to use it as fit-showing — five decent hearts and at least four clubs with a maximum pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8
♥ J 9 8 6 3 2
♦ Q 6
♣ Q 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 8th, 2012
One-half of the world cannot understand the pleasures of the other.
Jane Austen
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 6 5
♦ 5 4
♣ A K 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 5
♥ 10 3
♦ A K Q 9 7 3
♣ 8 |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ J 2
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ K 9 8 7 4
♦ J
♣ J 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
3♦ |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣8
It looks simple just to jump to six no-trump, assuming that you have enough high cards for this to make. However, a far better call is to explore with five no-trump. This is not the grand-slam force — it offers the choice of slams. It suggests the values for slam and asks partner to propose a strain at the six-level. He might have either five spades or four clubs, in which case you'd prefer not to play no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 3
♥ A Q 6 5
♦ 5 4
♣ A K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
There is no security on this earth; there is only opportunity.
Douglas MacArthur
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 9
♥ 4
♦ K 10 7 6 3
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 8
♥ 9 7 2
♦ A 4 2
♣ J 10 8 7 |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ K J 10 8 5 3
♦ Q 5
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 5 4 3
♥ A Q 6
♦ J 9 8
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♥* |
Dbl. |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
* Both minors, short hearts
♥2
There is no reason to look beyond your black suits on opening lead. Spades are an unbid suit — but either opponent might turn up with four. The advantage of a club is that your extra length and intermediates make it both more attacking and somewhat safer if partner produces any high card in the suit. As against that, East has bid the suit. I think a club feels right; five-card suits have so much more to offer.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5 4
♥ Q 3
♦ 9 5
♣ Q 10 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 6th, 2012
|
The ACBL appeal booklets refers to good and bad tempo breaks. I thought they were all bad, by definition. Please explain the difference.
Slow Learner, Twin Falls, Idaho
The ACBL tournaments publish a summary of appeals here. When a player takes a long while to sign off or to double, he is generally conveying unauthorized information to his partner. This is a bad hesitation, and one should strive to avoid such actions. Conversely, many other slow actions do not convey a clear message of what you are thinking about. They are not giving unauthorized information.
Recently you ran a deal where the player in second seat doubled one spade with: ♠ K, ♥ K-10-6-2, ♦ A-K-Q-7-2, ♣ A-J-4. That player then removed a double of four spades by his partner to four no-trump. Was this Blackwood? If not, what did the call show?
Doubly Confused, Selma, Ala.
The four-no-trump bid should have been annotated as suggesting two possible strains in which to play — akin to the unusual no-trump, but here not specifically the minors. Whenever you remove a high-level double, you show a good hand of course. With a one-suiter you'd bid it; with two suits you announce it with an unusual no-trump call, then correct partner's choice if he picks the wrong one.
I'm responding with regard to the letter from the couple who want to learn to play bridge but have no resources where they live. "Bridge for Everyone," by D.W Crisfield, (Morris Book Publishing Co.) is a "Knack Made Easy" book. I know several beginner and intermediate bridge players who have found it very helpful, myself included.
Marian the Librarian, Princeton, N.J.
|
Thank you. I especially value my readers' opinions on issues like this. The graphics in "Bridge for Dummies" by Eddie Kantar are also helpful for beginners.
Holding ♠ K-7-4, ♥ Q-J-9-5, ♦ A-4, ♣ K-Q-10-2, I assume you would open one no-trump. When the next hand shows the majors and your RHO picks hearts, would you double? I did not do so, and the contract went three down. I felt it was an opportunity lost.
Lucy Locket, Miami, Fla.
You cannot double, at least not in my book. I play that as takeout, typically a hand with a maximum and a small doubleton in hearts — since I might be facing a Yarborough. Maybe if you pass, your partner could find a reopening double with short hearts and a six- or seven-count.
How should I respond to an opening bid of one of a minor when I hold both four-card majors and 6-9 HCP? I know it is standard to bid up the line, but if my partner has a balanced hand with four spades, he may bypass the spade suit to bid one no-trump. Is it reasonable for responder to bid one spade and then introduce the hearts?
Major Major, Tupelo, Miss.
I would never do this unless the spades were very strong and the hearts very weak. My partner would normally bid one spade over one heart with four or more clubs, and if he does rebid one no-trump with a square hand, the board may play just fine in that strain.
|
May 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If you don't know where you are going, you will probably end up somewhere else.
Laurence Peter
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 2
♥ —
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A K Q 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A K J 7 5 4 3
♦ 8
♣ J 9 5 3 |
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ Q J 10 9 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 5
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 7 5 3
♣ 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥K
Despite the absence of controls and high cards, you are best off raising to two hearts now, rather than passing and hoping to get a second chance. You do have some playing strength, and raising here does not promise the earth. When both sides have a fit, that is the time to bid more, not less.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ Q J 10 9 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Praise is the best diet for us, after all.
Sydney Smith
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10
♥ A 9 5 3 2
♦ A K
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 8
♦ J 9 7 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 7 5 3 |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ K Q J 7 6
♦ Q 4
♣ K J |
| South |
♠ Q J 8 7 6 5 2
♥ 4
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥10
Some people would tell you that they know whether it is right to open one no-trump or one heart with this hand. I don't feel strongly either way, but my general approach is to open a five-card major when I have a 5-4 pattern in the appropriate range. This hand is something of an exception — the strength of the two doubletons and the absence of intermediates both argue for the no-trump call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10
♥ A 9 5 3 2
♦ A K
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
May 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
When I hoped I feared, Since I hoped I dared.
Emily Dickinson
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 6
♥ Q 10 9 8 3 2
♦ J 6
♣ 8 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A 7 6 4
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ Q 2 |
♠ Q J 7 5
♥ J
♦ A K 8 5 4
♣ 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ K 4 3 2
♥ K 5
♦ Q 3
♣ A K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4♦* |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl.** |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas transfer to hearts
**Re-transfer
♦10
Although you have a maximum hand for your first call, the combination of the negative double on your left (suggesting spade length), coupled with your partner's silence, argue for caution. I don't think you are likely to get badly hurt if you bid two spades now, but I believe you should pass and hope your partner will be able to balance if he has values and the two-diamond bid comes back to him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3 2
♥ K 5
♦ Q 3
♣ A K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Quarry mine, blessed am I In the luck of the chase. Comes the deer to my singing.
Navajo hunting song
| West |
North |
| North-South Teams |
♠ J 10 6
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q J
♣ A K Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 8 5
♥ J 9 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ 10 5 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ 4
♦ 10 9 7 6 4 2
♣ 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q 10 5
♦ A 8 3
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This is a difficult hand to evaluate. You have enough to commit the hand to game in spades, but if you believe you have enough to make a mild slam-try (which is aggressive but certainly not unreasonable), then you should bid four hearts now. This has nothing to do with presence or absence of a heart control, but simply shows opening-bid values in a raise to at least four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q J
♣ A K Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
3♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
My family pride is something inconceivable. I can't help it. I was born sneering.
W.S. Gilbert
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 3 2
♥ A 6 5 4
♦ 5 2
♣ K 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ 3
♦ 8 7 4 3
♣ Q J 10 7 2 |
♠ K J 6
♥ K 7
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7
♥ Q J 10 9 8 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
3♦ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
The best way to make a slam-try here is to jump to four clubs. This is a splinter raise of spades, suggesting short clubs, and lets your partner evaluate his assets accurately. A simple forcing raise of spades might work well, but the key may well be whether there are wasted values in clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7
♥ Q J 10 9 8 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 30th, 2012
It is incident to physicians, I am afraid, beyond all other men, to mistake subsequence for consequence.
Samuel Johnson
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 5 3
♥ K 10
♦ J 4
♣ A Q 9 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 4 2
♥ 7 4 2
♦ 8 5 2
♣ J 4 |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ A 5
♦ A K Q 10
♣ 7 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♦2
On auctions of this sort, when you have no easy lead (e.g., an honor sequence or a five-carder), you tend to look for safety. Here it feels right to lead hearts; dummy rates to have either one heart or two, and as long as partner has any heart bigger than the eight, you should not cost your side a trick. If dummy has a singleton or doubleton honor, you surely rate to build your side quick tricks.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ Q 5
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
The fifth session of the 2011 Cavendish began with Levin-Weinstein (who had won the title in three of the last four years) having what seemed like a nearly insuperable lead over the pack. The tournament had thus far featured wild deals, but the first three deals of the final session were quiet. Not so for the fourth.
At one table an American international player sitting North made the mistake of overcalling two clubs, then, after his opponents had reached four hearts, reopening with a bid of five clubs. He was doubled there, and the defenders collected an easy 500 — not bad, since four hearts had no play at all because of the defense’s club ruff.
Of course it was possible for North-South to do better than defend four hearts or go for a big penalty. Look at what happened to the eventual winners. Kit Woolsey, South, heard his partner, Fred Stewart, bid two clubs, then double four hearts for takeout.
He removed to four spades and, when doubled by West, ran to five diamonds. Nobody doubled that contract — which was just as well, since it proved to be unbeatable! After a top-heart lead, Woolsey ruffed in dummy, played the club ace, ruffed a club, then crossed to a top diamond and ruffed another club. East followed suit, while West could not overruff the diamond 10. Then declarer drew the last two trumps, ran the clubs, and had 12 tricks for a remarkable plus-620.