April 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 9th, 2012
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you never should trust experts.
Lord Salisbury
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 8 5
♥ 6 3
♦ A 8 2
♣ A J 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K Q J 10 9 4 2
♦ Q 6 3
♣ 7 3 |
♠ J 9
♥ 8 7 5
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 4 3 2
♥ A
♦ K J 9
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 5 NT* |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick-a-slam
♥K
The spades do not offer much hope, given your weak intermediates and the fact that your RHO has four of them. So the choice is an obedient heart or an undisciplined club. I'm prepared to risk my partner's wrath by leading a club in the hope that I can find partner at home there. You only live once!
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 5 3 3
♥ 6
♦ 8 2
♣ K J 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My bridge reputation rides on the following hand. Holding ♠ 10-9-8-6-5-4-2, ♥ A-K-9, ♦ Q, ♣ A-K, I opened one spade; my partner responded two diamonds. Opinions of what I should have rebid vary widely, but I chose three spades as the only way to get the length and strength across.
Foxy Lady, Winston-Salem, N.C.
If two diamonds did not guarantee a second call, I don't disagree with your choice — not because I LIKE the three-spade bid (I don't), but because nothing else is better! If two diamonds guaranteed a second bid (either because you play two-over-one game-forcing or you play responder's suit rebid is invitational but everything else is game-forcing), then three spades is wrong, as it shows at most a one-loser suit. Simply rebid two spades.
My partner held ♠ J-9-5-4-2, ♥ A-9-4, ♦ K-4, ♣ Q-4-3 and responded one spade to one club. I raised to two spades and he passed, missing a decent game that needed one of two finesses. What determines whether to bid on or not?
Undercooked, Casper, Wyo.
When you find a spade fit, your hand gets much better. The fifth trump really improves the hand, maybe just enough to make a game-try of three clubs. It's certainly close, but paradoxically your bad spades makes your hand improve even more when you find a fit.
A new edition of the Encyclopedia of Bridge has just been published. I own an older edition. What would justify my buying the latest one?
Bookworm, Jackson, Tenn.
|
Brent Manley has produced what in my opinion is a masterwork. He has reorganized the contents of the book into sections that are far easier to follow, and has updated the book so that it covers modern bidding and play conventions for everyone, no matter what their level.
At our local duplicate club most tables were confronted with a diamond pre-empt by East. At unfavorable vulnerability South had ♠ A-J-10-9-4, ♦ K-9-6-2, ♦ Q-4, ♣ Q-4. Is correct to act over a three- or four-diamond pre-empt here?
Fair Catch, Woodlands Hills, Calif.
This is indeed a difficult hand. I think I would double a one- or two-level opening bid in diamonds, but my soft values, especially the doubleton trump queen, argue for restraint. Put it this way: With the doubleton king of diamonds I would double either a three-diamond or four-diamond opening. But I'd treat your hand as a minimum and pass now.
What is the largest penalty you've ever seen recorded in a serious event?
Record Keeper, Detroit, Mich.
Funny you should ask! When I went to Veldhoven this fall, a pair of ladies (who went on to win a medal!) had an auction where one player tried to transfer into spades no less than six times. Obviously there was a partnership misunderstanding, since the final contract was four hearts redoubled on a 3-1 fit. It went down 3400.
|
April 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
He that wrestles with us strengthens our nerve and sharpens our skill. Our antagonist is our helper.
Edmund Burke
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 5
♥ K Q 9 2
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ K Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 8 6 5
♦ 10 9 2
♣ 10 8 7 4 3 |
♠ J 10 6 3 2
♥ J 10 7 4 3
♦ K J 3
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A K Q 8
♥ A
♦ Q 8 4
♣ A J 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
♦10
The simple route here is to bid Stayman, planning to bid two hearts over a response of two diamonds. This would be the equivalent of Crawling Stayman over a no-trump opening bid to suggest a weak hand with both majors. If partner shows a major, I'd guess to jump to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 3 2
♥ J 10 7 4 3
♦ K J 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I have loved your kiddies playing run-sheep-run And cutting their initials on the ball-ground fence. They knew every time I fooled them who was fooled and how.
Carl Sandburg
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 9 7 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ J 5 4
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 7 3 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ Q 9 8 5 |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ 8 4
♦ 10
♣ A K J 10 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 5 3
♥ J 5
♦ A Q 9 7 3 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3 NT* |
| Pass |
5♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Minor-suit pre-empt
♠6
Despite your length in the opponents' suit, you have a good hand offensively, and your extra diamond length means your hand is not really a minimum in playing strength. You should thus simply compete to two diamonds, rather than passing (which would suggest a balanced hand).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 5 3
♥ J 5
♦ A Q 9 7 3 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Rules and models destroy genius and art.
William Hazlitt
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ Q 7
♦ A K Q 5
♣ A J 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 6
♥ A K 9
♦ J 8 7 6
♣ K Q 6 |
♠ 2
♥ 10 6 2
♦ 10 9 4 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 8 4
♥ J 8 5 4 3
♦ 2
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣* |
Pass |
1♦** |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Strong
**Weak
♥K
This sequence (while not entirely unambiguous) is traditionally played as takeout, not penalty. So you should simply bid three clubs and await further developments, hoping that your partner does not hang you too high at his next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ 10 6 2
♦ 10 9 4 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♦ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
It is a curious thought, but it is only when you see people looking ridiculous that you realize just how much you love them.
Agatha Christie
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 3
♥ Q 10 4
♦ K Q 9 8 6 2
♣ 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 7
♥ J 7
♦ J 10 4 3
♣ K J 4 2 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ 7
♣ Q 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 6 5 2
♥ A K 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
In an auction of this sort, where your partner has used fourth-suit as an exploratory move to determine more about your hand, supporting partner economically with honor-doubleton and a decent hand is normally a good idea. This leaves space for your partner to decide where he wants to go next. So a call of three diamonds looks right.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 5 2
♥ A K 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Do not men die fast enough without being destroyed by one another?
Francois de Salignac
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 2
♥ 9 4 2
♦ Q 10 6 3 2
♣ K Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K
♥ A K Q J 7 6 5
♦ J 9 5
♣ 10 2 |
♠ A 10 8 6 5 3
♥ 8
♦ A K 7 4
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 7 4
♥ 10 3
♦ 8
♣ A J 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠* |
4♥ |
4 NT |
Dbl. |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Spades and a minor
♥K
A simple jump to four spades looks obvious, but you might well do better to prepare partner for the possible five-level action in a red suit from your opponents. I play a jump to four clubs not as a splinter, but a fit-jump, the values for a four-spade call and a good source of tricks in clubs. This way you can bid four spades later and help partner make the final decision at the five-level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 7 4
♥ 10 3
♦ 8
♣ A J 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Hope is a good breakfast but it is a bad supper.
Sir Francis Bacon
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A
♣ A K Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ K Q J 8 6 5
♦ K J 9 7
♣ 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ 10
♦ Q 8 5 2
♣ J 10 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 6 3
♥ A 9 2
♦ 10 6 4 3
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 7♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
You might get strong opinions on this one. Some will tell you "Always lead a major"; others will tell you "Never lead from ace-fourth." My view is that against blind no-trump auctions you want to avoid leading from a four-carder headed by one honor if anything else looks attractive. Here, the spade-10 lead from the top of your sequence does look better — at least to me.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7
♥ A 7 6 2
♦ Q 6 5 4
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 1st, 2012
|
When my partner dealt and opened one spade, I could not decide whether to respond, holding ♠ J, ♥ J-10-9-4-3, ♦ Q-8-5-4, ♣ Q-4-2. I know it adds to six points, but with no aces or kings, I just hated the hand and thought we might get out of control if I bid. What logic should I apply to these positions?
Star-Gazer, Elkhart. Ind.
When you hold an unbid major, the motivation for responding (in case you have game in that strain) is stronger. Here, if partner rebid spades or introduced a red suit. you would not be unhappy that you responded one no-trump. Even if partner bids clubs, you may have improved your side's trump suit. And for sure, if your no-trump bid is not forcing, I would act now — if only to stop the opponents from coming in.
Has putting your column on the Internet worked out well for you?
Net Result, Huntington, W. Va.
Just to remind everyone, you can find back issues of the column at bridgeblogging.com, where I've enjoyed talking directly to my readers. And the fact that occasional points of analysis do come to my attention is reassuring, in that it indicates that the rest of the time I'm not too far off the mark. I'd say making the column available has been a nearly unqualified success.
My partner had a problem when I opened three clubs, and he was clutching: ♠ K-10-4, ♥ A-Q-9-4-3, ♦ K-Q-9-3, ♣ K. Does the vulnerability (we were not, they were) affect the decision to bid? For the record, three clubs was our last making contract!
Missed the Boat, Waterbury, Conn.
|
One other issue is relevant: What seat were you in? I'd pass a first-in-hand pre,empt, especially at this vulnerability, because I know my partner might take unusual liberties. Over a second-seat pre-empt I would bid three hearts and hope to get to three no-trump or four hearts. It is the absence of aces that worries me though, and this does argue for restraint.
Where do you recommend getting new or used bridge books from? And are there any new authors I should be keeping an eye out for?
Bibliophile, Wausau, Wis.
It is hard to look beyond Kantar, Kelsey, Lawrence and Reese as the big four. Kantar for humor, Kelsey for technical ideas, Lawrence for completeness, and Reese for style. Frank Stewart is always informative and entertaining too. For new books try Baron Barclay; for used books maybe Amazon is best.
In fourth chair one of our opponents held this hand: ♠ J-10-2, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-J-10-9-4, ♣ K-9-4. I opened one spade, passed back to him. He responded one no-trump and assured his partner after they had played the no-trump game down 500 that his call was correct. Personally, I thought that his hand was too weak and that two diamonds was a more obvious call. What do you think?
Trouble Town, Augusta, Ga.
The range for a balancing no-trump is quite wide — say 11-15. So this hand qualifies in high cards, but I suspect that with no clear spade stop I might have gone the coward's route and bid two diamonds. Certainly, though, the player's choice was not unreasonable — so long as his partner was on the same wavelength about the balancing no-trump having a wider range than in direct seat.
|
April 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Don't strew me with roses after I'm dead. When Death claims the light of my brow, No flowers of life will cheer me: instead You may give me my roses now!
Thomas F. Healey
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 10 7 6 3
♥ K 9 3
♦ 8 5
♣ J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 4
♥ J 7
♦ A Q J 4
♣ K 10 9 7 |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 4
♦ 9 7 6 3 2
♣ Q 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 8 2
♥ A Q 6 5 2
♦ K 10
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl |
2 NT* |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
3♥ |
4♣ |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors
♣10
Hide this answer from my friends, but I think there is much to be said for opening one no-trump. The problem with a one-heart opening is that you have no sensible call over a response of one no-trump. Equally, if you have a major-suit fit, you are quite happy to be declarer and protect your tenaces. It may not work out, but it is probably the most prepared bid available.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 8 2
♥ A Q 6 5 2
♦ K 10
♣ A 3 |
|
How good a contract is six spades here? You may be surprised to know that although the contract looks good, best play will result in only a 90 percent chance.
The instinctive line, however, will fail today. Imagine that you win the opening heart lead, draw trump, and play the club king and a club to the jack. East wins to return a club, and unless you follow an inspired line in the diamond suit, you will lose a trick to the diamond queen.
But you can do much better after the lead of the heart king to the ace. Take the spade ace and king, ruff dummy’s losing heart, then cash the club king and lead a low club, intending to cover West’s card. As the cards lie, when East takes the club eight with the nine, he can do no better than lead a low diamond. When the diamond nine forces the queen, declarer claims the rest.
In this variation, had the diamond nine been covered by the 10, declarer would cash his remaining trumps and discard a diamond from dummy. Then a club to the ace would reveal how that suit lay. If the clubs were 3-3, declarer could claim. If West had four clubs, then the diamond finesse would be a certainty as West could have no more than a singleton diamond. And if East had four clubs and had kept them all he would be down to one diamond, so it would be correct to play a diamond to the king.