June 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The shortest way to do many things is to do only one thing at once.
Samuel Smiles
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 5
♥ Q 8 7 3
♦ A 5
♣ K Q 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 6 5
♦ K Q 7 6 4
♣ A J 4 |
♠ A K J 10 6 3
♥ 9
♦ J 3 2
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A K J 10 4 2
♦ 10 9 8
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
2♠ |
| Dbl. |
3♦ |
Dbl.♥ |
3♠ |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠8
This is a sequence where you would have been happy to bid one heart over one diamond, but now would be forced to introduce hearts at the two-level. To make this call you need to have the values associated with a reverse (about an ace more than this hand). That being the case, you have to pass now and rely on your partner to reopen with extra values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ Q 8 7 3
♦ A 5
♣ K Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, June 5th, 2012
Oh I get by with a little help from my friends…
Lennon and McCartney
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 6 2
♥ A 9
♦ A K J 10 5 4
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 5 4
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 9 8 7 3 2
♣ 8 |
♠ K J 3
♥ K J 10 8 6 3
♦ —
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 7 4
♦ 6
♣ A J 10 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Dbl. |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
This is a minimum for a game-forcing jump-shift to two spades, showing five-plus diamonds and four spades. With a singleton heart and doubleton club, I might take the pessimistic decision to rebid one spade. But as it is, I think the jump to two spades gets the whole hand off my chest at one go — never a bad idea.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 2
♥ A 9
♦ A K J 10 5 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Sorrow knocked at my door, but I was afraid; Ambition called to me, but I dreaded the chances.
Edgar Lee Masters
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 7 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ Q 10 8
♣ Q 9 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5
♥ 9 5 4
♦ K 3
♣ A J 8 4 3 |
♠ A J 9 8 4
♥ A 3 2
♦ 9 6 5 4 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ K Q 2
♥ K J 8 6
♦ A J 7
♣ K 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
2♠ |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
With two attractive leads to choose from, I'd go for the diamonds rather than a spade. Just because your RHO has bid the suit doesn't mean that it won't be possible for you to set up the suit on defense. Unless dummy puts down three cards to an honor, the lead won't blow a trick — and even then, you might still survive the lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ 10 6 3
♦ Q J 10 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
At matchpoint pairs I am often tempted to open one no-trump and bid again in competition when I have a five-carder. What are the pros and cons of this approach?
Come Again, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
In a sense the no-trump opener passes captaincy to his partner after he opens, but there are so many variations of strength and shape that you should never feel restrained about acting again — especially by reopening with a takeout double after intervention, when you have a small doubleton in their suit. I do normally compete again by bidding a decent five-card suit when I can get it in. Even if the opponents can catch me, they don't always know that.
When my partner opened two clubs, I had almost an opening bid. I held ♠ A-4, ♥ K-7-5-2, ♦ Q-9-8-5-3, ♣ K-10 and responded two no-trump to keep the bidding lower than it would have been after a three-diamond response. After the deal my partner suggested that I might have lied with a two-diamond response, to hear what he had to say. What do you think?
String Theory, Staten Island, N.Y.
I can see where your partner was coming from. The problem hands in response to a two-club opening come when you don't know whether to go to slam. Here you know you will end in slam, so you don't have to show your values yet. Turn the heart king into a small one and I can see why you might bid two no-trump to get your values across.
My partner opened three clubs, the next hand doubled, and I bid three hearts with four small clubs and four hearts to the ace-queen, thinking I wanted a heart lead. When the next hand jumped to four spades, my partner bid five hearts with jack-third of hearts and we played six clubs doubled — down one trick too many! Was he naïve to trust me here?
Fool Me Once, Salinas, Calif.
|
He was right to bid on, but wrong to bid five hearts. In this auction, which in my book definitely promises club tolerance, he can bid five clubs with a partial club fit and four no-trump with a real heart fit, letting you pick the strain.
You are in third chair with ♠ Q-9-3-2, ♥ A-4, ♦ 7-6-5-2, ♣ Q-5-3. Your partner opens one heart, and the next hand doubles. What would you do?
Head Cook, Panama City, Fla.
This hand is too good to pass and back in. I'd prefer a straightforward call of one no-trump, burying the spades on the grounds that we may not want to find a fit even if we have one. This call shows the upper range for the action in a noncompetitive sequence, say a good seven to 10 points, and it leaves partner well placed for bidding on if necessary.
One of the problems I have at no-trump is that after my lead is taken by declarer, who switches to his suit, I do not know what signals my partnership and I should use at this trick. Do we use attitude, count, or suit-preference?
Wigwagger, Detroit, Mich.
Never signal attitude on declarer's leads. You do not need to announce that declarer has made a mistake. If he has erred, you will already be ahead of the field. Signal count only if you think partner needs to know (he often will). Otherwise, your carding should be suit preference, but a useful signal to have up your sleeve is the Smith Echo, which in cases of doubt suggests to partner whether to lead your suit back or shift. More on that anon; details can be found here.
|
June 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The great tragedy of Science — the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.
T.H. Huxley
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 3 2
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ K 10 7 2
♣ Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 7 6 5 4
♥ 8 5
♦ Q 8 5 4
♣ — |
♠ —
♥ 9 3 2
♦ J 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 7 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8
♥ A K 7 4
♦ A 6
♣ A K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
3♠ |
Pass* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
* Semi-positive values
♥8
When you hold a balanced 10-count facing a minimum opening bid, your first reaction should not be to try for game. Reasons to bid on include extra trump length, a long side-suit or support for partner. In this case you have no aces and no support for partner's original suit, so pass looks clear-cut.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3 2
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ K 10 7 2
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
One man who has a mind and knows it can always beat 10 men who haven't and don't.
G.B. Shaw
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ 9 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ K Q 10 9
♦ 10 9 6
♣ K Q J 6 2 |
♠ 8 5 4
♥ 5
♦ Q J 8 3 2
♣ A 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 7
♥ A J 7 6 3
♦ A K
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Second negative
♣K
There is some temptation to jump to four no-trump as a way to show the minors, but maybe a simple call of four diamonds is enough. And certainly if North has a very strong heart one-suiter, he would prefer to buy the hand at the four-level, rather than go higher unnecessarily.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 4
♥ 5
♦ Q J 8 3 2
♣ A 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♠ |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I would far rather feel remorse than know how to define it.
Thomas à Kempis
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9
♥ K 8
♦ 9 6 3 2
♣ A Q 8 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 6 5
♥ 7 2
♦ K J 10
♣ 10 9 3 |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ J 10 4
♦ Q 7 5 4
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 4
♥ A Q 9 6 5 3
♦ A 8
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
The raise to two hearts should be at the lower end of a simple raise. (Sophisticated partnerships have other ways to show a decent hand.) North could have started with a redouble, or, with partnership agreement , have bid two clubs to show a constructive major-suit raise. Here, you do not have enough to make a game-try; a simple call of three hearts is enough now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8 4
♥ A Q 9 6 5 3
♦ A 8
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Who saves his country, saves himself, saves all things, and all things saved do bless him! Who lets his country die, lets all things die, dies himself ignobly, and all things dying curse him!
Benjamin Hill
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A J 10 6 3
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ Q J 8 7
♦ 9 7 2
♣ Q J 10 7 3 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ 4
♦ K Q 8 5
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10
♥ A K 9 6 5 3
♦ 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♣Q
Anyone who responded one spade for fear of losing the spade fit should go to the back of the class. It works far better to respond two diamonds, bidding long suits before short ones, then if necessary introducing the spades over a two-heart rebid. By making the two-over-one response, you set up a forcing auction and describe your hand more accurately.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A J 10 6 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The imagination may be compared to Adam's dream — he awoke and found it truth.
John Keats
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ K J 10 9
♦ —
♣ A J 9 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ 8 7 6
♦ K Q 10 9 5
♣ Q 10 7 |
♠ A 10 7 5
♥ Q 5 4 3
♦ 6 3 2
♣ K 8 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A 2
♦ A J 8 7 4
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
Nothing is perfect here, especially if you play a new suit as encouraging but not forcing. I'd advocate that you play a new suit in response to an overcall as forcing for one round if third hand has passed. Even if two diamonds is not forcing, it is still probably the best way forward.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A 2
♦ A J 8 7 4
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The downhill path is easy, but there's no turning back.
Christina Rossetti
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8
♥ A 8 2
♦ J 10 8 7 5
♣ A 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 3 2
♥ 7 6 5
♦ 4
♣ K Q 10 9 6 |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ J 4
♦ A 9 6
♣ J 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4
♥ K Q 10 9 3
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
It is often right to lead a trump when declarer ends up in his second suit. (One can infer that dummy will be short in declarer's first suit.) Here, though, partner should be able to overruff spades, so a trump lead seems unnecessary. I'd lead the unbid suit — and while a good case could be made for a high spot-card, I'd simply lead the two (or the four if playing third-and-low leads).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4 2
♥ K 6
♦ Q 4 3
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
When our team qualified for the Senior Bowl in Veldhoven last June, we needed to beat the very strong Lynch team in the finals. Our team went down 50 IMPs early on, then recovered to win by a landslide. This deal occurred in the set where we pulled back almost all of the deficit, and it demonstrates that when in doubt, one should bid one more. You never know what the consequences might be!
At our teammates’ table, Arnie Fisher (East) and Fred Hamilton bid to four hearts after East had made a weak jump overcall of two spades over one club. The defenders made no mistake: They cashed two spades and shifted to a diamond, setting up the defense’s fourth winner before the clubs could be established.
At my table my partner Dan Morse (East) made a simple overcall of one spade over a Precision one-diamond opening, and South made a negative double. I guessed to jump to four spades as a calculated overbid, in the hope that something good would happen — and it did!
No one had anything more to say, and the defenders tried to cash two heart tricks, letting Morse ruff, draw trumps, and establish the diamonds to get his two club losers away.
Yes, a club shift at trick two would have defeated the game, but can you blame South for misreading the position? A club switch might be right if partner discourages at trick one – but I must admit I too would probably have got this wrong.