February 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
The struggle to reach the top is itself enough to fulfill the heart of man.
Albert Camus
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 7
♥ Q 3
♦ —
♣ K Q 10 9 8 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 2
♥ K 9 8 7 5 4
♦ K J 7
♣ — |
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A J 2
♦ A 9 8 6 4
♣ A J 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ * |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14 or any 18-plus
♠2
It is tempting to run from the double, but do you have any reason to assume spades or diamonds will play better? Your partner surely has some heart length here, or the opponents might be playing in that suit, so I suspect you won’t have an eight-card fit elsewhere. I would pass, albeit reluctantly. Give me the diamond jack instead of the two, and I might run.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
Now is not the hour that requires such help, nor those defenders.
Virgil
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ 4 3
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ A 9 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ K 10 9 8 5
♦ J 9
♣ K 4 |
♠ 6 4
♥ J 7 6
♦ Q 8 6 4
♣ J 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ A Q 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Majors
♥10
This is the precise hand that makes a Flannery opening to show the majors and a minimum opener a good idea. Alternatively, playing the no-trump response as non-forcing would let you pass with a clear conscience. If you play the one no-trump response as forcing (I don’t), you should bid two clubs as smoothly as you can, hoping to get by this round of the auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ K 10 9 8 5
♦ J 9
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Fraud includes the pretense of knowledge when knowledge there is none.
Benjamin Cardozo
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 10 7 6
♥ A 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 9
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ Q 7 5 4
♦ 4 3
♣ Q J |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K
♦ A 8 7 6 5
♣ 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ J 10 3
♦ K J 2
♣ A K 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Smolen: five hearts and four spades
♣Q
Even if your partner has three hearts, you seem to have no entry to your suit. Therefore, I would try to find partner’s long suit, which is surely clubs, not spades. If he had a five-card suit and values, he might have overcalled in spades, but may not have had enough to bid at the two-level.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 5
♥ Q J 9 4 2
♦ Q 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I know that my one-level overcalls should be on five-card suits or longer, but I have seen you recommend the action of overcalling with only four on occasion. And what about two-level overcalls — would you say five-card suits, as opposed to six-, are the exception, not the rule?
Short Shrift, New Haven, Conn.
Four-card suit overcalls at the one-level are rare. Bidding a strong four-carder with opening values may occur when you can’t double because of a shortage in an unbid major and the hand isn’t suitable for a one-no-trump call. Don’t overcall on a bad suit at the two-level, but sometimes your values require you to bid with only five and a reasonable suit in a strong hand when nothing else will do.
Holding ♠ A-J-2, ♥ K-9-6, ♦ Q-10-7-4, ♣ 10-6-3, I decided to raise my partner’s one-spade opener to two (suggesting 7-10 in our style, as we play forcing no-trump). Do you agree? After my partner tries for game with a call of three clubs, what do you recommend?
King Creole, Selma, Ala.
I like the simple raise. Now you can assume your partner has made a game-try suggesting three or four clubs in a suit where he needs help. Your club suit is as bad as it could be, but you have a maximum hand in high cards and decent spot cards. Maybe you could try three no-trump to suggest these values and let partner decide what to do next.
If you open a minor suit and your partner responds with one no-trump, are you allowed to invite to two no-trump with a good 16-count, or do you have to pass? What is the minimum you need to bid two no-trump, or even three no-trump?
Simple Simon, Vero Beach, Fla.
A jump to three no-trump suggests either a 19-count or a running minor and no shortage (since a jump to three in a new suit would be a self-agreeing splinter here). With an unbalanced 16-17 or a balanced 18, you can raise to two no-trump instead. You may be single-suited or have a 5-4 shape with a second suit you no longer feel like you need to introduce.
|
I was in third seat with ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-Q-6-4-3, ♦ A-7-4, ♣ 10-3-2, playing teams, and I heard my partner open three diamonds at favorable vulnerability. What is the right tactical approach in situations like this, playing with a relatively aggressive pre-empter?
Movers and Shakers, Riverside, Calif.
To give your opponents the hardest problem, you can jump to five diamonds, fortified by the knowledge that partner could have pre-empted to two diamonds but chose to do more. After a club pre-empt, you would not have quite as much confidence. Make them guess!
I dealt myself ♠ A-J-10-2, ♥ A-K-7, ♦ 4, ♣ Q-10-6-3-2, and opened one club. When I heard one diamond from my partner, I bid one spade, of course, and was given preference to two clubs. How much more would I need to bid on, and if I do act, how should I proceed?
Spare Change, Pueblo, Colo.
You have a nice hand, but your second action (one spade instead of one no-trump) suggests an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand, and your partner could have invited to three clubs easily enough. So I would surely pass, but I would not need much more in the club suit (say K-J-10-6-3) to consider bidding on with a call of two hearts, which might suggest a pattern very similar to this one.
|
February 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The public … demands certainties … but there are no certainties.
H.L. Mencken
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 3
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8
♥ 8 5 4
♦ 9 5
♣ Q J 9 4 3 |
♠ Q 7 6 5 2
♥ 9 3 2
♦ J 10 8 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ K Q 7 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ A K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Forcing
♠J
This feels like a good hand for hearts, but the issue is whether partner is showing a good hand or merely an invitational one. If you were sure that your partner had a good hand, you could bid three hearts and intend it to be forcing. To me, though, the three-club call sounds non-forcing, so you should just bid four hearts now and avoid accidents.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 3
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The rich have become richer and the poor have become poorer; and the vessel of the state is driven between the Scylla and Charybdis of anarchy and despotism.
Percy Shelley
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ K 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ K 2
♦ 10 6 4 3 2
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
♠ A 6 4
♥ A J 10 3
♦ K J 9
♣ J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 7
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ 8
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| 2 ♣ * |
Pass |
2 ♦** |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**Asking for the longer major
♣4
Your cue-bid shows a limit raise or better in diamonds. That said, you have nothing in reserve, but just enough in hearts to bid two no-trump now. This suggests a hand in the invitational range and is not forcing, which perfectly describes your assets. Let partner make the next decision, if any, as to strain and level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ K 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Curfew must not ring tonight.
Rose Hartwick Thorpe
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8
♥ 8 6
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ J 8
♣ J 6 4 |
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ 9 5
♦ K Q 9 6 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 6 2
♥ J 10 3
♦ 5 4
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Yes, your partner may have been dealt two trump tricks and not much else. But it is far more practical to play this double as a decent hand, asking you to decide whether you want to play offense or defense. If so, you must bid on now. A call of four no-trump to suggest the minors and a hand like this will let partner determine the best trump suit and what to bid over further competition.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ 8 6
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A mind quite vacant is a mind distressed.
William Cowper
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q 10 6 4 3
♦ 5 2
♣ K 10 7 4 3 |
♠ 10 5 3
♥ J 9
♦ K J 9 6 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 7 4
♥ A K 8 7
♦ —
♣ A J 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
In second seat, your pre-emptive opening bids should be relatively disciplined. Even when at favorable vulnerability, I would not want to open two diamonds with such a potentially powerful major suit on the side. To change this to a hand that I might pre-empt with, move the spade queen into either side suit, or make the spade queen the three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.
Mao Zedong
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 6 3
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ K J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ A 9 5 4 2
♦ 9 8
♣ A 7 5 |
♠ Q J 5 4 3
♥ Q J 10
♦ 5 4 2
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ K 7
♦ A Q J 7
♣ Q 10 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Whether playing inverted raises or not (where a simple raise promises a limit raise or better), this hand is on the cusp between a diamond raise and a one-no-trump response. In a strong no-trump base, I lean slightly toward bidding one no-trump, since it isn’t entirely clear I will be wrong-siding no-trump. As a passed hand, I might raise diamonds, since partner is slightly more likely to have real diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 6 3
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He who receives a benefit with gratitude repays the first installment on his debt.
Seneca
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 2
♥ A K
♦ A 8 5
♣ A K 8 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 5
♥ 9 7 4 2
♦ K J 10
♣ J 10 |
♠ Q 6 4 3
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 9 6 4
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 7
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ Q 7 3 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
The spades may not be splitting for declarer, but it still seems right to go active by leading a top diamond rather than a relatively passive heart. Anytime your partner has diamond length or one of the top three diamonds, this is a sensible lead. Moreover, if the diamond ace-king are to your right, the lead doesn’t cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 6
♥ 9 8 6 2
♦ Q J 2
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
Today’s deal from the Yeh Bros. tournament last year is out of character for this column: While the play is easy, the bidding is unusual. But the auction shows how good players think, even in a relatively unfamiliar partnership.
When the Poles were eliminated from the main event, they swapped partnerships for the consolation event. Michal Klukowski and Piotr-Pavel Zakorski won it, having found their way to a grand slam with the splendid auction shown here.
The one-club opener didn’t promise a good hand, but it could have had short clubs. After North’s natural and non-forcing two-club response, Klukowski (South) set clubs as trump with his rebid, then bypassed his heart ace to cue-bid his spade ace, knowing that if North did anything but bid five clubs, he would have a heart control. Then Klukowski would bid the grand slam.
When North denied a heart control, Klukowski’s five-heart call showed the ace and promised interest in a grand slam. That would let his partner bid the grand slam, sign off with no extras, bid five spades with second-round control (which would be bad news) or do anything else appropriate. North’s five no-trump call was intended — and interpreted — as extra club length or an extra diamond control.
Klukowski now knew his partner had at least two spades and two hearts, so relatively short diamonds were guaranteed. If his partner had seven clubs, he would be almost able to claim the grand slam; as the cards lay, there were indeed 13 top tricks.