January 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
How would you handle a hand like ♠ J-4, ♥ K-6-5-4, ♦ K-Q-4-2, ♣ 8-7-2, facing a strong no-trump? Would vulnerability or the form of scoring affect your decision?
Gun for Hire, Orlando, Fla.
It seems clearly right to start with a Stayman two-club call, with the intention of merely inviting game even if you find a heart fit. The honors in the long suits somewhat compensate for your lack of intermediates. With some heart intermediates, you might persuade me to do more. If vulnerable at teams, I might bid to four hearts if we found a fit.
If the opponents intervene over our no-trump, what would you recommend I play to describe my hand? Is Stolen Bid an approved gadget?
Barabbas, Madison, Wis.
Both opener and his partner must be able to bid all the suits efficiently. (The transfer element is less vital.) Each player should be able to double with shortage since that is the hand you are most likely to want to compete on. Responder can play transfers and Stayman over an artificial double or a call of two clubs — with double acting as Stayman. After higher intervention, new suits should be natural at the two-level and forcing at the three-level. The meaning of a two-no-trump call as Lebensohl is discussed at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensohl.
In second seat, I had ♠ A-Q-7-2, ♥ K-4, ♦ K-Q-J-9-5, ♣ Q-4, and opened one diamond. The next hand overcalled two hearts, my partner doubled, and the next player jumped to four hearts pre-emptive. I had planned to jump to four spades and wasn’t sure if that call would suffice here — or what slam try to make.
Missing Out, Mexico City, Mexico
If your right-hand opponent had let you jump to four spades, you would probably have made that call. As it is, you certainly want to make a slam try; but does a jump to five spades ask for a heart control? Does four no-trump suggest the minors here rather than being key-card? I’ll settle for bidding four spades and hope partner can do more with real extras.
|
My partner and I have been arguing about whether there is any sort of hand that would pass in first or second chair and then back into the opponent’s auction with a pre-empt. Is such a thing possible?
Better Late Than Never, Springfield, Mass.
There must be hands with the shape for a pre-empt but not the right honor location, where you might pass initially but decide to pre-empt later. Similarly, you may have a hand with too much defense or with a sidesuit. When vulnerable, you might also not have a good enough suit to act on initially. Whenever your partner bids, though, jumps by a passed hand in a new suit will not be a single-suited pre-empt but should show fit for your partner.
Holding ♠ Q-7-3-2, ♥ K-Q, ♦ A-J-4-3, ♣ A-Q-3, please discuss what you might open and why.
No Way Jose, Bellingham, Wash.
Not all 18-counts are created equal. This hand, with its doubleton heart honors not pulling their full weight and no intermediates, looks like a strong no-trump to me. You could persuade me that if your no-trump range includes good 14-counts, then you should go high and not low; I’ll take that under advisement. At pairs, though, I’d reluctantly open one diamond so as to go with the field.
|
January 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There’s not a joy the world can give like that it takes away.
Lord Byron
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ A 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ 10 8 6 3
♦ Q 5 2
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ K 4
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 10
♣ A 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 8 2
♥ A K 2
♦ 9 8 3
♣ Q 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♣J
When your partner introduces a major after the double of a minor, it tends not to be a call made with four small cards or dead minimum values. So, I would raise to two hearts now, aware that we might just miss a spade fit, but expecting even a 4-3 heart fit to play reasonably well.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ A 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Taste does not come by chance: It is a long and laborious task to acquire it.
Sir Joshua Reynolds
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 2
♥ Q J 6 3
♦ K 5
♣ A K 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6 4
♥ 4
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ J 10 7 4 |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ Q J 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
|
♣J
It would be nice if a double here were for penalties, but it isn’t. A double here would be for take-out. (Switch the diamonds and spades to produce a minimum example.) Generally, low-level doubles — especially those early in the auction and under the trumps — are more for take-out than penalty. I guess I’d pass; defending against two diamonds undoubled looks like our best possible result.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 5
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.
Thomas Brooks
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 5 4
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ 2
♣ A J 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 6
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 8 7 5 3
♣ 8 3 |
♠ J 9 3
♥ K 10 9 5
♦ 10 6 4
♣ Q 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A Q 8 3
♦ K Q
♣ K 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
Your controls argue for bidding on past four spades, even though you don’t have much “stuffing” in your suits. I would bid five clubs now to cue-bid my ace, and let partner take it from there. As a general rule, the hand with the aces and spaces shouldn’t use Blackwood, since the response won’t be helpful.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5 4
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ 2
♣ A J 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The meaning doesn’t matter if it’s only idle chatter of a transcendental kind.
W.S. Gilbert
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q J 5 4
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 8 5 2
♣ Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7 3
♥ 9 8 6
♦ J 6
♣ K 10 9 6 |
♠ K
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ 10 9 7
♣ A J 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 2
♥ J 10 5
♦ A Q 4 3
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT * |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing
♥9
This hand is definitely not worth a drive to game, although if you had a singleton spade and king-third of diamonds, you might feel slightly different. That said, this is not worth a response of two clubs; you should instead bid one heart to make sure you find your heart fit as quickly as possible. If your partner bids spades, you will jump to two no-trump to invite game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ 10 9 7
♣ A J 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I am a bear of very little brain, and long words bother me.
Winnie-the-Pooh
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ K 8 2
♦ J 10 7 6
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 8 5 3
♣ 9 8 3 2 |
♠ K 9
♥ J 7 6 4
♦ 9 2
♣ K 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 4
♥ A Q 5
♦ A K Q 4
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Slam-try for spades
♥10
At any vulnerability and form of scoring, you should balance with one no-trump now. The range for this call over a minor-suit opening bid is approximately 11-15 points; with more, you would double and rebid one no-trump. The range for this call is admittedly wide, but your partner can ask for range and shape with a call of two clubs at his next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ K 8 2
♦ J 10 7 6
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict everything you said today.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 5 4
♥ Q J 3 2
♦ A 5
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ K 10 8 7
♦ J 10 7 4
♣ 3 2 |
♠ J 9 8 7 2
♥ 9
♦ Q 8 6 3 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ A 6 5 4
♦ K 9
♣ A K J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Your controls and shape give you just enough to drive to game with a call of two hearts. This suggests a minimum of 5-4 distribution and a hand of this strength, leaving open all possible strains for game and slam. You won’t always be able to make game here, but you should be in one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 3
♥ A 6 5 4
♦ K 9
♣ A K J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
When opener supports responder’s major suit, I know that you believe the raise can be based on either three or four trumps. Can responder ask his partner to describe his hand more precisely?
Define and Dandy, Waterbury, Conn.
A convention, called “Spiral Scan” by some, is used after opener raises responder’s major-suit response. A call of two no-trump over the raise lets opener use a four-step response; minimum with three and four trumps, respectively, maximum with three and four trump, respectively. Responder’s two-spade call over two hearts tends to show four, to help reach a 4–4 fit if opener has raised hearts with four spades and three hearts.
If you were dealt ♠ A-9-7-4-2, ♥ J-5-2, ♦ A-K-7, ♣ Q-2, and heard your partner open one no-trump, would you merely drive to game, or would you invite slam? (As the cards lie, my partner had king-queen-third of spades and a 16-count, but he had all the missing controls bar the club ace, and we had 12 top tricks).
Underdone, Memphis, Tenn.
I would simply transfer to spades and then bid three no-trump, not considering slam unless my partner broke the transfer at his first turn. But if, over my jump to three no-trump, my partner made a call other than four spades, it should show a maximum with three trumps. Then I’d probably up and bid slam.
Please explain how leading third-and-fifth or third-and-low works — as opposed to fourth highest. What are the main differences, and which would you recommend I play?
Spot Belly, Staten Island, N.Y.
Leading fourth-highest, but also lowest from three, may make those two holdings hard to differentiate. By contrast, leading a high spot card from two or four cards, but lowest from three or five, means that any ambiguity should be between holdings that are two cards apart. This makes confusion rather less likely, so an experienced partnership might consider moving on from fourth highest.
|
If you were in fourth seat with ♠ J, ♥ Q-10-6, ♦ K-Q-10-6-4-2, ♣ K-3-2, would you use Pierson points (spades plus high-card points) to determine whether to open the bidding? Would the vulnerability affect that decision?
Keeping the Peace, Fort Worth, Texas
Playing pairs, I tend to open my balanced 11-12 point hands when vulnerable (even when relatively short in spades, a criterion others take seriously). Partner tends to have the hand closest to an opener in such circumstances. But this collection is an unbalanced hand with very little in the majors and no aces. I don’t expect the opponents to be able to make game — but it wouldn’t completely surprise me. I’d pass and apologize if I were wrong; but if I did open, it would be with a call of three diamonds.
Holding ♠ A-J-3-2, ♥ Q-4-2, ♦ K-Q-4, ♣ K-10-2, I assume you would open one no-trump in an uncontested auction. But what would you do if your right-hand opponent opened the bidding? When would you pass, when would you double, and when would you overcall one no-trump?
Call My Bluff, Willoughby, Ohio
I would open one no-trump happily enough, and I would overcall one no-trump over the opening bid of a minor or one spade, but I would double one heart. Having said that, if my partner were a passed hand and I heard a minor suit to my left, I might double and take the low road. I would never pass with this hand.
|
January 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In war there is no second prize for the runner-up.
General Omar Bradley
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 6 5 3
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ A 7
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ 8
♦ 10 9 8 3 2
♣ J 8 5 2 |
♠ Q J 2
♥ 10 9 7 5
♦ J 4
♣ 10 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9
♥ K J 6 3
♦ K Q 6 5
♣ K 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ * * |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Artificial, setting hearts as trump
**One of four key-cards
♦10
Yes, you could try to land on a pin-head by passing. But it seems like an acceptable risk to get too high in the attempt to find a fit. I would use Stayman, though with all these assets in the short suits, I can imagine that simply raising to three no-trump might be the winning strategy.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 2
♥ 10 9 7 5
♦ J 4
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The tempter or the tempted, who sins most?
William Shakespeare
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K
♥ A K 4 3
♦ 9 3 2
♣ A K 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 5 4
♥ Q J
♦ J
♣ Q 10 9 8 5 |
♠ A 10 9
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ J 7 |
| South |
♠ Q J 3 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 6 5 4
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
This hand is way too good to pass now (even though I can imagine that we might not be able to make anything). The choice is between a raise to three clubs and a double. The former suggests extra shape; the latter, extra high cards. I prefer to double, assuming that, if necessary, my partner can repeat clubs. If partner does pass out two spades doubled, I’d hope to beat the part-score on heart ruffs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ A K 4 3
♦ 9 3 2
♣ A K 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This is the last of the week’s examples of manipulating a trump fit missing the king. Here, South’s three-no-trump call offers a choice of games. North is allowed to pass, though he would normally convert to four spades with four-card trump support, if not owning a completely square shape or terrible trumps. Today, though, North might see the possibility of a club ruff in his hand.
As declarer in four spades, you cover the lead of the club jack with the king, win the club continuation and lead a heart to dummy for the winning spade finesse. It looks best now to take the diamond ace and spade ace. If the king does not fall, eliminate your clubs and hearts, then play a second diamond, hoping West began with the doubleton diamond king and just two spades. If so, he will be forced to lead a club or heart and let you pitch your third-round diamond loser.
As it happens, the spade king falls, and declarer can draw trumps and claim 10 tricks. Should anything different have happened?
Maybe, though much may depend on the ability (actual and perceived) of South and West. When declarer leads a trump to the jack, West has an obligatory false-card of dropping the nine or 10; this costs nothing and may create a losing option for declarer. If South has not encountered this maneuver before, he may decide to play West for a singleton or the doubleton 10-9 of trumps, then cross to dummy to lead the spade queen in an attempt to pin the remaining intermediate.