March 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting — died!
George W. Cecil
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ A Q 8 5 2
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 3
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 10 3
♣ 6 5 4 |
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ K 8
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
This is a tough one! Should you double hearts, then bid spades? I think so, since even if your right-hand opponent has length in hearts, that might be your best suit. Double hearts for penalty and then bid spades if the opponents find a fit in a minor suit. Whether you should bid spades or jump in that suit may depend on just how the bidding develops.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
My partner opened a strong two clubs, and I gave the neutral response of two diamonds. After a rebid of two no-trump, can I use Stayman and Jacoby Transfers, just as if my partner had opened the bidding with a no-trump call? What is the best use for a bid of three spades here?
Movers and Shakers, Albuquerque, N.M.
You play exactly the same as over a two no-trump opening bid. (The same applies when you overcall a weak two-bid with a natural two no-trump call.) Use the three-spade call in one of two ways: either as Minor Suit Stayman or as a puppet to three no-trump. After that, responder can show one or both minors in various ways. Some possibilities are listed at bit.ly/AoB2NTresponses.
When declaring, I can generally keep track of the trumps. But following the spots in more than two suits is a challenge. What would you recommend as a way forward?
Losing the Thread, Detroit, Mich.
I do not recommend trying to count all the suits. Focus on the ones that seem most likely to matter to you after dummy comes down. Try to focus only on trump (just count the missing ones in the opponents’ hands) and one other suit. As you get more skilled at the task, maybe you can expand your repertoire.
Would you consider it appropriate to open with a pre-empt in third seat, holding ♠ 4-3, ♥ K-Q-8-7-3, ♦ A-7-3-2, ♣ 10-3? I assume you might pass at some vulnerabilities, but if you bid, do you prefer one or two hearts?
Risking it All, Panama City, Fla.
You are right that I would probably pass at unfavorable vulnerability, though the heart 10 might tempt me to act. Non-vulnerable, I might mix it up with a call of two hearts, but a simple opening of one heart with both sides vulnerable is perfectly reasonable and mixes aggression with some degree of safety.
|
Recently, I was declaring three spades, and when I led the trump king, one opponent revoked. I asked her if she had any spades, and she corrected the revoke by playing her trump ace at once. What is the consequence of this? If I make three spades with an overtrick thanks to the revoke, would that be game?
Portia’s Pa, Lake Oswego, Ore.
For a revoke to be established, the offending side must have played to the next trick, unless a claim has been made. So here, the revoke is not established and the player can correct the revoke, with the card played in error a penalty card. In this case, it must be led to the next trick — but penalty cards are not always so simple if someone else wins the key trick! In any event, revoke penalties serve as under- or overtricks and can never turn a part-score contract into a game.
Would you ever compare the safety play in bridge to a gambit in chess or a sacrifice in baseball? Are there other games, such as poker, that serve as more apt comparisons to bridge?
Boy Scout, Pleasanton, Calif.
Most safety plays in bridge definitely advance your side’s cause by guaranteeing your contract, while a sacrifice at baseball is a less-guaranteed return on investment. Maybe a better comparison would be to the suicide squeeze, safety squeeze or sacrifice fly, which all get a run in when executed well. Psyching in bridge is like bluffing in poker, while the cerebral approaches required for chess and bridge are very similar. I wish bridge players realized that they need to read in order to improve, just as chess players do!
|
March 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The people people have for friends your common sense appall But the people people marry are the queerest folk of all.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 6
♥ 8
♦ A 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A K 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ Q 8 |
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 9 5 2
♦ 10
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
It seems obvious to bid or transfer into spades, doesn’t it? Indeed, the normal route with hands like this is to transfer into spades then offer no-trump. Here, however, I believe the quality of your spades should argue for playing four spades, even facing a small doubleton. I would transfer, then bid four spades — or use a Texas transfer to spades if that is in my repertoire.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
An act of God was defined as something which no reasonable man could have expected.
A. P. Herbert
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8
♥ A J 7 6 2
♦ 7
♣ K 6 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 5 4 2
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 6 5
♣ Q |
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ K Q 9 3
♦ A K 9
♣ 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
It feels right to re-raise to three diamonds. With so little defense to the majors but a good fit for your partner, you should be able to take nine tricks, or the opponents must be able to make a partscore. For the record, the bid of a major here would show a stopper and fit for diamonds, with a maximum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
They say to know oneself is to know all there is that is human. But of course no one can ever know himself. Nothing human is finally calculable; even to ourselves we are strange.
Gore Vidal
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 7 5
♥ A 3
♦ K Q J 9
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ Q 10 8 7 6 |
♠ A Q 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 7 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
♠ J 4 3 2
♥ K J 7 2
♦ 8 2
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT * |
| Pass |
2 ♠ * * |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*12-14
**Clubs
♦10
Your partner’s double is not penalty; he rates to have values and no clear call. (He is unlikely to have both majors, or he might have bid spades, then hearts). A typical shape would be 3-4-3-3, so you can introduce your diamonds, confident that if you do not have an eight-card fit there, hearts will be more than playable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 7 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Truth is on the march, and nothing can stop it.
Emile Zola
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 10 9
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ 10 4
♣ J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ A K Q J 8 5 3
♣ Q 8 |
♠ K 7 6 5 4 3
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 8
♥ A 10 6 3 2
♦ 2
♣ A 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 NT * |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
It is tempting to bid spades at the two- or three-level now, but it might be better to give preference to two diamonds, since your spade intermediates are so terrible and your heart king isn’t pulling its full weight. You may still be able to get to spades if your partner keeps the auction alive. I’d bid two spades I suppose, but I’m conflicted.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 6 5 4 3
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Speak now, and I will answer; How shall I help you, say.
A.E. Housman
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 3 2
♥ A J 6 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ K 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 9 6 5
♥ 10 4
♦ A 8 7
♣ Q J |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 7
♦ K J 9 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ K Q 9 8 5 2
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
I generally believe in introducing a four-card minor rather than rebidding a six-card major, but this hand has such weak clubs and decent hearts that it may be a sensible way to emphasize the minimum nature of the hand. If partner invites with a call of two no-trump, you can bid three clubs and describe your hand to a T.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ K Q 9 8 5 2
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The noblest prospect which a Scotchman ever sees is the high-road that leads him to England.
Samuel Johnson
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ Q J 10 2
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ Q 10
♦ A 9 6 4 3
♣ 8 7 6 3 |
♠ Q J 10 9 6
♥ 9 8 4 3
♦ K 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ A 8 2
♥ A K 5
♦ 8 7
♣ Q J 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦4
I can see a case for leading a deceptive diamond seven, simulating shortness in diamonds. Similarly, if declarer is really short in diamonds, we must cash our black-suit winners at once. I’d argue for leading clubs rather than the doubleton spade, since partner had the chance to bid spades and didn’t take it.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ 6 4 3
♦ Q 7 6 5 3
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
If I am in third seat with ♠ A-Q-8-4-3, ♥ A-9-7, ♦ Q-7-3, ♣ 10-3, and the bidding starts with a weak two diamonds from my partner, should I pass, raise diamonds or introduce my spades?
Prince of Tides, Atlanta, Ga.
The high-cards seem evenly divided here, and we have the best fit (diamonds) and the boss suit, spades. I’d raise to three diamonds, expecting partner to make it at least four times out of five, while maybe giving the opponents space to do something foolish. If they bid game, I will double.
Playing rubber bridge, I held ♠ J-4-2, ♥ K-J-7-5-3, ♦ J-7-3, ♣ Q-10. My left-hand opponent opened four spades, my partner doubled, and I was in the hot seat. Where on the spectrum of take-out to penalty should we play this double, and what would you do here?
Colonel Mustard, Fort Knox, Ky.
My preference for the double leans toward take-out; partner removes with shape or values, but can pass with a flat weak hand. What category does this hand fall into? I don’t know! My partner and I have agreed that we remove to a contract we think we can make, but does this hand have enough to bid five hearts? Whether to sit for the double or bid five hearts might depend on who is on my left.
Where do you stand on the question of doubling a minor suit without perfect shape? Assuming you have 12-16 points, what flaws are considered acceptable for the double?
Roman Way, San Francisco, Calif.
The Italians always doubled when they were broadly suitable for play in both majors, especially loose minor-suit opening bids. When short in one major, your choice is between a pass, hoping to double that major for take-out at the next turn, and an overcall in a four-card suit at the one-level. That call normally requires full values and a chunky suit.
|
When you open a minor with 4-3 in the majors and partner responds one heart, when do you prefer to raise with three, when do you bid one spade, and when do you bid one no-trump? Does it affect your decision if the next hand has doubled?
Skedaddled, Tupelo, Miss.
Bid spades, then support hearts anytime you possess extra values in high cards or shape. Bid spades, planning to pass one no-trump if you are looking at a balanced minimum with good spades and a decent doubleton in the unbid minor; with bad spades, you might prefer a call of one no-trump. Bid one no-trump immediately with a 4-3-3-3 pattern. If they have doubled your opening bid, you might be more tempted to raise the major when in doubt; partner might not have introduced a weak four-carder, after all.
I recently heard my left-hand opponent open the bidding and my partner overcall at the one-level, after which the next player jumped to two spades to show a weak hand and a long suit. I wanted to double to show cards, but I wasn’t sure if this might be penalty. What say you?
Frozen Solid, White Plains, N.Y.
Your double sounds like take-out to me. (Most players believe you can’t double any lowlevel suit bid for penalty at your first turn.) These doubles may be referred to as Snapdragon, Competitive or fourth-suit doubles, and they show the fourth suit and values, generally with at least tolerance for partner.
|
March 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The world is content with setting right the surface of things.
Cardinal Newman
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 3
♥ 10 5 4
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6 5 2
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2 |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ Q J 7
♦ 10 4
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A 9 8 6 3 2
♦ A Q 5
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Many partnerships play calls of both two clubs and two diamonds as artificial here. But even if a bid of two clubs were natural, I suspect I’d pass rather than bidding two spades or risking ending up in a 3-3 club fit. With the spade 10 or even the nine instead of the two, you could tempt me to rebid two spades, but not here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 5 2
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
How would you handle the North hand after using Stayman and failing to find a heart fit? The simple route to follow is to bid three no-trump. A more prudent route would be to bid three diamonds, suggesting game-forcing values and a doubt about strain or level. In other words, either one major is a concern or North has interest in higher things.
If North had chosen the diamond call, South would have signed off in three no-trump because he has both majors stopped — but you can easily imagine that South’s spade ace-king could be the ace of hearts and diamond king, in which case North-South might make slam in a minor but go down in three no-trump.
That said, after a top spade lead against three no-trump, how should South play? Declarer has eight sure tricks and needs a ninth from one of the red suits. In which order should he go about playing those suits? The answer is slightly counterintuitive, in that he must try a heart toward the king first, and fall back on the diamond finesse if necessary.
Yes, technically, playing a heart could allow the defenders to run four tricks on him — even five tricks on a really terrible day. But the point is that South can afford to lose four heart tricks. He can still fall back on taking the diamond finesse sooner or later, for his contract.
By contrast, if declarer takes the diamond finesse and it loses, there is no fallback position. The defenders set up spades and are ready to win the heart ace and cash out.