September 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The true way goes over a rope which is not stretched at any great height but just above the ground. It seems more designed to make people stumble than to be walked upon.
Franz Kafka
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 9
♥ A Q 5
♦ Q J 6
♣ 10 8 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 10 8 7
♦ K 9 5 3 2
♣ Q 9 |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 9 2
♦ 10 8 7 4
♣ K J 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 4 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ A
♣ A 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥J
It feels right to lead a major here, and while a spade is more likely to set up tricks for your side, it is also far more likely to cost your side a trick. So I would lead a heart, and to my mind the heart nine is the least deceptive card here. If you lead a low heart, partner is likely to play you for more length or strength in the suit than this.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8
♥ 9 6 4
♦ K 8 3
♣ A Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
What is your view on the use of the sandwich no-trump, when the auction starts with your LHO opening the bidding, and RHO responding at the one-level? Do you like to play a one-no-trump call as unusual, or strong and balanced?
Shape-Shifter, Pueblo, Colo.
Years ago, when players did not dredge up responses with very weak hands, there was a case for playing the two-suited one no-trump. No longer. These days you need the natural no-trump call since your side could still easily be making game, or at least a partscore. As a passed hand, the call shows the unbid suits of course, with more shape and less defense than a double.
Should you ever open one no-trump with a 5-4-2-2 shape? If so, what might the constraints be? I recently opened one no-trump, holding ♠ J-4, ♥ A-Q-5-4, ♦ K-J, ♣ K-J-5-4-2. Everyone at the table told me that I should have opened with a suit instead.
Home Tutoring, Twin Falls, Idaho
With 5-4-2-2 and a five-card major, never open one no-trump. Also with five of a minor and four spades you can generally bid your suits efficiently. With hands like yours, opening one no-trump is acceptable, but it is fine to open one club, planning to rebid one no-trump over a one-spade response. Conversely, with a 17-count, bid your suits, reversing if necessary, and you get to show both your values and shape.
I think I understand the phrase rectifying the count — which has to do with giving up tricks. The phrase seems to get used in many bridge articles but is rarely explained. Does it matter?
Counting Coup, Saint John, New Brunswick
When you are playing for a squeeze, it is frequently right to surrender all the tricks that you can afford to lose as early as possible, reaching a point where you need the rest of the tricks. This often increases the pressure on the opponents and is called rectifying the count. Failure to do so may leave a defender with a spare discard.
|
Last week I disagreed with the club expert, who was in fourth seat with ♠ Q-10-3, ♥ 3-2, ♦ K-Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-4-2. The bidding started one diamond to his left and I doubled. When his RHO bid one heart, he tried one spade! We ended up in a 3-3 fit, but I was too timid to comment. What would you have done?
Bowled Over, Palm Springs, Calif.
I must admit I would have bid two clubs, but if the opponents had raised hearts, I might have balanced with an imaginative two-spade call. The difference is that you would then have put me back to three clubs — right?
Please help me on this. I have played regular Key-card Blackwood forever and now my partner is insisting I play 1430 responses when we go to our next regional tournament. It is far too complicated for me, and I don't want to play it and mess up! I'm thinking about just not going to the tournament. What is your opinion?
Between a Rock and a Hard Place, Miami, Fla.
Whatever you do, don't give up! Tell your partner there is basically no real advantage to 1430 responses over 0314. What matters is KNOWING your system. Tell your partner you have Bobby Wolff's approval to stick with what you know and can remember.
|
September 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
Winston Churchill
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q J
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 6 4 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 4 3 2
♥ J 10 9 5 2
♦ A 7
♣ — |
♠ A 9
♥ K 7 6 3
♦ Q J 10 9 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ 8 7
♥ —
♦ K 8 5
♣ J 9 8 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
Hands of this sort are difficult to judge. Should you pass and try to go plus in two spades, or take action to protect against the opponents making a partscore or game? There is no 'right' answer, but I'd be tempted to raise to three spades to make my LHO's job far harder. He may think he is being stolen from and bid when he shouldn't, or pass when he should bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9
♥ K 7 6 3
♦ Q J 10 9 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 23rd, 2013
Man is an embodied paradox, a bundle of contradictions.
Charles Caleb Colton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 10 7 3
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ J 7
♣ Q 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ A K J 10
♦ A 9 8
♣ K 10 9 7 |
♠ Q 5
♥ 8 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 4 3 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ Q 9
♦ K 5
♣ A J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
| 3♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
You have plenty of high cards, but when your partner can only make a simple raise to two spades, you are surely high enough. Any club finesse rates to be wrong, your heart queen looks valueless, and so game is surely going to be against the odds. Therefore pass and try to go plus, though you may be obliged to bid three spades in the face of further competition.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ Q 9
♦ K 5
♣ A J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
It was, of course, a grand and impressive thing to do, to mistrust the obvious, and to pin one's faith in things which could not be seen!
Galen
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 8 6 5
♥ A
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ A 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 7 6 2
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ K 9 2 |
♠ J 10 7 4
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ J 2
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 2
♥ K J 8 3
♦ K 9 7
♣ Q J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Your partner has shown a strong hand and interest in penalizing the opponents. With a balanced defensive hand, it looks right to me to double rather than to pass. Partner doesn't have to sit for this with extreme club shortage, but assuming he has a balanced hand, your best bet looks to be to defend.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3
♥ Q 7 6 2
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A gambler never makes the same mistake twice. It's usually three or more times.
Terrence Murphy
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A Q 8 2
♥ A
♦ Q 5 4 2
♣ K J 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 3
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ K 10 8 7 3
♣ 5 |
♠ K 6 4
♥ K 9 8 4 2
♦ J 9 6
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ Q J 5
♦ A
♣ A Q 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
Your partner is NOT bidding two no-trump in an attempt to play there or in a no-trump game. As a hand that passed twice, he is scrambling for the best trump suit. He rates to have a weak hand with both minors and wants you to pick your longer suit. It is good strategy for responder to bid the cheaper suit in such instances, so bid three clubs and hope for the best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8 2
♥ A
♦ Q 5 4 2
♣ K J 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Unto the man of yearning thought And aspiration, to do nought Is in itself almost an act.
Christina Rossetti
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 10 9 8 7
♥ A Q 3
♦ 6 5 4
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ 10 8 5
♦ K 10 8 7
♣ 7 6 5 4 3 |
♠ A
♥ K J 9 4
♦ J 9 3 2
♣ A J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 4 3 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A Q
♣ K Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♣7
I'm often asked if I could include the vulnerability in the bidding problems. This deal is certainly one where your action might be different depending on the vulnerability. I'd bid two spades in second seat vulnerable, but would open one spade if nonvulnerable. By contrast, in first seat a one-spade opening looks right at all vulnerabilities.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 9 8 7
♥ A Q 3
♦ 6 5 4
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Show me a good and gracious loser and I'll show you a failure.
Knute Rockne
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 9 5 4
♥ Q 10 7
♦ J 5
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ Q 9 8 6 3
♣ 4 |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ A 9 5
♦ 10 7 4
♣ A J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 6
♥ K 8
♦ A K 2
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♦* |
Pass |
3♥** |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*A four-card major
**showing spades
♣4
East's auction shows 18-20 or so with a diamond stopper, but it does not guarantee an especially powerful holding in that suit. You really have no special clue as to your partner's shape, but leading the diamond nine looks as good as anything — and if it is wrong, you could hardly be blamed!
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ 9 4
♣ J 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
September 1st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
My wife and I have started playing duplicate after a long break and have found that times have changed — but we have not. We focus on evaluating our hands only by counting points but do not do a complete evaluation of our combined hands. Can you recommend any reading material that would help us evaluate our hands better?
Little Learning, Wichita Falls, Texas
Hand evaluation is truly one of the more complex areas of the game.
Evaluating trumps is well discussed by Larry Cohen in”The Law of Total Tricks.” “The Secrets of Winning Bridge” by Jeff Rubens is also very thought provoking. Mike Lawrence on hand evaluation is also good. (See the Wikipedia article on hand evaluation for further suggestions.)
I had a powerhouse: ♠ A-Q-4, ♥ A-K-Q-6, ♦ J-5, ♣ A-Q-4-3. I opened two clubs and heard an overcall of two diamonds on my left. My partner passed, suggesting scattered values, and my RHO raised to three diamonds. What would a double from me mean now? If it is takeout, should I make that call?
Wheel of Fortune, Portland, Ore.
I like the idea of passing with a takeout-oriented hand and doubling with a balanced hand, open to defending if partner is also balanced. So yes, I would pass and expect partner to show a four-card major.
Is a jump-shift by opener game-forcing? With ♠ A-5, ♥ K-Q-7-4-3, ♦ 4, ♣ A-K-10-5-4, I opened one heart, and over my partner's response of one spade, I jumped to three clubs. When he rebid three hearts, I passed, thinking he had a bad hand. Was I wrong?
Out of Gas, Bellevue, Wash.
The jump to three clubs sets up an unequivocal game force, so you cannot pass three hearts. However, it might have been better for you to rebid two clubs; then over partner's two hearts you can bid three clubs, showing 5-5 and extras. This consults your partner on whether to stay low, or in which game to play.
|
When is it right to bid spades in response to a one-heart opening? Holding ♠ K-Q-7-5-3, ♥ 9-4-2, ♦ Q-4-3, ♣ J-2, I responded one spade to one heart, then gave preference to two hearts over my partner's two-club rebid. My partner thought I should have raised directly. What do you say?
Piglet, Nashville, Tenn.
Your choice of introducing spades when you hold a good suit and poor hearts makes perfect sense. It will help partner to appreciate whether his cards fit yours. With better hearts or worse spades, a direct raise might be preferred.
When my partner has bid a major suit and has been overcalled in no-trump, should I lead his suit? My belief is that the no-trump bidder usually has two stoppers, and I have been burned a few times — whether I guess to lead that suit or not. I have come to the conclusion to lead his suit only when I have no better option. What do you think?
Robin Hood, Hartford, Conn.
I would always tend to lead a suit overcalled at the two-level — which should be a good one. I'd also be more inclined to lead his suit when you yourself are weak, and perhaps also if his overcall was a cheap one (as opposed to bidding one spade over a minor to mess up the opponents). Unbid suits should be led when you have a clear lead of that suit or if your opponents bid to no-trump confidently. But when in doubt, keep partner happy.
|
August 31st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.
Sun Tzu
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 6 5
♥ Q J 9
♦ 9 8 4
♣ 9 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ 8 7 4 2
♦ A 6
♣ K J 10 5 2 |
♠ K J 10 3 2
♥ K 10 6
♦ J
♣ Q 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A 5 3
♦ K Q 10 7 5 3 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
This hand is at the lower end of the range for a penalty double that suggests your side has the balance of the high cards, so it typically shows at least 9 HCP. Your balanced hand pattern may make it somewhat unlikely that you have a big penalty coming, but then again, why shouldn't partner have extras?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6 5
♥ Q J 9
♦ 9 8 4
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today's deal South should make the jump rebid of three spades over his partner's response of one no-trump. He may have only a 15-count, but with 100 honors in spades and great controls, he should take the high road. With the same hand but the singleton diamond king instead of the ace, a simple rebid in spades would be equally clear.
Now it is up to you as declarer to make your game when West leads the heart jack against four spades. You try dummy’s queen but East wins the king and returns a heart. What should you do next?
You should thank your partner, for providing the spade nine to turn a contract hinging on a finesse into nearly a sure thing! You win the heart ace, play a diamond to your ace and then lead a spade to dummy’s nine. Now you play the diamond queen, discarding a heart. West will make his king, and try to cash a heart, but you can ruff his return and cross to dummy with the spade king to discard a club on the diamond jack. You end up scoring six spades, two diamonds and two aces for 10 tricks.
Just for the record, had dummy’s spade nine been the eight, your best play for the contract would have been to unblock the diamond ace, then lead a spade to the eight, hoping to find West with the spade nine. That finesse would give you the entry to dummy to set up diamonds.