November 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Why, what a very singularly deep young man this deep young man must be!
W.S. Gilbert
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ A J 9 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 6 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 8 2
♥ Q 5 3
♦ Q
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10
♦ J 8 5 3 2
♣ A 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ A K
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦* |
2 NT |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Jacoby(!) Transfer to hearts
♠K
Today's hand looks as if it might belong in a club slam; but if partner does not have a spade control, you might not be able to make any game at all. Start with a cue-bid of two spades to ask partner to define his hand in terms of spade stoppers. After that, you can bid or jump in clubs.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ A K
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I used to have instructions about putting together a Bridge hand (I think it was called something like: Mississippi Riverboat Gambler hand) that looked unbeatable, and the bidder thought it would make a Grand Slam, but it usually didn't. Do you have something like that?
Poker Player, Berkeley, Calif.
Do you mean a deal referred to as 'The Mississippi Heart Hand'? You can find details here.
The dealer has six solid hearts and seven top winners in the other suits with a void in diamonds, but his LHO has the other seven hearts and six winning diamonds, so declarer scores only his six trump tricks. Please don’t use it on your friends…
My wife and I played duplicate for several years and found that we frequently finished near the bottom for a given evening. I have concluded that we are way too much into evaluating our hands by ONLY counting points. Can you recommend any reading material that would help us evaluate our hands better?
Out for the Count, Willoughby, Ohio
Hand evaluation is truly one of the more complex areas of the game. Evaluating trumps is well discussed by Larry Cohen in the "Law of Total Tricks"; "The Secrets of Winning Bridge" by Jeff Rubens is also very thought-provoking. Either of these might help, though both are moderately advanced. Mike Lawrence on hand evaluation is also excellent (and see the Wikipedia article on hand evaluation for further suggestions).
What is the most efficient style of responding to a weak two-bid when the next hand overcalls? Are new suits forcing or invitational? And does what you should do vary depending on whether the opponents double or bid a suit?
Changing Up, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Many play new suits as non-forcing after an overcall, with doubles being penalty. However, after a double, the priorities change since partner will probably end up on lead. A common treatment called McCabe allows new suits to be natural at the two-level, but lead-directional at the three-level, showing tolerance for partner. Redouble is strong and jump bids are natural but guarantee fit for partner. To sign off at the three-level, bid two no-trump as a puppet to three clubs, then pass or correct to your suit.
|
One of the areas that has always worried me is how to judge when an opponent's action takes you off the hook, in a situation where you might have responded or raised partner. Two examples: When the opponents double partner's minor, when do you pass on a hand where you would have bid in an uncontested sequence? And when do you pass when you would have raised partner's major?
Paso Doble, Union City, Tenn.
When you are minimum (in the range of 5-7) with a balanced hand or a weak four-card major, you do not have to bid one no-trump or introduce the major after a double on your right of partner's opening bid. Equally, when you have a minimum balanced hand with three weak trumps and what appear to be defensive values, you do not have to raise your partner's major in competition. Otherwise, I suggest you ignore the opponents' actions.
I was faced with a lead problem in our social game where my partner told me that I should have known what to do. My LHO opened one diamond, my RHO responded one no-trump, and my LHO jumped to three no-trump. My partner doubled and I held jack-fifth of hearts, jack-third of spades, a small doubleton diamond and three clubs to the jack. What should I have led?
Mother Jones, Springfield, Mass.
When your partner doubles a contract in a nncompetitive auction it tends to be lead-directing. The principle espoused by Theodore Lightner is that it asks for dummy's first-bid suit, so you should lead the top of your doubleton diamond, expecting partner to have a penalty double of diamonds.
|
November 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Nobody works better under pressure. They just work faster.
Brian Tracy
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 6 4 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ J 9 5 4 3 |
♠ K 7 3
♥ K Q J 9 7
♦ Q J 8
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 5
♥ A 8
♦ 9 3
♣ K 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
There is certainly a case for using two diamonds as natural here and two hearts as a raise of spades. Regardless, two hearts seem to be the most unambiguous way to show a constructive spade raise while keeping the partnership at a safe level. You would make a simple raise to two spades with a small diamond instead of the ace.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 6 4 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
In the meantime, in between time, Ain’t we got fun?
Gus Kahn and Raymond Egan
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 5 3
♥ 7 5 3 2
♦ K Q J 10
♣ Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 8 6
♦ 9 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 6 |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ J 9 4
♦ 8 4
♣ K 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 8 6 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ A
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 7♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Different partnerships use different methods over one no-trump, some transferring into diamonds via a two spade call, some via two no-trump, some via three clubs. I am not going to tell you which is best, but I strongly encourage you to make the transfer here; this hand will almost always play much better in diamonds than in no-trump. The bid does not imply values, just a long suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ 8 6
♦ 9 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
People who like this sort of thing will find it the sort of thing they like.
Abraham Lincoln
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 9 6
♥ A 6 5 4
♦ K 7 6
♣ A 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8 7 2
♥ Q 8 3
♦ J 8 2
♣ 7 |
♠ 5
♥ J 7
♦ Q 9 5 3
♣ Q J 9 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 4 3
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ A 10 4
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Cue-bid three spades, planning to follow up with a bid of four diamonds over a three no-trump bid from your partner. You are certainly going to go to at least six diamonds, but you would like partner to take control — you have a much better hand to answer questions than ask them, since your hand is all controls.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4 3
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ A 10 4
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Against this coming end you should prepare.
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ A 3
♣ A 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10
♥ J 10 9
♦ 10 9 6 2
♣ J 9 8 6 |
♠ J 9 7 5 3
♥ K 8 7
♦ J
♣ 10 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 2
♦ K Q 8 7 5 4
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♦ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| *Quantitative |
♥J
Your choice is to jump to three diamonds, suggesting about eight playing tricks in diamonds and inviting your partner to bid on if he has a trick. Or you can rebid at no-trump (a call of one no-trump shows 18-20, two no-trump shows 21-22). I prefer the diamond bid. With no quick tricks in your hand and with such a broken diamond suit, I’d be worried about the clubs running against me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K
♥ A Q 2
♦ K Q 8 7 5 4
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Life always gets harder toward the summit — the cold increases, the responsibility increases.
Friedrich Nietzsche
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 10 8 7 4
♥ A K 9
♦ A 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 8 5 3
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
♠ 9 6
♥ J 10 5 2
♦ 10 6
♣ 9 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 3 2
♥ Q 7 4 3
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♦* |
5♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Limit-raise or better in spades
♣K
Here a jump to four no-trump is unusual, suggesting this pattern and approximately these values. You may not be able to make game, or you may be cold for slam, but you don't have to decide that. Let your partner make the decision on where to play and at what level, once you have told him what you have.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 8 5 3
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 21st, 2013
The great source of pleasure is variety.
Samuel Johnson
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 6 5 2
♥ A 9 5
♦ 8 6 5 3
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 4
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ J 10 9
♣ 9 6 |
♠ J
♥ 8 7 6 3
♦ K Q 7 4 2
♣ 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 3
♥ K 4
♦ A
♣ A Q J 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠* |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
*An ace and a king, or three kings
♥Q
When partner passes out a takeout double and decides to play for penalties, you must lead a trump to stop declarer from scoring his small clubs. You know partner has a trump stack, so work on letting him draw trump.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10
♥ K J 3
♦ A K 7 4 2
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
November 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 20th, 2013
|
My wife and I belong to three rubber bridge groups and we enjoy reading your bridge column in the Dallas Morning News. In every group most of the people say they don’t focus on the bidding in your articles as opposed to the play because it is from world tournaments where they have many special bidding conventions we don’t use. Have you considered changing the auctions in such instances?
Bob and Carol, Sparta, Wis.
I apologize for aiming over people’s heads some of the time. I hope that isn’t the case on every deal. When the experts bid a hand playing largely natural methods I normally quote their auctions. So when a gadget comes up, I normally leave it in – or explain it, in case it will prove useful one day! But I recognize your point and will try to do better…
What is the logic behind the lead style that is sometimes described as third-and-fifth or as third-and-low? Is it better or just different from fourth-highest leads?
Spotty Muldoon, Durham, N.C.
The rationale behind third and lowest leads (the methods only differ in what one leads from a six-card suit) is that you lead low from an odd number and high from an even number, and thus hope to be able to differentiate holdings that are one card different. Normally the auction will allow you to judge whether a four-card or six-card holding in your partner's hand is more likely. The method has a slight edge over fourth-highest, where you often have difficulty telling a four-card holding apart from either a three- or a five-card holding.
After I opened one club, I made a limit raise of three spades to my partner's response of one spade with ♠ Q-7-4-2, ♥ A-Q-4, ♦ A-J-3, ♣ K-Q-3. My partner told me I should have bid four spades instead. What do you think?
Flat Broke, Staten Island, N.Y.
I strongly agree with your choice. With a balanced 18-19 points one normally bids four of partner's major, but here you took off a point for the balanced shape, and I agree with your action. Imagine that partner has as good a hand as four spades to the ace-king and three cards in each of the other suits. You might go two down in three spades!
|
Recently I was in fourth chair and held ♠ 10-5, ♥ A-Q-6-2, ♦ A-4-3, ♣ Q-6-4-3 and reopened when my opponents had bid unopposed: one spade – one no-trump – two diamonds – two spades. Was I wrong to balance — and would it have been acceptable to balance with this hand in the pass-out seat?
Lady Day, Sioux Falls, S.D.
Most people balance too little, not too much. On this hand, however, it was dangerous to reopen because the opponents had not announced a real fit and your LHO could still have a very good hand. But it could easily have been right to bid if the opponents had come to a stop in two spades, or if they had definitely located an eight-card spade fit.
I know how negative doubles work, but can you comment on how to cope with an opponent's delayed entry into the auction?-Our side began one club – one spade – one no-trump, and then an opponent overcalled either two clubs or two diamonds. Would a double here be negative or takeout?
Warning: Intruder, Grenada, Miss.
Few partnerships discuss this sequence in advance. I can see both sides of the case, but I'd say if your partner has rebid one no-trump (and thus defined his hand relatively precisely), then a double is penalty. In all other cases your double is cards, leaving it up to partner to decide what to do.
|
November 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There are worse things in life than death. Have you ever spent an evening with an insurance salesman?
Woody Allen
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 5
♥ 8 5 2
♦ A
♣ K 10 8 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ 10 9 6
♦ J 10 8 5
♣ A J 9 6 3 |
♠ 10 9 7 4
♥ A K Q J 7 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 3 2
♥ 4
♦ K Q 9 7 6 4 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥10
This hand falls into the gray area between a simple heart raise and a cuebid raise to three diamonds (remember, a jump to three hearts is shapely and weak). On this hand despite the singleton in the opponent's suit my bad trumps suggest going low, so I'd simply raise to two hearts. But if my partner had overcalled in spades I'd upvalue my hand and take the more aggressive position.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 5
♥ 8 5 2
♦ A
♣ K 10 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
It is almost three decades since the death of one of the world's stars, Oswald Jacoby. Ossie played in the first Culbertson challenge match in 1929, but continued to win national titles into the 1980s, when dying from cancer.
Not only was Jacoby the youngest-ever actuary, but his skill with numbers led to his being referred to as a human computer. He lied about his age in order to serve in World War I, and re-enlisted to serve in counterintelligence in both World War II and the Korean War.
The following hand demonstrates his skill, and illustrates the danger of a defender painting too clear a picture of his hand.
North’s two-diamond bid showed hearts, allowing Jacoby as South to volunteer a bid at the three-level over East’s revealing two-suiter bid. The defense against four hearts started well enough with two top spades and a ruff, and East switched to a diamond. Jacoby won the ace and made the essential play of a heart to the seven, East pitching a club. This was followed by the heart ace, East discarding a second club.
When Jacoby led a trump to his king, East could see that if he discarded a diamond, declarer would be able to ruff out his diamond honor, so he let a third club go. Declarer ruffed a club in dummy, came to his diamond king, ruffed a second club, dropping the ace, and his hand was now high.