October 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I notice that most of the men who tease me about my hair, don't have any.
Holland Taylor
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 6 3 2
♥ 8
♦ J 9 2
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ K J 9 6 2
♦ 10 5 3
♣ K 9 4 2 |
♠ A 10 7 4
♥ 10 5 3
♦ A K Q 8
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 5
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦3
This is a forcing auction, and you can bid two spades over two hearts without showing any values, as opposed to spade length. Your partner may hope for more but he has no reason to expect it (though if you had bid three clubs here it would be a second negative, and you might take that call with five small spades).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6 3 2
♥ 8
♦ J 9 2
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I am not a pessimist; to perceive evil where it exists is, in my opinion, a form of optimism.
Roberto Rossellini
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ A 8 7
♦ Q 10
♣ K J 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ A 4
♣ Q 10 8 6 5 |
♠ 10 9 8 4
♥ K 10 4
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ A 9 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ Q J 3
♦ K J 9 8 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*14-16
♣6
In this auction it is not clear that three spades would be forcing — although maybe it should be, since with a limit raise you might have shown it at your first turn. Regardless, with no great slam potential facing a hand that cannot bid over three clubs, you might as well simply drive to four spades by bidding it directly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5
♥ Q J 3
♦ K J 9 8 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| 2♦ |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Behold, I do not give lectures or a little charity, When I give I give myself.
Walt Whitman
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7
♥ A K 10 7 6 3
♦ A J 7 4
♣ K J |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 8 5 2
♥ Q 9
♦ 9 8
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ 6 4
♥ J 8 5 4 2
♦ 6
♣ A 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 3
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠K
The choice of leads is between the singleton diamond and a fourth highest heart. I'm going for the singleton lead — now the route to the target of four tricks is somewhat easier to predict, while finding partner with good hearts is not necessarily sufficient to beat the game.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ J 8 5 4 2
♦ 6
♣ A 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
| Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
October 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Please give me a quick synopsis of the Michaels Cue-bid. Does it interact with the unusual no-trump?
Having a Fit, Galveston, Texas
The two conventions mesh well. A jump in no-trump always shows the two lower unbid suits, while a Michaels Cue-bid of a minor suggests both majors, and a cue-bid of a major shows the unbid major and one minor. Responder can ask for the minor with a call of two no-trump. With a powerhouse (the hand that would have been suitable for an old-fashioned cue-bid), start by doubling, then take further strong action.
I have always been a fan of penalty doubles when the opponents overcall. But all the people I play with tell me they are outdated. Are there still positions where penalty doubles are appropriate?
Lost Boy, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Clearly in the middle or at the end of the auction one often wants to double the opponents for penalty. Equally clearly, at your first turn to speak or when the opponents bid and raise a suit, double is normally takeout. Here are some exceptions: Double of a no-trump opening or overcall, or any double when your partner has opened or overcalled with a pre-emptive action and thus defined his hand very precisely, should be for penalty.
My partner accused me of cowardice here. Was he right? I held ♠ Q-10-4, ♥ A-K-Q-10-7-3, ♦ Q-4, ♣ J-4, and when my partner responded with a forcing one no-trump to my one-heart opening bid, I tried two hearts. He raised to three hearts — were my solid hearts enough reason to bid on? I passed and made 10 tricks when hearts split 3-3.
Forever Amber, Londonderry, N.H.
My view is that you do have enough to bid on. However, I would seriously consider bidding three no-trump now, rather than four hearts. After all, my hand is likely to play well enough in no-trump, given my source of quick tricks and soft values outside. Partner can always put us back to four hearts if he thinks it wise.
|
Many of the experts at my club play a convention referred to as Smolensk in response to an opening bid of one no-trump. I tried to find any details of it, but was unable to locate it. Please explain how it works.
Tattooed Lady, Vancouver, British Columbia
It is Smolen, not Smolensk — and the convention handles game-forcing hands with 5-4 in the majors, in response to a one- or two-no-trump opening, transferring declarership to the strong hand. With this pattern, you bid Stayman, then jump in your shorter major over a two-diamond response. This allows your partner to play three no-trump with no fit, or declare the 5-3 major fit from the stronger side, while making declarer the hand whose shape is unknown.
Playing social rubber bridge, I picked up ♠ J-10-4-2, ♥ K-10, ♦ K-9-2, ♣ K-10-8-3 and after a one-heart overcall of my partner's opening bid of one club, I doubled to show four spades. When my partner rebid two clubs, I raised to three, then heard my partner bid three diamonds. What would you expect that to show and what should I have done next?
Sucker Punch, Selma, Alaska
Your partner appears to be making a game-try based on length, so it feels right to bid three no-trump now. Consider that you might make game facing six clubs to the ace and the diamond ace and nothing else at all!
|
October 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Think? Why think! We have computers to do that for us.
Jean Rostand
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 7 6
♥ A 8 6 4 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10
♥ 7
♦ 9 8 5
♣ Q 10 9 8 7 6 4 3 |
♠ 9 8 5 4 3 2
♥ 10 5
♦ K Q 6 3
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q J 9 3
♦ A 7 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
There is no point in trying to thread the needle by trying to stay out of game here. Your aces and fifth trump coupled with your builders in diamonds make this hand too good for an invitation. It is worth a straightforward jump to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6
♥ A 8 6 4 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Everything happens to everybody sooner or later if there is time enough.
George Bernard Shaw
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 10 9 7 6
♥ A Q 2
♦ K J 5 4
♣ Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 8 3
♥ 8 7
♦ 9 7 3
♣ J 9 6 |
♠ J 4 2
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 8 2
♣ K 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ K J 6 3
♦ A Q 10 6
♣ A 10 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Three-card heart support
♠K
Facing a takeout double, I'd simply bid three clubs rather than two hearts, trusting my RHO to hold the suit he has bid. If he is an untrustworthy customer, maybe a two-heart call would expose his psych — my failure to double one heart limits the strength of the heart suit I can hold. I'm not keen on introducing the three-card spade suit if I can avoid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 2
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 8 2
♣ K 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Eternal law has arranged nothing better than this, that it has given us one way into life, but many ways out.
Seneca
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ A 5 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 9 7 6 5 |
♠ A 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ K J 10 9 7 4 3
♣ 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ K Q J 7 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♦Q
Following your responsive double, your partner's cue-bid simply shows a good hand. You have been asked to bid your suits up the line regardless of suit quality, so simply bid three hearts. The objective here is to find a 4-4 major-suit fit, not necessarily the best fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 9th, 2013
Fates cannot find out a capacity Of hurting thee. From Thee their lean dilemma, with blunt horn, Shrinks, as the sick moon from the wholesome morn.
Richard Crashaw
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K J 10 8 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A K 4 3
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 3
♥ 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ A 7 6 5
♦ J
♣ J 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K J 10 9 4 2
♦ Q 10 6
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦2
In this position it looks more sensible to respond one no-trump than to introduce spades (and risk playing an unsatisfactory fit) or pass and let partner suffer in a 5-1 fit. While one can introduce spades here with only four, you would surely not care to do so with a relatively weak suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 7 3
♥ 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one.
Henry David Thoreau
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ A 6 3
♣ A K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ 9 5 2
♦ 4
♣ J 9 7 5 4 3 |
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A 10 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ K J 4 3
♦ K Q J 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣5
This hand is surely strong enough to drive to game, since even facing a minimum balanced hand, your singleton may still leave partner cold for game. That said, some play mini-splinters (a jump to three no-trump over one spade or to three spades over one heart showing a raise to game, with 9-12 points and an unspecified splinter). I'll write about this soon in the Sunday letters column.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A 10 8 7
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 7th, 2013
Think no more; 'tis only thinking Lays lads underground.
A.E. Housman
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ Q 6
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ J 10 5
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
♠ A 5 2
♥ A 9 7 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 7
♥ K Q
♦ A K
♣ K J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥J
My choice would be to lead a spade, even though my RHO bid that suit. After all, your fifth spade does suggest you might be able to set the suit up eventually. My second choice would be a diamond — both minor suits are equally dangerous but partner might have been able to double the club bid if that were the right lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 4 2
♥ K 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
When England play the Netherlands it is always an enjoyable encounter for both teams. The Dutch speak English as well as we do, and their exciting bidding makes for interesting auctions.
In Beijing the English Under-21 team faced the Netherlands in the round robin towards the end when England were securing their place in the top two and the Dutch were struggling to make it into the top eight.
On the deal below it was the English pair who created the swing, with a calculated risk in the bidding.
Ed Jones, sitting East for England, opened one diamond after two passes and the Dutch South, perhaps surprisingly, overcalled one no-trump. Tom Paske, West, made a disciplined pass, and North transferred to spades by bidding two hearts. When South completed the transfer by bidding two spades Tom sprang to life and doubled for take-out. East now had a tricky bid to make but he reasoned that his partner would not have four diamonds since he had not supported the suit, and that consequently his A-K-Q would pull their weight in defense. So he decided to pass the double, converting it into penalties.
Tom kicked off with a diamond, and after cashing three rounds Ed switched to the club jack, to the queen and king, and Tom returned a club. South could now draw trump (losing two tricks to Ed’s ace and 10 in the process) but he had nowhere to put his fourth club and ended up losing three diamonds, two clubs and two trumps for two down and 500 points to England. Since the other table had played peacefully in three diamonds and gone two down that was a good swing of 12 IMPs to England.