October 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I know you are a fan of what some people would consider the old fashioned strong jump shift. Many of the newer players pooh-pooh it, saying it puts the auction one-level higher before enough information has passed. I always considered it was essential to show the values — but can you comment please?
Old Fashioned, Los Angeles, Calif.
The jump shift, as I play it, shows one of three specific hands. It always guarantees a good suit and either real support for partner (if your next call is to support partner or cuebid), or if you rebid no-trump it shows upwards of a strong no-trump. Finally, if you rebid your suit it shows at least six cards and a semi-solid suit or better. None of these hands are easy to show unless you jump at your first turn.
You are South, all vulnerable, at matchpoints with: ♠ K-Q, ♥ K-Q-10-9-4-2, ♦ K-J-4, ♣ A-6, and after opening one heart and hearing a one spade response you jump to four hearts. Now partner bids five no-trumps, the grand slam force. Opener doesn't know whether partner has the bare heart ace, or more than one card in the suit, does he? At the table opener settled for the small slam, worried about the heart jack. Was this overly pessimistic?
Johnny Walker, Muncie, Ind.
Where you have space, the responses to five no-trump should be that reversion to the trump suit is the weakest action. The less you bid the more you have, but all calls higher than six of the trump suit show two top honors. Where opener has promised a VERY good suit and hand — and incidentally has neither — he should nonetheless probably show two trump honors with a six spade call. Even facing a singleton ace his chance of running the hearts is better than 50 percent.
After opening one diamond and hearing a one heart overcall followed by a one no-trump response from your partner, what should you do next holding: ♠ K-4-3, ♥ K, ♦ A-Q-7-5-4, ♣ A-10-6-4? I was torn between bidding two clubs and three clubs — but what do you think?
Bright Spark, Wilmington, N.C.
Jumping to three clubs invites game, and seems about right to me. A two club call would be pessimistic while a two-heart cuebid would drive to game and be overly aggressive. There is, though, surely something to be said for simply inviting with a call of two no-trump, and putting the clubs on the back burner.
|
What should you respond to a one-level opening bid with invitational values and both a five-card minor and a four-card major of your own? When my partner opened one diamond I chose to respond two clubs holding ♠ K-10-8-5, ♥ Q-5, ♦ K-4, ♣ K-10-7-4-2, and I was told that I should have bid my spades first. But how would I get the clubs into play without overstating my hand?
Lily Pond, Charlottesville, Va.
The general rule in response to minor-suit opening bids is to introduce any four-card major, on a hand up to invitational strength. Here bid spades first, planning to raise clubs if your partner bids them and to ignore the suit if partner bids one no-trump. The tricky question is whether to pass, raise diamonds, or bid two no-trump if you hear a rebid of two diamonds from your partner. I think the diamond raise is safest.
What is your view on the minimum required for a two-level overcall? Playing duplicate I was dealt ♠ Q-4-3, ♥ K-Q-8, ♦ K-5, ♣ A-J-4-3-2, vulnerable, and heard my RHO open one diamond. Am I supposed to overcall in clubs, to double, or pass?
Tact and Discretion, Casper, Wyo.
Few experts would vote for passing this hand; but many would try an overcall of one no-trump, and some would double, since you are playable in all three side-suits. A bid of two clubs it too unilateral, and seems an unnecessary risk to me – I’d like a sixth club or more intermediates in the suit before I make a two-level overcall.
|
October 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 5th, 2013
Hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy.
Sir Isaac Newton
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 9
♥ J 3 2
♦ A 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 7 4
♦ K Q 10 9 2
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ J 7 5 4
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 5 3
♥ A K Q 6
♦ —
♣ A 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
You have far too good a hand to sign off in three diamonds, but no clear-cut way forward. Since you effectively denied spades at your first turn to speak, perhaps a raise to three spades will show your partner where your values lie and help him decide where to go next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9
♥ J 3 2
♦ A 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♦ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Coleridge holds that a man cannot have a pure mind who refuses apple-dumplings. I am not certain but that he is right.
Charles Lamb
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ K J 6 4 3
♦ 10 7
♣ A K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 8 7 6 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ 5 3
♣ 7 2 |
♠ 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ Q J 9 8 6
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 5 2
♦ A K 4 2
♣ Q J 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠7
Were you tempted to bid on? I can understand that, but your partner's decision to reraise to four hearts — instead of describing his hand with a call of four of a minor — leaves him in absolute control here. You can double or pass, but should never bid on without freak distribution here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ Q J 9 8 6
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
3♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 3rd, 2013
I finally figured out that not every crisis can be managed. As much as we want to keep ourselves safe, we can't protect ourselves from everything. If we want to embrace life, we also have to embrace chaos.
Susan Elizabeth Phillips
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 6
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ K 8 3 2
♣ 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 2
♥ 10 8 7
♦ J 5
♣ K Q J |
♠ 7 5
♥ 9
♦ A Q 9 7 6 4
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A K Q J 2
♦ 10
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
Your decision as to how much to bid should be influenced by the vulnerability. Vulnerable, you could content yourself with a simple overcall, since it makes little sense to expose yourself to a big penalty by playing weak jump overcalls facing a passed partner. When nonvulnerable, you might pre-empt all the way to three diamonds to make the opponents' life that much harder.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ 9
♦ A Q 9 7 6 4
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 2nd, 2013
But satire, ever moral, ever new, Delights the reader and instructs him, too.
Nicolas Boileau-Despreaux
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 6
♦ 6 3
♣ A K 7 6 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 3
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ J 10 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ A 10 7 3
♦ K 9 7 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 2
♥ K 4 2
♦ A Q 8 5
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
Some play that one should pass over the double with no club stopper and wait for your partner to ask again by redoubling. A more mainstream position is to pass with moderate clubs, redouble with great clubs, and otherwise respond as if the opponents had not acted. So you would bid two spades now and expect your partner to check on a club stopper if he felt the need to do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 2
♥ K 4 2
♦ A Q 8 5
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Protection is not a principle, but an expedient.
Benjamin Disraeli
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q
♥ K Q 10
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 6 4
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ —
♣ J 10 9 5 |
♠ J 9 2
♥ 9 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 3
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K 5 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ A K 8 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 5♥* |
Pass |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for the trump queen
♣J
With your side holding the balance of high cards, I can see an argument for a trump lead to try to kill ruffs in dummy, or for leading the diamond queen to get our side's tricks going. However there is no real reason to jeopardize our potential trump trick or to get overactive, and a club lead looks reasonably safe. I'd lead the jack because of the presence of the eight.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ Q 3
♦ Q 5
♣ J 10 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 30th, 2013
I once knew a man out of courtesy help a lame dog over a stile, and he for requital bit his fingers.
William Chillingworth
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ 9 7 5 3
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 8
♥ 2
♦ 8 6 5 4 3 2
♣ 8 5 |
♠ A 5 4 2
♥ A 8
♦ J
♣ 9 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 6
♥ K Q J 10 6 4
♦ K 9
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
On this auction, nobody has really bid clubs. Your partner rates to have a balanced hand with three or four clubs. If he had more, your LHO might well have had enough length somewhere to transfer out of one no-trump. So lead your fourth-highest heart as your best bet — at least you know you have length there.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ 10 7 3 2
♦ K J 4
♣ J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Under what circumstances do you believe in playing weak jumps in response to opening bids or to overcalls? Does it matter whether you are in a competitive auction, or whether the player who makes the call is a passed hand?
Power Ranger, Midland, Mich.
Facing either an opening bid or an overcall, I play all new-suit jumps by passed hands as natural — decent suits of five or more cards, promising at least a decent three-card fit for partner's suit. Jumps facing an overcall or a weak-two opening by an unpassed hand are probably best played as fit jumps. I like to play jumps by unpassed hands in response to an opening bid as strong — unless in competition, when they become weak.
My partner opened one spade, and I held ♠ Q-5, ♥ A-Q-4-3, ♦ A-J-7-6-5, ♣ K-4. After I responded two diamonds, my partner bid two spades. What should I have done next?
Half-Baked, Dodge City, Kan.
My instincts are to bid two no-trump now, since I'm not looking for a heart fit and I do have the unbid suits stopped. The alternative is to raise to three spades, but your partner has not promised a sixth spade for his suit-rebid facing a two-level response. So a raise by you should show a third trump here.
A couple of weeks ago you stated that opener's repeating his first suit generally shows six. Does the same principle apply when responder bids and rebids a suit?
One Short, Little Rock, Ark.
Yes, this rebid strongly suggests six. There will be hands when you are absolutely stuck for a call (often with a weak hand and length in the unbid suit, where you cannot afford to bid no-trump). You may have to rebid a really chunky five-carder; but don't expect partner to play you for this.
|
Someone at our bridge club frequently opens one no-trump with 14 points. This has damaged us more than once. His partner always announces 15-17 points. When we call the director, he says that a person can open one point light of the no-trump range. My question is why do we have to mark our convention cards with our opening no-trump range, and then announce it, when, in fact, we don't have to follow the rule?
Lawful Laura, Cartersville, Ga.
Once a partnership has a history of opening 14-counts, the range becomes 14-17, not 15-17. Your director should tell the player that any time he deviates twice from the system, he has an implied understanding. But — and this is important — there is nothing illegal in opening 14-counts. The bad results you got did not come because you didn't expect a 14-count, but because the player judged luckily or well, or the cards lay well for them. That is unlucky, but not in any way the subject of a score adjustment.
Mr. Wolff, I play with a duplicate group and there is disagreement about how matchpoints are scored when a hand is passed out. Of course, the raw points would be zero for both East-West and North-South pairs, but the question is regarding how the matchpoints are scored.
Contrary Mary, Pleasanton, Calif.
In essence, just consider zero for a passed-out board as better for North-South than any minus score, worse than any plus score. So if all the scores are plusses for North-South, then a pass-out gets the pair in question a zero. If all the scores are plusses for East-West, then the reverse is true.
|
October 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
We are easily shocked by crimes which appear at once in their full magnitude, but the gradual growth of our own wickedness, endeared by interest, and palliated by all the artifices of self-deceit, gives us time to form distinctions in our own favor.
Samuel Johnson
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K Q J
♥ A K 7 6
♦ —
♣ Q J 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ Q
♦ K J 10 9 6 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ —
♥ J 10 9 5 4 3 2
♦ 2
♣ 6 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 5 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q 8 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣* |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
5♥** |
Pass |
| 7♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three key cards, counting the trump king as a key card
**Showing the spade queen and heart king
♥Q
Paradoxically, when you showed spades and diamonds and your partner indicated no interest in spades, that made your hand better for diamonds. After all, you may be able to make a slam in the minor suit by ruffing out the spades. Don't commit the hand to slam though. Bid four diamonds, guaranteeing slam interest and a fifth diamond, and hope partner can move on from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 5 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q 8 7 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The fascination of what's difficult Has dried the sap out of my veins …
W.B. Yeats
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ K Q 10 7 3 2
♦ J 4
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ A Q 5
♣ 9 4 |
♠ J 9 3
♥ 6
♦ 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 4
♦ K 10 9
♣ A K Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Good suit, bad hand
♠2
It's a close decision — to gamble with three no-trump, or to pass. The form of scoring might affect my decision. At matchpoints or nonvulnerable at teams, passing is reasonable; while at rubber bridge, or if vulnerable at teams, bidding three no-trump is probably with the odds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ A Q 5
♣ 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When the club king is led against your spade slam, you have to find a home for your two club losers. If trumps break, you might duck a club, then draw two rounds of trump. You could subsequently run the hearts, throwing a club from dummy, and ruff a club in dummy for your 12th trick. However, once the unusual no-trump from West has told you that the clubs are 5-1, you should be alive to the real danger of a bad trump break as well. (West's shortness rates to be in spades, not hearts.)
The obvious risk is that if you duck an early club, East will ruff in prematurely. Equally, if you cash a high trump in dummy, you may run out of top trumps. In fact, you need to make all your low trumps in hand when trumps do not break.
Win the club lead, cross to the heart jack, then cash the diamond ace, throwing a club, and ruff a diamond. Now a trump to the king is followed by another diamond ruff. Next, cross your fingers and, without drawing a second round of trump, play three more rounds of hearts, throwing a club from table. Only then do you concede a club to West.
It will do East no good to ruff his partner’s winner and return a trump, so he discards his last diamond, and West plays another club. But you ruff high in dummy and are left with two master trumps in hand.