August 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The more things man is ashamed of, the more respectable he is.
George Bernard Shaw
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10 8 7 6
♥ 9 6
♦ A Q J 10
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 5 4
♥ 7 3
♦ K 9 8 7 6
♣ 7 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 5 4 3 2
♣ Q J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q J 10 8 2
♦ —
♣ A K 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two-suiter, game-forcing
♠K
With partner limited in his possible high cards (he didn't act over one club despite apparently being short in clubs), your best chance looks to be in diamonds. Leading the diamond queen may cost a trick or solve a guess for declarer, but nothing else is likely to give you a chance to set the game.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ J 3
♦ Q 3
♣ J 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
At rubber bridge South plays in two spades, but West has 100 honors in spades. Does West get honors points?
Honor System, Wausau, Wis.
Yes indeed. I've been the victim at the table when my partner played four hearts doubled and vulnerable and his RHO had 100 honors in hearts. I've never been the beneficiary, but I'm still young.
I held ♠ 4, ♥ J-9, ♦ K-Q-10-8-6-5-4-3, ♣ Q-5. Playing pairs, what should I open in first seat at unfavorable vulnerability? At any other vulnerability I might toy with opening four or five diamonds. Should I pull in my horns here and open only three diamonds?
Timid Soul, Menominee, Mich.
A four- or five-level pre-empt would be justified nonvulnerable, but at unfavorable vulnerability I would open four diamonds only in first chair. In second seat, vulnerable, your pre-empts should be more disciplined — there is one fewer opponent to pre-empt, after all – so opening three diamonds would be fine.
How good a hand do you need to make a takeout double and then bid again? Is it better to overcall or double first with ♠ A-Q-6-5-4-3, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ A-9-3, ♣ 7 when your RHO opens one club?
Homing In, Mason City, Iowa
With the popularity of weak jumps, regular overcalls have become much more constructive, so that it would not be out of line to overcall one spade here, intending to act again later to show extras – if there is a next time. Make the diamond nine the queen, and most would double, then bid spades.
|
When the opponents open a strong no-trump, how much do you need to double? Would ♠ A-Q-4, ♥ A-10-4, ♦ K-10-5-4, ♣ Q-6-3 be enough?
Steam Engine, Ketchikan, Alaska
My advice is not to double one no-trump unless you hold the maximum end of the opponents' no-trump, or unless you hold a good suit and an attractive lead. With this hand I would advocate caution. Who knows, the opponents may give you a second chance!
In a recent home game I was called because one player had managed to lose a card in the play. Everyone started with 13 cards though. I just want to know whether the result should count or be thrown out.
Butterfingers, Vancouver, Wash.
If everyone started with 13 cards, you can't throw the deal in. If one player played two cards to the same trick, I assume you would just carry on and the player with one fewer card is unlucky. If the deal was defective, it shouldn't count.
|
August 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Then, welcome each rebuff That turns earth’s smoothness rough, Each sting that bids nor sit nor stand but go!
Robert Browning
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ J 10
♣ J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ Q 10
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
♠ 6
♥ J 6 5 2
♦ K 9 6 4 2
♣ 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 5 4
♥ K 9 3
♦ A 7
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦3
It looks tempting to raise to two clubs, but with your soft stoppers in the majors, it feels better to limit the hand with a call of one no-trump. If the opponents compete again, you might bid on to three clubs, but for the time being, I'd consider your hand one on which to aim low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 2
♥ Q 10
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
As Tammie glowered, amazed and curious, The mirth and fun grew fast and furious.
Robert Burns
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 9
♥ Q 4
♦ Q 10 9
♣ J 9 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ 7 2
♦ J 8 6 5 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ A J 10 6
♦ 7 2
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ K 9 8 5 3
♦ A K
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
Even though your partner's double may be more focused on the majors than the minors, you should compete to two clubs at once. If you don't bid now, you may feel obliged to bid at your next turn when the stakes will be higher and the auction more risky. Bid now and tell your story in one go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ Q 4
♦ Q 10 9
♣ J 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Better by far you should forget and smile Than that you should remember and be sad.
Christina Rossetti
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 7 6 4
♥ 6
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 3
♥ K 10 8 4 3
♦ 10
♣ Q J 5 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ K Q J 7 5
♣ 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ Q J 8 5 2
♥ A J
♦ 9 3 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣* |
2 NT |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Drury (a sound spade-raise)
♦10
Despite your awkward holding of three small cards in declarer's second suit, you have just enough to jump to three diamonds to suggest invitational values and diamond support. Aces tend to be somewhat undervalued in a complex hand of this sort. (With the king-jack of spades instead of the ace, you might content yourself with a call of two diamonds.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 6 4
♥ 6
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Some say be careful what you wish for. Well, I'd be more wary of not wishing at all.
Anon
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 10 9 3
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 3
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A K J 10 8 7
♣ K |
♠ Q 10 8 6 2
♥ J 4
♦ 3
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ K Q 7 2
♦ 9 5
♣ 10 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥* |
| 2♥ |
Dbl** |
Pass |
2♠ |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*spades
** Three-card support
♦K
It looks natural to bid two spades, but when your partner doubles for takeout, suggesting extras, that is not really enough. Your partner has at least three spades in this auction, so your choice is a jump to three spades, or going all the way to game. I choose the former, mainly because I don't want to discourage partner from reopening light in the future.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8 6 2
♥ J 4
♦ 3
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
No man thinks there is much ado about nothing when the ado is about himself.
Anthony Trollope
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ K J 10 4
♦ 10 3 2
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 5 |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K J
♣ A 10 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A Q 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ J 9 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
♦9
The question here is whether to drive to game because of your intermediates or to consult partner. At teams, if vulnerable, I would bid game. At any other form of scoring I would only invite game. At matchpoints, try to go plus and not risk thin games. At teams, if nonvulnerable, you do not need to stretch to 50-50 games.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K J
♣ A 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Authority forgets a dying king.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 4
♥ Q 9 6 5 4
♦ 5
♣ K Q 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 3 2
♥ 7 3
♦ K 3
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 2
♦ A Q J 6 4
♣ A J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 7 6 5
♥ J 8
♦ 10 9 8 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦K
You have a tricky choice, on a hand where it is not clear that you really want a ruff. Partner's bidding would be consistent for some with a hand with a bad spade suit, or a dead minimum overcall and decent spades, or even a hand with spades and diamonds. So leading your spade honor might easily cost you a trick. That argues for risking partner's wrath by leading a club honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ 9 5 3
♣ Q J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 21st, 2013
|
In response to a strong two-club opening, would you please comment on the two diamond response as a waiting bid, as opposed to showing a suit or controls, with an immediate response of two hearts being a double negative.
Norma Jean, Boise, Idaho
I prefer to use two diamonds as waiting or negative because that can be combined well with a method espoused by Eric Kokish. In these methods opener's rebid of two no-trump shows 22-24, and two hearts forces a call of two spades. Now opener rebids no-trump with a balanced game-force; minor suits show that minor plus longer hearts; three hearts is single-suited hearts. Even if not playing that, I don't think the immediate double negative via two hearts is very useful.
Would the sequence one club – three clubs – four clubs – five clubs ever be bid by two experts, especially two experts who are not a regular partnership? To put it another way, could the above sequence be described as intelligent? With what hands would this be a sensible route to the club game?
Heart to Heart, Bremerton, Wash.
Since we never invite facing an invitation, four clubs is either pre-emptive or a one-suited slam-try with no singleton (else a splinter), not interested in no-trump but looking for a cue-bid from partner. Your sequence is highly unlikely, since opener, with slam interest facing a limit raise, surely has a second suit or shortage and would describe his hand or ask for aces, not reraise his suit.
Does the concept of a free bid or a free raise still apply? If so, can you explain when it is in use?
Django, Sacramento, Calif.
The concept of the free raise showing extra values is best forgotten. One has to compete with a fit for partner, with or without values. So raise partner when you can — except that with a dead minimum and defensive values, especially with bad trump, passing initially may be wisest. The one place where a free action promises slightly more than in a parallel noncompetitive auction is that a one-no-trump response to an opening bid in competition tends to be a good 7-10 rather than 6-9.
|
What do jumps to five of a major typically show? I was faced with the following sequence: one heart – two clubs – two hearts – three hearts – four diamonds – five hearts. Is the last bid an asking bid or a statement about something specific?
Asking or Telling?, Madison, Wis.
There are many auctions where three suits have been bid (or where the opponents have bid a suit). In those cases a jump to five of the agreed major asks for a control in the danger suit – here, spades. In other sequences a jump in the trump suit most commonly asks for good trump, suggesting the bidder has especially poor trump, but a good hand in all other respects. Occasionally, though, the reverse is true: The call shows good trump and nothing to cue-bid — you generally know which!
Holding ♠ Q-5-4, ♥ A-J-7-3-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ 10-5-2, must I overcall over an opening of one club and one diamond? Does the vulnerability, or whether partner has passed, affect your decision?
In the Weeds, Birmingham, Ala.
Some would argue that a space-consuming overcall (robbing your LHO of the chance to bid one diamond in the first instance) should be made more aggressively than one that takes no space. I do not buy into this, but I would overcall unless at unfavorable vulnerability, facing a passed partner. I do not think the scoring method matters here — but change my heart jack into the 10, and I would be more discreet.
|
August 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I imagine, joking apart, that to know love, one must make mistakes and then correct them.
Leo Tolstoy
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8 2
♥ 7 4
♦ A 8 6 3
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ 8 3
♦ Q J 10 7 4
♣ K J 9 3 |
♠ A 10 4
♥ K 9 6 5
♦ K 5 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ A Q J 10 2
♦ 9
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
In third seat it must be right to open this hand, but I'm not sure whether to open one club or one heart. With a one-bid hand, as here, I will open a four-card major, but this suit does not really qualify — give me the jack as well and I would open one heart. So one club it is. As a general policy, open in third seat whenever you have close to opening values or a suit you want partner to lead.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4
♥ K 9 6 5
♦ K 5 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In a team game, West opened one spade, was passed around to South, who was willing to risk bidding at least six hearts, but had no way to let North know what was needed for seven. By bidding only hearts and clubs before jumping to slam, he tried to give the impression that he was worth a drive to slam, but was missing a trick in one of those two suits.
North got the message that his partner had longer hearts than clubs, but felt obliged to pass six hearts in spite of his diamond ace because he could not be sure his partner’s hearts were entirely solid. Of course, seven hearts can be made with a 3-2 club split, but on the lead of the spade king, it was up to South not to waste his energies on what might have been and to focus on making the contract he was in.
South found the solution when he ruffed the opening lead and, before playing any trump, cashed one high club, then led a low club, and eventually ruffed a club in dummy with the heart nine to make his contract.
By playing one high club and one low one, South guarantees the contract unless clubs break 5-0. This is clearly the best available play, since if declarer draws even one round of trumps, the defenders can arrange to prevent the club ruff in dummy. The overtrick is irrelevant unless South is playing pairs — and maybe even then!