June 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
John Kenneth Galbraith
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ A 7 5 4
♦ J 3
♣ Q J 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 3 2
♥ J
♦ K Q 10 9 7
♣ 9 6 5 |
♠ A 10 9 8 5
♥ K 10 8
♦ 6 5
♣ 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7
♥ Q 9 6 3 2
♦ A 8 4 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Bergen: four trumps in a limit raise
♦K
It would be nice to shuffle your cards and pick one at random — nothing looks attractive. I'll opt for the most passive lead I can find, the club eight, but since I hate all the options, I am not convinced I'm doing the right thing.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 3
♥ Q 10 6 4
♦ J 9 7 5
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
| Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 9th, 2013
|
What is the range for responding one no-trump to a simple overcall in a major? Should it be forcing, showing 6-12 points (like the response to an opening major-suit bid), or is it more tightly defined?
Closing In, Dover, Del.
The call is traditionally played as nonforcing but mildly constructive; say 8-12 points without a fit. Overcaller will generally correct to his suit with six and will invite game with a decent 14 and up in high cards. New suits by opener are natural, jumps are invitational, and a cue-bid is forcing for one round.
Where do you stand on leading aggressively from four or five cards to one honor, as opposed to passively from weaker or shorter holdings when faced with a blind auction, such as one heart – three hearts – four hearts?
Marking Time, Naples, Fla.
Assuming that you have decided not to play for ruffs, I always start out by looking for a sequence to lead from. When in doubt, I will generally lead from honors unless I know dummy is weak and declarer strong. On the given auction, there is a case for going passive, leading from three or four small cards if you had no obvious alternative, but I'm aggressive by instinct.
I know about New Minor Forcing in response to a rebid of one no-trump as a way to discover our partnership's degree of major-suit fit. Can something similar be used after a jump rebid of two no-trump, or in two-over-one auctions?
Digging for Treasure, Phoenix, Ariz.
The two auctions you mention cannot be considered in parallel. In a two-over-one sequence everything is natural. But many experts these days play that responder's rebid of the new minor after opener's jump to two no-trump can indeed be used artificially. It searches for a fit in the unbid major or for three-card support for the bid major. You can find out more on Richard Pavlicek's website here.
|
Should I consider raising partner after his opening bid is doubled via some artificial responses? Is this necessary, or sensible — and if so, what should I bid?
Artificial Sweetener, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When your partner’s major-suit opening is doubled, a response of two no-trump should show a limit raise or better in partner’s suit, while a jump to three of partner’s suit is more pre-emptive than strong. This convention has no downside – so long as you remember it! When you are happy with that, you might go one step further: play a two-club response as artificial (7-9 with three trumps) and a direct raise as 4-6. Think of it as mini-Drury!
I was playing with a relatively new partner and held ♠ K-Q, ♥ Q-6, ♦ A-K-J-9-7-4, ♣ A-8-4. My partner opened one diamond and I produced an inverted raise. She passed the first hurdle by not passing, but over her two-no-trump call, what should I have done next?
Poor Little Rich Girl, Little Rock, Ark.
When partner has shown a minimum balanced hand, then after the inverted raise, I like to play that responder can sign off in three of the trump suit, show shortage in a major by bidding it, or make an artificial call of the other minor to show slam interest, even facing 12-14 balanced. Now if partner signs off in three no-trump, I'd make one more effort with a quantitative call of four no-trump. Frankly, though, this hand is nearly worth a drive to slam facing a one-diamond opening.
|
June 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, June 8th, 2013
If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.
Douglas Adams
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ J 9 6
♦ Q J 7
♣ 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7 5 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 10
♣ K Q 9 2 |
♠ A J 9 2
♥ 10
♦ K 9 8 4 3 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 8 5 4
♦ A 6 5
♣ A J 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♥2
It looks simple enough to bid three spades now, but is that enough? If partner has what you expect (five or six diamonds and four spades in a strong hand), you are offering him four useful cards, two in each of his suits. It may be putting undue trust in him, but I'd drive to four spades and expect it to be at worst on a finesse.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ J 9 6
♦ Q J 7
♣ 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 2♦ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
She's loveliest of the festal throng In delicate form and Grecian face — A beautiful, incarnate song, A marvel of harmonious grace….
Paul Hayne
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 10 5 4
♥ —
♦ A J 4 3 2
♣ K 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 8 7 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 8
♣ A 8 4 2 |
♠ 9 3
♥ A K J 10 8 2
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 5 4 3
♦ K Q 10 9 5
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♥ |
| Pass |
3♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♥9
Minimum as you are in high-card points, you cannot do less than bid four hearts to emphasize heart shortage with a club raise. Admittedly, some of the time your partner might be able to infer this from his own heart length, but you owe it to him to describe your hand at one go and let him proceed from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 5 4
♥ —
♦ A J 4 3 2
♣ K 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
2♣ |
3♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
Terry Pratchett
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 3
♥ 7 6
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ A K Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 5
♥ J 9 3 2
♦ —
♣ J 9 8 4 |
♠ K 8 6 4
♥ 10
♦ J 9 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 2
♥ A K Q 8 5 4
♦ A K 10 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♣* |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6♦ |
Pass |
7♦ |
All pass |
*Weak, both majors
♠J
You are worth a second call, but the danger of bidding three clubs is obvious; no one likes playing in a 5-1 fit. The way to get spades into play would be to double. By contrast, a call of two no-trump is not natural but shows minors, with longer clubs of course. Your sequence suggests this precise pattern, plus extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 3
♥ 7 6
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ A K Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters.
Solomon Short
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 7 5
♦ A J 5 3 2
♣ A 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ K Q 10 4 2
♦ 10 8
♣ K Q J 9 5 |
♠ 10 9 8 2
♥ J 8
♦ 9 6 4
♣ 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 7 5
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ K Q 7
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣K
This auction suggests partner has real clubs as well as four hearts. (With a balanced hand, partner would rebid one no-trump; our sequence strongly suggests we have no major if we have less than invitational values.) Nonetheless, my choice is to rebid one no-trump here, despite possibly wrong-siding our spade stop. We can always get back to clubs if partner is minimum and shapely.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 7 5
♦ A J 5 3 2
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Exit, pursued by a bear.
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 6
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ J 5 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5 4 3
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 8 7
♣ A 8 3 |
♠ K 8 2
♥ 6 5 3
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ J 7
♥ A K J
♦ A K Q 9 2
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠4
Don't panic and pass. Your partner cannot convert a takeout double into penalties on an auction like this. His second double shows extras, but is still geared to takeout. Since you are unsuitable for defense and have nothing but a fifth club to show, just rebid three clubs. Incidentally, if your clubs were headed by the ace, you would have enough to drive to game, perhaps with a cue-bid of three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 2
♥ 6 5 3
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Applying fears to hopes, and hopes to fears, Still losing when I saw myself to win!
William Shakespeare
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K
♥ J 8 5
♦ A J 6
♣ K Q 10 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 6
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 7 2
♦ Q 10 8 7 5
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ K 9 6 4
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
Dummy rates to be close to entryless. Which of the four suit-leads will give declarer a finesse he cannot take for himself? This is very close, but I'll go with the diamond lead because of the slim chance that repeated diamond leads might promote my heart 10 into an additional trump trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4 3
♥ 10 5
♦ Q 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Can you tell me what my options are with the following hand: ♠ K, ♥ A-3, ♦ A-Q-10-5-4, ♣ K-Q-7-3-2? I opened one diamond, and over my partner's one-spade response, I rebid two clubs. Now he bid two no-trump, suggesting invitational values, and I was not sure if I had to give up on slam altogether and just bid three no-trump, or if I should force with three clubs?
Still Hoping, Salinas, Calif.
Beware! Rebidding your second suit would show this pattern, but would be weak and nonforcing. Three no-trump now is reasonable; four no-trump is natural, quantitative, and optimistic. The advance to three hearts is the only other sensible option. It should suggest real extras, including heart length, though in the days that I played on the Aces team, we used the sequence for a strong 5-5 pattern. Maybe the simple way to have gotten your extras across was to bid three clubs at your previous turn.
Although I now live in the United States, I was born in Asia. Do you think there will ever be a world-championship winning team from that continent?
Here's Hoping, Sunbury, Pa.
For the record, both the Chinese women and Japanese seniors have won world titles, and the Indonesian men and women have both reached the finals of world-championship events. The Chinese men probably offer the best current chance of a title — though I would be somewhat surprised if they make it in the next decade.
When opener reverses, what should responder do? How do you distinguish between good and bad hands with support? Specifically, I held ♠ Q-4, ♥ 10-8-7-4, ♦ Q-10-5, ♣ Q-7-3-2 and responded one heart to my partner's one-club opening. What should I have rebid when he reversed to two diamonds?
Braking Hard, Helena, Mont.
|
A convention called Blackout is in common use here by tournament players. This says that the cheaper of fourth suit (two spades here) or two no-trump is conventionally consistent with a weak hand; meanwhile, raising partner directly is game-forcing. Rebidding your own suit shows five or more cards and is forcing for one round. So here I'd bid two spades and hope to raise clubs in nonforcing fashion at my next turn.
Should one play a change of suit as forcing when partner overcalls over a weak two- or three-level pre-empt? What happens if you are a passed hand (or have passed over the pre-empt at your first turn to speak)?
Pre-emptive Strike, Kenosha, Wis.
A new suit is forcing here, though not necessarily to game. But as a passed hand, a new suit should be played as nonforcing but constructive. Having said that, since an overcall of a pre-empt guarantees a good hand, many would play a new suit at the three-level as forcing to suit agreement. That certainly makes sense.
Playing pairs, I opened one diamond, my LHO bid four clubs, and my partner doubled, leaving me to decide if I should act again with ♠ 10-4, ♥ A-J-7-3, ♦ K-Q-8-5-4, ♣ Q-3. I passed and hoped that my bits and pieces would be enough to set four clubs. In fact we did beat it a trick, and my partner did have only three hearts, but five diamonds would have made comfortably enough.
Fading in the Stretch, Charlottesville, Va.
You are supposed to take out your partner's takeout doubles if you can. So with shape, and especially when you do not have trump tricks, strain to remove partner's double, in this case to four hearts. If partner doesn't have hearts, he should know what to do.
|
June 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Pressure is something you feel when you don't know what the heck you're doing.
Peyton Manning
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 8
♥ Q 7
♦ A K 8 5
♣ A 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 5 4 2
♥ J
♦ Q 10 7 2
♣ 7 4 |
♠ K Q 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ J 9 6 3
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A K 10 9 6 5 3
♦ 4
♣ J 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥* |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
*Two of the five key cards, counting the trump king as a key card
♣7
This may not be a popular view, but I'm very tempted to respond two diamonds rather than two clubs. The logic is that spades are our likely best trump fit for game, but at the slam level we might be much keener to find a 4-4 diamond fit than a 4-4 club fit. With a weak club fit we might find we had located the only slam we cannot make.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8
♥ Q 7
♦ A K 8 5
♣ A 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal is a defensive problem for East, but it features a convention my readers often ask me about. Although I am not a great fan of Bergen raises, this is a good opportunity to explain them.
Marty Bergen, one of the biggest innovators in Standard American, was responsible for the idea that when holding four-card support for partner’s major and less than an opening bid, your hand could be immediately and accurately described in one of three ways. A double-jump is pre-emptive (say 2-5 HCP), while a jump to three clubs shows a mixed raise, with 6-9 HCP. And a jump to three diamonds, as here, shows a limit raise with 10-11 HCP.
The underlying logic is that whenever you have four-trumps, you are prepared to compete to the three-level sooner or later, and acting at once makes your opponents’ life far harder.
Against four hearts, West led the diamond king, won by declarer’s ace. South now played a heart to his ace and another heart. As East, you win the heart king, but what do you do next?
If you play a second diamond, partner might not realize that you want a diamond overruff. He might play you for the ace-queen of spades and shift to a spade — after all, that is how you would defend if this were the case. Help him to do the right thing by cashing your spade ace before leading a second diamond; then there will be nothing else for him to try but a third diamond.