August 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Danger, Will Robinson, danger!
Irwin Allen
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 5 2
♥ 4 3
♦ A J
♣ A Q 10 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ J 10 2
♦ Q 10 8 6 4
♣ 9 7 4 |
♠ 7 6
♥ A K 9 8 5
♦ K 5 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 8 3
♥ Q 7 6
♦ 9 7 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
Let me put it on record that a new suit in response to an overcall of a weak bid must be played as forcing, or you deprive yourself of the chance to have an intelligent conversation. Here the choice is to blast to three no-trump, to cue-bid with three diamonds and follow with three no-trump, or to bid three hearts now. I'd bid three hearts, though the cue-bid is a reasonable alternative.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6
♥ A K 9 8 5
♦ K 5 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The more things man is ashamed of, the more respectable he is.
George Bernard Shaw
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10 8 7 6
♥ 9 6
♦ A Q J 10
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 5 4
♥ 7 3
♦ K 9 8 7 6
♣ 7 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 5 4 3 2
♣ Q J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q J 10 8 2
♦ —
♣ A K 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠* |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two-suiter, game-forcing
♠K
With partner limited in his possible high cards (he didn't act over one club despite apparently being short in clubs), your best chance looks to be in diamonds. Leading the diamond queen may cost a trick or solve a guess for declarer, but nothing else is likely to give you a chance to set the game.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ J 3
♦ Q 3
♣ J 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
At rubber bridge South plays in two spades, but West has 100 honors in spades. Does West get honors points?
Honor System, Wausau, Wis.
Yes indeed. I've been the victim at the table when my partner played four hearts doubled and vulnerable and his RHO had 100 honors in hearts. I've never been the beneficiary, but I'm still young.
I held ♠ 4, ♥ J-9, ♦ K-Q-10-8-6-5-4-3, ♣ Q-5. Playing pairs, what should I open in first seat at unfavorable vulnerability? At any other vulnerability I might toy with opening four or five diamonds. Should I pull in my horns here and open only three diamonds?
Timid Soul, Menominee, Mich.
A four- or five-level pre-empt would be justified nonvulnerable, but at unfavorable vulnerability I would open four diamonds only in first chair. In second seat, vulnerable, your pre-empts should be more disciplined — there is one fewer opponent to pre-empt, after all – so opening three diamonds would be fine.
How good a hand do you need to make a takeout double and then bid again? Is it better to overcall or double first with ♠ A-Q-6-5-4-3, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ A-9-3, ♣ 7 when your RHO opens one club?
Homing In, Mason City, Iowa
With the popularity of weak jumps, regular overcalls have become much more constructive, so that it would not be out of line to overcall one spade here, intending to act again later to show extras – if there is a next time. Make the diamond nine the queen, and most would double, then bid spades.
|
When the opponents open a strong no-trump, how much do you need to double? Would ♠ A-Q-4, ♥ A-10-4, ♦ K-10-5-4, ♣ Q-6-3 be enough?
Steam Engine, Ketchikan, Alaska
My advice is not to double one no-trump unless you hold the maximum end of the opponents' no-trump, or unless you hold a good suit and an attractive lead. With this hand I would advocate caution. Who knows, the opponents may give you a second chance!
In a recent home game I was called because one player had managed to lose a card in the play. Everyone started with 13 cards though. I just want to know whether the result should count or be thrown out.
Butterfingers, Vancouver, Wash.
If everyone started with 13 cards, you can't throw the deal in. If one player played two cards to the same trick, I assume you would just carry on and the player with one fewer card is unlucky. If the deal was defective, it shouldn't count.
|
August 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Then, welcome each rebuff That turns earth’s smoothness rough, Each sting that bids nor sit nor stand but go!
Robert Browning
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ J 10
♣ J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ Q 10
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
♠ 6
♥ J 6 5 2
♦ K 9 6 4 2
♣ 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 5 4
♥ K 9 3
♦ A 7
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦3
It looks tempting to raise to two clubs, but with your soft stoppers in the majors, it feels better to limit the hand with a call of one no-trump. If the opponents compete again, you might bid on to three clubs, but for the time being, I'd consider your hand one on which to aim low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 2
♥ Q 10
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
As Tammie glowered, amazed and curious, The mirth and fun grew fast and furious.
Robert Burns
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 9
♥ Q 4
♦ Q 10 9
♣ J 9 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ 7 2
♦ J 8 6 5 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ A J 10 6
♦ 7 2
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ K 9 8 5 3
♦ A K
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
Even though your partner's double may be more focused on the majors than the minors, you should compete to two clubs at once. If you don't bid now, you may feel obliged to bid at your next turn when the stakes will be higher and the auction more risky. Bid now and tell your story in one go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ Q 4
♦ Q 10 9
♣ J 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Better by far you should forget and smile Than that you should remember and be sad.
Christina Rossetti
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 7 6 4
♥ 6
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 3
♥ K 10 8 4 3
♦ 10
♣ Q J 5 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ K Q J 7 5
♣ 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ Q J 8 5 2
♥ A J
♦ 9 3 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣* |
2 NT |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Drury (a sound spade-raise)
♦10
Despite your awkward holding of three small cards in declarer's second suit, you have just enough to jump to three diamonds to suggest invitational values and diamond support. Aces tend to be somewhat undervalued in a complex hand of this sort. (With the king-jack of spades instead of the ace, you might content yourself with a call of two diamonds.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 6 4
♥ 6
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Some say be careful what you wish for. Well, I'd be more wary of not wishing at all.
Anon
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A 10 9 3
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 3
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A K J 10 8 7
♣ K |
♠ Q 10 8 6 2
♥ J 4
♦ 3
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ K Q 7 2
♦ 9 5
♣ 10 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥* |
| 2♥ |
Dbl** |
Pass |
2♠ |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*spades
** Three-card support
♦K
It looks natural to bid two spades, but when your partner doubles for takeout, suggesting extras, that is not really enough. Your partner has at least three spades in this auction, so your choice is a jump to three spades, or going all the way to game. I choose the former, mainly because I don't want to discourage partner from reopening light in the future.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8 6 2
♥ J 4
♦ 3
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
No man thinks there is much ado about nothing when the ado is about himself.
Anthony Trollope
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ K J 10 4
♦ 10 3 2
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 5 |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K J
♣ A 10 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A Q 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ J 9 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
♦9
The question here is whether to drive to game because of your intermediates or to consult partner. At teams, if vulnerable, I would bid game. At any other form of scoring I would only invite game. At matchpoints, try to go plus and not risk thin games. At teams, if nonvulnerable, you do not need to stretch to 50-50 games.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K J
♣ A 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Authority forgets a dying king.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 4
♥ Q 9 6 5 4
♦ 5
♣ K Q 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 3 2
♥ 7 3
♦ K 3
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 2
♦ A Q J 6 4
♣ A J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 7 6 5
♥ J 8
♦ 10 9 8 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦K
You have a tricky choice, on a hand where it is not clear that you really want a ruff. Partner's bidding would be consistent for some with a hand with a bad spade suit, or a dead minimum overcall and decent spades, or even a hand with spades and diamonds. So leading your spade honor might easily cost you a trick. That argues for risking partner's wrath by leading a club honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ 9 5 3
♣ Q J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 21st, 2013
|
In response to a strong two-club opening, would you please comment on the two diamond response as a waiting bid, as opposed to showing a suit or controls, with an immediate response of two hearts being a double negative.
Norma Jean, Boise, Idaho
I prefer to use two diamonds as waiting or negative because that can be combined well with a method espoused by Eric Kokish. In these methods opener's rebid of two no-trump shows 22-24, and two hearts forces a call of two spades. Now opener rebids no-trump with a balanced game-force; minor suits show that minor plus longer hearts; three hearts is single-suited hearts. Even if not playing that, I don't think the immediate double negative via two hearts is very useful.
Would the sequence one club – three clubs – four clubs – five clubs ever be bid by two experts, especially two experts who are not a regular partnership? To put it another way, could the above sequence be described as intelligent? With what hands would this be a sensible route to the club game?
Heart to Heart, Bremerton, Wash.
Since we never invite facing an invitation, four clubs is either pre-emptive or a one-suited slam-try with no singleton (else a splinter), not interested in no-trump but looking for a cue-bid from partner. Your sequence is highly unlikely, since opener, with slam interest facing a limit raise, surely has a second suit or shortage and would describe his hand or ask for aces, not reraise his suit.
Does the concept of a free bid or a free raise still apply? If so, can you explain when it is in use?
Django, Sacramento, Calif.
The concept of the free raise showing extra values is best forgotten. One has to compete with a fit for partner, with or without values. So raise partner when you can — except that with a dead minimum and defensive values, especially with bad trump, passing initially may be wisest. The one place where a free action promises slightly more than in a parallel noncompetitive auction is that a one-no-trump response to an opening bid in competition tends to be a good 7-10 rather than 6-9.
|
What do jumps to five of a major typically show? I was faced with the following sequence: one heart – two clubs – two hearts – three hearts – four diamonds – five hearts. Is the last bid an asking bid or a statement about something specific?
Asking or Telling?, Madison, Wis.
There are many auctions where three suits have been bid (or where the opponents have bid a suit). In those cases a jump to five of the agreed major asks for a control in the danger suit – here, spades. In other sequences a jump in the trump suit most commonly asks for good trump, suggesting the bidder has especially poor trump, but a good hand in all other respects. Occasionally, though, the reverse is true: The call shows good trump and nothing to cue-bid — you generally know which!
Holding ♠ Q-5-4, ♥ A-J-7-3-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ 10-5-2, must I overcall over an opening of one club and one diamond? Does the vulnerability, or whether partner has passed, affect your decision?
In the Weeds, Birmingham, Ala.
Some would argue that a space-consuming overcall (robbing your LHO of the chance to bid one diamond in the first instance) should be made more aggressively than one that takes no space. I do not buy into this, but I would overcall unless at unfavorable vulnerability, facing a passed partner. I do not think the scoring method matters here — but change my heart jack into the 10, and I would be more discreet.
|
|
In response to your overcall, West leads the heart jack against four spades. Plan the defense.
In situations of this sort it is sometimes difficult to approach the problem because your instincts point you in the wrong direction. So let me prompt you with some questions. Let’s agree that our target is to take four tricks and that we do not mind conceding overtricks in exchange for a chance to defeat the game. How many quick tricks does our side have? The answer is that we have two hearts and we have to assume that we have a club trick coming, or we can surely never defeat this game.
Our best chance of a fourth winner is our diamond king. Can we just sit back and wait to score our two tricks in the minors? No indeed!
As soon as declarer knocks out our club king, then — no matter what his original club holding — he is surely going to have as many winners as he needs to discard slow diamond losers from his hand. Additionally, even if that were not so, declarer is probably threatening to pitch dummy’s slow diamond loser on the heart queen.
If this is the case, you have no hope of defeating the game unless partner has the diamond queen. If so, you need to switch to a diamond now, before either the clubs or hearts are established for a diamond discard. Therefore play a diamond at once, and hope for the best.