Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 21st, 2013

For some cry 'Quick' and some cry 'Slow'.

Alfred, Lord Tennyson


South North
North-South ♠ A 7 5 3 2
 A 2
 7 4 2
♣ 4 3 2
West East
♠ Q 8
 Q J 8 7 5 4
 8 6 3
♣ 7 5
♠ 10 9 4
 K 10 9 6 3
 5
♣ J 10 9 8
South
♠ K J 6
 —
 A K Q J 10 9
♣ A K Q 6
South West North East
2♣ Pass 2 NT* Pass
7 All pass    

*Two aces or one ace and two kings

Q

North-South were playing control responses to a two-club opening and that allowed South to identify his partner's two aces at once and drive to the grand slam in diamonds — a contract that was somewhat easier to bid than play.

After a heart lead, South was faced with a variety of chances involving his potential loser in spades or clubs. It looks simple to take the heart ace; but what do you discard from hand?

By ruffing the opening heart lead and delaying his decision whether to discard a club or a spade on the heart ace, South maintained all of his chances for the contract. After trumps failed to break 2-2 (preventing the straightforward approach of ruffing the club loser in dummy), declarer decided to set up a squeeze before resorting to the spade finesse.

Accordingly, South ran all his trump, as both opponents released hearts at every turn. Then declarer cashed the three top clubs, disclosing that East had started with four clubs.

Now in the four-card ending, South led a spade to dummy’s ace and cashed the heart ace. When East discarded a spade (holding his club guard), South discarded his club and knew to lead a spade to his king, dropping West’s queen – it could not be correct to take a spade finesse, as East’s last card was known to be a club.


This hand is more about methods than judgment. If you play simple transfers, you should transfer into hearts, then bid game. If you play Jacoby and Texas transfers (whereby you can reach four hearts in two ways), then the transfer and raise is a mild slam-try (this hand, but with the heart ace). Four diamonds is a transfer with no slam interest.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 8
 Q J 8 7 5 4
 8 6 3
♣ 7 5
South West North East
2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 20th, 2013

What mischief cleaves to unsubdued regret,
How fancy sickens by vague hopes beset;
How baffled projects on the spirit prey,
And fruitless wishes eat the heart away.

William Wordsworth


North North
North-South ♠ K 9 5 3
 A K 3 2
 —
♣ A K Q 9 3
West East
♠ J 10 2
 8 6 4
 Q J 5
♣ 10 7 6 2
♠ A Q 8 4
 10 9
 K 9 7 4 3
♣ J 4
South
♠ 7 6
 Q J 7 5
 A 10 8 6 2
♣ 8 5
South West North East
1♣ 1
Pass 2 Dbl. Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
4 All pass    

Q

In today's deal from the Dyspeptics Club, South had been tempted to pass North's takeout double of two diamonds, but in the end preferred to bid his chunky four-card heart suit. How would you plan the play in four hearts on a diamond lead?

At the table declarer ruffed the diamond lead in dummy, drew trump. played the three top clubs, and ruffed a club. He next played a spade to the jack, king and ace, and eventually had to go one down.

Feeling unusually contrite, South asked his partner if he might have done better. North consoled him, telling him that there was a double-dummy way he might have gone down two!

South should have seen that if hearts broke, he would have five trump tricks, three clubs and the diamond ace, so four club tricks would suffice. Instead of taking dummy’s entry out prematurely by ruffing the diamond, he should have won the opening lead with his ace, pitching a spade from dummy, drawn trump, and now played his clubs. If they had broken 3-3. he would have made an overtrick; as it was, he would ruff out the clubs and lead a spade to the king to try for an overtrick.

Even after ruffing the opening lead, he had an easy road to recovery. After drawing trump ending in hand, he should simply have ducked a club to East. He could then have won the return and cashed the four club tricks needed.


If ever there was a hand where underleading an ace made sense, this is it. Dummy rates to have decent clubs while neither red suit looks safe, and a trump is impossible. Particularly as partner did not raise clubs, you won't lose your ace by underleading it.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 8 4
 Q 10 7
 K 9
♣ A 7 4 3
South West North East
1♣ Dbl. Pass 1♠
Pass 1 NT Pass 2♠
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 19th, 2013

I had to decide at pairs how to respond to a strong no-trump with ♠ 8-7-3,  K-Q-J-7-4,  Q-10-3, ♣ 8-4. I elected to transfer to hearts and pass the response. My partner took nine tricks, but since he had 17 HCP with the doubleton heart ace, half the field made the no-trump game. Should I have bid two no-trump over his two-heart call? I didn’t think I was quite strong enough.

Stop, or Go? Montreal

This is truly tough, and I think you took the right pairs action. You would only have reached game facing a maximum hand with heart fit when partner breaks the transfer. When he doesn’t have a fit, game can only be 25 percent at best – so by trying for game you risk turning a plus into a minus maybe half of the time. At pairs your call was right and you were unlucky, I think.

My partner and I have been discussing how often a double of a no-trump contract has Lightner implications. Is that the exception or the rule?

Lightner in a Bottle, Portland, Ore.

When the opponents have had an unopposed sequence to a no-trump contract, a double by the hand not on lead normally suggests a sound holding in dummy's suit. It does not necessarily demand that that suit be led, but that is the normal implication. It is far less clear when the defenders have bid one suit or more.

Would you agree with my decision to open ♠ 9,  9-6-4-2,  K-J-9-8-4-3, ♣ K-4 with a weak two diamonds? Does vulnerability matter here? Be that as it may, I did open and partner responded two spades. What would you advise now?

Shaky Ground, Greenville, S.C.

Best is to bid two no-trump now. Unless you have a specific agreement to the contrary, new suits are forcing in response to a weak-two bid, so you must bid again. Since repeating diamonds with your feeble suit appears unattractive, and introducing hearts seems excessively forward, you should mark time with a call of two no-trump and hope your partner can now bid a red suit.

Can you help me out? My hand was ♠ J-9-8-2,  K-Q-8-3,  J, ♣ K-10-7-3; I responded one heart to one diamond and heard a rebid of one no-trump. How do I explore for a possible fit without the auction spiraling out of control?

Going Places, Harrisburg, Pa.

You should pass one no-trump and let well enough alone. You know your side does not have a spade or heart fit, and since partner has bid your shortage, stay low and hope that you can make one no-trump. Why does playing in a suit seem more attractive than no-trump?

Holding ♠ A-K-7-3,  K-9-8-4,  K-J, ♣ Q-J-5, I opened one no-trump. My partner responded three spades, which we conventionally play as both minors and short spades, game-forcing but not necessarily slam interest. I bid three no-trump, and there we rested with partner's 0-3-5-5 13-count leaving us cold for six clubs. Who should have done more? Should the three-spade bid be limited in strength?

Crocodile Tears, Sioux Falls, S.D.

There is no reason for any HCP limitation on the three-spade bidder, except that opener does not necessarily assume slam interest opposite and responder should bid on with real extras. So dummy underbid his hand by at least a trick. The right call over three no-trump is to move on (maybe with a call of four spades, which sounds like this pattern). By contrast, a bid of four hearts would emphasize the quality of the three-card heart suit, and four of a minor would pinpoint the five-card suit.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 18th, 2013

Hairbreadth missings of happiness look like the insults of Fortune.

Henry Fielding


West North
East-West ♠ Q 9 4
 Q 8
 Q J 10 7 6
♣ K 4 2
West East
♠ K J 3
 7 3
 K 5
♣ A J 8 7 6 3
♠ 10 8 7 2
 9 5 4 2
 A 8 3 2
♣ 5
South
♠ A 6 5
 A K J 10 6
 9 4
♣ Q 10 9
South West North East
2♣* Pass Pass
2 All pass    

*Clubs, 10-15 points

♣A

Today's deal comes from the Cavendish Teams of a decade or so ago, and it features the use of suit preference on defense.

It is bad enough to stay low and miss a cold game, but when your opponents beat you in the safe partscore you have reached, it hurts even more. After Peter Weichsel’s natural but limited opening of two clubs, Paul Chemla did not have enough to overcall in diamonds, and when Christian Mari reopened with two hearts rather than a double, Chemla decided not to explore for three no-trump, but to take the safe positive … not so fast!

Weichsel led the club ace, an incisive shot, then carefully played the club seven for Alan Sontag to ruff. Sontag now found the fine move of underleading the diamond ace (Peter’s middle club clearly indicated that he had no preference between the pointed suits; hence he was likely to have the king of both suits). Weichsel won his king, then gave Sontag a ruff with a high club. At this point, Sontag led the spade two to ensure one down, setting up the defense’s spade trick before declarer could establish the diamonds for discards.

At the other table West’s opening bid of one club let North overcall one diamond and South could show hearts, then raise his partner’s call of one no-trump to game. Declarer found the club jack and had no problem in making nine tricks.


Your soft 10-count might have been better suited to a one-no-trump call on the previous round. However, once you bid two diamonds – which is forcing but does not guarantee a second call and can’t tempt partner to a second call, what game can your side possibly make? Your partner must have a minimum hand with at least two spades, and without a diamond fit; pass two spades and hope to beat it.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 4
 Q 8
 Q J 10 7 6
♣ K 4 2
South West North East
1 1♠
2 2♠ Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 17th, 2013

Don't, sir, accustom yourself to use big words for little matters.

Samuel Johnson


South North
East-West ♠ J 10
 3
 5 4
♣ A Q J 9 7 6 5 4
West East
♠ K 8 7
 J 7 6 5
 A K J 3 2
♣ 3
♠ A Q 2
 Q 10 9 8 2
 8 7 6
♣ 8 2
South
♠ 9 6 5 4 3
 A K 4
 Q 10 9
♣ K 10
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
2♠ Pass 3♣ Pass
3 NT All pass    

K

This week's deals all come from the Cavendish tournament and feature points of technical interest in the play.

This deal might look like a simple defensive problem against three no-trump — just the five tricks hinge on the play to trick two! For example, at one table Zia Mahmood reached three no-trump against the Sanborns, having bid spades twice. Steve Sanborn led the diamond king (showing three of the top four honors in the suit, and requesting an unblock or a count signal). Kerri Sanborn showed an odd number of diamonds, helping her partner know that declarer had the guarded diamond queen left.

Still, West did not know whether to shift to spades or hearts to put his partner on lead for the diamond through. After much thought he shifted to hearts and declarer claimed his 10 tricks.

By contrast, Larry Cohen was on lead after a slightly different auction in which South had opened one spade and had rebid two no-trump. Although he had the option of leading the diamond king for an unblock, he decided that South was bound to have the guarded diamond queen. Therefore he led the diamond ace (which asked for attitude and was not an unblock request).

Now David Berkowitz’s diamond eight was suit preference for a spade — a great hand for his methods. Cohen shifted to a spade, East went back to diamonds, and the defenders cashed out the spades for down four.


At matchpoint pairs, it would be reasonable to pass, hoping that your side could not make game and that spades would outscore diamonds (or no-trump). At teams, it feels right to bid two diamonds, keeping the auction open and hoping to find a way back to a higher-scoring strain, if appropriate.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 2
 Q 10 9 8 2
 8 7 6
♣ 8 2
South West North East
1 Pass
1 Pass 1♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 16th, 2013

Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.

Henry Ford


East North
North-South ♠ K 10 9
 A 6 5 3
 K 7 5 2
♣ K 2
West East
♠ 7 6 5 4
 Q 8 7 2
 J
♣ J 9 7 3
♠ A Q 3
 9
 8 4
♣ A Q 10 8 6 5 4
South
♠ J 8 2
 K J 10 4
 A Q 10 9 6 3
♣ —
South West North East
2♣*
2 4♣ 5 All pass

*Clubs, 10-15 points

2

The auction for the 1999 Cavendish Pairs generated comfortably over a million dollars, so everyone knew that good play would be rewarded in more ways than one. And today's deal was just such an example.

At one table where Neil Chambers and John Schirmer were South and North respectively, they managed to silence their opponents here; when East opened one club Chambers overcalled one diamond, and Schirmer simply jumped to three no-trump, making nine tricks in comfort. But reaching the 4-4 heart fit was not easy when East-West could bid and raise clubs — and of course, the five-club sacrifice is relatively cheap.

However, on our featured auction Fred Gitelman finished in five diamonds and when West led a helpful heart, Gitelman won in hand, crossed to dummy with a trump to ruff a club, then drew a second trump.

Next he cashed the heart ace to get the bad news, and now he found the neat maneuver of leading the club king to pitch a low spade. East won his ace (ducking does not beat the hand as declarer would subsequently set up a spade) and could not safely give a ruff-sluff.

In fact, East chose to play the spade ace and lead another spade, hoping that his partner had the jack, and now Gitelman had a home for his heart loser. But there was a resource available; after winning the club ace: East had to underlead his spade ace-queen to beat the hand. Would you have thought of it?


By partnership agreement the jump to three hearts was a splinter. In other words, your partner has primary diamond support — five or more cards – with game-forcing values and a singleton heart. Since you want to steer clear of no-trump and you have certainly not given up on slam, you should bid three spades, planning to cue-bid the heart ace at your next turn.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 9
 A 6 5 3
 K 7 5 2
♣ K 2
South West North East
1 1 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 15th, 2013

Respect was mingled with surprise,
And the stern joy which warriors feel
In foemen worthy of their steel.

Sir Walter Scott


East North
North-South ♠ Q
 J 7 4 2
 K 4 2
♣ A K Q 5 3
West East
♠ J 6 4 3
 K 8 3
 6
♣ J 10 8 4 2
♠ 10
 A 9 6
 Q J 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 7 6
South
♠ A K 9 8 7 5 2
 Q 10 5
 A 7 3
♣ 
South West North East
3
4♠ Pass 5♣ Pass
5 Pass 5♠ All pass

You decide!

The Cavendish Pairs has traditionally been run as a five-session event in which every pair plays each of the other pairs. But the 1999 Cavendish featured the experiment of dividing the pool into a final event and consolation event after the first two days, followed by a one-day final. Three pairs were fighting it out for the big prize with a couple of rounds to go, and one of those three was Billy Cohen and Ron Smith. However, with a couple of rounds to go, Smith and Cohen dropped out of contention — and this board cost them blood.

Kerri and Steve Sanborn play a hyperaggressive style of pre-empting, hence Steve’s choice of opening. Cohen might have contented himself with a call of three spades, but when he jumped to four spades, that persuaded his partner to look for slam. The two cue-bids did not drive the partnership completely overboard, but it did get them to a dangerous spot.

The success of the contract would hinge on the opening lead, and there is scarcely a more attractive lead than a singleton in partner’s suit, but Kerri had been listening to the auction, and — more importantly — she knew her spade trick would not run away. She unerringly led a heart, and the defense cashed their two heart tricks and had an inevitable trump winner to come to defeat the contract and hand their opponents a crushing blow.


How will you stop the opponents from bidding their game or slam in spades? The baby psyche of three spades might well work; even a three-no-trump call might silence the opponents. The simple raise to four hearts might persuade them to stop in four spades. You can take your pick – and remember to be suspicious of your opponents in this position if you have the strong hand in fourth chair!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10
 A 9 6
 Q J 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 7 6
South West North East
3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

God knows what he knows,
And what his wits infer from what he sees
And feels and hears.

Edwin Arlington Robinson


East North
East-West ♠ J 5 3
 A J 8 7
 10 9 7
♣ Q 7 5
West East
♠ —
 K 9 3 2
 K Q J 6 4 3 2
♣ K 9
♠ Q 10 9 8 7 6 2
 5 4
 8
♣ J 10 6
South
♠ A K 4
 Q 10 6
 A 5
♣ A 8 4 3 2
South West North East
2♠
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

K

In today's deal from the Cavendish teams of 1999 North-South look destined to reach three no-trump whether East pre-empts or not. The attractive alternative would be if they can stop off to double their opponents should they go overboard in diamonds. Having said that, though, when the defense to three no-trump starts with West setting up the diamonds, nine tricks seem a long way off. Nonetheless, in the match between the teams captained by Wayne Chu and Gerald Sosler, both tables reached the no-trump game and did remarkably well.

When Craig Gower as South was declarer, Kay Schulle led a top diamond. Gower took the second diamond, then led the heart queen, covered by the king and ace, and next played off the top spades to try to exert a little pressure on West. When Schulle pitched two diamonds, declarer worked out why.

Gower determined that West had to be preserving a heart guard, so he cashed the 10 of hearts, then took the heart finesse. Next he played off the last heart winner and threw West in with a diamond. She could cash her diamond winners, but would eventually have to lead clubs, setting up the queen for declarer and conceding the ninth trick.

Remarkably, this nice play simply minimized Gower’s losses on the deal, since in the other room David Berkowitz had made exactly the same play in three no-trump doubled, landing nine tricks.


Your partner's cue-bid asks you primarily for a spade stopper. If you do not have one, you should describe your hand as effectively as possible. Here, with only half a spade stopper, you should bid three diamonds, waiting to see where partner wants to go next. Passing is an equally sensible approach if you consider your trump support unsatisfactory.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 5 3
 A J 8 7
 10 9 7
♣ Q 7 5
South West North East
1 1♠
Dbl. Pass 2♠ Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 13th, 2013

Even victors are by victories undone.

John Dryden


West North
Both ♠ 8 4 2
 10 9 5
 J 6
♣ K Q J 6 3
West East
♠ K Q 9 5
 6
 A K 10 9 7 2
♣ 10 9
♠ A J 10 7 6 3
 J
 8
♣ A 8 7 4 2
South
♠ —
 A K Q 8 7 4 3 2
 Q 5 4 3
♣ 5
South West North East
1 Pass 1♠
4 4♠ 5 5♠
Pass Pass 6 Pass
Pass Dbl. All pass  

K

All this week's deals come from recent Cavendish tournaments. Going into the final match of the 1999 Cavendish Teams, there were three squads with realistic chances of taking the title. Lou Ann O'Rourke was in the lead, but that team lost heavily to Peter Boyd, the team in third place that switched places with them. This meant that the Chip Martel team, in second spot, could take the title if they could win their encounter with Gabriel Chagas (playing with Zia) by more than 10 IMPs. They were 1 IMP down with just today's deal to score up.

In the auction shown, Chagas as East passed his partner’s five-spade bid, and Howard Weinstein as South sacrificed in six hearts, doubled by Zia. This figured to be a reasonable enough result for North-South. Better still, after a top diamond lead, Zia erred by shifting to the spade king, thus collecting only 500.

When Chagas’ teammates bid as far as six hearts with the North-South cards, Chip Martel as East tried six spades and North sacrificed in seven hearts. After the lead of the two top diamonds, Martel pitched a discouraging spade, so Stansby played a third diamond, collecting an overruff and the club ace for 1100, and 12 IMPs to his side. That meant Martel’s team won the event by the smallest possible margin.

Incidentally, at another table, when Fred Gitelman as East defended six hearts doubled on this deal, he thoughtfully threw the spade ace away at trick two to ensure that his partner played a third diamond!


Although you have a choice between the majors, there are clues suggesting that a spade might be better. The primary one is that partner did not double the two-heart cuebid. The second is that East did not make a negative double, and West did not bid two spades at his second turn. All of that makes it likely partner has three or more spades. Does that mean a spade must be right? No, but I'd still lead one.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 7 4 2
 9 3
 5 4 3
♣ Q 7 6
South West North East
1 1 2
Pass 2 Pass 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 12th, 2013

How would you deal with the following problem (one I found almost insuperable)? You hold ♠ A-J-7-6-2,  9,  Q-3, ♣ J-9-7-5-4. When you respond one spade to partner's one-heart opening, he naturally rebids two diamonds. What do you do now?

Dilemma's Horns, Jackson, Miss.

You could bid two hearts, giving false preference, or repeat your spades — either of which could backfire badly. A reasonable option is to pass, while the most aggressive call of all is two no-trump, an overbid by about a queen. I have sneaking admiration for a pass to limit the damage, but give me the spade nine instead of the two, and I'd repeat the spades.

Recently I had to interpret a double by my partner. I heard one diamond on my left, and two diamonds (forcing) on my right. Now my LHO bid two hearts, suggesting length and a stopper, and my partner doubled. Was this takeout for the black suits or did it show hearts?

Tea-Leaf Reader, Ames, Iowa

This is definitely and unambiguously hearts. Your partner did not overcall, but he might easily have four or five chunky hearts in an otherwise featureless hand.

With the black suits he must bid initially or introduce a suit (or bid the unusual no-trump) over two hearts.

Is it ever acceptable to make a negative double of an overcall without four cards in the unbid major? If so, when would that be?

Model Citizen, North Bay, Ontario

There are two relatively common positions where you might double with three cards in the unbid major. The first is at a low level without a stopper in the opponent's suit but with four or five cards in the other minor, three in partner's minor and about a nine-count. The second is when the opponents pre-empt and you have a strong hand with no clear direction. In each case you can double and hope partner does have extra shape or can bid no-trump.

I found myself in third seat with ♠ K-8-7-3-2,  J-9-4,  A-K, ♣ A-J-3. My partner passed and my RHO opened one heart.. Would you overcall one spade, or double?

Ready for Action, Hartford, Conn.

I would bid one spade. It used to be the case that overcalls had an upper limit of an opening bid, and that one always doubled first with good hands. No longer; overcalls can go up to a hand this good, while doubling, then bidding a suit, would show a better hand, and a better suit, than this.

I was just wondering if you utilize Eastern or Western cue-bids. As I understand it, the former tends to promise something, the latter tends to ask for help. My partner and I use the Western Cue-bid, and it seems to work for us.

East Meets West, Troy, N.Y.

When the target appears to be to get to three no-trump, but there is a danger suit, then you bid no-trump when you can do so sensibly, and cue-bid the suit with something but with less than a full stop. Only rarely do you cue-bid with a positional stop where no-trump will play better from partner's hand. With nothing at all in the danger suit, you are often better off waiting for partner to bid no-trump or asking you for help, when you will deny it.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2013. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].