June 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
For some cry 'Quick' and some cry 'Slow'.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 7 5 3 2
♥ A 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8
♥ Q J 8 7 5 4
♦ 8 6 3
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 10 9 4
♥ K 10 9 6 3
♦ 5
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 6
♥ —
♦ A K Q J 10 9
♣ A K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 7♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two aces or one ace and two kings
♥Q
This hand is more about methods than judgment. If you play simple transfers, you should transfer into hearts, then bid game. If you play Jacoby and Texas transfers (whereby you can reach four hearts in two ways), then the transfer and raise is a mild slam-try (this hand, but with the heart ace). Four diamonds is a transfer with no slam interest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ Q J 8 7 5 4
♦ 8 6 3
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
What mischief cleaves to unsubdued regret, How fancy sickens by vague hopes beset; How baffled projects on the spirit prey, And fruitless wishes eat the heart away.
William Wordsworth
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 9 5 3
♥ A K 3 2
♦ —
♣ A K Q 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ Q J 5
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
♠ A Q 8 4
♥ 10 9
♦ K 9 7 4 3
♣ J 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ Q J 7 5
♦ A 10 8 6 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
If ever there was a hand where underleading an ace made sense, this is it. Dummy rates to have decent clubs while neither red suit looks safe, and a trump is impossible. Particularly as partner did not raise clubs, you won't lose your ace by underleading it.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 8 4
♥ Q 10 7
♦ K 9
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I had to decide at pairs how to respond to a strong no-trump with ♠ 8-7-3, ♥ K-Q-J-7-4, ♦ Q-10-3, ♣ 8-4. I elected to transfer to hearts and pass the response. My partner took nine tricks, but since he had 17 HCP with the doubleton heart ace, half the field made the no-trump game. Should I have bid two no-trump over his two-heart call? I didn’t think I was quite strong enough.
Stop, or Go? Montreal
This is truly tough, and I think you took the right pairs action. You would only have reached game facing a maximum hand with heart fit when partner breaks the transfer. When he doesn’t have a fit, game can only be 25 percent at best – so by trying for game you risk turning a plus into a minus maybe half of the time. At pairs your call was right and you were unlucky, I think.
My partner and I have been discussing how often a double of a no-trump contract has Lightner implications. Is that the exception or the rule?
Lightner in a Bottle, Portland, Ore.
When the opponents have had an unopposed sequence to a no-trump contract, a double by the hand not on lead normally suggests a sound holding in dummy's suit. It does not necessarily demand that that suit be led, but that is the normal implication. It is far less clear when the defenders have bid one suit or more.
Would you agree with my decision to open ♠ 9, ♥ 9-6-4-2, ♦ K-J-9-8-4-3, ♣ K-4 with a weak two diamonds? Does vulnerability matter here? Be that as it may, I did open and partner responded two spades. What would you advise now?
Shaky Ground, Greenville, S.C.
Best is to bid two no-trump now. Unless you have a specific agreement to the contrary, new suits are forcing in response to a weak-two bid, so you must bid again. Since repeating diamonds with your feeble suit appears unattractive, and introducing hearts seems excessively forward, you should mark time with a call of two no-trump and hope your partner can now bid a red suit.
|
Can you help me out? My hand was ♠ J-9-8-2, ♥ K-Q-8-3, ♦ J, ♣ K-10-7-3; I responded one heart to one diamond and heard a rebid of one no-trump. How do I explore for a possible fit without the auction spiraling out of control?
Going Places, Harrisburg, Pa.
You should pass one no-trump and let well enough alone. You know your side does not have a spade or heart fit, and since partner has bid your shortage, stay low and hope that you can make one no-trump. Why does playing in a suit seem more attractive than no-trump?
Holding ♠ A-K-7-3, ♥ K-9-8-4, ♦ K-J, ♣ Q-J-5, I opened one no-trump. My partner responded three spades, which we conventionally play as both minors and short spades, game-forcing but not necessarily slam interest. I bid three no-trump, and there we rested with partner's 0-3-5-5 13-count leaving us cold for six clubs. Who should have done more? Should the three-spade bid be limited in strength?
Crocodile Tears, Sioux Falls, S.D.
There is no reason for any HCP limitation on the three-spade bidder, except that opener does not necessarily assume slam interest opposite and responder should bid on with real extras. So dummy underbid his hand by at least a trick. The right call over three no-trump is to move on (maybe with a call of four spades, which sounds like this pattern). By contrast, a bid of four hearts would emphasize the quality of the three-card heart suit, and four of a minor would pinpoint the five-card suit.
|
June 1st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Hairbreadth missings of happiness look like the insults of Fortune.
Henry Fielding
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q 8
♦ Q J 10 7 6
♣ K 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 3
♥ 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ A J 8 7 6 3 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 9 5 4 2
♦ A 8 3 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A K J 10 6
♦ 9 4
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♣* |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Clubs, 10-15 points
♣A
Your soft 10-count might have been better suited to a one-no-trump call on the previous round. However, once you bid two diamonds – which is forcing but does not guarantee a second call and can’t tempt partner to a second call, what game can your side possibly make? Your partner must have a minimum hand with at least two spades, and without a diamond fit; pass two spades and hope to beat it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q 8
♦ Q J 10 7 6
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 31st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Don't, sir, accustom yourself to use big words for little matters.
Samuel Johnson
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 10
♥ 3
♦ 5 4
♣ A Q J 9 7 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ J 7 6 5
♦ A K J 3 2
♣ 3 |
♠ A Q 2
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 6 5 4 3
♥ A K 4
♦ Q 10 9
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
At matchpoint pairs, it would be reasonable to pass, hoping that your side could not make game and that spades would outscore diamonds (or no-trump). At teams, it feels right to bid two diamonds, keeping the auction open and hoping to find a way back to a higher-scoring strain, if appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 2
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 16th, 2013
Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.
Henry Ford
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 10 9
♥ A 6 5 3
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 5 4
♥ Q 8 7 2
♦ J
♣ J 9 7 3 |
♠ A Q 3
♥ 9
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 10 8 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ J 8 2
♥ K J 10 4
♦ A Q 10 9 6 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♣* |
| 2♦ |
4♣ |
5♦ |
All pass |
*Clubs, 10-15 points
♥2
By partnership agreement the jump to three hearts was a splinter. In other words, your partner has primary diamond support — five or more cards – with game-forcing values and a singleton heart. Since you want to steer clear of no-trump and you have certainly not given up on slam, you should bid three spades, planning to cue-bid the heart ace at your next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9
♥ A 6 5 3
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Respect was mingled with surprise, And the stern joy which warriors feel In foemen worthy of their steel.
Sir Walter Scott
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q
♥ J 7 4 2
♦ K 4 2
♣ A K Q 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 4 3
♥ K 8 3
♦ 6
♣ J 10 8 4 2 |
♠ 10
♥ A 9 6
♦ Q J 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 8 7 5 2
♥ Q 10 5
♦ A 7 3
♣ |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♦ |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
5♠ |
All pass |
You decide!
How will you stop the opponents from bidding their game or slam in spades? The baby psyche of three spades might well work; even a three-no-trump call might silence the opponents. The simple raise to four hearts might persuade them to stop in four spades. You can take your pick – and remember to be suspicious of your opponents in this position if you have the strong hand in fourth chair!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ A 9 6
♦ Q J 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
God knows what he knows, And what his wits infer from what he sees And feels and hears.
Edwin Arlington Robinson
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 5 3
♥ A J 8 7
♦ 10 9 7
♣ Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K 9 3 2
♦ K Q J 6 4 3 2
♣ K 9 |
♠ Q 10 9 8 7 6 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 8
♣ J 10 6 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ Q 10 6
♦ A 5
♣ A 8 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦K
Your partner's cue-bid asks you primarily for a spade stopper. If you do not have one, you should describe your hand as effectively as possible. Here, with only half a spade stopper, you should bid three diamonds, waiting to see where partner wants to go next. Passing is an equally sensible approach if you consider your trump support unsatisfactory.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3
♥ A J 8 7
♦ 10 9 7
♣ Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 13th, 2013
Even victors are by victories undone.
John Dryden
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 10 9 5
♦ J 6
♣ K Q J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 9 5
♥ 6
♦ A K 10 9 7 2
♣ 10 9 |
♠ A J 10 7 6 3
♥ J
♦ 8
♣ A 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 8 7 4 3 2
♦ Q 5 4 3
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| 4♥ |
4♠ |
5♥ |
5♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
6♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦K
Although you have a choice between the majors, there are clues suggesting that a spade might be better. The primary one is that partner did not double the two-heart cuebid. The second is that East did not make a negative double, and West did not bid two spades at his second turn. All of that makes it likely partner has three or more spades. Does that mean a spade must be right? No, but I'd still lead one.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 4 2
♥ 9 3
♦ 5 4 3
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
How would you deal with the following problem (one I found almost insuperable)? You hold ♠ A-J-7-6-2, ♥ 9, ♦ Q-3, ♣ J-9-7-5-4. When you respond one spade to partner's one-heart opening, he naturally rebids two diamonds. What do you do now?
Dilemma's Horns, Jackson, Miss.
You could bid two hearts, giving false preference, or repeat your spades — either of which could backfire badly. A reasonable option is to pass, while the most aggressive call of all is two no-trump, an overbid by about a queen. I have sneaking admiration for a pass to limit the damage, but give me the spade nine instead of the two, and I'd repeat the spades.
Recently I had to interpret a double by my partner. I heard one diamond on my left, and two diamonds (forcing) on my right. Now my LHO bid two hearts, suggesting length and a stopper, and my partner doubled. Was this takeout for the black suits or did it show hearts?
Tea-Leaf Reader, Ames, Iowa
This is definitely and unambiguously hearts. Your partner did not overcall, but he might easily have four or five chunky hearts in an otherwise featureless hand.
With the black suits he must bid initially or introduce a suit (or bid the unusual no-trump) over two hearts.
Is it ever acceptable to make a negative double of an overcall without four cards in the unbid major? If so, when would that be?
Model Citizen, North Bay, Ontario
|
There are two relatively common positions where you might double with three cards in the unbid major. The first is at a low level without a stopper in the opponent's suit but with four or five cards in the other minor, three in partner's minor and about a nine-count. The second is when the opponents pre-empt and you have a strong hand with no clear direction. In each case you can double and hope partner does have extra shape or can bid no-trump.
I found myself in third seat with ♠ K-8-7-3-2, ♥ J-9-4, ♦ A-K, ♣ A-J-3. My partner passed and my RHO opened one heart.. Would you overcall one spade, or double?
Ready for Action, Hartford, Conn.
I would bid one spade. It used to be the case that overcalls had an upper limit of an opening bid, and that one always doubled first with good hands. No longer; overcalls can go up to a hand this good, while doubling, then bidding a suit, would show a better hand, and a better suit, than this.
I was just wondering if you utilize Eastern or Western cue-bids. As I understand it, the former tends to promise something, the latter tends to ask for help. My partner and I use the Western Cue-bid, and it seems to work for us.
East Meets West, Troy, N.Y.
When the target appears to be to get to three no-trump, but there is a danger suit, then you bid no-trump when you can do so sensibly, and cue-bid the suit with something but with less than a full stop. Only rarely do you cue-bid with a positional stop where no-trump will play better from partner's hand. With nothing at all in the danger suit, you are often better off waiting for partner to bid no-trump or asking you for help, when you will deny it.
|
|
North-South were playing control responses to a two-club opening and that allowed South to identify his partner's two aces at once and drive to the grand slam in diamonds — a contract that was somewhat easier to bid than play.
After a heart lead, South was faced with a variety of chances involving his potential loser in spades or clubs. It looks simple to take the heart ace; but what do you discard from hand?
By ruffing the opening heart lead and delaying his decision whether to discard a club or a spade on the heart ace, South maintained all of his chances for the contract. After trumps failed to break 2-2 (preventing the straightforward approach of ruffing the club loser in dummy), declarer decided to set up a squeeze before resorting to the spade finesse.
Accordingly, South ran all his trump, as both opponents released hearts at every turn. Then declarer cashed the three top clubs, disclosing that East had started with four clubs.
Now in the four-card ending, South led a spade to dummy’s ace and cashed the heart ace. When East discarded a spade (holding his club guard), South discarded his club and knew to lead a spade to his king, dropping West’s queen – it could not be correct to take a spade finesse, as East’s last card was known to be a club.