July 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
People who know little are usually great talkers, while men who know much say little.
Jean Jacques Rousseau
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J 8 5 2
♥ 5 3 2
♦ K 8
♣ K J 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ Q 9 4 3 2
♣ 10 7 |
♠ 7 3
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ A J 6
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ K Q
♦ 10 7 5
♣ A 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠* |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Four-card spade fit and a nonminimum hand
♥J
Leading an unsupported ace is something you should try to avoid if there are viable alternatives, but today nothing else looks better. It may be that leading the heart ace will simply let you work out what you should have done, but there is no other choice that seems remotely attractive.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ A 10 5 2
♦ J 6
♣ Q 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| 3♥ |
3♠ |
All pass |
|
July 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
Is a splinter raise a slam-try, or simply a promise of game-going values? For example, after opening one spade and hearing a four-club response, I did not know whether to sign off, cooperate, or drive to slam, holding ♠ K-Q-7-5-4, ♥ A-Q-5-4, ♦ 10-2, ♣ A-4. What is your opinion?
Jack Reacher, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
In my view, responder's splinter to an opening bid does not guarantee slam interest, just the values for game. Opener tends to cooperate only with working cards, where the splinter has improved his hand. Here you are clearly worth one effort of four hearts, intending to pass your partner's sign-off in four spades. Consider that a bare hand with the spade ace, heart king and diamond ace, plus the promised singleton club, makes slam very playable.
I think most can agree on what the Jacoby Transfer's purpose is. Most use this only for an indication of a five-card suit by the responder, but why wouldn't it be just as useful for responder to use transfers to show a four-card suit? I want to try this convention, but my partner won't go along with it. I admit that I surely must be overlooking something, or others would be using it!
Pathfinder , Riverside, Calif.
The simple answer is to use Stayman to find a 4-4 fit and use transfers to show five. There ARE transfer methods to show four or five, which have the merit of concealing declarer's shape, but you then get into considerable complexity, so I'd advise against them.
This link will show you what I mean.
Playing duplicate at favorable vulnerability, I held:♠ J-9-4, ♥ 10-9-3, ♦ Q-J-9, ♣ A-Q-7-4. My LHO opened three diamonds, my partner doubled, and I had to choose between a call of four or five clubs, a pass, or the bid of three no-trump. My partner told me I should have passed, but I felt that was too much of a gamble. What do you think?
No Quitter, Kingston, Ontario
I agree with you. Bidding three no-trump certainly has a lot to recommend it. You have the diamonds stopped. If your RHO has only one diamond, the defense will not be able to get that suit going. Even if the defense can set up diamonds and be in position to run the suit, you may still take nine tricks before they can get five.
|
With ♠ A-J-4, ♥ K-Q-8-7-4, ♦ J-7-2, ♣ A-J, my partner opened one no-trump. I held a 3-4-1-5 seven-count, with the diamond ace and five clubs to the K-10-9. I transferred to clubs and played there, making five — for a bottom. Everybody else was in hearts. Should my partner have opened one heart? Should I have used Stayman in response? I didn't know what to do over a response of two spades.
Raise the Roof, Montreal, Canada
Your partner made the right call in Standard American. A 16-count would be stuck for a rebid after opening one heart. YOU were wrong, though. You could have used Stayman and followed up with two no-trump over a two-diamond response, but passing one no-trump looks normal. NEVER transfer into a minor facing a strong no-trump with a weak hand and only a five-carder. Switch partner's diamonds and hearts to see why bidding is so likely to be wrong.
How far would you go here, when your LHO has opened one heart and your partner overcalls one no-trump? My hand was ♠ Q-4, ♥ 9-4, ♦ A-Q-9-7-5, ♣ 6-4-3-2, and I simply bid three no-trump. We went down on a spade lead when my partner had only three spades to the jack and 15 points, but he said I should have simply invited game.
Tipping Point, St Louis, Mo.
Your decision to drive to game facing a no-trump overcall seems the normal action to me. Remember, it is not mandatory to overcall one no-trump on all 15-counts. The range for the bid is closer to 16-18 in my book, particularly when vulnerable. With all your values in your long suit, you might make game facing quite limited values.
|
July 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Artificial Intelligence usually beats natural stupidity.
Anon.
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 7
♥ A Q 8 5 3
♦ J 9 7
♣ K 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 6 5 4 3 2
♣ J 8 |
♠ K Q J 4 2
♥ K 7 2
♦ 10
♣ Q 10 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 3
♥ J 9 6
♦ A K 8
♣ A 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
In this position, a pass by you does not suggest a place to play — not that you would object vehemently to defending that contract. (After all, it isn't game.) Instead, your pass simply indicates you have nothing to say. If partner runs to one heart, you won't sit for it if doubled — though it is not clear where you will end up.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 6 5 4 3 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of.
Blaise Pascal
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K J
♥ 10 6
♦ K 8 5 3
♣ A 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ J 7 4 3
♦ Q 10 7
♣ Q 10 4 |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ A K Q 9 8 5
♦ 2
♣ J 8 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8
♥ 2
♦ A J 9 6 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♥ |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♥3
The first question you should ask is how many clubs does this sequence promise? I'd say at least five, not necessarily six; partner can have an awkward call with five good clubs and no heart stopper. That said, you have an awfully good hand for a simple invitational raise to three clubs, but nothing else really appeals. A cue-bid here should probably set up a game-forcing auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 8
♥ 2
♦ A J 9 6 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Wisely and slow; they stumble that run fast.
William Shakespeare
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 8 2
♥ 8 7
♦ A Q 6
♣ A J 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 7 3
♥ 10 6 3 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
♠ 4
♥ Q J 9 5
♦ K 10 9 5 2
♣ Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 6 5
♥ A K 4
♦ 8 3
♣ K 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
2♦ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three-card support
♦4
This is one of the rare positions in standard bidding where it is not only acceptable but standard practice to rebid a three-card suit, without misleading your partner. After the negative double, you can jump to two spades with four spades and anything other than a dead minimum, so the one-spade call is quite consistent with three trumps and a hand unsuitable for a one-no-trump bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 2
♥ 8 7
♦ A Q 6
♣ A J 10 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Every man is a damn fool for at least five minutes every day; wisdom consists in not exceeding the limit.
Elbert Hubbard
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 3
♥ K J 9
♦ Q 9 8 5
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ 4 2
♣ J 4 3 |
♠ —
♥ 8 6 5 2
♦ A K J 10 7 6 3
♣ A Q |
| South |
♠ K J 9 6 4 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ —
♣ K 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦4
A typical conundrum in standard bidding with a minimum hand and 6-4 pattern is whether you should repeat the long suit or introduce the second suit economically. Put me firmly in the camp of those who bid the second suit with anything but a dead minimum hand. While at pairs it may work to repeat the major, it is generally better to describe nine of your 13 cards than six of them.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9 6 4 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ —
♣ K 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Sweet Analytics, 'tis thou hast ravished me!
Christopher Marlowe
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 8 6 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K Q 6 2
♣ K 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 4
♥ A K 10 9 7
♦ 5
♣ J 7 6 |
♠ 7
♥ J 6 4 3 2
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ Q 5
♦ A J 10 7
♣ A 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
2♣* |
2♥** |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*5-4 majors
**Spades
♥K
This auction is forcing, suggesting an original 6-4 hand pattern. With a singleton heart, you do not want to play in that suit unless partner insists, and with no aces you cannot jump to five diamonds. Your choice is to revert to four diamonds or bid three no-trump — and you have no source of tricks unless partner's hearts are semisolid or better. That argues for a four-diamond call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 6 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K Q 6 2
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 1st, 2013
Attempt the end, and never stand to doubt; Nothing’s so hard, but search will find it out.
Robert Herrick
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5
♥ A K 8 6 4
♦ K Q 10 5 3
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 9 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 2
♣ K Q 10 9 5 |
♠ K 10 3 2
♥ Q 10 7 2
♦ 6
♣ 8 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9 8 7 4
♥ —
♦ A J 4
♣ A J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Dummy rates to be 4-5 or 4-6 in clubs and hearts, and declarer is likely to want to ruff spades in dummy and maybe clubs in hand. Leading a trump doesn't seem to accomplish anything dramatic, but it looks like the best chance to cut down the crossruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 5
♥ 8 6 5
♦ Q 4 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
|
July 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
You recently wrote about this hand: ♠ K-10-8, ♥ A-5, ♦ J-7-4, ♣ Q-J-10-9-3. In response to your partner’s overcall of one heart over one diamond, you bid two clubs, and the issue was what your partner meant when he cue-bid two diamonds. Does this show a raise of clubs or something else — and what should you do next?
Hop to It, Pottsville, Pa.
North’s cue-bid is artificial and simply says “Good hand; tell me more; then I’ll let you know why I set up a one-round force.” Your two-heart bid now reveals secondary support for your partner and lets him decide whether to settle for hearts or do something else – whatever it was that he planned when he cue-bid.
At our club we received a request from a younger pair to be allowed to play a complicated system, which included very light opening bids. I know some of our members are opposed to this, but I want to encourage the younger crowd. What do you think I should do?
Blame Game, Lorain, Ohio
This is tough. You are right to encourage younger players, but mustn't risk losing your regulars. I think maybe one day a week you might experiment with allowing the methods — but only if proper defenses are provided and full explanations given.
Can you tell me what I should take into account in deciding whether to jump-shift as opener at my second turn to speak? Say I open one diamond and hear my partner respond one spade. Do I have enough to bid three clubs, holding ♠ 7-4, ♥ K-Q, ♦ A-J-9-5-4, ♣ A-K-J-2? Would your answer be different if partner had responded one heart?
Gonna Jump Down Spin Around, Jackson, Tenn.
|
There is certainly something to be said for bidding two no-trump over a one-spade response. After all, you do have a fairly balanced hand and a stopper in the unbid suits. Over a one-heart response you are maximum for a call of two clubs, planning to act again. Your suits are not good enough for a jump to three clubs, but with three hearts, or slightly better intermediates, I would jump to three clubs.
I think I understand when doubles are takeout and when penalties, but when you open the bidding and hear the opponents each bid a suit, what should a double by you at your second turn mean now? After one heart – one spade – pass – two diamonds, what does a double show? Is it just a good hand or the unbid suit?
Sally Forth, Macon, Ga.
When partner has not acted, all low-level doubles are primarily takeout. This sequence sounds like five hearts and four clubs, with a strong hand. With a fifth club, you might simply up and bid the suit to get your strength and shape across unambiguously.
I have heard of the unusual no-trump, but must that always be at the two-level? Can you make an unusual no-trump call at other levels?
Out of the Ordinary, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Direct no-trump overcalls by an unpassed hand of a pre-emptive opening should be natural, not unusual. However, in competition, a four-no-trump call is generally unusual. Anytime in a competitive auction you start either by passing, or by overcalling or responding to a takeout double in a suit, subsequent bids of no-trump facing a partner who has not acted at his previous turn are typically unusual.
|
July 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, June 29th, 2013
More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.
Woody Allen
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 6
♥ 6
♦ A J 9 8 3
♣ Q J 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 3
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ 10 7 6
♣ 10 3 2 |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ A K 3
♦ K Q 5 4
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 8 4
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ 2
♣ A K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♠A
I rarely tell my readers there is no second choice in a deal. But today I'm going out on a limb: two spades is mandatory, and there are no second choices, including two clubs. Unbalanced minimum opening bids with a three-card raise should start by raising rather than bidding the second suit and then supporting. Switch the club five to the ace and you bid two clubs, then support partner at your next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6
♥ 6
♦ A J 9 8 3
♣ Q J 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Consider the play in four spades here, after an uninformative auction.
West starts by leading the heart jack to East’s ace, and a heart comes back. You win the trick in hand and presumably plan to draw as many rounds of trump as is appropriate, ending in hand. With three minor-suit losers looming if the cards are unfavorably located, can you see how to turn a good contract into an excellent one?
The answer is to lead the first trump to the jack, ruff dummy’s heart, then draw the second trump with the queen, (leaving a trump outstanding if it is West who has the length) and now lead a club to the eight, rather than to dummy’s jack.
Why? Well the answer is that when East takes the trick, he is guaranteed to be endplayed. He can only give you a ruff and discard (in which case you ruff in hand and pitch a diamond from dummy) or lead back a club or a diamond into dummy’s tenaces. Whichever minor he plays, you have the communication to be able to ensure that you lose only one more diamond trick, thus making your contract.
By contrast, if you had led a club to the jack as your first play in the suit, East would have won his queen and returned the suit. When clubs failed to break, you would have had to fall back on the diamond ace being onside. And when that chance also failed to come through for you, you would have been sunk.