May 15th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I could a tale unfold whose lightest word Would harrow up thy soul, freeze thy young blood, Make thy two eyes, like stars, start from their spheres.
William Shakespeare
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K
♥ K Q 10 5
♦ A Q 5
♣ K 10 9 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ 9 8 4
♦ J 10 4
♣ 7 5 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 5 2
♥ A 6
♦ K 8 7 3
♣ J 4 |
| South |
♠ J 9 4
♥ J 7 3 2
♦ 9 6 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦J
Your partner has shown extra values and good clubs – probably 17 or more HCP since he could have bid three clubs directly with a decent overcall. With an eight-count, you surely have enough to get to game, but which? Cuebid three diamonds, hoping partner can bid three no-trump, or make some other descriptive call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ J 7 3 2
♦ 9 6 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
The challenge is high. The stakes are important. I think it's manageable.
William H. Webster
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 10 9 7 2
♥ K J 2
♦ 9
♣ A 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5
♥ Q
♦ A 7 5 4 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
♠ J 4 3
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 6 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ K J
♣ K Q 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5♠ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
In situations of this sort, simple diamond raises are limited in high cards. So to show a good hand and short hearts, your choice is two hearts (showing an invitation or better) or three hearts, promising very short hearts and a good hand. This second call should help partner judge how far to go on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5
♥ Q
♦ A 7 5 4 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
God is in the details.
Gustave Flaubert
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 5
♥ 7
♦ K 9 6 5 2
♣ 7 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ K 10 8 4 3
♦ J
♣ Q J 10 9 2 |
♠ K 8 6 2
♥ Q J 5 2
♦ 10 7 4 3
♣ K |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ A 9 6
♦ A Q 8
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣Q
Your partner’s double is doubtless based on a club stack, and declarer surely has the missing spade honors. I’d lead a heart rather than the singleton club – the clubs can surely wait. My choice would be the six — second highest from four small is acceptable against no-trump, though rarely elsewhere.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9 5 4
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ K 9 6
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
May 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I held: ♠ K-9, ♥ K-Q-4-3, ♦ K-Q-10-5-4, ♣ 7-4. In first position, I opened one diamond and my partner responded one spade. RHO bid two clubs. Should I n ow pass, bid two diamonds, or bid two hearts? (After an overcall, is two hearts considered a reverse?) I couldn't double, because this would have been a support double.
Nowhere to Go, Montreal
You can play a double as support (and if not support, then it would be for penalties not negative). Two diamonds shows six cards, and two hearts does indeed show a reverse (just as it would have done without opposition bidding). So passing is correct here; you have no extras, no fit and no convenient call.
Incidentally, if partner doubles, you bid two hearts to show your approximate red-suit pattern.
This board came up at our local duplicate and I'm not looking to place blame. I just would like to know how to handle it if it ever comes up again. (We got a zero for this deal.) After my partner opened one no-trump, I heard two spades on my right and was looking at ♠ 9-3, ♥ 4, ♦ K-10-8-5-4-2, ♣ A-Q-J-2. I thought three diamonds would be forcing here so I bid it. I'm still waiting for my partner to bid!
The Force Be With You, Little Rock, Ark.
Answering your question properly might require adding a conventional agreement to your armory. See whether you like it — it is called Lebensohl, and the way it works is that after the opponents overcall your side's no-trump opening, all two-level actions are natural and weak. All three-level suits are game-forcing, and double is takeout. Use two no-trump as a transfer to three clubs. It's a way to get out cheaply with a long minor.
Have you ever played bridge on a cruise ship? Would you ever consider teaching in that environment?
Shuffleboard Enthusiast, Panama City, Fla.
I know that some of my friends enjoy that sort of thing, but I’m not sure I’m cut out for it myself. Larry Cohen has a knack for that, though. Now if the BBC ever brought back their televised competition – which involved, among others, Zia Mahmood and Bob Hamman – you might tempt me back to the sea.
|
Recently you ran a problem where South held ♠ 5, ♥ K-Q-J-3-2, ♦ K-J-5-4, ♣ A-7-3. His partner opened one spade and, in response to two hearts, advanced to three diamonds. In my opinion Blackwood is reasonable, as North needs more than a minimum for his forcing diamond bid. If he has two or more aces, there should be an excellent play for slam. This may be a little aggressive, but any other bid could leave you short of slam.
No Guts No Glory, Palm Springs Calif.
The unspoken subtext in my answer was that some play the three-diamond call to promise extra shape, but not necessarily additional high cards – that would be most peoples’ view if playing two-over-one. If (and only if) a call of four clubs shows a good raise in diamonds here, then it may be better to do that and not take control. If, however, the three-diamond bid guarantees real extras in high cards, driving to slam facing two aces is certainly plausible.
My partner and I had a discussion about the minimum values required for a response to an opening bid. I dealt and opened one club with 13 points and 4-3-3-3 distribution. My LHO passed and my partner had three points — specifically the diamond jack and the heart queen with a 3-4-3-3 pattern. What would be your call: pass, one diamond or one heart?
Squeaker, Augusta, Ga.
Passing is the indicated action, but sometimes for strategic reasons one keeps the bidding open – and sometimes one regrets it! Bidding one heart might well work better than inventing a diamond suit, even though the chance of an inconvenient raise is somewhat lower.
|
May 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same….
Rudyard Kipling
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 3 2
♥ A 10 8 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4
♥ 3
♦ A J 7 3
♣ K 10 9 8 2 |
♠ J 10 6
♥ Q J 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ A J 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 9 8 6 5 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣9
This is an easy one. You are facing a passed hand. Which game do you think your side can make? It seems you have no decent fit in either major, but you do have a playable fit in diamonds. Therefore you should try to stop as low as possible since you have no values to spare. Pass two diamonds, and hope partner can make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 3 2
♥ A 10 8 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He has two chances, slim and none, and slim just left the building.
Chick Hearn
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q
♥ J 6 3
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A J 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 6
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 9 |
♠ A K 5 4 3
♥ Q 5
♦ J 4
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣9
Despite the fact that you have a 12-count, your side does not necessarily have a game here. A pessimistic approach would be to invite game with two no-trump or to raise to three diamonds. A more aggressive approach is to bid three clubs, a cuebid asking partner to show a club stopper or to make a descriptive call. If you take that action and hear a three-diamond rebid, you might elect to pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
You cannot make a revolution with silk gloves.
Josef Stalin
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 3
♥ 6
♦ J 8 7 5 4
♣ A K 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ 8 5 4 3 2
♦ K 2
♣ J 3 |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ K J 9
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors, invitational
♠2
Your partner's sequence shows four spades and the values for game, so you should correct to four spades. If your partner did not have a major, he would have simply raised to three no-trump. And since he clearly does not have hearts, you are safe to assume that you can work out which major he has!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
He has, indeed, done it very well; but it is a foolish thing well done.
Samuel Johnson
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ A J 3
♦ K 9
♣ J 8 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 10 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 |
♠ A 9 8
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 7 6
♥ K 9 8
♦ A Q
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦3
You seem to be too good to pass, but you do not have enough to drive to game. Since new suits would be nonforcing, the simple invitational choices are a two-no-trump call (right on values but potentially wrong-siding no-trump) or a raise to three clubs, which might lead to an awkward 5-2 fit. A cuebid of two spades allows you to pass a three-club call and raise a two-no-trump rebid to three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There are no second acts in American lives.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
| Both |
North |
| North |
♠ A J 6 4 2
♥ 6 5
♦ Q
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 9 8 7 5
♣ 6 |
♠ K Q 10 8 7
♥ Q 7 3
♦ J 6
♣ A 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A K 8
♦ A 10 4 3 2
♣ K 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♥J
If you play New Minor Forcing, you have the option of checking back for a 5-3 spade fit, but my instincts are simply to raise directly to three no-trump, giving away less information to the opponents about your shape and not giving the opponents the chance to double an artificial call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 8 7
♥ Q 7 3
♦ J 6
♣ A 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Anyone who uses the phrase 'As easy as taking candy from a baby' has never tried taking candy from a baby.
Anon.
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 8 5
♦ K J 9 7 6 3
♣ 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 8 6 4
♥ 9 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ K |
♠ A 9 5 3
♥ Q J 7
♦ A 4
♣ 9 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A K 10 4 2
♦ 2
♣ A Q J 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
My philosophy on blind leads against no-trump is to lead from length of more than five cards, but only lead from four-card suits if they look safe – or nothing else is attractive. Here a heart lead is plausible (I’d lead the seven rather than the three or five), but I might lead from Q-10-7-2 if that were a major rather than a minor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q 10 7 2
♣ K 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
The natural play in four hearts here on the lead of the diamond jack is to cover with dummy's queen. East will win with the king and return the diamond eight. Whether South covers or not, the defenders will establish their second diamond winner and be ready when in with the trump ace to cash their diamond and spade winners.
The winning approach features the concept of a frozen suit — a somewhat arcane designation of a position where neither side can successfully attack a suit except at the cost of a trick.
If declarer accurately reads the opening lead as coming from J-10-x of diamonds, then he can rise with the diamond ace and simply knock out the trump ace. With the cards lying the way that he had hoped, neither defender can successfully play on diamonds without establishing the third-round winner for declarer. Of course, declarer cannot play on diamonds himself without creating two winners for the defenders — but he doesn’t need to. Since he has five club winners, four trump tricks and the diamond ace, he can come to 10 tricks whatever the defenders choose to do.
This concept of a frozen suit would apply equally well if the East-West holdings were identical but the diamonds were Q-5-2 in dummy facing A-9-6. Again, declarer would have to work out that West had the J-10, then duck the opening lead to prevent the defenders from continuing the suit effectively.