July 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Master of human destinies am I! Fame, love, and fortune on my footsteps wait.
John Ingalls
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 7
♥ 10 9
♦ K J 10 9 6
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5
♥ K 8 7
♦ 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
♠ 9 6 4
♥ J 6 5 4 3 2
♦ 4
♣ 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 3 2
♥ A Q
♦ A Q 8 7 5 3
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠K
This is the sort of sequence where it is important to bid four spades with confidence, leaving it to the opponents to work out if you are bidding to make or are sacrificing. Yes, there are lies of the cards where you can beat four hearts if you get a diamond ruff. But against that, you rate to escape for no worse than two down in four spades. So unless the vulnerability is against you, take the save.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10 5
♥ K 8 7
♦ 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
3♠ |
4♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 1st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Every time you get out of bed in the morning, you take a risk. To survive is to know you're taking that risk and to not get out of bed clutching illusions of safety.
Maria V. Snyder
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 6 5 2
♥ K J 10 6
♦ K
♣ J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ 5 4
♦ Q 10 9 7 5
♣ Q 9 7 6 2 |
♠ K J 10 8 7 4
♥ 8 3 2
♦ 6 3
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ A J 8 4 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
5♦* |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
Pass |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Trump-queen ask
♠9
The double calls for dummy's first-bid suit. Geniuses might lead a low diamond, hoping partner will work out that he can win the lead and put you back in, but that is for geniuses only! The rest of the world leads the jack and apologizes later if it does not work out perfectly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6 4
♥ J 6 5 2
♦ J 4
♣ 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
June 30th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Recently I sat in third chair with ♠ J-9-3, ♥ J-8-7, ♦ K-J-9-4, ♣ A-5-4 and heard two spades from partner and three clubs on my right. I raised to three spades, the call I would have made without the opponents having intervened, and my partner said he would have passed with my hand and let well enough alone. Both three-level-contracts would have gone down a trick.
Sadder but Wiser, Charleston, S.C.
Your decision to compete was right on all fronts. The main reason for bidding is to take space from the opponents. Why shouldn't they find their heart fit if you leave them space?
My partner asked me if I played "Unusual versus Unusual" and I had no idea what he meant. Could you help me out please?
Unusual Suspect, Nashville, Tenn.
When the opponents overcall with a two-suiter like Michaels, Ghestem, or the unusual no-trump, this gives responder at least one clear cue-bid. If RHO has shown a specific two-suiter, a cue-bid of the lower suit can be used to show the fourth suit with a decent hand, while the cue-bid of the higher suit shows a limit raise in partner's suit. Consequently, raising partner or bidding the fourth suit is purely competitive. If there is only one known suit, or one cue-bid below three of partner's suit, use that cue-bid as the limit-raise.
I'm out of touch with the way players in your column seem to bid all the time. Why are jump raises of partner weak, not strong, and how do you ever get to show a good hand?
Nostalgic, Orlando, Fla.
|
The modern approach is that, particularly in competitive auctions, jump raises tend toward distributional rather than high-card values — though many take a good thing too far. Undeniably, though, you need to be able to show a good hand. The key is to start with a cue-bid, which promises limit values or better and support.
Last night my partner passed in second chair over one heart. Subsequently, though, he balanced with a double at his second turn after a raise to two hearts. I held an uninspiring collection: ♠ J-3-2, ♥ 10-4, ♦ A-Q-5-4-3, ♣ 10-7-2. I gambled by biddingtwo spades, trying to keep the auction low, and played in a 3-3 fit with a nine-card diamond fit available. Was I wrong to expect at least four spades from my partner?
Sadly Lacking, Corpus Christi, Texas
This is an auction where partner might even balance into a four-card spade suit if he had one, so finding him with only three spades is not entirely surprising. When I am asked to bid a suit and hold a five-carder, I bid it and let the chips fall where they may — whether it is a minor or a major.
I got some grief from my partner when I held this hand: ♠ J-4, ♥ 7-4, ♦ K-J-9-5-4, ♣ Q-J-7-2. My partner opened one spade, and my RHO bid one no-trump. I chose to try two diamonds – was this unreasonable?
Indecently Exposed, Chicago, Ill.
Acting in this position typically shows a six-card suit (though a decent five-carder will suffice in a pinch) and a hand in the range of six to nine points, since with more you would probably double the opponents in one no-trump. On this occasion two diamonds was somewhat aggressive, but far from absurd. With the diamond 10 instead of the four, I admit I would surely have done the same.
|
June 29th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
When a person cannot deceive himself, the chances are against his being able to deceive other people.
Mark Twain
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 8
♥ K 9 5 3
♦ A 6 4
♣ A J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ A 10 7 2
♦ J 9 7 5 3
♣ 10 6 |
♠ K 10 9 4 3
♥ 8 4
♦ Q 10
♣ Q 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K 8 2
♣ K 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦5
Since with 12-14 you would pass here, a free bid of two no-trump shows a balanced 18-19 now. So it is the right way to describe this hand, unless you play support doubles. If you do, start by doubling to show three-card support, planning to bid on in no-trump over a sign-off from your partner to describe your extra values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8
♥ K 9 5 3
♦ A 6 4
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 28th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Thou wast the inspirer of a nobler life, When I with error waged unequal strife, And from its coils thy teaching set me free.
Amos Alcott
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 7 4 3
♦ 6 4 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 5 4 3
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ J 10 8 7
♣ — |
♠ 9 8
♥ A 5
♦ Q
♣ K 10 9 8 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10
♥ 6 2
♦ A K 9 5
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3 NT* |
| Dbl. |
4♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Four-level pre-empt in a broken minor
♥J
I'm sure there is an argument for passing one no-trump, rather than introducing a suit as weak as your diamonds, but with a singleton spade I don't think it is right to pass. You should bid two diamonds and apologize if your seven- or eight-card fit plays worse than no-trump for you.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K Q 7 4 3
♦ 6 4 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 27th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Do not stop thinking of life as an adventure. You have no security unless you can live bravely, excitingly, imaginatively; unless you can choose a challenge instead of competence.
Eleanor Roosevelt
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 2
♥ A K J 6
♦ Q J 9 4 3
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 3
♥ 5 4
♦ 8 7 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 10 9 8 3
♦ K 5
♣ A K Q J 9 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7 5 4
♥ 7 2
♦ A 10 6
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
2 NT |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
I would not necessarily advocate opening this hand in first or second seat because of the uncomfortable rebid over a response of one spade. In third seat, passing is not an option, although whether you open one heart for the lead or one diamond is a matter for your partnership — or your conscience. Put me down as a one-heart bidder.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ A K J 6
♦ Q J 9 4 3
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Double your pleasure, double your fun.
Wrigley’s Doublemint commercial
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ A J 2
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 7 6 4
♥ 5
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ K 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 10 9 8 6 4
♦ K 6
♣ Q 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 9 5
♥ K 7 3
♦ A 8 7 4
♣ A J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦2
In just the same way that everyone uses a response of two no-trump to a weak-two as an inquiry with at least game interest, so here the two-no-trump call is looking for game. I think bidding a feature makes sense here, so I would bid three clubs, but I could understand using the inquiry as asking for a singleton. In that case you would bid three hearts now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 7 6 4
♥ 5
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
For men improve with the years; And yet, and yet, Is this my dream, or the truth?
W.B. Yeats
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J 8 7 5 4 2
♥ —
♦ 8 4 3
♣ J 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q J 6 3 2
♦ K 6
♣ A K 7 5 3 |
♠ —
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ J 10 9 7 2
♣ Q 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 6 3
♥ K 9 7 4
♦ A Q 5
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♠* |
4♠ |
5♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
5♠ |
All pass |
*Michaels, promising hearts and a minor.
♣K
It is reasonable to double to get both majors into play, but my choice would be to overcall one spade, planning to double or bid hearts at my next turn — if there is one — to get both my suits in, in the correct order. The problem with doubling is that if the opponents raise clubs, we might have to overbid considerably at our next turn to compete efficiently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 6 3
♥ K 9 7 4
♦ A Q 5
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
John Kenneth Galbraith
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ A 7 5 4
♦ J 3
♣ Q J 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 3 2
♥ J
♦ K Q 10 9 7
♣ 9 6 5 |
♠ A 10 9 8 5
♥ K 10 8
♦ 6 5
♣ 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7
♥ Q 9 6 3 2
♦ A 8 4 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Bergen: four trumps in a limit raise
♦K
It would be nice to shuffle your cards and pick one at random — nothing looks attractive. I'll opt for the most passive lead I can find, the club eight, but since I hate all the options, I am not convinced I'm doing the right thing.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 3
♥ Q 10 6 4
♦ J 9 7 5
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
| Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 9th, 2013
|
What is the range for responding one no-trump to a simple overcall in a major? Should it be forcing, showing 6-12 points (like the response to an opening major-suit bid), or is it more tightly defined?
Closing In, Dover, Del.
The call is traditionally played as nonforcing but mildly constructive; say 8-12 points without a fit. Overcaller will generally correct to his suit with six and will invite game with a decent 14 and up in high cards. New suits by opener are natural, jumps are invitational, and a cue-bid is forcing for one round.
Where do you stand on leading aggressively from four or five cards to one honor, as opposed to passively from weaker or shorter holdings when faced with a blind auction, such as one heart – three hearts – four hearts?
Marking Time, Naples, Fla.
Assuming that you have decided not to play for ruffs, I always start out by looking for a sequence to lead from. When in doubt, I will generally lead from honors unless I know dummy is weak and declarer strong. On the given auction, there is a case for going passive, leading from three or four small cards if you had no obvious alternative, but I'm aggressive by instinct.
I know about New Minor Forcing in response to a rebid of one no-trump as a way to discover our partnership's degree of major-suit fit. Can something similar be used after a jump rebid of two no-trump, or in two-over-one auctions?
Digging for Treasure, Phoenix, Ariz.
The two auctions you mention cannot be considered in parallel. In a two-over-one sequence everything is natural. But many experts these days play that responder's rebid of the new minor after opener's jump to two no-trump can indeed be used artificially. It searches for a fit in the unbid major or for three-card support for the bid major. You can find out more on Richard Pavlicek's website here.
|
Should I consider raising partner after his opening bid is doubled via some artificial responses? Is this necessary, or sensible — and if so, what should I bid?
Artificial Sweetener, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When your partner’s major-suit opening is doubled, a response of two no-trump should show a limit raise or better in partner’s suit, while a jump to three of partner’s suit is more pre-emptive than strong. This convention has no downside – so long as you remember it! When you are happy with that, you might go one step further: play a two-club response as artificial (7-9 with three trumps) and a direct raise as 4-6. Think of it as mini-Drury!
I was playing with a relatively new partner and held ♠ K-Q, ♥ Q-6, ♦ A-K-J-9-7-4, ♣ A-8-4. My partner opened one diamond and I produced an inverted raise. She passed the first hurdle by not passing, but over her two-no-trump call, what should I have done next?
Poor Little Rich Girl, Little Rock, Ark.
When partner has shown a minimum balanced hand, then after the inverted raise, I like to play that responder can sign off in three of the trump suit, show shortage in a major by bidding it, or make an artificial call of the other minor to show slam interest, even facing 12-14 balanced. Now if partner signs off in three no-trump, I'd make one more effort with a quantitative call of four no-trump. Frankly, though, this hand is nearly worth a drive to slam facing a one-diamond opening.
|
|
These days Ely Culbertson is regarded with a somewhat jaundiced eye. Players remember the tales of his histrionics, but forget that he was both a trailblazer in the theory of the game and a fine card-player at a time when there were no textbooks to teach you technique. He was credited with defending today's deal.
The bidding may look strange to a modern eye, but the call of four no-trump showed rather than asked, while the response of five no-trump promised two aces.
The partnership had nonetheless reached a slam that appeared to hinge on the heart finesse, and the auction had made this somewhat unlikely to succeed. Against six diamonds, Ely (West) led the spade king. Declarer took this with dummy’s ace, then ran six rounds of trump, throwing a heart from the table. Next came the three top clubs. Culbertson is credited with discarding the heart eight, spade 10, his four clubs, then finally the spade queen and jack. Meanwhile East discarded his club first, then two hearts and next the spade six.
Accordingly, when declarer led the spade eight from his hand at trick 11, Culbertson was able to follow low. East could win the spade nine and exit with a heart through declarer, insuring that Culbertson scored his heart king at the end.
If Culbertson had not unblocked all of his spades when discarding, he would have been thrown in to win the second spade and thus have been forced to lead from his heart king into declarer’s heart tenace.