April 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
A man, a plan, a canal — Panama.
Leigh Mercer
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K 8
♥ K J 3 2
♦ 9 5
♣ A 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5 4 2
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 10 6 4 2
♣ 9 |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 9 8 5
♦ J 8
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 3
♥ A Q 7 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♦* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced slam-try with four hearts
♣9
Your partner's double is for takeout, not penalties. All low-level doubles of suit bids facing a passing partner are not for penalties, so your partner rates to have a shape broadly similar to 1-3-3-6. If he happens to have four hearts and six diamonds, he will correct your call of three clubs to three diamonds — which you will pass. But for the time being, simply bid your clubs and take it from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7
♥ 9 8 5
♦ J 8
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| Pass |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
All good is hard. All evil is easy. Dying, losing, cheating and mediocrity are easy. Stay away from easy.
Scott Alexander
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9 5
♥ K 2
♦ A K 6 5 3
♣ K 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 8 3
♥ Q 9 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 8 6 |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ J 9
♣ Q J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A 10 7
♥ A 8 7 5
♦ 8 4 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠K
This is a close call between two actions. (Pass is not on the agenda – you could easily be selling out when your side could make game or collect a sizeable penalty.) You could double – the safest way into the auction, which preserves the chance of a penalty – or bid one no-trump. The latter describes your values nicely, since the bid shows 11-14 in balancing seat. It would be my choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7
♥ A 8 7 5
♦ 8 4 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When you know what you want, and want it bad enough, you will find a way to get it.
Jim Rohn
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 4
♥ J 10 4 2
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 6
♥ —
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ 9 8 6 4 2 |
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 10 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ K 8 6 5 3
♦ A K 7
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Since you'd double with any strong balanced hand, any action you take in a suit will be somewhat limited in high cards. A simple call of two spades (planning to come again in hearts) would be sensible enough. An alternative approach (if you trust your partner to be on the same wavelength) would be to cuebid two clubs to show both majors and a limited hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ A Q 9 5
♦ 10 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Better be ignorant of a matter than half know it.
Publilius Syrus
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 5
♥ K 6 3
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 6 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ A 8 7 |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 7 5 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 4
♥ A Q 10 9 4
♦ K 3
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥** |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three hearts
**Two of the five keycards (the four aces and the trump king)
♠6
A diamond looks to be slightly safer than a heart lead, but when the opponents have bid a suit, there is certainly a good case for looking elsewhere for your choice of opening lead. Yes, dummy could be 4-4 in the majors with three diamonds, but there are many more hands where a heart lead is necessary to set up your side's suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ J 10 5 2
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 7th, 2013
|
Recently you ran a problem where in fourth chair you heard one club on your left, one diamond from partner, and you held ♠ Q-10-6-4, ♥ K-Q-8-5, ♦ Q-2, ♣ Q-10-4. The choice you gave was between a call of one- or two-no-trump. I wondered whether your intermediates would make the hand worth a two-no-trump call, since if partner’s overcall was little more than six good diamonds and the club king, there might be a play for the no-trump game.
Cashing In, Torrance, Calif.
Yes, jumping in no-trump is reasonable on values – but I’d like just a little more. Bear in mind that if partner bids on over my no-trump call, I can act again. My concern here is the absence of quick tricks. If we have only one club stopper, my major-suit cards do not translate into quick tricks.
In a recent column in the paper, a Stayman sequence after a two-no-trump opening bid saw opener deny a major. Then a call of three spades by responder was footnoted, saying it showed five hearts and four spades plus a good hand. Can you explain further?
Mystery Bid, Edmonton, Alberta
This is a specific agreement called Smolen that operates like a transfer. In the same way that hands with both majors may want to transfer declarership to the strong hand, you can do the same over a two-no-trump opening after Stayman. Visit here.
I have always played that after an uncontested auction by us started: one heart – one spade – two clubs, a jump to three spades by responder was invitational, not forcing, but my partner on OK Bridge said it was 100 percent forcing. I think he is wrong — but maybe things have changed.
The Force Be With You, Albuquerque, N.M.
|
You are absolutely right and he is wrong. On the auction you quote, responder sets up a game-forcing sequence by bidding the fourth suit, two diamonds. In this auction jumps by responder to three hearts or three spades or a raise to three clubs would invite game.
What I should have expected from my partner on the following auction? I held ♠ Q-9, ♥ J-4-3, ♦ Q-10-8-5-4, ♣ K-10-2 and when my partner doubled one club and the next player bid one spade, I tried two diamonds. Now my partner bid two spades. What should that be, other than confusing?
Fog of War, Mitchell, S.D.
A good default agreement to have is that when a player doubles or opens two clubs and hears a suit on his left, his first bid in that suit is natural, not artificial (unless it is clear that with length he would pass – for instance, because his partner had doubled). So here I’d play two spades as spades, and raise to three spades.
I grew up believing that I could answer an opening bid of one of a suit with as few as six points, if I replied at the one-level. But does the same apply to making a negative double, or acting at the two-level? A friend says I need more points to respond in a new suit, even at the one level. Where do you stand?
Bottom Line, Ketchikan, Alaska
This is a complex question, but I'd say a free bid (acting in competition when you could have passed) starts at a six-count at the one-level, and this also applies to raises of partner. Negative doubles at the one-level also start at six points. At the two-level nine-plus is required. The higher the level you commit to, the more points you need.
|
April 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There are no safe choices. Only other choices.
Libba Bray
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 10 7 4 2
♥ A
♦ A 7 4 3
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6
♥ K Q 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ 10 4 2
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ K 6 5
♣ A Q J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♥K
However tempting it might be to rebid your hearts here, that virtually guarantees a six-card suit. If you had the heart 10 instead of the five, you might make that call because the suit would be quite playable facing a singleton; but here a rebid of one no-trump is more descriptive of your hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6
♥ K Q 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ 9 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He that diggeth a pit shall fall into it.
Ecclesiastes 10:8
| East |
North |
| Nil |
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 6 2
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 2
♣ Q J 10 6 3 |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ Q J 10 8 5 3
♦ 5
♣ 9 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 2
♥ K 9
♦ A Q J 8 6 4
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣Q
This column may sometimes err too far toward the modernist approach of arguing that every double is for takeout, not penalties. Today's deal will no doubt be a welcome exception to that approach. When your side has no fit and you have suggested clubs and values, partner's double indicates that the opponents have made a mistake. Pass, and let's see who's right!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 6 2
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
To laugh at men of sense is the privilege of fools.
Jean de La Bruyere
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K Q J 4
♥ Q J 7 5 3
♦ 10 7 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 3 2
♥ A 4
♦ 3
♣ 9 8 6 4 2 |
♠ 9 5
♥ K
♦ A Q J 8 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ 10 9 8 6 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ A K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♦ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
In this position, a double by you would be takeout, saying that you would pass if your partner had a penalty double of clubs. But would you? I think not. You'd surely remove the double to two hearts. If that is what you would do, then you should bid two hearts yourself immediately, emphasizing your extra shape and lack of suitability for defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 4
♥ Q J 7 5 3
♦ 10 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
In married life three is company and two none.
Oscar Wilde
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 3
♥ A 6
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ K J 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4 2
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ — |
♠ 10 6
♥ 5 3 2
♦ 8 5 4 3
♣ 10 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ K
♣ A Q 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Had you doubled in direct seat and heard partner respond one heart, you would surely have passed now. With the diamond king not pulling its full weight, you would be unwise to indicate you had real extras. But your partner could easily have up to a 10-count and might do no more than bid one heart when facing a balancing double. So you should make a mild invitation to game by raising to two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ K
♣ K Q 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013
There is no finer investment for any community than putting milk into babies.
Winston Churchill
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ 10
♦ K Q J 8 5 3
♣ 10 9 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6
♥ Q J 7 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K Q 10 8 5
♥ 5 2
♦ 2
♣ A J 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 4 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 3
♦ 10 9 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
| 5♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦A
When partner responds one spade to one heart, you are encouraged to raise to two spades with three trumps and a ruffing value –so long as that call looks more appropriate than a one-no-trump rebid. Here, with useful stoppers in both minors and with weak spades, the one-no-trump call looks more descriptive. Interchange the diamond ace and spade jack, and I'd raise spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6
♥ Q J 7 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
I’m reluctant to impose sophisticated conventional calls on my readers, but in today’s deal the North-South pair were using an artificial series of calls after Stayman to distinguish between those balanced hands with slam interest that had four–card support for partner, and those that did not. Their agreement was to use a jump to four no-trump after Stayman as quantitative, not Blackwood, and to use four diamonds as agreeing partner’s major with a balanced hand.
South heard his partner make a slam-try and decided his extra shape and nice controls were enough to drive to slam after Blackwood. Indeed, six hearts was a decent contract, but required careful play.
When West led his singleton club, declarer could see he had six tricks in the side suits. To come to 12 tricks, he would need to score two ruffs in one hand or the other and draw trumps after that. Thus he needed to play for ruffs before drawing trump.
He took the opening club lead with the ace and returned the suit. West showed out, correctly discarding a spade rather than ruffing in. Declarer won his club king and now took the top spades, ruffed a spade low, then gave up a club. East won and played a fourth club, and declarer ruffed high and drew trumps, relying on the 3-2 break.
Notice that if declarer plays to take diamond ruffs in dummy with a low trump, then a high trump, East can overruff early and defeat the slam.