March 26th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The verdict of the world is conclusive.
St. Augustine
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 4
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ 10 9 8 4 2
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ 7 |
♠ 9 7 6 2
♥ A 6 5 3
♦ 2
♣ K 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K Q
♦ A J 7 3
♣ A Q J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♥10
The answer here is more about partnership agreement than judgment. I suggest you adopt the idea that your partner in fourth chair can bid any suit or no-trump naturally, so a call of two clubs or two hearts would be natural. To show the unbid suits, jump to two no-trump, or double with more high cards and less shape. Here it feels right to pass two hearts, not raise to three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 4
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 25th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 11th, 2013
Be sure you put your feet in the right place, then stand firm.
Abraham Lincoln
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ 4 3
♦ A J 9 5 2
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ K 10 8 7 5
♦ 8 6 4 3
♣ — |
♠ K J 10 4
♥ Q 9 6
♦ K
♣ 10 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8
♥ A J 2
♦ Q 10 7
♣ A Q 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥5
Your partner's three-diamond call was a help-suit try for game. Despite your bad trumps, you have a good hand for him now. But just in case he was slam-oriented, you should raise to four diamonds; it is easy to imagine a 5-4 diamond fit playing better in slam than a five-three spade fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 3
♥ 4 3
♦ A J 9 5 2
♣ K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 24th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
Why is it that the more aggressive players who bid contracts to the limit don't get credit, even for say an extra five points? Is it right that a team that bids three clubs and makes 10 tricks currently gets the same score as the team that bids four clubs and makes 10 tricks? The same logic would apply to a team bidding two spades making three, as compared to one bidding and making three spades.
Extra Credit, Albuquerque, N.M.
This is the precise approach in a game like spades, where there is a bonus for exact bidding. This is a good idea for the occasional tournament such as a Christmas party, but runs counter to the idea in bridge that discretion is the better part of valor. Still, maybe someone will incorporate this theme one day.
I'm confused about the concept of a maximal double. In my club last week I held ♠ 10, ♥ Q-8-7, ♦ K-J-9-4, ♣ K-Q-9-3-2. My partner opened one club and the next hand overcalled one spade. I bid two spades to show a good hand with clubs, and the next player bid three spades, doubled by my partner. Is this something special, such as a club raise with game interest?
Blinded by Science, Chicago, Ill.
After one hand or the other has given partner a simple raise, there are times when a double in competition is a game-try, but this is only after the opponents have competed to take away all bidding space. After a jump or limit raise by either hand has already established that the partnership has nearly the values for game, doubles revert to their normal meaning of penalizing the opponents.
You recently ran a sequence where opener reversed into two diamonds after opening one club and hearing a one-spade response. Can you run through again what continuations by responder should now be forcing and what can be passed?
Da Capo, Casper, Wyo.
|
Here is a simple set of rules that are easy to remember. All direct actions by responder at the three-level are natural and game-forcing. Fourth suit remains artificial and an inquiry, while responder's rebid of his suit simply shows five cards and is forcing for one round, but not to game. With a weak hand and four cards in your long suit, bid two no-trump. Now all continuations by opener except fourth suit are nonforcing.
How much do I need to move on, facing a jump to game over an opponent's pre-emptive opening? I held ♠ J-7, ♥ A-7, ♦ Q-8-6-3, ♣ K-J-6-5-3 and my partner jumped to four spades over a three-heart pre-empt. How would you decide whether to bid on, and what call would you choose if you did act?
Nosedive, Elmira, N.Y.
This hand looks worth an effort, but I'm not happy with using Blackwood since I really do not know what to do over a response indicating that an ace or keycard is missing. I'd try five hearts to show my heart control and let partner decide whether he has enough to bid further.
I'm only an intermediate bridge player but one of the first things I learned is pull trump first, unless you have a reason not to (such as to crossruff, trump a loser, maintain trump control). I've noticed that experts don't always do this. Why?
Trump Eliminator, Levittown, Pa.
When you want to ruff things, don't draw trump. When you don't want to ruff anything, draw trump as soon as possible. Often it is more important to set up a side suit or take discards, or even to cut the defenders' communications before drawing trump. The only thing you need to know is "never say never."
|
March 23rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The place where optimism most flourishes is the lunatic asylum.
Havelock Ellis
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 10 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 10 5
♣ 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ 6
♦ 8 6 3 2
♣ A K Q J 10 |
♠ 7 6 4 2
♥ A Q 5 4
♦ 9 7
♣ 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 10 9 7 2
♦ K J 4
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣K
Here a double by you is emphatically not penalties. Few low-level doubles are penalty-oriented, especially when the opponents have found a fit. This double suggests the unbid suits and values. You should be content to have a doubleton in partner's suit as a fallback for him if he does not have four cards in either black suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 10 5
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
So here I’ll watch the night and wait To see the morning shine, When he will hear the stroke of eight And not the stroke of nine.
A.E. Housman
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 7
♦ 10 8 7 5 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ K 10 9 5
♦ K J 4
♣ J 10 9 5 |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ 8 6 4 3 2
♦ Q 9
♣ K 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 5 3
♥ A
♦ A 6 3
♣ 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
A response of three no-trump would show 13-15 points while denying a four-card major. There is some real temptation to make that call, but why shouldn't your partner have really short spades or hearts, in which case game or slam in either minor might be a far superior spot? So just bid one diamond and take it from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 7
♦ 10 8 7 5 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 21st, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Whether ye may not hold Secrets more dear than gold? This is the ever new Puzzle within your blue.
Charles Goodrich Whiting
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 6 5
♥ A K J 6
♦ A 7
♣ Q 9 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ 10 7 5 4
♦ K J 10 3 2
♣ K 2 |
♠ K Q J 10 9
♥ 9 3
♦ 8 6 5
♣ J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 9 4
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠8
With a balanced hand, after hearing a one-diamond response to one club, your best rebid is one no-trump rather than one spade. The one-spade call should show an unbalanced hand with at least four clubs. In fact, even with a 4-4 pattern in the black suits, you have the choice of rebidding one no-trump. The logic is that responder rates not to have a major or to have enough points to introduce a major over one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 9 4
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 20th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
An American credit card … is just as good in Europe as American gold used to be.
Edward Bellamy
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 3
♥ J 9 8 6 4 2
♦ 9 7 6
♣ 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 4
♥ A 7
♦ K J 5 4
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K J 7 2
♥ 5
♦ 10 8
♣ 10 9 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 8
♥ K Q 10 3
♦ A Q 3 2
♣ A J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Transfer to hearts
♣K
It might look sensible to bid hearts, but in fact with spade support this good, you should simply raise to two spades. The problem with bidding hearts is that it will tend to deny spade support. Additionally, if you do bid hearts and hear the opponents raise clubs, you may feel obliged to bid spades later, to prevent partner from leading a heart.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 3
♥ J 9 8 6 4 2
♦ 9 7 6
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 19th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The best things carried to excess are wrong.
Charles Churchill
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6 3
♥ A K 9 8
♦ A 10 9 6 4
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10
♥ 5 2
♦ Q
♣ A K J 8 7 6 4 3 |
♠ Q 9 8 5
♥ 7 3
♦ K J 5 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q J 10 6 4
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
4♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Whatever form of scoring is in use, and whatever the vulnerability is, this is a hand where you want to balance to show the majors, using DONT, Cappelletti, Landy, or Meckwell. Passing out one no-trump rates to see declarer wrapping up seven-plus tricks on a minor-suit lead. Facing any sort of fit in hearts or spades, you won't go for a number — and might make your contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q J 10 6 4
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 18th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
I got a girl, a peach; we save up and go on a farm and raise pigs and be the boss ourselves.
Carl Sandburg
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 8 7
♥ 7 6 5
♦ 8 4 3
♣ Q J 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ J 10 9
♦ Q J 9 7
♣ K 8 7 |
♠ J 10 4 2
♥ K 8
♦ 10 5
♣ A 10 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ A Q 4 3 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠5
On this auction you should always lead a trump, as partner needs very good trumps to pass the double. There will be time to tackle the side suits, but your prime target is to prevent declarer from scoring his small trumps.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q J 8 3
♦ K Q J 10
♣ A 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
March 17th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Assume you are in third seat and hold ♠ 8-6, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ K-Q-10-7-3, ♣ Q-10-4. You hear one diamond from your partner and one heart on the right. Would you jump to three no-trump now, or would you look for a suit contract first?
Lento Assai, Durango, Colo.
Jumping to game in no-trump without worrying about spades seems highly premature. Since most people play a jump raise to three diamonds in competition as based on shape, start with a cue-bid of two hearts to show a good diamond raise and take it from there. You can always bid no-trump later.
What is the difference between a renege and a revoke, and what are the penalties for the two offenses?
Splitting Hairs, Springfield, Mass.
A renege and revoke are exactly the same thing, and the only difference is that the latter term is the only one used in the UK, whereas in the U.S. the former may be slightly more popular. Just for the record. The penalty for a renege is now one trick in pretty much every circumstance — UNLESS you personally win the revoke trick with a revoke card, which in turn implies you need to have trumped the trick in error. Of course, if one trick does not restore equity, there may be a further adjustment.
My partner did not agree with my choice here. I was in fourth chair and heard a pass on my left, one club from my partner, and one heart to my right. I had ♠ J-8-7, ♥ 4, ♦ K-9-7-5-4, ♣ A-J-5-4 and simply raised to two clubs. When two hearts on my left was passed around to me, I thought I was too shapely to pass, so I bid three clubs, ending in a 4-3 fit when diamonds was far safer. What should I have done?
Minor Errors, Fayetteville, N.C.
Your two-club call was very reasonable. (You might have stretched to bid two diamonds instead, but there is a lot to be said for supporting with support.) When the auction comes back to you in two hearts, I wonder whether a call of two no-trump here — unusual, suggesting four clubs and longer diamonds, would be appropriate? If you had wanted to bid no-trump naturally, you would have done so on the first round of the auction.
|
My RHO was declarer at our local club. Halfway through the play of the hand she led a card and told the dummy to play anything. When I contested this, a director said this was permissible. She then said I could play any card from the dummy that I wished. Can this possibly be correct?
Carte Blanche, Columbia, S.C.
If declarer says "play anything," then as a defender you can ask for a specific card to be played from the dummy. But declarer is within her rights to do that to speed up play (generally if not always to imply to the defenders that nothing THEY do matters either). You are not being damaged here, since if the choice of play matters, YOU get to make the choice, not dummy.
I was in second chair and doubled an opening call of one club, holding ♠ A-10-8-4, ♥ K-J-2, ♦ K-Q-3, ♣ J-8-4. This was redoubled and came back to me. Since my partner had not acted when he could have done, I thought he wanted to play there – suffice it to say that three redoubled overtricks later I was sadder if not wiser. Who goofed? (My partner had four small spades and an otherwise balanced hand.)
Flat Top, Galveston, Texas
There is no villain here, merely a lack of partnership agreement. A simple rule is to play that all passes of redoubles are to play, but one should make an exception when the opponents are at the one-level, and especially in today's quoted auction, where the pass is neutral, waiting for partner to name a suit.
|
|
In today's deal, West leads the heart 10 against what turns out to be a fairly shaky no-trump slam. (Maybe a jump to five no-trump by North to offer a choice of slams would have been more sensible.) East wins the heart ace and returns the three to your king. What is your plan to make your contract?
Obviously, you need East to have the club king to have any chance of making your contract. If he has that card and clubs are 3-2, then almost any plan will succeed. When he has four clubs headed by the king, you will need West to have at least two diamonds, but suppose that West has four diamonds.
The simple line is to win the second heart, lead a diamond to the king, then take a club finesse. When you next cash the diamond ace and lead a diamond toward dummy, West meanly puts in the 10, robbing you of an entry to dummy. Now you need clubs to split 3-2, since you have no more entries to the board.
A better line is to win the diamond ace at trick three, then lead the diamond jack and overtake it if West follows suit. You take a club finesse and are left with the Q-9 of diamonds in dummy facing two small diamonds in hand. Whatever the original lie of the diamonds, you can now insure two further entries to dummy to allow you to take two more finesses in clubs and bring home your slam.