May 13th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
God is in the details.
Gustave Flaubert
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 5
♥ 7
♦ K 9 6 5 2
♣ 7 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ K 10 8 4 3
♦ J
♣ Q J 10 9 2 |
♠ K 8 6 2
♥ Q J 5 2
♦ 10 7 4 3
♣ K |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ A 9 6
♦ A Q 8
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣Q
Your partner’s double is doubtless based on a club stack, and declarer surely has the missing spade honors. I’d lead a heart rather than the singleton club – the clubs can surely wait. My choice would be the six — second highest from four small is acceptable against no-trump, though rarely elsewhere.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9 5 4
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ K 9 6
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
May 12th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I held: ♠ K-9, ♥ K-Q-4-3, ♦ K-Q-10-5-4, ♣ 7-4. In first position, I opened one diamond and my partner responded one spade. RHO bid two clubs. Should I n ow pass, bid two diamonds, or bid two hearts? (After an overcall, is two hearts considered a reverse?) I couldn't double, because this would have been a support double.
Nowhere to Go, Montreal
You can play a double as support (and if not support, then it would be for penalties not negative). Two diamonds shows six cards, and two hearts does indeed show a reverse (just as it would have done without opposition bidding). So passing is correct here; you have no extras, no fit and no convenient call.
Incidentally, if partner doubles, you bid two hearts to show your approximate red-suit pattern.
This board came up at our local duplicate and I'm not looking to place blame. I just would like to know how to handle it if it ever comes up again. (We got a zero for this deal.) After my partner opened one no-trump, I heard two spades on my right and was looking at ♠ 9-3, ♥ 4, ♦ K-10-8-5-4-2, ♣ A-Q-J-2. I thought three diamonds would be forcing here so I bid it. I'm still waiting for my partner to bid!
The Force Be With You, Little Rock, Ark.
Answering your question properly might require adding a conventional agreement to your armory. See whether you like it — it is called Lebensohl, and the way it works is that after the opponents overcall your side's no-trump opening, all two-level actions are natural and weak. All three-level suits are game-forcing, and double is takeout. Use two no-trump as a transfer to three clubs. It's a way to get out cheaply with a long minor.
Have you ever played bridge on a cruise ship? Would you ever consider teaching in that environment?
Shuffleboard Enthusiast, Panama City, Fla.
I know that some of my friends enjoy that sort of thing, but I’m not sure I’m cut out for it myself. Larry Cohen has a knack for that, though. Now if the BBC ever brought back their televised competition – which involved, among others, Zia Mahmood and Bob Hamman – you might tempt me back to the sea.
|
Recently you ran a problem where South held ♠ 5, ♥ K-Q-J-3-2, ♦ K-J-5-4, ♣ A-7-3. His partner opened one spade and, in response to two hearts, advanced to three diamonds. In my opinion Blackwood is reasonable, as North needs more than a minimum for his forcing diamond bid. If he has two or more aces, there should be an excellent play for slam. This may be a little aggressive, but any other bid could leave you short of slam.
No Guts No Glory, Palm Springs Calif.
The unspoken subtext in my answer was that some play the three-diamond call to promise extra shape, but not necessarily additional high cards – that would be most peoples’ view if playing two-over-one. If (and only if) a call of four clubs shows a good raise in diamonds here, then it may be better to do that and not take control. If, however, the three-diamond bid guarantees real extras in high cards, driving to slam facing two aces is certainly plausible.
My partner and I had a discussion about the minimum values required for a response to an opening bid. I dealt and opened one club with 13 points and 4-3-3-3 distribution. My LHO passed and my partner had three points — specifically the diamond jack and the heart queen with a 3-4-3-3 pattern. What would be your call: pass, one diamond or one heart?
Squeaker, Augusta, Ga.
Passing is the indicated action, but sometimes for strategic reasons one keeps the bidding open – and sometimes one regrets it! Bidding one heart might well work better than inventing a diamond suit, even though the chance of an inconvenient raise is somewhat lower.
|
May 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same….
Rudyard Kipling
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 3 2
♥ A 10 8 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4
♥ 3
♦ A J 7 3
♣ K 10 9 8 2 |
♠ J 10 6
♥ Q J 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ A J 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 10 9 8 6 5 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣9
This is an easy one. You are facing a passed hand. Which game do you think your side can make? It seems you have no decent fit in either major, but you do have a playable fit in diamonds. Therefore you should try to stop as low as possible since you have no values to spare. Pass two diamonds, and hope partner can make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 3 2
♥ A 10 8 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He has two chances, slim and none, and slim just left the building.
Chick Hearn
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q
♥ J 6 3
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A J 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 6
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 9 |
♠ A K 5 4 3
♥ Q 5
♦ J 4
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣9
Despite the fact that you have a 12-count, your side does not necessarily have a game here. A pessimistic approach would be to invite game with two no-trump or to raise to three diamonds. A more aggressive approach is to bid three clubs, a cuebid asking partner to show a club stopper or to make a descriptive call. If you take that action and hear a three-diamond rebid, you might elect to pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
You cannot make a revolution with silk gloves.
Josef Stalin
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 3
♥ 6
♦ J 8 7 5 4
♣ A K 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ 8 5 4 3 2
♦ K 2
♣ J 3 |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ K J 9
♦ A 10 6
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors, invitational
♠2
Your partner's sequence shows four spades and the values for game, so you should correct to four spades. If your partner did not have a major, he would have simply raised to three no-trump. And since he clearly does not have hearts, you are safe to assume that you can work out which major he has!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ Q 9 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
He has, indeed, done it very well; but it is a foolish thing well done.
Samuel Johnson
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ A J 3
♦ K 9
♣ J 8 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 10 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 |
♠ A 9 8
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 7 6
♥ K 9 8
♦ A Q
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦3
You seem to be too good to pass, but you do not have enough to drive to game. Since new suits would be nonforcing, the simple invitational choices are a two-no-trump call (right on values but potentially wrong-siding no-trump) or a raise to three clubs, which might lead to an awkward 5-2 fit. A cuebid of two spades allows you to pass a three-club call and raise a two-no-trump rebid to three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There are no second acts in American lives.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
| Both |
North |
| North |
♠ A J 6 4 2
♥ 6 5
♦ Q
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 9 8 7 5
♣ 6 |
♠ K Q 10 8 7
♥ Q 7 3
♦ J 6
♣ A 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A K 8
♦ A 10 4 3 2
♣ K 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♥J
If you play New Minor Forcing, you have the option of checking back for a 5-3 spade fit, but my instincts are simply to raise directly to three no-trump, giving away less information to the opponents about your shape and not giving the opponents the chance to double an artificial call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 8 7
♥ Q 7 3
♦ J 6
♣ A 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Anyone who uses the phrase 'As easy as taking candy from a baby' has never tried taking candy from a baby.
Anon.
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 8 5
♦ K J 9 7 6 3
♣ 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 8 6 4
♥ 9 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ K |
♠ A 9 5 3
♥ Q J 7
♦ A 4
♣ 9 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A K 10 4 2
♦ 2
♣ A Q J 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
My philosophy on blind leads against no-trump is to lead from length of more than five cards, but only lead from four-card suits if they look safe – or nothing else is attractive. Here a heart lead is plausible (I’d lead the seven rather than the three or five), but I might lead from Q-10-7-2 if that were a major rather than a minor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q 10 7 2
♣ K 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
May 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 21st, 2013
|
Playing Standard American, I held ♠ A-Q-6-4, ♥ Q-10-4-3, ♦ 9-7-4, ♣ A-5. Would you open with a bid other than one diamond at any vulnerability or position?
Open Wide, Holland, Mich.
I would never pass this hand, but in third seat I think it is reasonable to open a major rather than diamonds. After all, diamonds is the last lead you want. Whether you open one heart or one spade is somewhat up to you, though. In fourth seat it is a tossup as to what opening you choose, but in first or second seat open one diamond. The hand is too good to pass, despite the pitiful diamond suit.
Please recommend a Web site or primer on the best techniques for opening leads and defensive leads.
Getting a Lead on Leads, San Antonio, Texas
Richard Pavlicek and Eddie Kantar have done great work in this area. Pavlicek’s Bridge Basics offers some excellent basic advice, while Kantar’s website has some very helpful tips.
In second seat I passed, holding ♠ J-9, ♥ K-10-4-3, ♦ Q-8-4, ♣ A-9-8-6. When my partner opened two no-trump, I used Stayman and received a three-spade response. How much is my hand worth now?
Growth Fund, White Plains, NY.
While you might have a club slam here, you seem to have no great fit, and no more than 32 HCP. It may be pessimistic, but I'd put on the brakes in three no-trump rather than invite slam with a quantitative call of four no-trump.
|
I’m impressed by the occasional advice you give your readers about the conventions we should consider playing. Perhaps you could head in the other direction and suggest a gadget that we should NOT play – either because it is a bad idea or because it is unnecessary.
Junk in the Trunk, Winston-Salem, N.C.
Playing two diamonds as a strong three-suiter misuses an opening bid by concentrating on a hand-type that almost never comes up. A more common conventional usage is the Rosenkranz redouble of an overcall after a negative double, showing a high honor in that suit. I prefer to raise with support rather than allow the opponents an extra round of bidding.
In a recent column you described a player as having good instinct. Are the expert's instincts better than the beginner's? Is this any different from intuition? (Personally, I suspect that the pros' instincts are far more accurate because some functions have become automatic/unconscious and have not reached that point in the amateur.)
Basic Instinct, Brandon, Miss.
I think of instinct not as learned but innate. However, one's instincts can be honed by practice. No matter how good your feel for the game, you can't succeed without experience, and making mistakes helps you learn better. Even so, there are many positions where you have to follow your nose; and some people have sharper noses' than others.
|
May 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When everyone is wrong, everyone is right.
Nivelle de la Chaussee
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 3
♥ A K Q 8 2
♦ 5
♣ J 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 5
♥ 3
♦ A J 7 6 3
♣ Q 8 5 |
♠ 10
♥ 10 9 7 6 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ K 9 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 4 2
♥ J 4
♦ K 8 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥3
Until you know the secret, it may perhaps be tempting to raise spades here. The best call, though, is to bid two clubs, expecting to be able to raise spades at your next turn. This will show extras with three spades. If over two clubs your partner inquires with two diamonds, the fourth suit, jump to three spades to show extras with three-card support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 3
♥ A K Q 8 2
♦ 5
♣ J 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
You'd expect today's contract of three no-trump to be reached at most tables. North's diamond suit offers enough prospects for development that he should raise the two-no-trump opening to game, relying on there to be a decent chance that declarer has some length in diamonds.
West has a choice of attractive opening leads, a major and a minor. West should opt without question for the solid sequence. You should only settle for a major in the case of a tie, not true here.
After East overtakes the club lead, South wins the first club (to avoid a heart switch) and imagines that he will be able to cash out the diamonds. The 4-1 break is a rude shock, but declarer will still be able to come to nine tricks so long as he can take four spade winners. Can you see any possible snag?
If South runs dummy’s spade jack, which spade will he play from hand? If he drops the 10, then East can cover the spade nine on the second round and build a trick for his eight. If South does not unblock his 10, then he must win the second spade in hand and can no longer remain in dummy to play spades.
The solution is painless, though. Simply run the spade nine on the first round of the suit, then lead the jack and underplay it with the 10, retaining the lead in North for the third spade play from dummy.