September 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
From things that differ comes the fairest attunement; all things are born through strife.
Heraclitus
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 7 6 5
♥ J 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ Q 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K 9 7 6 2
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 2
♥ A 4
♦ A 10 9 7
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Offering a choice of slams
♥3
On an auction of this sort there seems to be no obvious urgency to lead diamonds. If declarer is going to set up clubs or hearts successfully, he will probably be making his contract whatever you do. But what may be relevant is the need to kill a ruff in dummy. And when your side holds the balance of high cards, as appears to be the case here, repeated trump leads might be effective.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3 2
♥ K 3 2
♦ K 10 7 4
♣ Q 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
September 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 2nd, 2012
|
I assume you and your partner play Michaels. What would it mean to you if, after your RHO bid one diamond, you passed, your LHO bid two clubs, and your partner then bid three clubs? I bid this with ♠ Q-9-8-3-2, ♥ J-10-9-7-4, ♦ K-Q-9, ♣ —, thinking that it would be obvious that, since I didn't double, I had less than an opening bid and had two five-card majors. Was I wrong?
How's That Again?, Augusta, Ga.
You are theoretically right. But since double is takeout showing a good hand and two no-trump would be unusual for the unbid suits, it is at least arguable that there is potentially some confusion. Incidentally, I'd pass your hand rather than bid. Why tip the opponents off to bad breaks when there is virtually no chance that the hand belongs to your side?
Recently, during a game of rubber bridge, I was the declarer. I was the fourth player to a trick led from my left. I somehow detached the wrong card (too small in value to win the trick) from my hand. I realized it was the wrong card when I tabled it. I then exchanged it for the card I had intended to play to win the trick. My defenders would not allow me to correct this error. Which law should apply?
Lucky Luke, Tucson Ariz.
In layman's terms you can only change your card if it was played with no intention of playing it. The law refers to dropping a card, not playing a card that was wrong. Rightly or wrongly you put a card on the table — not the one that you should have, but the one you intended to play before you realized it was a mistake. You have an extremely high threshold for your play to qualify as "accidentally played."
With this hand would you bid over a weak two diamonds: ♠ J-9-8-3-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ A-K? Would your answer change depending on the form of scoring, on position, or on vulnerability?
Plumb Tuckered, Grand Junction, Colo.
|
This is a tough one; You would overcall one spade over one diamond without a flicker, but this case is not so clear. For what it is worth, I would bid except facing a passed partner at teams or rubber. But make my diamond seven the club seven, and double makes good sense too.
We play New Minor Forcing for only one round so that we can find a 5-3 major fit, and then decide whether game is there by making an invitational or help-suit bid. Is this standard, or should we play it as game-forcing?
Musical Chairs, Laredo, Texas
If you play New Minor, then you should use a direct jump by responder at his second turn as invitational, and new minor then three of a new suit as game-forcing. Similarly responder's jumps at his second turn after three suits have been bid (as opposed to a no-trump rebid) are ALL invitational, while all game forces go through fourth suit.
What is the sensible meaning of a sequence where the partner of a no-trump opener uses Stayman, then in response to a major bids the other major ? Should that be natural or artificial — and what would it show?
High Hopes, Torrance, Calif.
After the Stayman inquiry finds a major, you should use responder's jumps as splinter raises of that major. But bidding the other major at the three-level shows a balanced hand agreeing partner's major, with slam interest. Meanwhile, a jump to four no-trump is quantitative, without a fit for partner's major.
|
September 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
An event has happened, upon which it is difficult to speak, and impossible to be silent.
Edmund Burke
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 10 4 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 6 3 2
♥ Q
♦ 6 5 3
♣ A 5 4 2 |
♠ A J 10 8 4
♥ A 9 8 7 6
♦ 2
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K J 5 3
♦ A J 10 9 7 4
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
| 2♦ |
2 NT* |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Spade raise
♠2
Your partner has shown a strong hand with both minors and implicitly short hearts, so your cards appear to be working overtime. The choice is to give preference to three diamonds (which sounds like three-card support since you did not raise at your previous turn) or to raise to four clubs. I prefer the first option.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 10 4 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The battle rent a cobweb diamond-strung And cut a flower beside a ground bird’s nest Before it stained a single human breast.
Robert Frost
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K Q 9 7 6 3
♦ 4
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 6 4
♥ A J 10 8 4
♦ Q
♣ K Q 5 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 5 2
♦ 10 9 8 6 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 3
♥ —
♦ A K J 7 3 2
♣ A J 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT* |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*[IS SOMETHING MISSING HERE?]
♣K
You have three choices: an invitational two no-trump; a reverse to two spades to show the major-suit pattern; and a cautious two clubs, planning to come in again if partner does not pass this call. The first two bids are right on values; the third leaves you space to explore. Put me down as a two-club bidder, but don't ask me to justify it!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6 4
♥ A J 10 8 4
♦ Q
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
By the work one knows the workman.
Jean de La Fontaine
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 8 3
♥ 2
♦ K 9 6 5 4
♣ A J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ K 10 9 7 4
♦ 7 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ A Q J 8 6 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 6
♥ 3
♦ Q J 2
♣ K 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
3♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Though partner has not acted here, there are reasons to assume that he has a few values (e.g., the opponents' attempts to stay low).. To involve him here, double three clubs for takeout. This suggests your precise hand pattern, though it may be a slight overbid. If you are worried that this sounds like penalty, remember the opponents have bid and raised the suit three times, so you can't hold a trump stack.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 2
♥ A Q J 8 6 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Gaze upon the rolling deep (Fish is plentiful and cheap).
Edward Lear
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K 9 5
♥ K 9 8
♦ A 9 6 5 4
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ 10
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ K 6 4 3 2 |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ A Q J 7 6 3
♦ 10 2
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
♠2
Passing here would be truly pessimistic, so a simple raise to three clubs looks reasonable. But I think you can be more descriptive than that. Bid two spades instead, which cannot show a long spade suit since you already denied that. This shows a club raise with spade cards, suggesting a maximum hand for the auction: perfect!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 28th, 2012
'Oh! Love,' they said, 'is King of Kings, And Triumph is his Crown. Earth fades in flame before his wings, And Sun and Moon bow down.’
Rupert Brooke
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 9 7 6 5 4
♥ A Q 9
♦ A 7 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ 7 6 2 |
♠ Q
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q J 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥* |
Pass |
| 3♠** |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
Pass |
7 NT |
All pass |
*transfer to spades
**super-accept
♦Q
There is no need to commit the hand to four spades yet. Three no-trump, or even a part-score, may be the highest scoring spot. Start with a two -diamond cuebid to show a spade raise. You can always bid game later when you have found out more about the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
When the hurlyburly's done, When the battle’s lost and won….
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 7
♥ K 9 4
♦ A K 10 9 3
♣ A 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 7 6 2
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 4 2 |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ Q J 8 5
♦ Q 7 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 4 3
♥ A 10 3
♦ J 8
♣ K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
*three-card spade raise
♥6
On an auction of this sort, where declarer may well have a void, leading an ace looks like a bad idea. A trump looks safe enough; I might choose the seven for deceptive purposes in case partner has the bare queen, but there is very little to choose from among the small spot-cards.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 3
♥ J 7 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
How do you feel about overcalling on a four-card suit? For example, if you held ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-Q-10-7, ♦ A-Q-7-2, ♣ J-10-4, would you consider overcalling one heart over an opening bid of one club or one diamond? If yes, would you feel the same way if the hand was somewhat weaker — say the diamond suit with the nine instead of the queen?
Short-Change Artist, Newark, N.J.
Overcalling on a good four-card suit with opening values makes sense only if you have a little extra shape on the side. In other words, don't do it with a 4-3-3-3 pattern. Your example looks like a reasonable one-heart overcall rather than one diamond.
What is the best use for Stayman in response to your partner's opening bid of one no-trump, followed by converting the response of a red suit to two spades? Should it be weak, strong or invitational?
A Bid for All Seasons, Springfield, Mass.
I think it is unrewarding to use the sequence as weak with both majors and longer spades. (Transfer to spades with that hand.) And with game-forcing hands you can start with a transfer rather than Stayman. However, a difficult hand to describe is one that is unbalanced and invitational with five spades (either a 5-4-3-1 or 5-5 pattern). So that is what I use the sequence for.
When you double an opening bid and the next hand redoubles, is your partner's pass for penalty? I would have thought so if the suit opened was a potentially short minor, but if that is not the case, how does the doubler rescue himself when he has one good suit and one weak one? For example, after one diamond is doubled and redoubled, what should the doubler do at his next turn with: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ 10-7-4-3, ♦ Q-9, ♣ A-K-10?
Panic-Stricken, San Francisco, Calif.
|
I believe the pass is best played as "nothing to say," not for penalties. As the doubler, your responsibility is to show quantity, not quality. Here bid one heart and rely on your partner to remove if he cannot stand the contract. Just for the record, your partner should always bid the cheapest rescue suit himself if he has four cards in it — in this case by bidding one heart over the redouble, which is not lead-directing.
In our private game we had the two hands below and had to try to reach the best spot. What would you have recommended? The dealer had ♠ A-K-J-10, ♥ A-Q-7-5-4, ♦ A-K-Q-J, ♣ –; the responder held ♠ 9-8-3-2, ♥ J, ♦ 9-2, ♣ A-Q-J-8-5-3.
Best Fit Forward, Miami, Fla.
I think I'd respond three clubs to the two club opening bid. Now the strong hand bids hearts, the weak hand spades, and the strong hand jumps to five no-trump. This last call is the grand slam force: "Tell me how many trump honors you have!" After the response to show zero, the partnership comes to a stop in six spades.
I have been following the junior tournaments from around the world on BBO and I haven't seen the U.S. players do well recently. Are there any encouraging signs for the future?
Looking Forward, Twin Falls, Idaho
There are always good individuals; we sometimes have to rely on organizers to put them together and train them — no easy task. I note, though, that in countries where bridge is part of the curriculum or has Olympic training schemes in place — especially Israel and Poland — results have been stellar in the last decade. Perhaps we need to work harder to match this!
|
September 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
There is nothing stable in the world; uproars your only music.
John Keats
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 5 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 7 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 9 6 2
♥ K 10 6
♦ K
♣ J 9 2 |
♠ 5 3
♥ 9 3
♦ J 10 9 3 2
♣ A 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8
♥ Q J 8 7 4
♦ A Q 8 5
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3♥ |
3♠ |
| 4♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦K
Your partner has shown a powerful hand with his cuebid. Since you virtually denied a four-card major with your first bid, you can bid two hearts now to show your values and your three-card suit. This will let your partner know where you live and he can tell you whether he has one major, both majors, or club support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ A 5 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal has two problems in one. In both cases you play in six spades, but in one case you receive the unfriendly heart lead, which sets up a winner for the defenders immediately. In the other case you receive a passive club lead. How should your approaches differ?
The deal, like all this week’s deals, comes from the world championships four years ago in Beijing.
West led the heart three and declarer won with the ace, drew trumps, eliminated the clubs ending in hand, and exited with a heart. East allowed West to win and he exited with a low diamond. (I’ve been told the jack is the best shot, but it never seems to work when I try it.) Declarer took East’s queen with the ace, and the diamond finesse gave him plus-920.
In the other room the lead was a trump. Is there a better plan than the one described above? Yes, your best play is to draw trumps and go after diamonds to establish a discard for your heart loser. It is a very close decision whether to lead them from the top or finesse twice against West. So the best approach is to test clubs before playing diamonds. If West shows any real spade or club length, you should go for two finesses against her by leading to the nine, then to the king and finessing. If West appears to be shorter in clubs than East, play diamonds from the top.