Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 3rd, 2012

From things that differ comes the fairest attunement; all things are born through strife.

Heraclitus


South North
East-West ♠ A J 7 6 5
 J 5
 K 6 5
♣ Q 10 7
West East
♠ 8 3
 Q 10 8 3
 J 8 3
♣ J 6 3 2
♠ 10 4
 K 9 7 6 2
 Q 4 2
♣ 9 8 5
South
♠ K Q 9 2
 A 4
 A 10 9 7
♣ A K 4
South West North East
2 NT Pass 3 Pass
3♠ Pass 5 NT* Pass
6♠ All pass    

*Offering a choice of slams

3

Today's deal has two problems in one. In both cases you play in six spades, but in one case you receive the unfriendly heart lead, which sets up a winner for the defenders immediately. In the other case you receive a passive club lead. How should your approaches differ?

The deal, like all this week’s deals, comes from the world championships four years ago in Beijing.

West led the heart three and declarer won with the ace, drew trumps, eliminated the clubs ending in hand, and exited with a heart. East allowed West to win and he exited with a low diamond. (I’ve been told the jack is the best shot, but it never seems to work when I try it.) Declarer took East’s queen with the ace, and the diamond finesse gave him plus-920.

In the other room the lead was a trump. Is there a better plan than the one described above? Yes, your best play is to draw trumps and go after diamonds to establish a discard for your heart loser. It is a very close decision whether to lead them from the top or finesse twice against West. So the best approach is to test clubs before playing diamonds. If West shows any real spade or club length, you should go for two finesses against her by leading to the nine, then to the king and finessing. If West appears to be shorter in clubs than East, play diamonds from the top.



On an auction of this sort there seems to be no obvious urgency to lead diamonds. If declarer is going to set up clubs or hearts successfully, he will probably be making his contract whatever you do. But what may be relevant is the need to kill a ruff in dummy. And when your side holds the balance of high cards, as appears to be the case here, repeated trump leads might be effective.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 6 3 2
 K 3 2
 K 10 7 4
♣ Q 8 6
South West North East
1 1♠
2 2♠ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 2nd, 2012

I assume you and your partner play Michaels. What would it mean to you if, after your RHO bid one diamond, you passed, your LHO bid two clubs, and your partner then bid three clubs? I bid this with ♠ Q-9-8-3-2,  J-10-9-7-4,  K-Q-9, ♣ —, thinking that it would be obvious that, since I didn't double, I had less than an opening bid and had two five-card majors. Was I wrong?

How's That Again?, Augusta, Ga.

You are theoretically right. But since double is takeout showing a good hand and two no-trump would be unusual for the unbid suits, it is at least arguable that there is potentially some confusion. Incidentally, I'd pass your hand rather than bid. Why tip the opponents off to bad breaks when there is virtually no chance that the hand belongs to your side?

Recently, during a game of rubber bridge, I was the declarer. I was the fourth player to a trick led from my left. I somehow detached the wrong card (too small in value to win the trick) from my hand. I realized it was the wrong card when I tabled it. I then exchanged it for the card I had intended to play to win the trick. My defenders would not allow me to correct this error. Which law should apply?

Lucky Luke, Tucson Ariz.

In layman's terms you can only change your card if it was played with no intention of playing it. The law refers to dropping a card, not playing a card that was wrong. Rightly or wrongly you put a card on the table — not the one that you should have, but the one you intended to play before you realized it was a mistake. You have an extremely high threshold for your play to qualify as "accidentally played."

With this hand would you bid over a weak two diamonds: ♠ J-9-8-3-2,  A-7-4,  Q-9-7, ♣ A-K? Would your answer change depending on the form of scoring, on position, or on vulnerability?

Plumb Tuckered, Grand Junction, Colo.

This is a tough one; You would overcall one spade over one diamond without a flicker, but this case is not so clear. For what it is worth, I would bid except facing a passed partner at teams or rubber. But make my diamond seven the club seven, and double makes good sense too.

We play New Minor Forcing for only one round so that we can find a 5-3 major fit, and then decide whether game is there by making an invitational or help-suit bid. Is this standard, or should we play it as game-forcing?

Musical Chairs, Laredo, Texas

If you play New Minor, then you should use a direct jump by responder at his second turn as invitational, and new minor then three of a new suit as game-forcing. Similarly responder's jumps at his second turn after three suits have been bid (as opposed to a no-trump rebid) are ALL invitational, while all game forces go through fourth suit.

What is the sensible meaning of a sequence where the partner of a no-trump opener uses Stayman, then in response to a major bids the other major ? Should that be natural or artificial — and what would it show?

High Hopes, Torrance, Calif.

After the Stayman inquiry finds a major, you should use responder's jumps as splinter raises of that major. But bidding the other major at the three-level shows a balanced hand agreeing partner's major, with slam interest. Meanwhile, a jump to four no-trump is quantitative, without a fit for partner's major.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 1st, 2012

An event has happened, upon which it is difficult to speak, and impossible to be silent.

Edmund Burke


North North
Both ♠ Q 9 5
 10 4 2
 K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3
West East
♠ K 7 6 3 2
 Q
 6 5 3
♣ A 5 4 2
♠ A J 10 8 4
 A 9 8 7 6
 2
♣ 8 7
South
♠ —
 K J 5 3
 A J 10 9 7 4
♣ K Q 10
South West North East
Pass 1♠
2 2 NT* 3 Pass
3 4♠ Pass Pass
5 Dbl. All pass  

*Spade raise

♠2

The world championships have just finished in Lille, so to mark that, this week's deals come from the last event, four years ago, in Beijing.

Our first deal features a double-game swing in the match between China and Hungary. Would you open one spade as East or make a one-spade overcall as West? When the Hungarians were East-West, both passed at their first opportunity. North responded one no-trump to the one-diamond opening, East cuebid two diamonds to show the majors, and Harangozo now jumped to four spades over South’s three-diamond call to end the auction. He was not taxed to come to 10 tricks since, after the one-no-trump response, he could not misguess the spade suit.

In the other room the auction was as shown. It takes a heart lead and a heart ruff (or a heart switch after the unlikely lead of the club ace) to defeat five diamonds. Even after West led a spade, however, Peter Trenka had to play well to land the doubled contract.

He ruffed the opening lead, pulled trump, then led a club to the king and ace. He ruffed the spade return, discarded a heart on the fourth round of clubs, and called for a low heart. With a count on the West hand, declarer knew his only chance was to find him with a singleton heart queen. There were no more entries to dummy, so it would not have helped to find East with both missing heart honors. Declarer therefore put up the heart king and was rewarded when the queen fell. He lost just two tricks for plus 750.



Your partner has shown a strong hand with both minors and implicitly short hearts, so your cards appear to be working overtime. The choice is to give preference to three diamonds (which sounds like three-card support since you did not raise at your previous turn) or to raise to four clubs. I prefer the first option.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 5
 10 4 2
 K Q 8
♣ J 9 6 3
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1 NT Dbl. Rdbl. 2
Pass Pass 3♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 31st, 2012

The battle rent a cobweb diamond-strung
And cut a flower beside a ground bird’s nest
Before it stained a single human breast.

Robert Frost


North North
Both ♠ Q 9 5 2
 K Q 9 7 6 3
 4
♣ 10 8
West East
♠ K J 6 4
 A J 10 8 4
 Q
♣ K Q 5
♠ 8 7
 5 2
 10 9 8 6 5
♣ 7 6 3 2
South
♠ A 10 3
 —
 A K J 7 3 2
♣ A J 9 4
South West North East
2 Pass
2 NT* Pass 3 Pass
3 NT All pass    

*[IS SOMETHING MISSING HERE?]

♣K

Today's deal was a fascinating clash between Zia Mahmood and Tony Forrester, with the latter coming out on top, as he did in the event as a whole. A big win in the last round gave the Gold Cup team a clear victory, allowing Andy Robson to equal Zia's record of seven wins.

When Forrester led the club-king lead against three no-trump, Zia won and fired back a club, which Forrester ducked. Quite reasonably, Zia took the diamond finesse now. Forrester won and faced an awkward problem. He cashed the club queen (on which dummy threw a heart) to avoid being thrown in with that card, then exited with the spade jack. This should have been fatal. Zia put on the queen, but failed to unblock the 10 from his hand.

Had he done so, he would have been able to get home in two ways. The first would have been by leading the heart king, and when West wins and returns the heart jack, declarer ducks and West is endplayed. Or Zia could have crossed to the spade ace, cashed all his minor-suit winners, and exited with his last spade. If that were the 10, West could duck it, but as it is, declarer would have been able to put West on lead and come to his ninth trick in the majors.

Zia did not know the diamonds were 5-1 at this time, but the spade-jack exit might have given him a clue to the layout.


You have three choices: an invitational two no-trump; a reverse to two spades to show the major-suit pattern; and a cautious two clubs, planning to come in again if partner does not pass this call. The first two bids are right on values; the third leaves you space to explore. Put me down as a two-club bidder, but don't ask me to justify it!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K J 6 4
 A J 10 8 4
 Q
♣ K Q 5
South West North East
1 Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 30th, 2012

By the work one knows the workman.

Jean de La Fontaine


East North
East-West ♠ J 8 3
 2
 K 9 6 5 4
♣ A J 7 6
West East
♠ 10 5 4
 K 10 9 7 4
 7 3
♣ Q 10 9
♠ K 7 2
 A Q J 8 6 5
 A 10 8
♣ 8
South
♠ A Q 9 6
 3
 Q J 2
♣ K 5 4 3 2
South West North East
1
Dbl. 3 Dbl. 4
Pass Pass 4 NT Pass
5♣ All pass    

K

At the 2011 Lederer, Artur Malinowski, declarer in today's deal, won the award for best-played hand. The play was simple, but his reasoning was excellent. After the normal start to the auction, Janet de Botton made a responsive double with the North hand, and East competed further to four hearts. When this came back to de Botton, she tried again with four no-trump. (In a similar position one North had tried an intellectual bid of four spades, but declarer was forced to go one off on the club lead, either sustaining a ruff or losing control.)

Against Malinowski’s contract of five clubs, Tony Priday led the heart king and switched to a spade, which cleared up any doubts in that suit. Declarer won East’s king with the ace, then played the club king and finessed the jack for plus 400. Why did he do this? There were two reasons: the first was that if East had been dealt a doubleton club, he would have been less inclined to go on to four hearts and, equally, West might have led or switched to a club with a doubleton rather than playing a dangerous spade. With queen-third of clubs he was never leading one.

The odds might favor playing the bidder for the missing high cards, but here the inferences pointed in the other direction: East appeared to have extra shape, and thus West was more likely to have long clubs.


Though partner has not acted here, there are reasons to assume that he has a few values (e.g., the opponents' attempts to stay low).. To involve him here, double three clubs for takeout. This suggests your precise hand pattern, though it may be a slight overbid. If you are worried that this sounds like penalty, remember the opponents have bid and raised the suit three times, so you can't hold a trump stack.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 7 2
 A Q J 8 6 5
 A 10 8
♣ 8
South West North East
1♣
1 2♣ Pass Pass
2 Pass Pass 3♣
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012

Gaze upon the rolling deep
(Fish is plentiful and cheap).

Edward Lear


West North
Neither ♠ A K 9 5
 K 9 8
 A 9 6 5 4
♣ A
West East
♠ 10 6 2
 10
 Q J 8 7
♣ K 6 4 3 2
♠ Q J 7
 5 4 2
 K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5
South
♠ 8 4 3
 A Q J 7 6 3
 10 2
♣ 10 8
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1 Pass 1♠ Pass
2 Pass 4♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 6 All pass

♠2

At the 2011 Lederer there are awards for best-bid, -played and -defended hand. This one belongs in the category of "You should have seen the one that got away."

Andy Robson had an opportunity in this deal where, like many declarers, he found himself in six hearts.

On a minor-suit lead there are enough entries to establish and enjoy the diamonds. However, Justin Hackett found the most testing start, a spade, and Andy won and ducked a diamond. East won and returned a second spade, perforce won in the dummy. Robson won and cashed two rounds of hearts and could no longer recover from the unfriendly breaks in the red suits.

The correct line at trick four is to cash the heart and diamond aces (you have no chance on a 5-1 break) and ruff a diamond high. Now the diamonds are known to be breaking 4-2, and when you cross to the heart nine, you also know the trumps are 3-1.

This forces you to fall back on your last chance, namely that spades were 3-3, by ruffing a diamond high, crossing to another heart in dummy, and throwing a spade on the long diamond. Then you can ruff out the spade, and finally use your club ace to enjoy the 13th spade. So, the third chance, an unlikely one, would have worked.

In the end you finish up ruffing two diamonds and a spade in your hand, establishing a long card in both of dummy’s suits.


Passing here would be truly pessimistic, so a simple raise to three clubs looks reasonable. But I think you can be more descriptive than that. Bid two spades instead, which cannot show a long spade suit since you already denied that. This shows a club raise with spade cards, suggesting a maximum hand for the auction: perfect!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 7
 5 4 2
 K 3
♣ Q J 9 7 5
South West North East
1 Pass
1 NT Pass 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 28th, 2012

'Oh! Love,' they said, 'is King of Kings,
And Triumph is his Crown.
Earth fades in flame before his wings,
And Sun and Moon bow down.’

Rupert Brooke


South North
North-South ♠ K 9 7 6 5 4
 A Q 9
 A 7 2
♣ K
West East
♠ J 3
 J 8 5 2
 Q J 10 9
♣ 7 6 2
♠ Q
 10 6 4 3
 6 5 4
♣ Q J 9 4 3
South
♠ A 10 8 2
 K 7
 K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2* Pass
3♠** Pass 4♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 5 NT Pass
6 Pass 7 NT All pass

*transfer to spades

**super-accept

Q

Today's deal from the 2011 Lederer requires no skill in the play, since I am confident every reader of my column would find a way to take 13 tricks. But bidding to the grand slam is another matter. Let's take a look at the sole pair who not only managed it, but found their way to seven no-trump

There is a bit of a myth that Zia Mahmood is a law unto himself in the auction, but he showed that he could bid constructively on this hand. However, it was David Gold’s judgment that made it all possible. The opening no-trump showed 15-17, but the aces and kings, coupled with the two four-card suits and the builders in the long-suits mean that this was an accurate assessment of the hand’s true worth.

When Zia transferred to spades, Gold re-evaluated his hand, breaking the transfer with a jump to three spades. He did have another sequence to show a suitable hand for spades with a maximum in high-cards, so he was limited by failing to do that.

After two cuebids, Zia bid Roman Keycard Blackwood for spades, finding the two missing aces, then asked for specific kings that had not been previously cued. East (who had already showed the diamond king) now showed the heart king, and Zia thought he could count six spades, three hearts, two diamonds and two clubs, and indeed was able to claim the grand slam when spades broke 2-1. This won the pair the award for the best-bid hand.


There is no need to commit the hand to four spades yet. Three no-trump, or even a part-score, may be the highest scoring spot. Start with a two -diamond cuebid to show a spade raise. You can always bid game later when you have found out more about the hand.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 8 2
 K 7
 K 8 3
♣ A 10 8 5
South West North East
1 1♠ Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, August 27th, 2012

When the hurlyburly's done,
When the battle’s lost and won….

William Shakespeare


South North
Both ♠ A J 7
 K 9 4
 A K 10 9 3
♣ A 8
West East
♠ Q 5
 7 6 2
 6 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 4 2
♠ 9 6 2
 Q J 8 5
 Q 7 2
♣ 10 5 3
South
♠ K 10 8 4 3
 A 10 3
 J 8
♣ K J 7
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT* Pass
3 NT Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 6♠ All pass

*three-card spade raise

6

At last year's Lederer tournament, Nicola Smith and Sally Brock demonstrated the form that has won them three world titles as partners or teammates. And they needed all their experience to break the seemingly impregnable slam reached in today's deal by Norwegian Thomas Charlsen.

North’s two-club call was an artificial game-force, and two no-trump showed a three-card spade raise. This was followed by Key Card Blackwood to reach the good spade slam. Nicola led the heart six, consistent with her actual holding, but also consistent with an original holding of J-7-6, J-8-7-6 or J-8-7-6-2. Sally defended well by false-carding with the queen when dummy played low, and Charlsen took his normal line in spades of low to the ace, followed by the running of the jack, so that he could pick up Q-(9)-x-x with East.

When Smith won her spade queen, she continued with the heart seven, and Charlsen decided to believe the opponents rather than playing to establish diamonds with one ruff. When he put in the heart nine, it was all over, and an unbeatable slam had been defeated.

Some commentators on Bridge Base thought Nicola would not lead from the heart jack against a slam, but when you look, you will see that the defenders have all four queens, so they might well have been pushed to find a safe lead. They had to lead some suit after all, and J-x-x-(x) might well have been the least evil. This defense earned Nicola and Sally the award for the best-defended hand.


On an auction of this sort, where declarer may well have a void, leading an ace looks like a bad idea. A trump looks safe enough; I might choose the seven for deceptive purposes in case partner has the bare queen, but there is very little to choose from among the small spot-cards.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7 3
 J 7 4
 A 10 5
♣ 10 7 5 2
South West North East
Pass 1
Pass 3 Pass 6
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 26th, 2012

How do you feel about overcalling on a four-card suit? For example, if you held ♠ 3-2,  A-Q-10-7,  A-Q-7-2, ♣ J-10-4, would you consider overcalling one heart over an opening bid of one club or one diamond? If yes, would you feel the same way if the hand was somewhat weaker — say the diamond suit with the nine instead of the queen?

Short-Change Artist, Newark, N.J.

Overcalling on a good four-card suit with opening values makes sense only if you have a little extra shape on the side. In other words, don't do it with a 4-3-3-3 pattern. Your example looks like a reasonable one-heart overcall rather than one diamond.

What is the best use for Stayman in response to your partner's opening bid of one no-trump, followed by converting the response of a red suit to two spades? Should it be weak, strong or invitational?

A Bid for All Seasons, Springfield, Mass.

I think it is unrewarding to use the sequence as weak with both majors and longer spades. (Transfer to spades with that hand.) And with game-forcing hands you can start with a transfer rather than Stayman. However, a difficult hand to describe is one that is unbalanced and invitational with five spades (either a 5-4-3-1 or 5-5 pattern). So that is what I use the sequence for.

When you double an opening bid and the next hand redoubles, is your partner's pass for penalty? I would have thought so if the suit opened was a potentially short minor, but if that is not the case, how does the doubler rescue himself when he has one good suit and one weak one? For example, after one diamond is doubled and redoubled, what should the doubler do at his next turn with: ♠ A-Q-3-2,  10-7-4-3,  Q-9, ♣ A-K-10?

Panic-Stricken, San Francisco, Calif.

I believe the pass is best played as "nothing to say," not for penalties. As the doubler, your responsibility is to show quantity, not quality. Here bid one heart and rely on your partner to remove if he cannot stand the contract. Just for the record, your partner should always bid the cheapest rescue suit himself if he has four cards in it — in this case by bidding one heart over the redouble, which is not lead-directing.

In our private game we had the two hands below and had to try to reach the best spot. What would you have recommended? The dealer had ♠ A-K-J-10,  A-Q-7-5-4,  A-K-Q-J, ♣ –; the responder held ♠ 9-8-3-2,  J,  9-2, ♣ A-Q-J-8-5-3.

Best Fit Forward, Miami, Fla.

I think I'd respond three clubs to the two club opening bid. Now the strong hand bids hearts, the weak hand spades, and the strong hand jumps to five no-trump. This last call is the grand slam force: "Tell me how many trump honors you have!" After the response to show zero, the partnership comes to a stop in six spades.

I have been following the junior tournaments from around the world on BBO and I haven't seen the U.S. players do well recently. Are there any encouraging signs for the future?

Looking Forward, Twin Falls, Idaho

There are always good individuals; we sometimes have to rely on organizers to put them together and train them — no easy task. I note, though, that in countries where bridge is part of the curriculum or has Olympic training schemes in place — especially Israel and Poland — results have been stellar in the last decade. Perhaps we need to work harder to match this!


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 25th, 2012

There is nothing stable in the world; uproars your only music.

John Keats


South North
Neither ♠ 7 4
 A 5 2
 7 6 4
♣ K 7 5 4 3
West East
♠ K J 10 9 6 2
 K 10 6
 K
♣ J 9 2
♠ 5 3
 9 3
 J 10 9 3 2
♣ A 10 8 6
South
♠ A Q 8
 Q J 8 7 4
 A Q 8 5
♣ Q
South West North East
1 2♠ Pass Pass
Dbl. Rdbl. 3 3♠
4 Dbl. All pass  

K

At last year's Lederer Invitational Teams, held in London, two Souths reached the pushy four hearts doubled. Each defending pair had a chance to defeat the game, but both fell at a late hurdle.

Against John Salisbury, West led the diamond king. Declarer won and exited with the club queen, won by East, who naturally enough led the diamond jack. Salisbury covered, and West had to discard to beat the contract. When he ruffed and exited with a club, Salisbury could ruff and run the heart queen, covered with the king and ace. Now South had just enough entries to establish the long club and play to ruff a diamond to dummy. Then he could cash the winning clubs to dispose of his losing spades for plus-590.

At another table, after the same first two tricks, East, David Burn, did extremely well by winning his club ace and shifting to the spade five instead of leading the diamond jack. Now declarer, Zia Mahmood, knew that the spade finesse was hopeless, so he put in the eight. West won with the nine, and now exited with a spade, fatally, giving declarer 10 tricks. A club would have been equally unsuccessful here — West gets endplayed, forced to lead a spade or allow the long club to be developed. However, West did have an escape, albeit one that is very hard to find at the table. He could have exited with a small heart, playing his partner for the trump nine, after which declarer has no way home.


Your partner has shown a powerful hand with his cuebid. Since you virtually denied a four-card major with your first bid, you can bid two hearts now to show your values and your three-card suit. This will let your partner know where you live and he can tell you whether he has one major, both majors, or club support.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 4
 A 5 2
 7 6 4
♣ K 7 5 4 3
South West North East
1 Dbl. 1 NT
2♣ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].