July 31st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Come, Watson, come! The game is afoot.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 3
♥ A 6 4 3
♦ 9 4
♣ Q J 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ K J 9 7 5 2
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ 10 |
♠ Q J 8 7
♥ Q 10 8
♦ J 10
♣ K 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ A Q 8 7 6
♣ A 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
You can pass, playing partner for long hearts in a weak hand, which he has suggested he holds. Equally, you can bid two no-trump, two spades or even three diamonds, to improve the partscore. If one of your small clubs were a heart, it would be clear to pass. Even though passing seems to me to be the most trusting action, three diamonds may be your best chance to improve the contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 6 5 4
♥ —
♦ A Q 8 7 6
♣ A 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
And even the ranks of Tuscany Could scarce forbear to cheer.
Lord Macaulay
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 8 7 6 5
♥ —
♦ A 9 7 3
♣ J 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ 9 8 7 5
♦ Q J 2
♣ 9 6 |
♠ A K 10
♥ Q J 10 6 2
♦ K 10 5
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A K 4 3
♦ 8 6 4
♣ A K Q 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
5♣ |
All pass |
♦Q
The hearts can wait. Your priority here is to lead trumps to prevent declarer from ruffing his spades in dummy. The typical dummy will contain a small spade or two, and the best defense will consist of keeping declarer from setting up the spades successfully. Whenever declarer plays in his second suit, you should think about a trump lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4 2
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 10 7 6
♣ Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 15th, 2012
|
How do you decide between opening a very strong hand at the one-level as opposed to opening two clubs and then bidding your suit? Does your decision depend on whether you have a one- two- or even three-suiter?
Rock-Crusher, Nashville, Tenn.
Opening two clubs on marginal hands with long minors and a second suit works badly; you pre-empt yourself out of two levels of the auction and often lose the ability to define of your hand. Equally, true three-suiters in the range of 21-23 may be best handled by opening a minor. Somebody else normally bids!
Say you open one club with the following hand: ♠ K-7-3, ♥ K-10-6-2, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ A-J-4. Your partner responds one spade, and the next hand doubles. Should you rebid one no-trump, raise spades, or pass?
Options, Bellingham, Wash.
One no-trump is acceptable, but another conventional action that might (by partnership agreement) be available is to redouble. Some people play this to show three trumps, so a call of one no-trump would deny three trumps. A raise to two spades would show four trumps, whatever your methods, and passing would be a balanced or semibalanced hand unsuitable for a call of one no-trump.
I will be playing in my first pair game next week, having only played rubber bridge and team games till now. Please explain how the scoring works.
Tyro-Maniac, Kenosha, Wis.
Pairs is all about beating the other pairs sitting the same way as you, holding your cards. (The margin by which you beat them is irrelevant.) Imagine 10 results on a single deal. Nine matchpoints are available, one fewer than the number of pairs. Five pairs bid a small slam making exactly, one makes the grand slam, one goes down in it, three make the overtrick. As one of those three pairs, you score a point for beating the five pairs who made 12 tricks in slam, and the pair who went down in slam, and get half a point for each of the pairs who made 13 tricks in the small slam. So you get 7 matchpoints out of 9.
|
How do you judge what level to pre-empt to when your partner opens two spades and the next hand doubles? With nobody vulnerable you hold ♠ K-9-8-5-4, ♥ 10-2, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ Q-10-6. Is this a hand where you want to force the opponents to bid a slam, or do you want to time the auction to keep them out of slam?
Levelheaded Louis, Elkhart, Ind.
I'd guess our side will lose six tricks in a spade contract so four spades should be high enough for our side as a sacrifice. But can we beat our opponents' slam? Even facing a hand with no side-cards, I'd guess we have more than a 50 percent chance of scoring a trick in each minor or one trick from the minors and a spade. So bidding four spades will give the opponents enough rope to hang themselves. We may go down 500, but it is still worth the effort to make the opponents' life harder.
I use Rosenkranz doubles and redoubles with my partners, these actions showing a high trump for partner, typically in a two- or three-card holding. We have never discussed whether it applies when partner makes a simple overcall of a weak two-bid. What are your views on an auction such as a two-diamond opening on my left, a two-heart overcall from partner and a three-diamond bid on my right?
Zen and Now, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I really don't like the double to mean support for partner. It is more important to get the unbid suits in, in other words, values and no clear call. Here a bid of three hearts would buy the hand (the opponents won't bid four diamonds), so there is no need for a Rosenkranz double, which is most useful in auctions where you rate to be defending.
|
July 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I would that we were, my beloved, white birds on the foam of the sea: We tire of the flame of the meteor, before it can pass by and flee….
W.B. Yeats
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 4 3
♥ K 4
♦ 8 3 2
♣ K 9 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ A K J 5
♣ J 7 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 10 9 6 5 2
♦ 10 9 4
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 7 6 2
♥ —
♦ Q 7 6
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
With your extra side-suit shape and your values concentrated in your long suits, you should compete to three hearts. You should not bid three diamonds, though — that should be a game-try with approximately this pattern. Change the heart jack to the heart king or even perhaps the queen, and you would have a sound minimum for that action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ A K J 5
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
One can relish the varied idiocy of human action during a panic to the full, for, while it is a time of great tragedy, nothing is being lost but money.
J.K. Galbraith
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K Q
♥ 5 2
♦ A K Q J 5
♣ 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 4 3 2
♥ A K 9 4 3
♦ —
♣ 9 3 |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 7
♦ 10 8 7 6 3
♣ A Q 10 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 8
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ 9 4 2
♣ K J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣* |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
1 NT** |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
3♠ |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Strong
**Majors or minors
♥4
In a competitive auction like this, your partner would normally raise to two hearts with four trumps — if he had them. But as he has guaranteed three-plus hearts by his double, you should nonetheless compete to two hearts yourself. You know you can, if necessary, ruff diamonds in dummy, so you should be protected from a force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ 9 4 2
♣ K J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, July 12th, 2012
True nobility is exempt from fear: More can I bear than you dare execute.
William Shakespeare
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A 2
♣ A K 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10
♥ J 5 3
♦ Q J 8 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
♠ 9 5
♥ A K 10 9 7 6
♦ 10 7 5
♣ J 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 4 2
♥ 4
♦ K 9 6 4
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
All pass |
♥3
You should use three diamonds, the fourth suit, as a temporizing bid here. Rebidding spades would show a sixth spade or a much better five-card suit, while bidding three no-trump prevents partner from producing secondary support for your spades. Your plan would be to bid three no-trump next if partner repeats his hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6 4 2
♥ 4
♦ K 9 6 4
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
You pays your money and you takes your choice.
Anon
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K
♥ 8 6 5 3 2
♦ 8 6 4
♣ K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 5 2
♥ J 9 7
♦ Q J 9 7
♣ 10 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ A 5 3
♣ Q J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 9 3
♥ A
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
Your partner's two-club call shows spade support and at least the values for a raise to three spades (perhaps starting at a good 10-count with three trumps). Your nice trumps and extra shape coupled with good controls suggest you have enough for a try for game. A bid of three clubs should show your side-suit and get partner to evaluate his club length.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 3
♥ A
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The world abounds with laws and teems with crimes.
Anonymous
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 8 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 8
♣ K Q 10 6 5 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 2
♥ 6 3
♦ A K J 6 5 4 2
♣ J |
♠ 5 4
♥ J 10 9 8 4 2
♦ 10 9
♣ A 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 6
♥ A K Q
♦ Q 7 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
When the opponents pre-empt in this sequence, they leave your side short of descriptive actions. A double here shows a good hand and is optional. In fact, it may be closer to takeout than penalties in the modern style, so you should simply bid three hearts. A rebid of three clubs would show weakness, but would not get the extra heart length across.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4
♥ J 10 9 8 4 2
♦ 10 9
♣ A 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
No woman can be a beauty without a fortune.
George Farquhar
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9
♥ A Q 7 5
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 6 2
♥ 4 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ Q 10 4 |
♠ 3
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 9 8 4 2
♣ K J 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 5 4
♥ K J 10 9
♦ A K
♣ A 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
On this sort of auction declarer still has not guaranteed real clubs — he might have four hearts in a square hand, for example. Lead a club as your best chance to set up a suit for your side. You could guess by trying a red suit, but it is easier to lead what is front of your face.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6
♥ Q 6 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ K 9 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
July 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 8th, 2012
|
What is the right way to signal on declarer's lead? I assume attitude is rarely relevant, but when should one signal at all?
Signal Corps, Wichita Falls, Texas
Never signal attitude on declarer's lead. Partner never needs to be told declarer is playing a suit he should not have tackled. Only give count if you think partner needs to know (because his subsequent play may depend on how many cards you or declarer have in that suit). Conversely, when following from a selection of equivalent cards, where your play in the suit cannot affect the number of tricks your side takes, consider showing suit preference.
My wife did not like my action yesterday, when I held ♠ K-J-4, ♥ K-10, ♦ A-K-Q-7-2, ♣ 9-4-2. My RHO opened one heart. I overcalled one no-trump and sat it out after being doubled. My LHO had six club winners and I also lost the two major-suit aces for a disastrous result. She claimed I should have overcalled two diamonds or run to two diamonds.
Shoulda-Woulda, Corpus Christi, Texas
Oh dear. Much as I hate to spread dissension between spouses, I strongly agree with your one-no-trump bid and suspect that I too would have sat out the double and duplicated your result. Maybe it's just a guy thing.
I understand the next world championships are going to be in Cardiff, Wales. Will you be going?
Anchors Away, Charleston, S.C.
Actually, the event has been moved at short notice to take place next month in Lille, France. The playing venues were not suitable for all the Mind Sports Games, but Lille housed the 1998 World Championships and has a large Palace which will be ideal. I just hope the weather is better than it was 14 years ago. As of now, I do not expect to be there.
|
What should I open in first seat with this hand: ♠ 10-9, ♥ A-K-9-8-2, ♦ —, ♣ K-Q-9-8-7-2? What about other 5-6 patterns where you have length in the minor and a five-card major?
5-6, Pick Up Sticks, Portland, Ore.
I would open one club, planning to reverse to two hearts over a one-spade response. My experience with concentrated 5-6 hands is that finding the right trump suit by bidding the suits in the correct order is the best way to win out in competitive auctions. Give me five hearts and six diamonds and I might go the other way – but that's because with touching suits I KNOW I'll have a rebid problem if I open one diamond.
If a pair plays transfers and a partner refuses the transfer and rebids no-trump instead, does he/she still have to announce "transfer"? My partner was told that she should not accept a transfer with less than three-card support. I didn't think there was any option other than super support with support of four or more cards. Do you agree?
Special Ed, Bella Vista, Ariz.
Transfers are not optional, since you, as the no-trump opener, can't know whether partner has five or six in the major, but you have passed captaincy by your opening. Yes, the bid must be announced as transfer even if you don't intend to honor it. Whoever told this player that completing the transfer shows three cards is both wrong and apparently convincing — a dangerous combination!
|
|
Today's deal is from Robert Ewen and Jeff Rubens' new book, "It's all in the game." As I mentioned last week, this book melds humorous and instructive deals. Today's is a real-life affair, in which a name from the past found a neat play to recover from his unfortunate opening lead.
A trump lead would defeat four spades by force. But when the club 10 was led, North’s queen was played, and East had to duck. South cashed the heart ace and led a diamond to the queen and king. Now when South regained the lead and cashed the diamond ace, the fall of the J-10 allowed him to bang down the two top trumps: making four.
At another table, however, Peter Leventritt recovered from his opening lead by smoothly ducking the diamond queen. Then, when South cashed the diamond ace and East followed with the jack, South pictured his original holding as K-J-10. When declarer tried to ruff a low diamond in dummy, East overruffed and gave West a club ruff. West led another diamond, giving East another overruff of dummy. Finally, a further club from East promoted a trump winner for the fourth and setting defensive trick.
At IMPs, declarer could have ensured the contract (except against a 5-1 trump split) by abandoning diamonds temporarily when the jack dropped, and cashing two high spades. This play, however, could lose the contract if diamonds were 3-3 and spades 5-1. I’ve seen many deceptive ducks, but never one done in quite this way for quite this reason.